Devlin's Arguments Used To Prevent The Disintegration Of Society

215 Words1 Page

Devlin raises two theses that illicit a response from Hart. The first is the Moderate (Disintegration) thesis which claims that a shared morality is the cement of society and necessary to its continued existence. Additionally, the thesis supports that threats to society are to be justifiably punished in order to prevent the disintegration of society. The second thesis raised by Devlin, the Extreme (Conservative) thesis, states that a society is more than justified but rather entitled to preserve its values and ways of life. I would like to clarify that within this context Devlin is focusing on criminal law specifically, but even so, connections can still be drawn between his arguments and the statements used to support the 1984 National Organ

Open Document