Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical, moral and legal implications of euthanasia
Ethical, moral and legal implications of euthanasia
Ethics in patient care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical, moral and legal implications of euthanasia
Are euthanasia and assisted suicide the same? No, euthanasia is the willing of the patient to be killed by a lethal injection, or any other means of killing a patient. Assisted suicide is where a patient asks the doctor to prescribe a lethal amount of drugs to someone. The difference is that Euthanasia can be taking someone off life support and assisted suicide is a prescribed lethal drug. Euthanasia is the most ethical way, out of the two, to put someone down.
There are many ways of euthanizing someone. An example from Patients Rights Council is, “In this report, euthanasia is defined as intentionally, knowingly and directly acting to cause the death of another person (e.g., giving a lethal injection)” (Marker). There are more than just
…show more content…
a lethal injection; it can be the doctors purposely, with permission, forget to turn on the feeding tube. Prescribed overdose, with your consent, is not considered euthanasia. According to the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health, Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg have legalized euthanization of people while Oregon and Washington legalized physician-assisted suicide (PMC). The differences in the two legalized ways of assisting death is one is done by a physician and one is done by a doctor. They are physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia are under the argument of euthanasia. People like the United Nations do not really agree with euthanizing people, and the Hippocratic Oath is one of the reasons. Many doctors, surgeons, and veterinarians all have to take an oath, called the Hippocratic Oath.
The Hippocratic Oath states, in simplest terms, that they cannot kill any patient. There is an exception for euthanasia and assisted suicide. In BBC News stated, “Euthanasia is against the law in the UK where it is illegal to help anyone kill themselves. Voluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide can lead to imprisonment of up to 14 years.” After a big debate and statistics they changed their law, some questions were was it morally right or ethically right. This is a more of a morally right thing to do, based off of the Hippocratic Oath. Their morals call euthanasia as “mercy killing” according to BBC News (qtd. in BBC). Mercy killing is killing someone so they don’t have to suffer. In conclusion euthanasia is. There are many reasons why they would do …show more content…
so. There are many reason why people would get euthanized. According to BBC News: Most people think unbearable pain is the main reason people seek euthanasia, but some surveys in the USA and the Netherlands showed that less than a third of requests for euthanasia were because of severe pain.
Terminally ill people can have their quality of life severely damaged by physical conditions such as incontinence, nausea and vomiting, breathlessness, paralysis and difficulty in swallowing. Psychological factors that cause people to think of euthanasia include depression, fearing loss of control or dignity, feeling a burden, or dislike of being dependent.(BBC)
People who are depressed, terminally ill, and anyway people are going to eventually commit suicide might as well do euthanasia so the police don’t have to get involved in a suicide case. This would benefit ethically but also make people’s lives easier. According to the National Library of Medicine and the National Health Institute, anyone needs a written consent before doing so. This is so family members aren’t doing it to harm someone or make sure they really want to go with it.
Euthanasia is a more ethical way to put someone down than assisted suicide. Euthanasia is used as a death sentence in some places, why not the terminally ill. If someone wants to commit suicide might as well do it humanely. It is better than overdosing purposely. Choose wisely which one is legal and which one is
not.
The issues in the euthanasia debate usually revolve around patients who are terminally ill and/or suffering intractable pain. The patient must fully think about every aspect of what euthanasia would involve. I think that once a patient is seeking to end his or her life due to illness; they must have a will in place and also note the reason why they want to end their life. Euthanasia does raises lots of worrying ethical dilemmas like in what condition euthanasia can be justify, is there any ethical difference among killing someone and letting them die, is there any right to end the life of an individual who is suffering from serious
The difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide is seen this way: One way to distinguish them is to look at the last act - the act without which death would not occur. Using this distinction, if a third party performs the last act that intentionally causes a patient's death, euthanasia has occurred. For example, giving a patient a lethal injection or putting a plastic bag over her head to suffocate her would be considered euthanasia.
"People are stewards, not owners, of the life God has entrusted to them" (Vaticana, 550). To decide if euthanasia is wrong, one must first decide whom life belongs to. The Bible says, "In God's hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind" (Job 12:10). Life belongs to God and since God gave life to the human race, God should decide when it is time to take life. Also, the fifth commandment says, "Thou shall not kill." Assisted suicide and euthanasia disobey this commandment.
As stated in KWL Ethical Thinking: “It is important to distinguish between voluntary euthanasia – as when a person who is mentally competent requests that his or her life be ended – and involuntary euthanasia – as when others make the decision to intentionally end the life of a
First off, what is euthanization? reference.com describes euthanization as "the intentional ending of a life via a drug administered by a professional." There are many opinions on
Euthanasia is debated globally about whether or not it should be illegal or become legalized. Some will say that it is wrong, that it is taking the life of a human being; however, others will say that it is just taking the life of a human who is already terminally ill, and suffering. Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands, Belgium, Columbia, and Luxemburg. Assisted suicide; which is another form of euthanasia is legal in Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Canada, and in some parts of the U.S: Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Montana, and California. Despite many beliefs of euthanasia being morally wrong, it provides terminally ill patients an alternative to the painful suffering they are to experience before their death.
Suicide is legal in most parts of the United States. Since Suicide has been made legal, there have been more suicides than homicides everyday. Suicide and Euthanasia and totally different and should not be compared with each other. Suicide is the act or an instance of taking one's own life voluntarily and intentionally. Euthanasia is not a private act. It is one human being doing something that directly kills another. This is why most physicians want administer it, because it leaves them with a heavy heart, knowing they just ended a person's
Euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a terminally ill patient by means of lethal injection by a doctor in a controlled medical environment. Similarly, physician assisted suicide (PAS) is when a patient requests a lethal prescription from a doctor or pharmacist to end their life before a fatal disease does. The two are akin to each other and are almost interchangeable in definitions. Being a highly controversial topic, there is a plethora of arguments surrounding PAS, all very emotionally driven and opinionated. There are those who firmly believe that euthanasia should be legal, pointing to morality and ethics to defend their position. On the other side, of course, are those who are inflexibly against the idea of assisted suicide and wish for it to be banned immediately. Right behind them are the individuals who find PAS completely unnecessary, questioning the position of a doctor the moment they participate in assisted suicide. Finally is the notion that people have the right to euthanasia, finding protection in the US Constitution. All sides pose very solid and cohesive arguments with plenty of understandable points and respectable views.
Any discussion that pertains to the topic of euthanasia must first include a clear definition of the key terms and issues. With this in mind, it should be noted that euthanasia includes both what has been called physician-assisted "suicide" and voluntary active euthanasia. Physician-assisted suicide involves providing lethal medication(s) available to the patient to be used at a time of the patient’s own choosing (Boudreau, p.2, 2014). Indifferently, voluntary active euthanasia involves the physician taking an active role in carrying out the patient’s request, and usually involves intravenous delivery of a lethal substance. Physician-assisted suicide is felt to be easier psychologically for the physician and patient than euthanasia because
Whose life is it, anyway? Euthanasia is a word that means good death. Euthanasia normally implies that the act must be initiated by the person who wishes to commit suicide. But, some people define euthanasia to include both voluntary and involuntary termination of life. Physician assisted suicide is when a physician supplies information and/or the means of committing suicide (lethal dose of sleeping pills or carbon monoxide gas) to a person, so that they can easily terminate their own life.
The voluntary active euthanasia is legitimately moral. It is morally right for a person to seek euthanasia because it is their freedom or autonomy to control their own lives. It ends the suffering of the patient without harming other people. Furthermore, it prevents the person to suffer by giving him/her lethal injection or medication that prevents a person to die slowly with pain. On the other hand, the arguments against euthanasia are not sound. A thorough assessment will protect patient who request euthanasia for the benefits of others. A patient who seek for euthanasia does not use him/herself as means, but as ends to respect his/her own humanity. Furthermore, God as a benevolent will not allow a person to suffer which endorse the purpose of euthanasia – to end suffering. Therefore, voluntary active euthanasia should be legalized in the United States.
According Richard Gula, active euthanasia is legally considered homicide (5). Another intervention and approach to euthanasia could be through the use of analgesic means. The use of morphine or other anesthetic medication could be used to allow the patient to die or hasten their dying process. I consider the latter procedure to be more humane than that of the other because it is morally wrong to kill a person, rather it's humane for someone to die naturally. Before I discuss the rights and wrongs of euthanasia, I will define death or a person, when is it safe to say...
First of all, euthanasia saves money and resources. The amount of money for health care in each country, and the number of beds and doctors in each hospital are limited. It is a huge waste if we use those money and resources to lengthen the lives of those who have an incurable disease and want to die themselves rather than saving the lives of the ones with a curable ailment. When we put those patients who ask for euthanasia to death, then the waiting list for each hospital will shorten. Then, the health care money of each country, the hospital beds, and the energy of the doctors can be used on the ones who can be cured, and can get back to normal and able to continue contributing to the society. Isn’t this a better way of using money and resources rather than unnaturally extend those incurable people’s lives?
Euthanasia is a medical procedure which speeds up the process of dying for people with incurable, painful, or distressing diseases. The patient’s doctor can stop treatment and instead let them die from their illness. It come from the Greek words for 'good' and 'death', and is also called mercy killing. Euthanasia is illegal in most countries including the UK . If you suffer from an incurable disease, you cannot legally terminate your life. However, in a number of European countries it is possible to go to a clinic which will assist you to die gracefully under some very strict circumstances.
Euthanasia is ending the life of a person deliberately to relieve their pain. It usually happens when a person is terminally ill or is suffering from a lot of pain and there is no other option to relieve the pain.