Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion to pros and cons of ehr
Conclusion to pros and cons of ehr
Essays on disadvantages of ehr system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
III. ADVANTAGES IN USING THE EHR List the advantages in implementing the EHR using bullet points and write a paragraph for each of them. Identify any four critical advantages the EHR would provide to the practice. The advantages of implementing an EHR system are: • Information Access • Data Organization • Claims Processing Efficiency • Performance Monitoring The access to information can be very beneficial in an EHR system. With all the patient medical files being integrated within the EHR, the physician will find it convenient when seeing numerous patients. They will access to these files whenever and wherever they are needed to make effective decisions for the patient. Better access to information also allows better communication amongst the providers. Data organization is …show more content…
very helpful in an EHR system, especially because there is loads of data to be stored. The EHR keeps basic patient data in a central place, where all files can be swiftly accessed and entered one time only. With one quick name search, the practice can find a patient file without the added stress of sorting through numerous paper files. Claims processing efficiency allows easy access to electronic clinical data. Easy access to these files results in “the process of gathering and providing documentation for claims purposes” [3]. If any complications arise, the practice will be able to access their electronic clinical files immediately, with better accuracy and efficiency. An EHR improves performance monitoring in a practice. Each individual provider has a profile that monitors their performance. This monitoring helps improve patient quality within the practice. It also highlights the areas providers need more educational training in. Knowing their weakness can benefit the providers and ultimately the patients. A. Meaningful Use Meaningful use encourages healthcare providers to utilize EHR systems to improve overall quality of healthcare, while incorporating patients and their families. There are 3 stages of meaningful use that an EHR system can satisfy. The first stage is the foundation of meaningful use, focusing on making all data files electronic and sharing basic information. A family medicine practice EHR would satisfy this requirement by utilizing CPOE and providing patients with electronic copies of their health information. Physicians will also have the luxury of electronically entering orders or instructions without the bother of paper charts. Stage 2 of meaningful use focuses on the advancement of clinical processes within the EHR, such as. Continuing to add clinical processes allows a wider range of EHR usage amongst healthcare organizations and their “respective patient populations” [3]. Stage 3 is the final stage of meaningful use, with a goal to improve outcomes. IV. INTEROPERABILITY Interoperability in healthcare is the ability of individual healthcare systems to communicate and share patient medical information electronically in a sufficient period of time to another healthcare system for specific usage. This is possible by the help of the Continuity of Care Record, or CCR. The CCR sets the standards for the electronic sharing of patient data between healthcare organizations. One specific standard of CCR requires all patient data to be put in a format readable for all EHR medical systems. With this in effect, patient records would be well defined, easily accessible, and easy to retrieve amongst different providers. With the usage of interoperability come challenges.
The accuracy of matching patient records becomes troublesome when looking at their demographics. “Different systems use different demographic information to match individuals to their health records,” thus it can cause a staff member to identify the wrong patient [4]. Furthermore, since state privacy rules vary, complications can arise when trying to share patient data from one state to another. Unreasonable high “system costs and legal fees can deter providers” from fully achieving interoperability also [4]. To participate in interoperability some EHR systems require multiple applications, which need financial funding to happen. A. Health Information Exchange EHR systems would work with a Health Information Exchange, by providing a smooth transfer of medical information between unrelated organizations. With the records being in electronic form, seeing a patient should be less strenuous. The advantages of effective HIEs eliminate redundant testing of patients for the same issues. This elimination alone helps reduce health care costs. Also, HIEs motivates patients to be more active in their own healthcare, while encouraging consumer
education.
• Provides a basic level of interoperability among electronic health records (EHRs) maintained by individual physicians and organizations
The federal government has taken a stance to standardized care by creating incentive programs that are mandated under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) of 2009. This act encourages healthcare providers and healthcare institutions to adopt Meaningful use in order to receive incentives from Medicare and Medicaid. Meaningful use is the adoption of a certified health record system that acquires or obtains specified objectives about a patient. The objectives or measures are considered gold standard practices with the EHR system. Examples of the measures include data entry of vital signs, demographics, allergies, entering medical orders, providing patients with electronic copies of their records, and many more pertinent information regarding the patient (Friedman et al, 2013, p.1560).
Historically, physicians and nurses documented patients’ health information using paper and pencil. This documentation created numerous errors in patients’ medical records. Patient information became lost or destroyed, medication errors occur daily because of illegible handwriting, and patients had to wait long periods to have access to their medical records. Since then technology has changed the way nurses and health care providers care for their patients. Documentation of patient care has moved to an electronic heath care system in which facilities around the world implement electronic health care systems. Electronic health records (EHR) is defined as a longitudinal electronic record of
middle of paper ... ... The goals are to empower patients and their families, reduce health disparities, and support research and health data. The EHR can prevent medication errors, reduce long term medical costs, improve population health and through the Meaningful Use program the vision of this program is becoming reality.
To begin, there are numerous advantages throughout the EHR system. Considering this, enhancing patient safety is priority in the healthcare industry. Reminders, alerts, and pop-ups are just a few of the safety features an EHR can provide. These items can prevent medication errors, by alerting a nurse or physician of a blood sugar that is out of range, or a medication with too high of a potency, such as a wrong dosage amount. Reminders can be as simple as an immunization reminder to get a flu shot. Another example could be a drug interaction between NSAIDS such as i...
Portability can improve patient care. Patients no longer have to “tote” their cumbersome medical records around anymore. EHR’s give physicians and clinicians access to critical healthcare information in the palm of their hand, which ultimately leads to improved patient care outcomes. EHR’s also provide security to vital medical and personal healthcare information. Organizations like HIPPA defines policies, procedures and guidelines for preserving the privacy and security of discrete distinguishable health information (HHS.gov,
It is hoped that meaningful use will also bring an acceleration in medical data research. EHR’s are now being used to measure Physician’s quality of service in the workforce through the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). This program rewards by reimbursement to individuals who, through the EHR tracking, can prove they meet “care-quality measures.” The goal is to force the act of certifying EHR’s. Eventually, programs like PQRS will require certification, therefore anyone using these services must comply in order to maintain costumers/patients. In order to maintain efficiency and variety in the healthcare system, EHR systems need to be diverse. The full potential is reached when information can be shared through integration. This is known as Interoperability within the healthcare IT system. Because records and patient information can be so easily lost in transit or translation through either fax, mail, etc., Interoperability is one of the primary motivations for healthcare information technology or EHR
The EHR is a computerized health record that will take place of the paper chart. The health care information will be available to all health care providers at anytime, anywhere. The record will contain medical history, diagnosis, medications, immunization, allergies, diagnostics and lab results; from past doctors, emergency department visits, school, pharmacies, and out patient laboratories and facilities (Department of health and human services, 2014). Health care providers will be able to access evidence-based tools to aid in decision-making. EHR will also streamline workflow, and support changes in payer requirements and consumer expectations. In 2004, “the HHS secretary, Tommy Thompson appointed David Brailer as the national health information coordinator to provide: leadership for the development and nationwide implementation of a interoperable HIT infrastructure, with the goal of establishing electronic health records...
“There are two concepts in electronic patient records that are used interchangeably but are different-the electronic medical record (EMR/EHR) and the electronic health record. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology (NAHIT) defines the EHR as the electronic record of health-related information on an individual that is accumulated from one health system and is utilized by the health organization that is providing patient care while the EMR accumulates more patient medical information from many health organizations that have been involved in the patient care. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has been urging the healthcare industry to adopt the electronic patient record but initially
Physicians use these systems to collect detailed, specific information about each patient, providing complete documentation of their personal health records. The history documented includes injuries, diagnoses, treatments, prescriptions, visits and much more. This comprehensive database helps physicians see the big medical picture, which in turn makes future diagnosis easier. Health care businesses have capitalized on this information by providing practices with patient portals. Integrating an ambulatory EHR solution with a patient portal gives patients access to their up-to-date medical records. In recent years, this has become more of a necessary EHR feature than a “nice-to-have”
1. The main advantages of EHRs is accessibility. It is a lot easier to send digital files from one office to another rather than a large folder of paperwork. It cuts down on the time required to transfer files and allows for patients to get more rapidly care.
Studies have implied that, healthcare professionals who practice clinical features through EHR were far more likely provide better preventive care than were healthcare professionals who did not. (page 116). From 2004, EHR has initiated, even the major priority of President Obama’s agenda is EHR (Madison & Stagger, 2011). Health care administration considers EHR as the introduction of advanced technology which can improve patient satisfaction are can increase the financial incentives of the healthcare organization. Studies have pointed out that the federal policy is proposed to transform all medical records into EHR (Hebda & Calderone, 2010).
Included in this information are patient demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, vital signs, past medical history, immunizations, laboratory data, and radiology reports” (HIMSS H. I., 2011). These records can provide a lot of handy information regarding the patient profiles that could influence the pace of handling the services to the patients in terms of safety and quality. “EHR systems can include many potential capabilities, but three functionalities hold great promise in improving the quality of care and reducing costs at the health care system level: clinical decision support (CDS) tools, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems, and health information exchange (HIE). These and other EHR capabilities are requirements of the “meaningful use” criteria set forth in the HITECH Act of 2009” (David Blumenthal, August 5,
But, in order to derive the full benefits of EHR systems, this information should be released by the patients to the scientist and researchers. For this reason, the EHR systems should be designed in such a way that 1) patients have the ability to release their health information to the research agencies autonomously and 2) approved researchers have access to such data. That being said, patients should also be able to opt out of such situations autonomously. Health care providers and researches should use the information available on the electronic records for the maximum welfare of their patients with the informed consent and respect for their