Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Papers on diversion programs
Types of diversion for juveniles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Papers on diversion programs
1.
The types of diversion programs that are currently used are, pre-booking, post-booking, and post-plea.
The pre-booking diversion program is also known as a pretrial diversion program, this may be the most beneficial diversion program because it intervenes just before an offender is charged with a crime, and tries to keep the offender out of jail entirely. Highly trained criminal justice personnel usually aim toward offenders that have a serious mental illness and are trained to recognize the symptoms of mental illnesses. If the offender is diagnosed with a serious mental illness, personnel will redirect the offender to a treatment center instead of booking them; this will end the offender’s involvement with the criminal justice system.
…show more content…
Prisons hold offenders with more serious crimes who receive a longer sentence; approximately 72% of inmates are held in prison for 5 years.
6 .
Classification systems need to be tested prior to implementation and after implementation, in addition, the system needs to be regularly monitored and re-evaluated to check for effectiveness, without staff training and monitoring components, the system will fail to perform and will have issues with reliability. Some jurisdictions do not test the systems reliability and validity compared to the agency’s offender population, instead, they use the classification system without it being correctly designed and tested. The classification staff and anyone else who is involved in the scoring process must be professionally trained and tested on their scoring skills otherwise the system in unreliable.
Another problem with the classification system is validity; this has to do with predicting an inmate’s behavior. Predictive validity tests the inmate’s behavior and then will test them again in the future and compares the
For starters, a pretrial diversion program is defined as an alternative prosecution which seeks to divert certain offenders from traditional criminal justice processing into a program containing different methods of supervision. In practice, this sanction results
...es and cautions of jail diversion programs include safety of the public and the potential cross-purpose goals of the treatment services industry and the criminal justice system. Public safety is paramount when discussing jail diversion programs. Whatever has caused the offender to commit crime, be it substance abuse or a mental illness, does not negate the fact that the crime was committed and the public must be protected from the offender is some form or fashion. Jail diversion programs have various tracking methods of offenders but they do provide enough freedom and opportunity for recidivism. Also, treatment services and incarceration do often work at cross purposes and unless integrated successfully can cause barriers to coordination and solutions (SAMHSA, 1993). One organization emphasizes treatment and the other emphasizes public safety and punishment.
The writer further contends Young’s noting the mathematical models was intentional, and designed to effectively illustrate his point of their ineffectiveness because they are difficult to absorb. Despite such difficulty, the writer contends Young did immediately create some useful insights. Foremost was the ideal of what Young metaphorically termed, the “datasauer also known as Empiricus Abstractus” (Young, 2011). What the writer noted was Young’s critique of modern criminology’s ineffective and improper overuse of empiricism to predict criminal behavior is a flawed concept due to variation fluctuations and data manipulation. The writer noted that Young (2011) used as evidence to demonstrate deficiencies the very thing he argues against in noting the level of explanatory power in multivariate models over-estimates prediction levels (p.
...ement in the juvenile justice system. The OJDA coordinates programs that offer constructive alternatives to official court procedures. According to the Ohio Juvenile Diversion Association (n.d.), “diversion programs stress positive values, personal responsibility, and achievement.” Juveniles in diversion programs are offered a variety of programs with a goal of learning to cope with stressors and temptation through better decision making skills. Juveniles who are involved in the OJDA are still held accountable for any crimes they have committed, but may avoid formal charges (Ohio, n.d.).
The Federal Bureau of Prisons believes that reentry into society begins the day you enter prison. You must examine each individual's “criminogenic factors” such as criminal history, substance abuse, and education level. Evaluating one's individualist needs allows for the justice system to understand characteristics, traits, mental and emotional problems within imates that might reduce in the recidivism of reoffending the crime.
Pretrial diversion process is when defendants charged with non-serious offenses are diverted in lieu of prosecution, if they agree to complete certain requirements such as community services, enrollment in rehabilitation program, conditional supervision. The process give first time offenders a second chance at having a clean criminal record. The prosecutor’s office serve as a gateway as to which defendants are eligible for pretrial diversion process. Defendants are evaluate on certain factors to determine if the likelihood of future criminal behavior or noncompliance.
In recent years, there has been controversy over mass incarceration rates within the United States. In the past, the imprisonment of criminals was seen as the most efficient way to protect citizens. However, as time has gone on, crime rates have continued to increase exponentially. Because of this, many people have begun to propose alternatives that will effectively prevent criminals from merely repeating their illegal actions. Some contend that diversion programs, such as rehabilitation treatment for drug offenders, is a more practical solution than placing mentally unstable individuals into prison. By helping unsteady criminals regain their health, society would see an exceptional reduction in the amount of crimes committed. Although some
They attempt to predict the risk of an offender in a community and the chance of success.
This particular population of offenders are classified as people whose minds do not process in normal ways. Because of this, they have to be separated and be put into special facility centers or in a mental hospital.
Justice has always been the goal of our court system, but it is not always served, especially in cases involving juveniles. The judiciary process has evolved from a system that did not initially consider juveniles, to one where juveniles have their own court proceedings, facilities, and even rules or laws. The juvenile justice system has come a long way, and people have worked very hard in its creation. A juvenile is considered to be an individual, under the age of 18, resembling an adult. However, resembling an adult does not always mean that juveniles will have an adult mindset. Thus, juveniles may need extra attention to help get their lives on track. This paper will analyze various ways involving juveniles and correction facilities and programs.
Over the last few decades classification systems for offenders have been used for a variety of organizational purposes. Over time these classification systems have evolved, not only as a whole in the criminal justice system, but also varying between different organizations. Classification systems that create models based on the risks and needs of offenders are most popular. Throughout the years these models and the purposes for their use have been in a state of change, as well as the way their effectiveness is gaged.
What is the difference between juvenile diversion and probation? Juvenile diversion is processing a juvenile without going to court. It is a referred to the commonality board like court for youth, or if there is legal insufficiency they would dismiss it. Diversion can have a number of essential and imperative designs. It can benefit juveniles who are low-liability that are less likely to make poor decisions and avoid the stress that can have consequences from being delinquent in the determination process. Diversion has provided some great conveniences for public collaborators and victims to have an effective role in managing low-liability juvenile delinquents. The diversion development can deflate accountability of the courts, which would on the other hand come across as impractical for them to arbitrate every single delinquent that is recommended for it. Diversion is also in-expensive it would be expeditiously against the, opposed actions. Diversion also helps the process in reducing probation cases; also, it helps the appropriate capabilities for staff’s precious yet limitless time to more of the serious delinquents. Probation is usually for offenders who need to be rehabilitated by strict supervision but do not need to be incarcerated. Probation has optional arrangements with condemnation given out by the judge that would also allow for halfway housing arrangements and other programs such as conversion programs. Even though, diversion programs deflect confinement and condemnation probation punishes if one should be convicted of an offense and could possibly be confined if the delinquent should happen to violate their terms of the probation process (State of Alaska, 2012).
Unfortunately, the criminal justice system is a vital piece of today’s society. Without it, the public would be free to do whatever they choose with no real consequence to negative actions. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, roughly 3 million workers were employed in the criminal justice field in 2015 (Occupational Employment, 2016). This is made up of countless different agencies, including law enforcement, corrections, homeland security, and many more. Corrections is a key element in the criminal justice system, which has its own unique functional philosophy, administrative structure and functions, theoretical assumptions that govern its existence, organizational mission, goals and objectives, and division of responsibilities.
However, because these individuals are not expected to improve or regain cognitive ability through rehabilitation efforts and may exhibit further incompetence that limits their ability to understand the implications of their offense, they are unlikely to benefit or be otherwise affected by traditional sanction or behavioral modification therapy. These individual may instead rely on certain symptomatic treatments and/or supportive care efforts (supportive living care, nursing homes, hospital commitment) to manage their behavior. The prevention of future offense then becomes reliant upon the attendance of a third party, and certain leniency should be allowed in the event of minor repeat
The data gathered in the Teplin, Abram & McClelland (1994) research was conducted in the Cook county jail in Chicago during a six year period, using interview techniques during the intake process of 728 inmates. They then tracked the participants over the six years by monitoring their rap sheets. What sets this research apart from the others is that they utilized the population of a jail versus a prison. Typically, once in prison, the time spent there is long whereas in jail, the incarceration time is usually much shorter as the inmates are in jail for lesser crimes or are awaiting trial. In any case, there is a larger turnaround and more opportunity to obtain diverse long term data.