Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crusades and their benefits to the church
Muslims and Christians during the Second Crusade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crusades and their benefits to the church
In the late 11th century, the Byzantine Empire was under attack by the Turks and lost a lot of territories. The Emperor, Alexios I Komnenos, asked the Pope, Urban II, to send an army to help him. In the Council of Clermont, Urban II answered his request and gathered up an army called the Crusade to launch to the east and to reinforce the Byzantine Empire. Although the crusaders were supposed to help the Byzantine Empire, both sides did not have a strong relationship. The Byzantine Empire only wanted to maintain its kingdom while the crusaders wanted to go on a pilgrimage and to enjoy killing. When the crusaders and the Byzantine Empire first came to connect, they created a lot of conflicts. According to the primary sources, Alexiad, Gesta Francorum, and Historia de Hierosolymitano itinere, both sides had four different conflicts. Although they tried to make a compromise, at the end, because of so much distrust between them, the crusaders broke away from the Byzantine Empire. The origin of the weak Latin- Byzantine relations was that they had different purposes on the war. …show more content…
The Byzantine Empire’s interest was to protect its kingdom.
In the later 11th century, the Turks kept attacking the eastern part of the Byzantine Empire and conquered Asia Minor. Alexios could not fight against the invasion. He needed help. Hence, he sent an embassy to Rome and asked Urban II for “military aid for the recovery of Asia Minor”. In his strategy, the western knights would serve in his army and would fight against the Turks under his name. After the war, Alexios would pay the western knights for protecting his kingdom. During the First Crusade, the Byzantine Empire’s interest was to use the Europeans to protect its
kingdom The crusaders’ interest was to go on a pilgrimage and to fight. In the early 10th century, Western Europe was a poor and undeveloped area. The knights had to fight for lords to get land and wealth. This created a culture of violence. At the same time, the knights were afraid of getting excommunicated by killing immorally such as killing un-armed people and the clergy. Once they heard about the preaching of the crusade, they were so excited. When Urban II received the request from Alexios, he held the Council of Clermont to preach the First Crusade. Modern historians do not know what exactly the Pope said during the Council. However, according to different witnesses, the main points from this council were “the danger that the Eastern Church faced at the hands of the barbaric Turks; the sacred quality of Jerusalem for Christians, and the rewards to be gained by those who took the cross.” The Crusaders digested these messages and interpreted them differently. They thought that the purpose of the crusade was to go on a pilgrimage. In this pilgrimage, they would help the Greek Christians who suffered under the Muslims’ rule. More important was that they could kill morally. When they reached the east, the Greek Christians would welcome them, fight with them, and go on the pilgrimage with them. The crusaders’ interest was to go on a pilgrimage and to enjoy fighting. The People’s Crusade started the distrust between the Latin crusaders and the Byzantine Empire. In the Pope’s mind, there would be a well-trained army to march to the east and to aid the Byzantine Empire under his banner. Nevertheless, a lot of people were self-appointed to become the commanders of the First Crusade, such as the People’s Crusade because they wanted to go on a pilgrimage. Peter the Hermit, a priest from “middle of nowhere”, organized a lot of un-armed people, including children and women, to go to the east. Because they did not have any military training, they made the mistake of traveling to the east over the winter. During the middle ages, there was limited food in the winter. They were starving. They chose to attack Hungary and killed a lot of people; they destroyed a Jewish community in the Rhine Valley. When they traveled to the east, they caused a lot of violence. Anna Comnena, a Greek princess, recorded the Byzantine Empire’s reaction to the People’s Crusade. According to Alexiad, Once the People’s Crusade got to Constantinople, Alexios was “feared the incursions of these people” because he “heard the rumors of the arrival of innumerable Frankish armies.” When Peter the Hermit tried to across the sea to fight against, the Emperor knew that the People’s Crusade were not strong enough to fight against the Turks, so he “urged him to await the arrival of the other counts.” Nevertheless, the People’s Crusade refused to take Alexios suggestion. At the end, the Turks destroyed the People’s Crusade. What Anna Comnena said about Alexios’s suggestion to the People’s Crusade might not be true since Alexios could simply refused to give ships to the People’s Crusade and forced them to wait for the other crusaders. One of the possible explanations is that Alexios actually sent the People’s Crusade across the sea and let the Turks to destroy them. The main interest of Alexios was to use the western knights to protect, not to destroy his kingdom. The interest of the Empire was valued above everything. He did not care why they wanted to go to the east. If they threatened his kingdom, he would fight back. Therefore, when the People’s Crusade reached Constantinople, Alexios only saw a number of unarmed people who could not help him. If he sent them across the sea, he would not have to supply them with food and money. He also did not want People’s Crusade bother his city and his kingdom because he did not want to see his city became another victim like the Jewish community in the Rhine Valley. However, if Anna Comnena wrote the truth, it would make Alexios looked like a selfish murder that only cared about his self-interest, not like a good Emperor that cared about his brothers from Europe. Hence, she wrote that the Alexios tried to stop them across the sea. The tragedy of the People’s Crusade created the first conflict in the Latin- Byzantine relation. The conflict between Bohemund and the Byzantine Empire was the second conflict in the Latin- Byzantine relation and showed the different expectations of each side. In the Latin’s writing, Gesta Francorum, a Latin chronicle, reported that the Byzantine Empire and the Greek Christians did not trust Bohemund. In this chronicle, the purpose for Bohemund was to go to the east was to go on a pilgrimage. Hence, they did not want to hurt the Greek Christians. Bohemund ordered, “Seigniors, take heed all of you, for we are pilgrimages of God. We ought, therefore, to be better and more humble than before. Do not plunder this land, since it belongs to Christians, and let no one, at the cost of blessing, take more than he needs to eat”. Bohemund thought that the Emperor and his people were all Christians and their brothers and helpmates. He also thought that if the Latin crusaders were well behaved, the local people would welcome them. However, in fact, the Greek Christians did not welcome them. For example, when Bohemund reached Castoria, a Greek city, and “sought a market”, the people there were “unwilling to accord it” to the crusaders. At that time, the crusaders did not understand the situation. They were trying to go on a pilgrimage. They did not want to offend anyone especially the Greek Christians. However, the local people feared the crusaders “greatly” and thought that the crusaders were going to “devastate their lands and to killed them”. Later on, when the crusaders were kept moving, Thereupon, an army of the Emperor attacked them. Bohemund, again, did not understand why. He was here for a pilgrimage, not to fight with the Empire. He asked thereupon, “do you want to kill the Christ people? I have no quarrel with your Emperor!” This passage was to show that Bohemund was a good Christian and the Greek Christians were unreasonable. Nevertheless, Gesta Francorum did not show the whole story. First, according to Gesta Francorum, Bohemund did not hurt the people, but that information was not was not reliable. Due to the cultural difference, the crusaders probably took and stole from the Greek Christians. The Greek Christians had no choice but to fight back. Second, the Byzantine Empire and the people did not welcome Bohemund because their major interest was to protect themselves, not to help him to go on a pilgrimage. Due to the bad reputation of the People’s Crusade, the Greek Christians wanted to protect themselves first, so they were afraid of the Latin Crusaders and did not want to help them. Third, Bohemund had wars with the Byzantine Empire before.
Foss explains, “What Urban needed was an enterprise, clearly virtuous in serving the ends of Christiandome… in these moments of reflection, the popes mind turned towards Jerusalem.” Urban II reflects back on the first taking of the Holy City after the defeat of the Byzantine Empire in 1071, and begins to question what his people know about the Turkish race and really the ideology of Islamic thought. Foss goes on to examine the ignorance of westerners and needed to be “reminded [by the pope] of the infamous heathens, their cruelty and hatred of Christians,” hoping this would justify the first Holy Crusade. However, Foss identifies the creativity of the Pope’s language to persuade the knights and army of the people to embark on the Holy Crusade based on the Muslims cruel actions turned onto their fellow Christians. Claiming the Muslims “Killed captives by torture…poor captives were whipped…and others were bound to the post and used as a target for arrows.” Foss examines the Popes words as an effective effort of persuasion in creating an army of crusaders to help clean “…Holy places, which are now treated with ignominy and polluted with Filthiness” and any sacrifice in Jerusalem is a “promise of a spiritual reward… and death for
Now, in 1198, in order to raise the papacy rather than take the Holy Land, Pope Innocent III, called for another crusade. This crusade is mostly being led by French Knights and instead attempting to capture Jerusalem, they end up sacking the Christian city of Constantinople! After the fourth Crusade, the other crusades were disorganized efforts that accomplished little to
The First Crusade is often cited as one of the most damnable consequences of religious fanaticism. A careful inspection of the circumstances and outcomes, however, will reveal a resultant political restructuring of Europe under the banner of Christendom. The purpose of this investigation is to investigate Pope Urban II’s motives in initiating the First Crusade, with a particular focus on the consolidation of the Western Church’s influence in Europe. Among the primary sources that will be consulted are the letter sent by Patriach Alexios of Constantinople to Urban, and an account of Urban’s speech at Clermont. Relevant excerpts from both of these primary sources, as well as contextual evidence and a wide array of historiography, will be taken
In March of 1095, the Byzantine emperor Alexius I Comnenus appealed to the papacy for military aid to help against increasingly hostile neighbours. In 1095 the Seljuk Turks had come within one hundred miles of Byzantium or Constantinople, and they were thought to be threatening Eastern Christians. It was at this point that Alexius summoned the pope’s help to rid the area of th...
Some of the most widely-repeated interpretations of the Crusaders are that they are viewed as either motivated by greed or religion. According to Riley-Smith, historians throughout history have had various flipping beliefs as to what motivated the Crusaders on their raiding. Riley-Smith believes that views change "to reflect the mood of the times." He disagrees with the view that the Crusaders were motivated by greed because there is no direct evidence to bolster the contention that the Crusaders took these rash measures "to prevent the break-up of their estates" or because they were attracted "by the hope of adventure, spoils, and land overseas." He believes that many historians have disregarded motivation from religion because of a disdain
While expanding his empire across Europe, Charlemagne did remember that he was indeed a Christian, and converted many of the tribes he conquered, to Christianity. However, when 4,500 Saxons resisted, they were slaughtered ("Charlemagne"). But, for better or for worse, by 1000 AD Christianity had spread like wildfire throughout most of Europe, and the Catholic Church, who had crowned our friend Charlemagne the Emperor, had risen to power. Meanwhile, the Seljuk Turks had taken Jerusalem and were threatening Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire (“Crusades”). Near the end of the eleventh century, Emperor Alexius wrote a letter to Pope Urban the II that called for the assistance of his fellow Christians in West (“Crusades”). And, Pope Urban, was more than happy to assemble an army for such a worthy cause, and he also hoped that it might improve the relations between the two
How did the Crusades affect the Christians, Muslims, and Jews? The crusades impacted them all greatly for they were all a key part of the Crusades. Occasionally A religion may get a positive consequence but most of the time it was a negative one. Why did they all want Jerusalem? They all wanted it because it had a religious value to them. For the Jews, it was their spiritual city where the great temple once stood. For the Christians, it was where Jesus was crucified and rose from the dead. Last but not least for the Muslims it was where Muhammad rose to heaven during the night journey.
The emperor of the Byzantine Emperor was upset with Turks encroaching on his empire. He went to the Pope Urban II and complained. He made up atrocities about the Turks. In 1096, The Pope Urban II promoted the Crusade to reclaim the Holy Land from the barbaric Turks. These crusades lasted till the 13th century. In the process, Jews were persecuted and lots of looting took place. Many countries took interest in the Crusades because they were ready for travel and adventure. They wanted to expand trade with the Middle and Far East and so the Crusades gave them a chance to open up trade routes with those countries. They used Christianity to justify the Crusades. In reality, they wanted to expand trade and gain more territorial land.
The Crusades were the first tactical mission by Western Christianity in order to recapture the Muslim conquered Holy Lands. Several people have been accredited with the launch of the crusades including Peter the Hermit however it is now understood that this responsibility rested primarily with Pope Urban II . The main goal of the Crusades was the results of an appeal from Alexius II, who had pleaded for Western Volunteers help with the prevention of any further invasions. The Pope’s actions are viewed as him answering the pleas of help of another in need, fulfilling his Christian right. However, from reading the documents it is apparent that Pope Urban had ulterior motives for encouraging engagement in the war against the Turks. The documents and supporting arguments now highlight that the Pope not only sought to recruit soldiers to help but also to challenge those who had harmed the Christians community and annihilate the Muslims. He put forth the idea that failure to recapture this lands would anger God and that by participating, God would redeem them of their previous sins.in a time of deep devoutness, it is clear this would have been a huge enticement for men to engage in the battle. Whether his motives were clear or not to his people, Pope Urban’s speeches claiming that “Deus vult!” (God wills it) encouraged many Christians to participate and take the cross.
The crusades in the middle ages were a long-lasting series of vigorous wars between Christians and Muslims over the Holy Land, Jerusalem. The crusades lasted for almost two hundred years. They began in 1099 and approximately ended in 1291. (What were the motives, and causes of these gruesome wars?) is the first question one might ask. To properly answer this question, I am about to analyze the first four crusades that had began in 1099 and ended in 1212.
The First Crusade was established in 1095 in a council of the Church in Clermont. Alexius I Commenus, emperor of Byzantium, wanted to control Asia Minor and Northern Syria after losing to the Turks. He needed more Western troops and looked towards Pope
A main cause of the Crusades was the treatment of Christian pilgrims. They were robbed, beaten, and then sold. The main group of Turks, the Seljuk Turks, were threatening and growing in power. The Byzantine Emperor, Alexus I, began to become worried and sent out an urgent plea to Pope Urban II, in Rome. He requested for Christian knights to help him fight the Turks. Pope Urban II did agree to his appeal although Byzantine Emperors and Roman Popes were longtime rivals. He also did agree with Alexus I, in fearing that the Turks were expanding. Pope Urban encouraged French and German Bishops and Nobles to also take part in this. “ An accused race has violently invaded the lands of those Christians and had depopulated them by pillage and fire.” This is when Pope Urban II called for a crusade to free the Holy Land. Urban did agree to this having some of his own motives in mind. He was hoping his power would grow in ...
The Byzantine empire was under attack from the Seljuk Turks and Alexius Comnenus, the emperor of the Byzantine empire, required help from Western Europe. Knights were sent for support, but during the Fourth Crusade, defending the Byzantine empire was not made an important priority, and the Crusaders therefore pillaged Constantinople for their own benefit. Pope Innocent the Third was outraged to hear that the Crusaders destroyed Constantinople, saying in the reprimand of papal legate, “It was your duty to attend to the business of your legation and to give careful consideration, not to the capture of the Empire of Constantinople, but rather to the defense of what is left of the Holy Land…”. Through the quote, it is proved that defending the Holy Land was a higher priority than attacking the Byzantine empire. Furthermore, Pope Innocent the Third did not mention that defending the Byzantine empire was the Crusaders’ ‘business of their legation’ and therefore means that the cause is very trivial, or it has been neglected. Although defending the Byzantine empire was a cause of the Crusades, it did not last long and did not contribute much to the creation of the other
Latham, Andrew A. "Theorizing the Crusades: Identity, Institutions, and Religious War in Medieval Latin Christendom." International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 1 (March 2011): 234. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed March 14, 2012).
...h while the Ecumenical Council became the main authority for the Eastern Church. During the Crusades, Constantinople was fought over and pillaged more than once. It was generally a time of more fighting and disagreement that really led to sacred relics being dispersed throughout Europe. Finally attempts of reconciliation were made after Emperor Michael VIII led the recapture of Constantinople in 1261. In the city of Lyons in 1274 an agreement was reached, but it was soon rejected by the people and even some monks. Again an agreement was made in Florence in 1438 by Emperor John VIII and Patriarch. However this time the public on the eastern side (including some original signers) forbade a resolution. As a final point, the Great Schism can be said to have begun because of the political and theological differences, the Crusades, and the many attempts of reconciliation.