Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gospel portrayals of jesus
Gospel portrayals of jesus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gospel portrayals of jesus
An increasingly common phenomenon in the church today, particularly in more liberal streams of Christianity, is the privileging of one attribute of God over another. Perhaps the most frequent example of this is the privileging of God's love over his justice. Those who fall prey to this dichotomy draw a distinction between God in the Old and New Testaments. In the Old Testament, God is viewed as a being of wrath who mercilessly executes judgment on the pagan and sinner. In the New Testament, however, with the coming of Christ, God is seen as more benevolent, loving, and gracious to the sinner. Those who espouse this view hold up the actions of Jesus toward a variety of sinners: the Samaritan woman at the well, the woman caught in adultery, Zacchaeus, and more. They argue that Jesus was far more interested in showing love, forgiveness, and grace than wrath and judgment. They believe rightly that “God loves you just the way you …show more content…
There is a reciprocal and symbiotic relationship between the two. Each is dependent on the other for its proper functioning. In the same way, in the case of privileging the love or justice of God, Kapic would likely point out that there must instead be reciprocation between the two of them. God is not either loving or wrathful; gracious or just; merciful or holy. He is all these things, in perfect measure, and at all times. In fact, the perfect justice of God informs his lovingkindness, and his love tempers his justice and wrath. Once again, Kapic echoes this reality when stating, “We tend to choose between the Lord’s grandeur or his mercy, but we must consistently resist this choice. Simply put, a faithful theologian is someone who – like the psalmist – knows that God’s glory is gracious and that his grace is
It also follows that God, not as benevolent as could be hoped, prefers the maximization of good (2) as opposed to the minimization of evil (1). This is disquieting for the individual who might be the victim of suffering a “greater good.”
God is sinless, loving, forgiving and full of wisdom. God’s love is shown throughout the Old and New Testaments. Many times throughout the Old
The Christian faith focuses on the orientation of the human heart behind human thoughts and actions. Living by faith is a beautiful alternative to the way people think of themselves and the way they live in relation to others in their daily lives (Merrick, 2014). Christians see themselves in terms of God’s profound love for them but not in terms of what they do. The teachings of the Christian faith; nonviolence, non-retaliation, inward integrity, selflessness, and love your neighbor as yourself provide the framework for ethical thinking. Although, adopting belief in Christianity can bring forth confusion in the heart and mind causing agony of learning to sacrifice one’s rightful claims for personal justice for the restoration of another (Merrick, 2014). Unconditional forgiveness is difficult to understand because spiritual forgiveness and actual costly forgiveness is viewed as the same in the gospel. If you do not forgive, then one does not have faith in God’s forgiveness as it really is. Christianity influences a person thinking and behavior developing wisdom which requires faith. The faith that is needed to reorient the heart away from selfishness to selflessness.
Moreover, Stern’s explains how God is the creator of all things he is the uncreated [author’s italicization]. Furthermore, he gives in details God’s unfailing love for his creation by showing creation right from wrong. “According to the New Testament, he is love. His love is expressed, in part, in providing law
N.T Wright (2008) stated that “When we read the scriptures as Christians, we read it precisely as people of the new covenant and of the new creation” (p.281). In this statement, the author reveals a paradigm of scriptural interpretation that exists for him as a Christian, theologian, and profession and Bishop. When one surveys the entirety of modern Christendom, one finds a variety of methods and perspectives on biblical interpretation, and indeed on the how one defines the meaning in the parables of Jesus. Capon (2002) and Snodgrass (2008) offer differing perspectives on how one should approach the scriptures and how the true sense of meaning should be extracted. This paper will serve as a brief examination of the methodologies presented by these two authors. Let us begin, with an
This paper is written to discuss the many different ideas that have been discussed over the first half of Theology 104. This class went over many topics which gave me a much better understanding of Christianity, Jesus, and the Bible. I will be addressing two topics of which I feel are very important to Christianity. First, I will be focusing on the question did Jesus claim to be God? This is one of the biggest challenges of the Bibles that come up quite often. Secondly, I will focus on character development.
Within the law there are three functions; the curb function, mirror function and a rule. These three uses of the law act as a path to fulfill civil righteousness to therefore become closer to Christ. The three different functions of the law all have their different effects. While these three functions are based on people’s reactions to the law, the overall outcomes are based on their sinfulness and unsuccessful completions of God’s commands. As stated by Mueller, ‘“The law affects people externally as a “curb” and internally as a “mirror”’ (Mueller, 43). The third use of the law acts as the function for someone to be saved by grace alone apart from the overall co...
The implementation of this new ethical paradigm allowed for Abrahamic societies to link their belief in God to common social values and responsibilities (Stark, 2001). The approach which Judaism, Christianity and Islam each take toward these common social values and responsibilities displays which values are held highest in each religion. Despite differences in each religion’s approach, common themes exist. The role of justice and forgiveness in each religion displays a common belief that man’s nature is to stray from God’s justice, but that man can ultimately connect with the divine through the contemplation and understanding of what is good and right.
Abstract: Deneff begins with a discussion of the state of holiness in modern times. For him, the church has not sufficiently approached this subject with the intensity it deserves. This can be seen in how the values of Christians are often the same as those of secular people. The only way for people to truly embrace moral living, however, is the a strong embrace of religious principles. From here he moves on to articulate some of the ways our culture has begun to incorrectly think about God. In modern times we no longer see God as frighteningly holy, we see Him as a sort of pushover who doesn’t demand a certain standard of living. In ancient times, people were afraid of mispronouncing the name Yahweh, now we think we can come to God without
In Judaism, God is seen as having a contractual relationship with the Jewish people where they must obey his holy laws in return for their status of the chosen people. God rewards or punishes Jewish people based on whether they obey or disobey his will. In parts of the Old Testament, however, God does show mercy or forgiveness, and in later interpretations God’s laws such as the Ten Commandments are followed
Jesus and Paul are two crucial characters in the New Testament. They both depict the Gospel on which Christianity is based upon, but there is debate about rather these two versions of the Gospel are complementary. Scholars like George Shaw claim that Paul is “anti-Christian,” and he “produced a fantastic theology” (Shaw 415-416). On the other hand, I believe that even though Jesus and Paul may present the Gospel differently at times, they are still advocating the same religion. Through the understanding of the similarities, differences, and contexts of the Gospels and Paul’s letters, it is clear that Jesus and Paul have the same underlining values and practice the same religion.
In the days of Christ’s life on this earth, believers did not have access to the Bible in its entirety as we know and are familiar with today. Believers in this ancient time period only had access to the Old Testament. However, through their access to the Old Testament, believers were provided a foundation for New Testament times. This foundation provided New Testament believers with the Lord’s established principles of right and wrong they were expected to follow. In addition, the Old Testament is overflowing with accounts of people whose lives exemplified the future life of Christ on this earth. These pictures allowed the Israelite nation to begin to have an understanding of why Christ needed to come as their Messiah and the work He needed to do on earth. Finally, there are common themes that are interwoven throughout the entire Old Testament. Three of these themes: transgression, redemption, and consummation point to the purpose of Christ’s atoning death on the cross. These themes portray God’s work both in the lives of Old Testament believers, but they also foreshadow God’s desire and plan for believers in New Testament times and beyond.
Every author depicts information in light of purposes and themes. Sometimes these themes are moral issues, emotions, or existential concepts. In the case of the Old Testament, the authors wrote books that highlighted various ideas such as love, obedience, and suffering. Despite various subtopics, the Old Testament clearly demonstrates the theme of God’s faithfulness to his followers.
Be Merciful (Luke 6:31). "Be merciful just as your father is merciful." (Matthew 5:7): "Happy are those who are merciful to others; God will be merciful to them." The passage s teaches us mainly about being merciful to our enemy and God will be merciful toward us. Forgiveness of kind especially toward our enemy. We should not harm others even if they done bad things against us. We should show compassion towards others because if we don't people might not show compassion towards us. The passage told us that Jesus is merciful even towards his enemies. Perfect example of this is forgiving Jusus' enemy when he was put on the cross. Jesus even prayed for them to not punish them.
This research will show how that both retributive and remunerative righteousness have been demonstrated in the covenants that God has made with his people throughout history, and how in the exercising of divine justice God is righteous when He punishes violations of His covenants and when He rewards those who are obedient to His covenants.