Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of discrimination on society
Effects of discrimination in today's society
Discrimination scenarios in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of discrimination on society
Legal aspects of employment that can impact employees in the workplace [Discrimination] 1. Issue overview: [Outline of the issue and why it is important] Discrimination is a significant issue that many employees are facing in their work place. Discrimination is the unfair treatment of one particular person because of their gender, religion, nationality, ethnicity, culture, race, or other personal traits. It is unlawful to refuse to hire a potential employee based on one of the attributes listed above. Discrimination in the workplace generally falls into two categories, direct and indirect discrimination. Direct discrimination is when a person is treated less favourably due to their personal traits, while indirect discrimination involves actions that may involve an imposition of a condition, requirement or practice in which one class will be able to comply with, while another class of employees will fail to do so. Discrimination is an important aspect of Australian workplaces, as Australia is known for its multiculturalism. …show more content…
2.
Employee rights: [Outline of the rights that employees have in this area] Employees have the right to feel safe in their workplace and not feel targeted because of their personal traits. All employees in Australia of all backgrounds have the right to be treated equally and the right to have the same opportunities. 3. [A law that protects Australian workers in this area] The best-known employment anti-discrimination law that prohibits an employer or employees from discriminating on the basis of race, national origin, gender, or religion is the Fair Work Act 2009. This law is in place to ensure that employees and prospective employees are protected from unlawful workplace discrimination and any other adverse actions by an
employer. 4. Case/Media: [A case or article from Australia in the past 10 years that highlights this issue that includes what the problem is, what action was taken and the outcome] The Fair Work Ombudsman publicized that the operators of a Japanese restaurant at Surfers Paradise in Queensland, Australia have confessed to purposely underpaying 16 casual employees. Many of the workers were in Australia on a 417 working holiday visa. They were allegedly paid flat rates as low as $10 an hour to work as kitchen hands and wait on tables. Under the Restaurant Industry Award, they should have been paid a minimum of $21.09 for ordinary hours worked, up to $25.31 on weekends and $42.18 on public holidays. All together, they were short-changed more than $31,500 when they worked for the Uchouten Japanese Restaurant between December 2013 and October 2014. Operators Chiiko Minagawa and Moon Yeom admitted the underpayments were deliberate and the restaurant operated on the foundation that it would not be caught. The Fair Work Ombudsman discovered the wage fraud after one of the workers went to the Agency's Gold Coast office demanding assistance. Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James said the restaurant's admission that it deliberately exploited overseas workers is extremely worrying and announced that the business faces enforcement action and has been requested to sign an Enforceable Undertaking (EU). The EU requires: - Back-payment of all remaining wages and entitlements -A public apology for their behavior to be placed in the Gold Coast Bulletin newspaper -Registration with the Fair Work Ombudsman's online tool -Employment records be upheld and pay-slips issued to staff -An obligation to future obedience with federal workplace laws -Workplace associations training for managers with HR, payroll and recruitment functions -The appointment of an external professional to review the business's compliance with workplace laws and regulations by the end of November 2016.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits most of the discrimination and harassment in the workplaces. The provision of the Title VII covers all the state, local government, private employees as well as educational institutions that have at least 15 employees or more. The Act prohibits any discrimination that may be meted against the individuals on the basis of the origin, religion, sex, color, race, and national origin (http://topics.hrhero.com/title-vii-of-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/).
The law prohibits discrimination when it comes to any phase of employing someone, including hiring, firing, getting a raise, getting a promotion and other related stuff.
According to Corley, Reed, Shedd, and Morehead, (2001) “the most important statue eliminating discriminatory employment practices, however, is the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act o 1972 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991.” The appropriation section o...
• Australian society values equality of opportunity for individuals, regardless of their race, religion or ethnic background
discrimination in the workplace was officially declared illegal in 1964 with the passage of the Civil Rights Act (Public Law 88-352). Employers could not deny employment to, fire individuals, or discriminate in any way against these individuals.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and various other federal and state laws prohibit intentional discrimination based on ancestry or ethnicity. Some employers practice blatant forms of minority discrimination by paying lower salaries and other compensation to blacks and Hispanics. Others engage in quota systems by denying promotions and jobs to individuals on the basis of race or color. Federal laws prohibit employers of 15 or more employees from discriminating on the basis of race or color. Virtually all states have even stronger anti-discrimination laws directed to fighting job-related race and minority discrimination. In some states, companies with fewer than eight employees can be found guilty of discrimination.
Discrimination can be defined as the unequal treatment of equal groups in workplace situations such as engagement, compensation, and promotion. There are two key notions of discrimination in relation to a workplace context;
Before the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it was actually legal for a job applicant to be rejected for a job due to their race, sex, religion or national origin. It was legal to be turned down for a job, promotion, or anything in that nature, due to discriminatory reasons. Title VII is a federal law, but it does not give victims of discrimination the immediate right to file a federal lawsuit. Instead, Title VII created a federal government unit, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to enforce the right to vote, to free speech,and to fair and equal treatment at work. The EEOC publishes guidelines and understandings for the people and facilities that are not part of the government to help businesses in deciding what employment practices are lawful or illegal.
Affirmative action is defined as the as action or policy favouring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education; positive discrimination. This is a significant issue, that will be affecting most if not all working Canadians. Jobs could either be given to candidates to create more diversity or given to those who are potentially more qualified, but already represent the majority of the workforce. On one end of the debate, the conservative government, is against affirmative action, because they believe only qualifications should be taken in consideration when hiring. While, the Liberal government would like to have more minorities be represented in the workforce.
Throughout the years the United States has faced many challenges with equal employment opportunities for everyone. The United States has developed The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, also known as the EEOC, to enforce laws that help prevent everyone from being treated unfairly when it comes to employment options. The EEOC has established stipulations and overlooks all of the federal equal employment opportunity regulations, practices and policies (“Federal Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination Questions and Answers”). Some laws that have been passed are the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. Although some discrimination is still a problem, all of these laws have helped the United States citizens become treated more equally in the work force.
Introduction- Discrimination affects people all over the world. People of all ethnicities and from all different walks of life are influenced in some way by workplace discrimination. "Discrimination" means unequal treatment. One of the most common elements discriminated against is a persons ethnicity, or their race. This is called Racial Discrimination. While there are many federal laws concerning discrimination, most states have enacted laws that prohibit it. These laws may have different remedies than the federal laws and may, in certain circumstances be more favorable than the federal laws.
The law also makes it illegal to retaliate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit (Laws Enforced by EEOC, 2017). These laws protect people from businesses turning them away for any or no reason at all. For example, veterans with disabilities are covered because of injuries they can easily be discriminated against. There are more specific laws for those with disabilities but the equal employment laws apply
Workplace harassment is unwelcome actions that are based on a person’s race, religion, color, and sex, and gender, country of origin, age, ethnicity or disability. The targets of the harassment are people who are usually perceived as “weaker” or “inferior” by the person who is harassing them. Companies and employers can also be guilty of workplace harassment if they utilize discriminatory practices against persons based on ethnicity, country of origin, religion, race, color, age, disability, or sex. These discriminatory practices have been illegal since the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Civil Rights Act of 1964), and have been amended to be more inclusive of other people who experience discrimination by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (The Civil Rights Act of 1991), and most recently, President Obama’s signing of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Stolberg, 2009).
There are many forms of discrimination such as age, disability, transgender, and sex discrimination. This paper will focus on discrimination based on gender, race and age in the workplaces. All over the world, we hear about people treating each other prejudicially depending on their background, ethnicity, or sex orientation. Workplaces should be free from all personal biases but unfortunately, we hear about employees being discriminated against, almost, on a daily basis. Workplace discrimination can be described as treating an individual or a group of people differently than others.
Therefore, when the employee follows the job schedule, they can prevent work overload because of a systematic system applied by the company. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 also stated the laws to protect discrimination based on colour, age, gender, national origin and religion in the workplace. These laws are designed to make sure every employee is treated fairly in their workplace. In Australia, employers should implement best practice on how to maintain privacy in the workplace in accordance with the privacy standards set out in the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).