Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of digital culture and technology on human interactions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1- Digital Culture and New Media (Research Introduction) “For the first time in history, the media make possible a mass participation in a productive process at once social and socialized, a participation whose practical means are in the hands of the masses themselves”1 It does not take Galilean perceptions in order to understand the complexity of new media and digital culture and the evermore expanding cosmos of the computer mediated communications. But, it leads us in a vague, indefinite space of exploration of this complex state. Certainly not an utopia, if we’d say that this is an utopic state nor condition, we would be circling around the utopic vision itself, and that is not what we pursue. How to understand digital culture, how to …show more content…
An example would be that in the years 12 000 B.C. to the year we have gathered 10% of information while from the years 2014 to 2015 we have gathered 90% of data which just goes to show that we are facing an immense information gathering and thus are facing an explosion of the socio political realities and the implosion of political realities. The world as we knew it has shifted a gear into the unknown, blasted into a new (dis)connected hyperrealites, with the global (glocal) content having the same global concept though within the complexities of the local context is where things get messy. Because the world is as divided as it was before the explosion of social media and smart phones smart TV’s in our lives (as it was in the era of satellite TV), the problematic case of double standard of the developed countries towards the developing countries is still the factor x of a divisible world, where the software and hardware has getting us closer yet the divisions remain the same. In this case, it is easy to understand how the economic and political background works on a society, but, it is of outmost importance to understand how it behaves within perception and context. The implicit here is that it differs hugely in the developed countries (the west) and in the developing countries. The fragility of the software powered entire societies and the absurdity of the traditionally powered societies, yet they both are face to face and one (software powered societies) ever more so expanding with their artificially created needs of consuming and “being” of a certain automated image that has been haunting their perceptions of the world as they knew it. Consumer societies and being a consuming societies depends on a welfare on the general GDP of the country, it is absurd to state that a developing countries people can be called a consumerist. In order to be a consumer society
The protestations which he argues makes the reader debrief himself about his own lifestyle; Birkerts claims, “The electronic media are invisible in process, but omnipresent in product” (Birkerts). This claim is plausible to make his readers ponder about the electronic media as a negative
Turkle’s stance on this topic is emotionally engaging as she uses rhetoric in a very powerful approach, while also remaining unbiased. The article flows very smoothly in a beautifully structured format. The author maintains a composition that would appeal to the interest of any sort of audience. She effectively questions the reader’s views on the negative consequences technology has on social interactions. Her work is inspiring, it sheds light on the dark hole society has dug for themselves, a state of isolation through communication in the digital age; this is a wake up
When it comes to the definition of technology in their articles, both Carr and Cascio have similarities and differences. Both authors are debating about the use of technology in today’s society. Both of their articles touch base on the ideals of “what technology is” in their perspectives. Carr believes that technology is making us want the quick path to information or common knowledge and says the Internet is “a machine designed for the efficient and automated collection, transmission, and manipulation of information”. Cascio also believes th...
Looking the historical moment we are living at, it is undeniable that the media plays a crucial role on who we are both as individuals and as a society, and how we look at the...
In Urs Gassers and Jon Palfreys, Born Digital, both authors take a sociological approach on analyzing and interpreting the new phenomenon known as the emergence of Digital Natives, or the part of society born after 1980. The main thesis for Born Digital that Urs Gassers and Jon Palfrey were trying to transcend, was how individuals who are Born Digital are transforming the world we live in. Digital Natives are transforming our world because of their interactions and intuit with technology and the web. Those born after 1980 have grown up in a networked world and are different, in sometimes enigmatic ways, from those born before them. In Palfrey and Gasser's view, the digital natives promise to make astonishing contributions to society, but also face daunting problems. It is the authors' view that as a society we must do all we can to enable the progress, of Digital Natives, while trying to create the organizations and values necessary to protect them from the threats that they face. In addition, self-perception of self is becoming slightly effected in either a positive or detrimental way, depending on the individual. These self-perception changes are in turn changing the way we react with society in the reality. These individuals known as digital native’s have a strong knowledge for technology and the working of the internet because they were born into it. We are now living in an era where people who grew up without technology are being forced to learn and adapt to a world where technology is becoming very prevalent in everyday life. Being born into a world where technology is emerging, assuming they were born in an industrial economy, they have the benefit of not being too far behind the digital immigrants. In many homes ...
Although the book focuses primarily on one communication technology, the principles and examples are applicable to a much broader range of media. The author spends considerable time describing the social mores of the American people and the resulting cultural metamorphosis that appears to have occurred because of the technological changes. He begins with a quote issued by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), “The telephone is essentially democratic; it carries the voice of the child and the grown-up with equal speed and directness…It is not only the implement of the individual, but it fulfills the needs of all the people (Fischer, 1992).” If we substitute the word posting for telephone, you can see how this concept applies to a much broader technological and temporal field. Similarly, published in 1881, just 35 years earlier, in an article about the telegraph, the journal Scientific American, stated, “(it) promoted a kinship of humanity (Fischer, 1992).” Again, by applying that same concept to the general act of posting reveals the relationship between early iconography and modern social media posts and it becomes clear that the “specific devices” are less important than the need for recognition and subsequent act of communication in and of
The use of media and popular culture is a sociological phenomenon wherein the structural changes to society, which accompany the emergence of new forms of communication and accessing information, can be examined. There are many differing views regarding whether media and popular culture are necessary to the functioning of a democratic and egalitarian society or whether they actually further social inequality and inhibit political discussion or involvement. Although both interpretations are arguably valid, it can be seen that it is not popular culture and the media in and of themselves but rather how they are consumed by the public that determine how these mediums influence individuals and by extension the wider society.
David. "Mass Media and the Loss of Individuality." Web log post. Gatlog. N.p., 11 Sept. 2007. Web. 10 May 2014.
“Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, allowing us to do things more quickly and efficiently. But too often it seems to make things harder, leaving us with fifty-button remote controls, digital cameras with hundreds of mysterious features.” (James Surowiecki) Whether or not is known, technology has become too heavily relied on. It is replacing important social factors such as, life skills and communication skills. While technology is created to be beneficial, there must be a point in time where we draw the line. Once face-to-face conversations begin to extinguish, this means that there is too much focus on the “screen culture”. In her writing, “Alone Together”, Sherry Turkle talks
Curran, J. and Gurevitch, M. (eds.) Mass Media and Society: fourth edition. Arnold, pp. 29-43.
Basically, the media performs three functions to inform, to influence and to entertain. But effects of these functions are multidimensional in modern times. It has provided awareness about the whole world. In twenty-first century, media has a tendency to shape political, economical and social values of an individual. Moreover, media has eliminated the boundaries of information, so that a person can become an active citizen of the global economy. Hence, it is logical to state the media has become a basic need of human civic life.
The power of the mass media has once become so powerful that its undoubtedly significant role in the world today stays beyond any questions. It is so strong that even politics uses it as a means of governing in any country around the world. The mass media has not only political meaning but also it conveys wide knowledge concerning all possible aspects of human beings’ lives and, what is utterly true, influences on people’s points of view and their attitude to the surrounding environment. It is completely agreeable about what kind of virtues the mass media is supposed to accent. Nevertheless, it is not frequent at all that the media provides societies with such a content, which is doubtful in terms of the role consigned to it. Presenting violence and intolerance as well as shaping and manipulating public are only a few examples of how the role of mass media is misunderstood by those who define themselves as leading media makers.
Hence, any debate of the future becoming digital must take into consideration the reaction of the media to the technological innovations of the world, from the Personal Computers (PC) to the smallest Smartphone. Although mass media has increased with technological innovations, what driv...
Malcolm X, a human rights activist, once said, “The media´s the most powerful entity on Earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and the guilty innocent, and that´s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” Through numerous studies and considerable amount of research, it has become clear that the media has a significant effect on society and its perception. This applies to all topics, but mostly to issues that are difficult for the mass to experience for themselves. For example, our views of government and social institutions are largely based on the medium’s reports, not our own experiences.
Rosen, senior editor if New Atlantis, on her essay published in Wilson Quarterly in autumn 2009 “In the Beginning Was the Word,” points out how digital technology, especially in communication and entertainment, affects negatively on our lives socially and cognitively. She believes that although technology might appear as sign of our progress as humans, it is withdrawing us from the core literature. Rosen explains th...