Disobedience Under Socialism

813 Words2 Pages

“It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion,” claims Oscar Wilde in his 1891 essay, “The Soul of Man Under Socialism”. Disobedience can be defined as breaching an existing law, going against authority, or infringing upon establishments in power (Britannica). This act can be either civil or violent in nature, rebellion being an example of the latter. Noncompliance often leads to social progress, this advancement meaning that one’s quality of life is being elevated through economic, political, or social means. Through the attainment of equality, justice, or the fulfillment of other basic necessities at the cost of obeying mandates, disobedience occupies a role as one of the social progress …show more content…

While disobedience is necessary to better one’s current situation at times, it is not an inherently positive entity as the motive behind the act ultimately determines whether social progress is being established. Without the goal to better a community in its entirety and instead finding a negative footing in the ideology behind the act of disobedience, social progress is not attained. Subsequently, Oscar Wilde’s assertion remains partially valid, as social progress is not always achieved through disobedience, but through other means as well. Moreover, disobedience does not always lead to social progress. Wilde also states that disobedience is “man’s original virtue,” which is not exclusively true as it connects to the reasoning that furthers the act. Rebellion can be characterized as a beneficial entity that leads to societal progression when one’s circumstances are tangibly or visibly improved after the event occurs. This improvement can be demonstrated through a positive shift in one’s physical or mental condition, earning of equality, or the manifestation of justice through the act of …show more content…

According to Fred Gray, a former civil rights attorney, she “gave all of us moral courage”. If she had not done what she did, I am not sure that we would have been able to mount the support for Mrs. Parks” (University of Idaho). Nine months later, when Rosa Parks famously followed suit, she was “arrested.a consequence of the Jim Crow laws, legislation designed to codify racism and marginalize black Americans” (BBC). These laws were established within the 1856 court ruling of Plessy vs. Ferguson, which introduced a new era of “separate but equal” for the United States (Library of Congress), legalizing segregated facilities. Both women challenged inequitable societal customs and defied unjust rulings, sparking the Montgomery Bus Boycott that ultimately contributed to the abolishment of the Jim Crow laws through the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Harvard University). Through the abolishment of the legislature which condoned racism against African Americans, societal progress was achieved. Without acts of disobedience, this evolution would not have been realized

Open Document