Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the Great Exxay
Alexander the Great with contribution
Great alexander king
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alexander the Great Exxay
Robin Waterfield aims to fill the gap between the death of Alexander the Great and the rise of Rome. The time of the successors is often overlooked and Robin Waterfield aims to “revive the memory of the successors” while providing an enjoyable narrative on the military endeavors and strong cultural impact the successors had over their territories (x). Alexander was more focused on his conquests that solidifying the territory was overlooked and so when he died his empire was left without a guaranteed succession, no administration, and numerous of the conquered territories to be left untamed. Diving the Spoils is meant to discuss how the spoils of Alexander’s empire were divided and how “grand imperialism was possible” in the beginning of the successors ruler but not at the …show more content…
The author recounts in great detail how men like Ptolemy, Seleucus, Perdiccas, Lysimachus and a numerous others attempted to become the new Alexander, but were unsuccessful. The narrative moves chronology through the successor wars, their repercussions, the fate of the main characters, to even the last standing successors and their impact on the Hellenistic world. While this approach abandons strict chronology, the narrative nevertheless flows smoothly from Successor to Successor and from one war to the next. Numerous books outside of Waterfield’s focus on the successful successors such as Ptolemy, Seleukid, and Antigonids; where as he provides a character list to show all the people involved. The Wars of the Successors are a perplexing series of “alliances, marriages, battles, treachery and violence, involving a long list of characters, most of whom are little known to the modern reader” (d). He included rulers who control vast resources and have plausible bids to being successful. Robin Waterfield does focus on the characters that are significant in the end of the Hellenistic Era. The conventional style and detailed timeline of Dividing the Spoils creates an emphasis on individual
from Odysseus, hero of the Trojan War, to Richard III of Shakespeare’s play. A prominent,
The French Revolution, the American Civil War, the constant civil conflicts in certain parts of Africa in recent history and even today; these are all historical clashes of countrymen. They all also contain stories of immense atrocities. The violence, bloodshed, and ruthlessness that were seen throughout these events were appalling. They were made perhaps even more so by the fact that theses horrors were inflicted upon one another by countrymen, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers. The civil war or stasis at Corcyra during the Peloponnesian War was no different. This paper will detail the events surrounding the conflict and attempt to give scope to it as a mirror into the rest of the conflict.
In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and
Pericles ascended to power at the empire’s height and was, according to Thucydides, the city’s most capable politician, a man who understood fully the nature of his city and its political institutions and used his understanding to further its interests in tandem with his own. After Pericles, however, Thucydides notes a drastic decline in the quality of Athenian leaders, culminating in Alcibiades, the last major general to be described in The Peloponnesian War. While he is explicit in this conclusion, he is much more reticent regarding its cause. What changed in Athens to produce the decline in the quality of its leadership? The development of an empire is a change strongly emphasized in the Archeology as a radical departure from the Hellenic tradition, and consequently a major source of conflict among the Greeks.
Alexander the Not so Great:history through Persian eyes by Prof Ali Ansari Paragraph 1 Page
Bury, J. B.; Russell Meiggs (2000). A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great
When reading the two excerpts from Thucydides it is clear that his book, The History of the Peloponnesian War, was written to memorialize Athenian history. Although it is considered to be the first textbook it was still written by an Athenian so analysis of the excerpts are still required. But while analyzing the two excerpts will provide information about the reliability of the document, it will also provide insight to answer the question “What is the author trying to say about his native city of Athens?”
Sophocles. Antigone, Oedipus the King, Electra. Trans. H. D. F. Kitto. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.
This book “The Golden Mean”, written by Annabel Lyon is about Aristotle, a genius philosopher who touched the mind of a boy, Alexander The Great, who would eventually conquer the known world. A man of knowledge and wisdom must try to connect with one that only knows of violence and warfare, a challenge he took out of optimism.
The causes of the Peloponnesian War proved to be too great between the tension-filled stubborn Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. As Thucydides says in Karl Walling’s article, “Never had so many human beings been exiled, or so much human blood been shed” (4). The three phases of the war, which again, are the Archidamian war, the Sicilian Expedition and the Decelean war, show the events that followed the causes of the war, while also showing the forthcoming detrimental effects that eventually consumed both Athens and eventually Sparta effectively reshaping Greece.
Robinson, Charles Alexander. Athens in the age of Pericles. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1959.
In Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War, Pericles commends the ergon of Athenian heroes, which has placed them in the realm of logos, while directing the Athenians to follow these ideals of logos. The maintenance and continued success of Athens' political establishment relies on the prevalence of polis, rationality and discourse over family, emotion and reckless action. However, the indiscriminate turns of fate and fortune, often place logos in opposition with the base, primal nature of ergon. Both Thucydides and Sophocles recognize that when logos conflicts with the unexpected ergon, the preservation of rationality and unanimity among the citizens of the polis depend on the leadership of a single honest leader. In the History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides presents Pericles as a man of logos, whom Athens needs to achieve its full potential as an empire and later to rescue her from disaster. Likewise, Sophocles presents Theseus, in Oedipus Colonus, as the perfect successor of Pericles, who returns Athens to its former glory before the end of the war. In these two examples, we see that the dominance of logos over ergon within a polis lies in the ability and logos of the city’s current leader.
In his account, he discusses the precursors to the war, including the 30 years truce and revolutions, such as the stasis in Corcyra. When looking at wars, the primary focus is normally the fighting itself, such as what we see in World War II. However, it is important to look at the anatomy of war, meaning what effect the war has on the people who are experiencing it first hand, and the consequences that the conflict has on the rest of the world. Therefore, in this essay I shall discuss, drawing directly from Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, how the civilians reacted to the war, their involvement and socio-economic factors. Furthermore, the first section of my essay shall focus on the direct effect of war on the people, regarding the plague, and violence and hopelessness that was experienced.
Ptolemy briefly mentions how Alexander destroys Thebes and burns Persepolis, then gives an overview of Alexander's journey through west-Persia, including his declaration as the son of Zeus by the Oracle of Amun at Siwa Oasis. He also points out his great battle against the Persian Emperor Darius III in the Battle of Gaugamela and his eight-year campaign across Asia. The movie focuses a lot on Alexander's private relationships with his childhood friend Hephaestion and later his wife Roxana. Hephaestion compares Alexander to Achilles, to which Alexander replies that, if he is Achilles, Hephaestion must be his Patroclus, who is Achilles' best friend and his lover. Th...
It is unknown whether Alexander intended to adopt these practices; if he adopted the policies that he liked; or if he adopted policies for political purposes. No matter his intentions, Alexander’s changes in leadership pol...