Difference Between Human Resource Planning And Strategic Planning

1659 Words4 Pages

How Is Human Resource Planning Integrated With Strategic Planning?

Companies don’t run themselves, and virtually every strategic planning decision has to consider the personnel issues related to it. Whether it’s having enough money to cover increased labor costs or that the initiative requires expertise the company doesn’t have, strategic planning and human resources go hand in hand.

Strategic Planning
Strategic planning focuses on what a company wants to do, rather than how it does it. For example, a company might decide it needs to diversify into new business areas because the chance for increasing its current market share is small. The strategic options might include developing new products within its current market, entering a completely …show more content…

Nor is it simply about establishing customers' requirements, important though that is. Excellence is increasingly concerned with having the individual intellectual capacity and the collective business intelligence to predict today what will happen tomorrow. Against this background, the integration of HR planning, in particular of an organization's intellectual capacity with strategic business planning, is likely to be the most effective route to true integration with business excellence. It implies a balanced approach to excellence based upon a different interpretation of motivation theory, recognizing a new balance between financial and non-financial rewards. A context in which enabling personal growth and successful contribution through opportunities to learn and apply learning successfully are the dominant drivers both for personal and for organizational advancement. Successful strategic planning seeks input from all stakeholders, including the shareholders, customers, suppliers and people, to identify the part each has to play to ensure the delivery of the business strategy. Given the global trends referred to earlier, the 'people' part of the strategic planning takes on new significance, since the capacity of the organization to learn is fundamental to improvement. The learning component of HR strategy becomes the business's own learning strategy. To harness intellectual capacity and to get and keep the best people, far more innovative approaches than performance-related pay are necessary. Organizations have to create fluid structures of employment. This may mean that it is prudent to accommodate employees' own business interests within the umbrella of the organization. To get value from their key assets, organizations need to build environments in which their people are prepared to share their ideas rather than leaving the

Open Document