Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
French revolution and social class
French revolution and social class
3rd estate before the french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: French revolution and social class
Discontentment amongst the people of the Third Estate in France from 1788-1795 reached an apex, thus leading to a revolution. Ideology and actions converged within the Third Estate to form the basis of the insurgency that later took life and further entrenched the people. The French Revolution was a significant event of the Age of Revolutions that began with the American Revolution and heavily influenced by Enlightenment philosophy. Reasons for the discontent within the Third Estate include monetary issues like arduous taxation from nobility and the Church along with an inflation of prices due to immense state debt, visible divisions within the social hierarchy that limited rights of the Third Estate while giving power to the First and Second, …show more content…
and an underlying fear of what will occur. Beginning with the American Revolution that borrowed principles from the Enlightenment, the Age of Revolutions was a time period in European and American history marked by many cataclysms. This epoch resulted in a decrease in power of the Church as well as undermining absolute monarchies as nationalism expanded. Oft included is the Industrial Revolution, which metamorphosed economies and imperialism. Arduous taxation was laid upon the peasantry of the Third Estate (doc. 2a); over 50% of their wages were used to pay landlords for rent, tithes for the church, and taxes for the government. Entering the commencement of the French Revolution, France had just come from supporting the American Revolution, thereby amassing a vast amount of national debt. Incorporating a famine, thus a declined harvest, and an economic failure, the monetary situation in France came to a summit so that King Louis XVI announced a conference of the Estates General to ameliorate the circumstances (doc. 1). This compiled information clearly portrays the financial crisis that France was in insofar as to transparently display the distribution of money (doc. 2a and b); that the extremes of the spectrum were creating even more debt for France. This condition resulted in a rise of discontentment in the Third Estate because to remediate the debt, often, taxations on the Third Estate would rise to meet the demands of the kingdom. Document 1 is an announcement exclusively to those who are educated and learned. The King addresses the three estates with beautiful and intelligent language firstly to promulgate the message and secondly, to possibly maintain an air of confidence, halcyon, and assuredness with a bit of elitism in order to keep a kingly reputation. The document is valuable as a primary source of information for historical record of an important event, but has a limitation of perhaps sounding spurious. A key piece of information that could be appended is some historical insight of the happenings within the convocation of the Estates General during the spring of 1789 – that an impasse was created because of indecision and the separation of the Third Estate forming the National Assembly. Social hierarchies are a part of every society, institution, or nation and usually uphold order and peace within.
France prior to the Revolution was no exception; however, the lowest class, the Third Estate, was oppressed to no end by taxes, lack of privileges, no part in government, and an unfair lifestyle even though the Third Estate provided the structure and foundation for the other Estates to thrive upon (doc. 3). This also seeded discontentment within the people of the Third Estate. In response to the social inequalities of the estate, the National Assembly, a sect broken from the Estates General, forced the king’s hand in following the Constitution of 1791: a document that instituted a limited monarchy where the Third Estate gained some power while limiting some of the king’s (doc. 4). These two documents show a cause and effect with the social inequalities endorsed by pre-Revolution France – the political pamphlet stimulated the minds of the bourgeoisie to start thinking about how they could transform French society, and the Constitution was one of the first results of such thought. Document 3 is written for the bourgeoisie – those who were educated in order to provoke their thoughts about the disparity between the lives of the Third Estate and the First and Second Estates. Therefore, mostly everything found within the excerpt is against the government or somehow belittling it. This document grants us insight into the vengeful and frustrated minds of those belonging to the Third Estate. A document that could be annexed is the view of government from a person of the First or Second Estate so that their perspectives could be
compared. Fear is an emotion that can drive people to run on their instincts; it is able to seize control of their thoughts and actions. These qualities of fear ruled the people during the Reign of Terror after the Jacobins rose to power, Robespierre became a leader, and radicalism began in the revolution. Robespierre ruled by fear and terror and sought to flush out every spy for the neighboring kingdoms who waged war on the French revolutionaries. He was discontent with the status quo of the newly formed Republic, since it was still not yet secure. The French also could have agreed with him, using their newfound sense of nationalism that all outsiders must be put down lest one of them not be loyal to the Republic.
This oppression of the Third Estate along with the financial problems that fell on the common people would lead to the French Revolution. Overall, the people of France revolted against the monarchy because of the unsuccessful estate system and the inequality it led to, because of the new enlightenment ideas that inspired them, and because of the failures of the monarchy.
Sieyes, Emmanuel. "What is the Third Estate?" Reproduced by Lynn Hunt, editor and translator. The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History. Boston: Bedford / St. Martin's, 1996.
The dissatisfaction of the nobles and the clergy was another reason why the radical stage occurred. Nobles and clergy were mad because the lost their privileges. Before the revolution, the first two estates enjoyed tax exemptions while the third estate paid for everything. Politically, the first two estates had much more power than they should have had based on their numbers. In the Estates General, each estate was represented equally. This was true even
Historian Albert Mathiez states that “The middle class… was sensitive to their inferior legal position. The revolution came from them- the middle class. The working classes were incapable of starting or controlling the Revolution. They were just beginning to learn to read.” The middle class were not able to have a class on their own; they were still considered peasants. In the illustration it showed how much people and land each estate held, the Clergy was one percent of the population which owned ten percent of the land. Nobles were two percent of the people that owned thirty-five percent of the land. The middle class, peasants, and city workers were ninety-seven of the people owned fifty-five percent of the land. This means that if the third estate were to riot, this would cause havoc. There was a lot during that time; the website Macrohistory and World Timeline shows that “The population of France had grown to between 24 and 26 million, up from 19 million in 1700 without a concomitant growth in food production. Farmers around Paris consumed over 80 percent of what they grew, so if a harvest fell by around 10 percent, which was common, people went hungry. There was insufficient government planning and storage of grain for emergency shortages”. If there were approximately 26 million people, there would be 25,220,000 people in the third estate, 520,000 people in the second estate, and 260,000
Some people like Emmanuel Sieyès, middle-class writer who was taken by the Enlightenment ideas, believed that all of French Society lay on the backs of the third estate. On the contrary, Robespierre, the monarch at the time, believed that the third estate did not have the power to do anything important to society. The third estate had to pay taxes like the Gabelle and Taille while the first and seconds estates did not have to pay any taxes to the king. Also, the third estates had less of a representation in voting. The first and second estate could outvote the third estate every time and this was a huge inequality. The condition of the third estate was horrible but a good portion of this third estate was the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie had some wealth and social class, so they influenced the rest of the third estate about their rights, while also inspiring some lower clergies and provincial nobles and thus led to a group of rebellious people to fight the monarchy. This fight for political representation and political rights was only one cause of the French Revolution. Another causes lies in the French Monarchs: Louis XlV, Louis XV, and Louis XVl. When Louis XlV was ruling, the monarchy had unlimited power and was known as a
Each social class in France has its own reasons for wanting a change in government. The aristocracy was upset by the king’s power, while the Bourgeoisie was upset by the privileges of the aristocracy. The peasants and urban workers were upset by their burdensome existence. The rigid, unjust social structure meant that citizens were looking for change because “all social classes.had become uncomfortable and unhappy with the status quo.” (Nardo, 13)
During the eighteenth century, France was one of the most richest and prosperous countries in Europe, but many of the peasants were not happy with the way France was being ruled. On July 14, 1789, peasants and soldiers stormed the Bastille and initiated the French Revolution. This essay will analyze the main causes of the French Revolution, specifically, the ineffectiveness of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the dissatisfaction of the Third Estate, and the Enlightenment. It will also be argued that the most significant factor that caused the French Revolution is the ineffective leadership of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.
The French Revolution was a bloody civil war that lasted from the years 1789-1799. [1] The revolution arose out of hard economic times that had befallen France. Widespread famine and hunger, due to a grain shortage, rampaged through sections of the country. The economic crisis led to an increase in taxes on the lower classes, known as the third estate, to upkeep the lavish lifestyle of the nobility. [1] All of these are the known factors that led to the rise of the French Revolution.
At this time, France was going through a radical change. The three estates were starting to become equal and the huge gap between them was closing fast. The commoners of the 3rd estate were fed up with the life of poverty that they were forced to live in and sought for a change to the French system. But do the commoners deserve ALL the blame for executing the French Revolution? No they don’t. It was the Nobility that provoked this revolution and who drove the commoners into such despair.
With the outreach and uproar of the Third Estate occurring, the issues brought forth by them seemed to become more and more prominent among the French people. Sieyes often refers to the Third Estate to “the whole” or the majority of France whose needs must be fulfilled as well. More specifically the Third Estate was composed of the commoners which included peasants, merchants, and artisans which all had their own individual grievances. One of the major problems the Third Estate worked towards eliminating was the high taxation in which they had to pay to the other estates. The fact that they had to work harder than the majority of the first and second estates to make less money and to pay more taxes didn’t fit too well with them. Most of the third estate was poor to begin with and they felt it wasn't right that they had to pay extra and this was a major reason as to why they ultimately decided to revolt which sparked the French Revolution.
The third estate consisted of the remaining 23.5 million French people who were 90% peasants. The third estate was the only estate that paid taxes. Their taxes ensured the financial well-being of the clergy, state, and nobles (French Revolution Overview 6). The Enlightenment was a major influence of the French Revolution. The Enlightenment caused the revolution in three ways.
Historians Mora Ozouf and Keith Baker have both discussed the significance of the emergence of the public sphere during this period which gave rise to hundreds of political satires, pamphlets and cartoons which were used to devastating effect to decry the lack of influence the Third Estate was able to exert. Through these mediums, the commons began to question the legitimacy of a strictly hierarchical society and, even more troublingly as far the upper estates were concerned, started to suggest that the Third Estate, by virtue of their labours, were the only true citizens of the French Nation, as articulated in Father Sieyes pamphlet ‘What is the Third Estate.’ It seems that instead of engaging with these issues, the king ‘surrendered to reactionary elements at court’, most noticeably the Princes of the Blood who, in December of 1788 had issued a memorandum denouncing the various reform proposals put forward by the Third Estate in anticipation of the Estates General.
On August 26, 1789, the assembly issued the “Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.” Through judicial matters, this document was written in order to secure due process and to create self-government among the French citizens. This document offered to the world and especially to the French citizens a summary of the morals and values of the Revolution, while in turn justifying the destruction of a government; especially in this case the French government, based upon autocracy of the ruler and advantage. The formation of a new government based upon the indisputable rights of the individuals of France through liberty and political uniformity.
The first underlying cause of the French Revolution was the Old Regime. The people of France were divided into three estates. The first estate was composed of the highest church officials. They held about ten percent of all the land in France. They paid no direct taxes to the royal government. The second estate was made up of nobles. They were only two percent of France’s population, but owned twenty percent of the land. They paid no taxes (Krieger 483). The third estate accounted for ninety-eight percent of France’s population. The third estate was divided into three groups; the middle class, known as the bourgeoisie, the urban lower classes, and the peasant farmers. The third estate lost about half their income in taxes. They paid feudal dues, royal taxes, and also owed the corvee, a form of tax paid with work (Krieger 484).
Both the 1789 and 1848 revolutions in France aimed to abolish the unjust monarchy and fulfill their desire for liberty and equality for all citizens, yet neither revolution had true success. Some significant similarities between the Revolutions of 1789 and 1848 were the French citizens’ goal to eradicate the monarchy and to achieve revolutionary goals like equality and freedom for all. In 1789, Louis XVI was an absolute monarch whose autocratic rule upset the Third Estate (bourgeoisie, sans-culottes, and peasants). Louis XVI controlled all aspects of society and politics, French citizens did not have a voice in government, they lacked many civil liberties such as freedom of speech, and the Third Estate was taxed extremely unfairly. The Third Estate had to pay 50% of their income in taxes, while the nobility and clergy only had to pay 1-2%.