Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Where freedom is restricted to the giver
Freedom and choice in the giver
Marriages in my culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Where freedom is restricted to the giver
“The life where nothing was ever unexpected. Or inconvenient. Or unusual. The life without color, pain or past” (Lowry 165). That’s what separates the life in the novel The Giver and the life in our modern society. While our modern society and the society in The Giver have few similarities, they have many distinct differences.
One distinct difference between the novel The Giver and our modern society is that people in the society of The Giver don’t get to choose their spouse or have their own children or even name the children they are given. For example, “The Matching of Spouses and the Naming and Placement of the new children were scrupulously thought through by the Committee of Elders” (Lowry 49). In our modern society, anyone can marry whoever they would like and have and name their children whatever they like. This may be sad difference, but there are many more.
One other distinct, but sad difference between the novel The Giver and our modern society is that people aren’t able to feel or have a love for something or someone in The Giver. For instance, Jonas enjoyed the feeling of love in a memory he was given, however “It wouldn’t work very well. It was a dangerous way to live” (Lowry 126). This shows
…show more content…
that the society in The Giver may have learned from previous mistakes and tried to make love nonexistent to prevent bad things from happening again. In contrast, our modern society seems to thrive off of love. Everyone has a love for someone or something and that right should not be taken from them. One final distinct difference between the novel The Giver and our modern society is that in the novel The Giver, the citizens are required to work a job they don’t get to choose when they become a Twelve, or twelve years old, until they are sent to the House of the Old when they become an elderly citizen.
All Assignments are determined by “A secret selection, made by the leaders of the community” (Lowry 15). In our modern society, people have the option of working wherever they want when they when they turn sixteen. Also, elderly people aren’t able to go to a retirement home unless they can afford to pay for it. In the end, there are many distinct differences between the novel The Giver and our modern society, however there are a couple of major
similarities. One major similarity is that both the novel The Giver and our modern society have a school system and jobs. In The Giver, the children attend school until they are old enough to have their own Assignment, or job. Likewise, our modern society has us attend school until we achieve the required intelligence for our job. This is just one of the major similarities Another major similarity is that both the novel The Giver and our modern society have a form of government. In The Giver, the society is run by Elders, or community leaders. Similarly, our modern society has a government run by leaders and officials. This similarity can help people relate to the society in The Giver. All in all, the novel The Giver and our modern society have many distinct and noticeable differences and a few similarities. The differences ranging from love and family to jobs and the and similarities ranging from school to government.
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
The book The Giver by Lois Lowry is a different book. This book is a futuristic book, I mean showing beyond the present. It is mainly based on a child, and his future work and or destination, making history in a small community, where everything is quiet and could be said perfect and controlled. Each of its inhabitants is assigned to their job to avoid mistakes. Curiously, the book is about people, not their ignorance, but their lack of life experiences and knowledge of the outside world. This perhaps shows the day that the world will be a miserable world in my view and colorless, literally. It would be an empty, false and perfect life, without errors, and incomplete happiness, where the word love feels like it has lost its meaning and has become somewhat devalued.
The society in The Giver does not allow any changes in the number or the gender of the members in a family unit. Although both societies have an organized way of defining the structure of a family unit, our society is better because it gives us the freedom of deciding what we want and expect of a family unit. Even though both the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry and modern society are both unique in their own ways, our society is a better society to live in. Our society gives us more freedom to choose for our own benefits and happiness.
“How could someone not fit in? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made.” (Lowry, 48) In Lowry’s novel, The Giver, eliminating choices and feelings caused their society to be worse than our society today because you don’t have any choices and you don’t get to experience the feeling of joy and happiness.
In The Giver the theme will depend largely on the human emotion that has been removed from the community in their desire to create a utopia. But as most humans crave human emotion, love is somewhat uncertain, a very fragile central emotion to our being and it makes us who we are. Love is more than a feeling; it is an unquenchable thirst that completes us as humans. Just like Jonas feels for Gabriel. “His thoughts continued. If he had stayed, he would have starved in other ways. He would have lived a life of hungry for feelings, for color for love.” (162) Love is essential to the story and for us to exist in our happiness or utopia as people; we cannot truly live without the emotion of love. If we did not love, it would be difficult for any nation to function. An example of that would be, why would you join the military if you didn’t care for and love your nation? There would be no point, to give up so much for something or someone that truly did not love. The love has to be there for all of us and in all that we
The Giver was an example of a dystopian society. In this community citizen doesn`t had any freedom. It had a lots of information about why it was dystopian, but today I will talk about few thing. First reason was the natural world was banished and distrusted. Second was information, independent thought, and freedom were restricted. The last was they had fear of the out side world.
The Giver provides a chance that readers can compare the real world with the society described in this book through some words, such as release, Birthmothers, and so on. Therefore, readers could be able to see what is happening right now in the real society in which they live by reading her fiction. The author, Lowry, might build the real world in this fiction by her unique point of view.
When mankind started to build a community, maintaining orderliness and balance also came with it. The citizens are trying to make a utopia or a perfect society for them to live in. Of course, as the years passed, it has come to their senses that there has to be someone who can lead the society to greatness. That 's the time they 've started to appoint leaders that are capable of maintaining the very stronghold of the society. These leaders have the power to control their society to their will. Unfortunately, some of these leaders became deprived of power which blinded them that instead of making a utopia, they 've made a dystopian society that drastically affected their citizens. Similar to the novel, The Giver by Lois Lowry. Jonas, the protagonist in the novel did not know the state of the society he lives in
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
The Giver is actually one of my all-time favorite books, so I’ve looked into why she left the book so inconclusive in the past. The Giver is basically about a boy named Jonas who lives in a perfect society. He lives in a household with his two parents and his little sister Lilly. When he becomes a 12, he goes through a huge ceremony and all the elders assign them their jobs. In this community, there is no lying, stealing, racism, pain, sunlight or color. Jonas was chosen to be The Receiver, and he didn’t know what to do because this job was such a big deal. Jonas then goes through training with the current Receiver, who is now The Giver. Training consists of The Giver passing down the memories from when the community was not what it is today. Memories that are passed down are things that are normal to us. Memories of sun, snow, pain, and sorrow.
The two novels’ family unit system is very different from each other. The family structure in The Giver is somewhat similar to ours today. The families consist of parents and children but each family unit is limited. A unit is restricted to two adult parents, one male child, and one female child. Brave New World has no family structure. A motto included in the novel states, “everyone belongs to everyone else”. Every adult lives alone in his or her own apartment with no spouse but with many sexual partners.
“The Giver” a novel by Lois Lowry (1993), is an, engaging science fiction tale that provides the reader with examples of thought provoking ethical and moral quandaries. It is a novel geared to the young teenage reader but also kept me riveted. Assigning this novel as a class assignment would provide many opportunities for teachers and students to discuss values and morals.
Lois Lowry’s The Giver considers something the world takes for granted: personal empowerment. These simple day-to-day decisions create what the world is. Without self-empowerment and right to believe in a personal decision, what is the human race? The world can only imagine, as Lois Lowry does in The Giver. She asks: What if everything in life was decided by others? What if spouses, children, the weather, education, and careers were chosen based upon the subjects’ personality? What if it didn’t matter what the subject thought? Jonas, the Receiver, lives here. He eats, sleeps, and learns in his so-called perfect world until he meets the Giver, an aged man, who transmits memories of hope, pain, color, and love. Jonas then escapes his Community with a newborn child (meant to be killed), hoping to find a life of fulfillment. On the way, he experiences pain, sees color, and feels love. Irony, symbolism, and foreshadowing are three literary devices used to imply the deeper meaning of The Giver.
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
When asked why Lowery used a dystopian society she stated, “ I chose the setting because I wanted to give the reader a warring that society will never be perfect.”(Lowry) If she would have chosen a different setting the book I do not believe the book would have been the same. Lowry stated, “that when writing The Giver created a world that existed in her imagination only. She got ride of all the things she feared and disliked: violence, prejudice, poverty and injustice.