Difference Between Sovereignity And Sovereignty

1129 Words3 Pages

Sovereignty and legitimacy appear to be the same thing, but through careful inspection, it is shown that they are positively correlated. By definition, the sovereignty of a state is a state that has the right and freedom to rule independently. Sovereignty is shown to be positively correlated to its legitimacy. By definition, the legitimacy of a government is the acceptance of the government by the people. When sovereignty is achieved, the people in a state accept the authority of their government; therefore, by being sovereign, a country should naturally achieve legitimacy.
According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, a sovereign state is one that “ governs itself independently of any foreign power.” A government achieves sovereignty when it has the legal and independent right to rule, therefore proving the authority of a government. This right of a state to rule can be achieved in several different ways, depending on its regime. Some ways to achieve sovereignty are through conquest, through an election, and through obtaining of the crown in a monarchy. For example, an authoritarian or fascist government may force its sovereignty through conquest, …show more content…

According to one source, two things should be expected from a state with political legitimacy. Firstly, a legitimate state should be more flexible and secure when dealing with any type of political, social, or economic crisis. Secondly, any rulers will be compelled to execute practical and effectual political and/or social policies to keep the state running smoothly. Because of these characteristics, having a legitimate state will provide the essential factors to create a basis of a sovereign state. For example, Declaration of Independence of 1776 provides an example of how, in a sovereign state, citizens have the power to affect political

Open Document