Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eassy abouy health care in canada
Canada versus united states healthcare coverage
Health care system in canada essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eassy abouy health care in canada
When we think about health care, different countries have different interpretation and their own way of running the public healthcare system. Even though the system differ they both have advantages and disadvantages that oppose one another. After watching the documentary “Sicko” it can be clearly seem that Canada and the United states are oppositely sided when it comes to the health of their people. To start off, in Canada there are many advantages, to name one, it would be that Canada’s system never leaves anyone behind. In Canada no one denies access to healthcare based on whether or not they can afford to pay. Funds are already paid for by the people’s taxes and The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, this is another advantage. When someone in Canada checks into a hospital they are freely to recover without worrying about the cost. With this advantages, people with low family income are also relieve of financial stress, making them happier, healthier and not conflicted with numbers. Thought the Canadian health system has many benefits there are disadvantages that correspond. One of the major disadvantages is access to care can sometime be a significant problem. …show more content…
Since healthcare is very costly, it can cut into the government budgets and restrictions on government funding can limit the access via waiting lists. These wait times may put the patients at risk while they wait for a surgery or their condition may be worst as they wait. Those that need priority care make the wait times for others very frustrating. Seniors, those with life threatening conditions, and other urgent cases will be looked after first while others can sometimes wait a long time. Opposing to the Canadian system, there’s the United States health care.
Even though the system has more disadvantages, there are still some advantages to take into consideration one of which is that it has one of the best medical research system. The U.S. has one of the best medical research systems in the world. Researchers from institutions such as Harvard Medical School, the Mayo Clinic and the Cleveland Clinic are world-renowned for the advances they are making in medicine. As well there is the Affordable Care Act which uninsured people will get access to affordable, high-quality health insurances. This insurance policy ensure that people well not be dropped from coverage when they are sick and also can’t be denied coverage, treatments or get charged
more. Though there are advantages that exist now, they were not put into action a few years ago. The people were at a disadvantage of either pay or die. Nothing is paid for even though people have their insurance plans and if it was paid for it would be a small amount, that left people in lots of death. As seen in the documentary, “Sicko” people such as the elder couple had to move in with their children due to debts that resulted them into bankruptcy. Another disadvantage would be health care programs denying people access to medical procedures that is indeed significant to their lives. There were many examples in the documentary that shows this for example, Tracy, even though his younger brother was willing to be a donor, at the last minute the hospital refuse to do the procedure, resulting in his death. As well, another person who was denied of their access to health was the Japanese women who had a brain tumour, even though there were clear evidence, the insurance company and health service kept on denying it and state that she was fine and that there was no tumour. Lastly, not all Americans are covered with insurance, even though insurance was not doing its part. It was still difficult to qualify for a plan because the applicant had to be free of a long list of conditions to be approve.
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
The basic values of fairness and equity that are demonstrated by the willingness of Canadians to share resources and responsibility are displayed in Canada 's healthcare system, and have been reflected in the modifications and major reforms made to the system since its initiation. The system has been and continues to be modified as the country 's population and circumstances change, and as the nature of health care itself evolves. Health care in Canada is delivered through a publicly funded health care system, which is mostly free at the point of use and has most services provided by private entities. It is guided by the provisions of
Some of these aspects include long wait times, uneven distribution of care, and most importantly, the various costs. Canada's system is certainly not the worst, but it is not the best either. The provision of care for Canadians is not flawless, however it is significantly better than some of the forms of care in other parts of the world. In contrast to the United States, Canada's healthcare system is thought of as a shining example of what they wish to achieve, but there are a few holes that need to be filled before any country can look up to Canadian healthcare. One of the issues that need to be address in Canada's healthcare system is about delivery, as there can be some bias as to who is eligible for things like proper treatments and surgeries. Another example could be being referred to a specialist that is not covered under a patient's insurance, resulting in possibly high costs. Lest Canadians be forgetful of no hospital bills or be ungrateful for the quality of the care and facilities, many still need to be educated on why the healthcare system is not entirely perfect. Therefore, this paper will outline why Canada's healthcare system has
In this paper, there will be a comparative analysis to the United States (U.S.) healthcare system and Canadians healthcare system highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of both.
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
Nuala Kenny and Roger Chafe state that “Canadian health care is moving toward privatization without evidence that this will help efficiency, equity, cost containment, or access – highlighting the market's power to change the course of even the most cherished social programs.” Canada has had public health care for a number of years and now is looking at adding privatization again. That would make you conclude that private insurance has more advantages than public insurance.
Health care in America tends to be a gray area for citizens without prior experience with medical issues. Michael Moore an American filmmaker discusses in his documentary “Sicko” the unpleasant experience some Americans had to go through because of our health care system. Moore implements humor to his documentary by inserting comical music, images, and narration in spots that help his argument gain attention. He also travels abroad to places like Canada, France, and Cuba, where universal health care is supported. He does this in order to provide reason why universal health care is a good ideas by capturing the different emotions and opinions of individuals in those countries versus what people think in America. In addition, Moore provides evidence on why the United States should adopt a different health care system by providing facts like the life expectancy and cost of health care in America compared to other countries. Michael Moore’s main goal is to inform the audience as well as introduce his argument that our health care system is inadequate and that better solutions are out there like universal health care.
The issue of a universal approach to Canadian Health Care has been contended for several years. Canada's national health insurance program, or Medicare, was designed to ensure that all people can have medical, hospital and physician services. The cost is to be paid for by Ontario medical insurance program (OHIP). The Canada Health Act was intended to represent certain principles of our health care system. It was intended to be a symbol of the Canadian values. Those values are fairness equity and togetherness. This oneness of a universal approach is what we call the one tier system. Many Canadians still believe the official government stand on this: Canada’s medical insurance covers all needs and services for every insured citizen. Officially then, there is a one level health care system. This paper shall argument that Canada has a two tier health care system.
Individuals experience different access to health-care depending on their social location. “A lack of access is illustrated by a person who has had an unmet health-care need for which he or she felt he or she had needed, but had not received, a health-care service in the past year” (Ives, Denov, & Sussman, 2015, p. 170). Health-care access in Canada is often unequally distributed, leaving vulnerable individuals unable to secure sufficient assistance. Changes in health-care delivery in Canada have affected individuals’ access to services. Vulnerable groups such as low-income, rural, and immigrant families experience pronounced difficulty adjusting to Canada’s health-care system.
Health care has become an issue because of the shortage of doctors in Canada. Many of them are either going to the U.S.A. or going to other countries to practice in hospitals and clinics. The earning cap imposed by the government has forced doctors to work fewer hours than are necessary to serve the public. Many Canadians are without a doctor to help them with their needs, and emergency rooms are filled to capacity with no available beds for those who have to be admitted to the hospital. Waiting time for specialist and specialty tests has become so long that someone diagnosed with a major illness may die before they can be properly treated.
The public health care system in Canada is still flawed, proven through the wait times that many patients have to go through. Canadians may wait up to six to nine months for “non-urgent” MRIs . The waiting list is dreary for Canadians, unlike Americans who can get their services immediately through paying out-of-pocket, the long public sector in Alberta waits up to a year for services, the wait for cataract surgery was six weeks ; these waits for some patients put the public health care system to shame, and helps push the idea of the privatized health care system a bettering option for the future of the nation. Additionally, 41 percent of adult Canadians said they experienced a difficulty in accessing hospital and physician care on weekday nights and weekends . Furthermore, it is still evident that Canadians in fact pay a higher income tax compared to Americans, due to the fact that they are paying the fund the health care system through their taxes; however, it is still significantly less to pay for a public health care system than it is privatized . Privatization is further proved as a superior choice with regards to the discharge situation many Canadians face. In Canada, it is common to see patients discharged earlier than recommended due the rising amount of patients using the free-of-charge public health care system, patients are released “quicker and sicker” because of this . Additionally, when discharged, the public health care system does not cover home care and private nurse care ; further proving the notion that there is still some forms of privatization already in the health care system in
Lastly, survey after survey Canadians have supported their health care system in which access is based on need rather than wealth. Medicare is a Canadian success story, something that all of us are proud of, not perfect of course but something that binds a country of six time zones.
The Canadian healthcare system is a socialized system that offers universal coverage to all Canadians at a cost, it is not for free. It is publicly funded and administered on a provincial basis. This means that each province collects money for healthcare from taxes. On average, each Canadian pays about $6,000-$9,000 per year- which is not that much different from the American private healthcare. The federal government collects the taxes then distributes money to each province based on the needs. The major requirement of the Canada Health Act is that all provinces, which do get federal money to deliver healthcare, have transparency and accountability, be universal and portable. This means that a Canadian living in one province can move to another province and still have the same medical coverage. The type of medical services provided is left to each province. While most of the basic health care is covered, plastic surgery for cosmetic reasons and certain other rehabilitation services are not covered. It is important to know that in this system there are often very long delays to get surgery or to see
The United States has a good healthcare system that is better than a universal system, but this means that people have to pay for their own healthcare because who wants to pay for their own healthcare? Most people would probably want to have universal healthcare because it is basically free healthcare that the government provides for the citizens of that country, it sounds good but most people don’t know about the negative side effects of universal healthcare. The reasons that the U.S has a better system than a universal system is because the U.S has a more unique healthcare system, a national healthcare system which means medical services are publicly financed but not publicly provided, unlike a lot of countries that have universal healthcare
It is interesting with how different America’s health care is from everyone else in the world. Most are universal, required to have health care. We are trying to accomplish that in America, but many don’t like being taxed if they don’t have it. There definitely is a lot we can learn from other countries. Overall Switzerland has a great system set up, with the United Kingdom behind them. Japan is also on track. America is definitely trying to make head way, and eventually will. It all comes down to weighing what is most important, cost, quality, or access to health care.