Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on political parties
An essay on political parties
The role of political parties in election
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on political parties
Citizens of the United States rely heavily on their representatives to ensure that their concerns are heard, as well as that their needs are met. Descriptive and agency representation are two types of representation. Descriptive representation is the idea that one will get representation when they share characteristics with representatives such as race, religion, and gender (Conover, 10/13). This means that persons who have similar backgrounds and experiences should also have similar political preferences. Therefore, the characteristics of the elected representatives should clearly epitomize the characteristics of their constituents. The importance of descriptive representation regarding the American Democracy is that it enhances the representation …show more content…
Therefore, Congress is supposed to be responsible for reflecting the ideas and beliefs of its constituents by speaking and acting on their behalf. Unfortunately, Congress has not been extremely representative of the American people. The New York Times article “Lost in America” elaborates on the negative feelings that today’s American’s have towards government officials. Referring to the number of Senators and Representatives in Congress who sought after and won re-election, the article stated “The tyranny of money, patronage, name recognition and gerrymandering in American politics guaranteed as much” (NYT, 8/26, A23). Congress consists mainly of white, middle aged, protestant, upper-class males (Conover, 10/13). Therefore several groups, such as women, non-whites, and the poor are significantly underrepresented within the membership of Congress. Also, as a result of consisting mainly of elite men, Congress does not appear to have the descriptive representation previously explained. In order to convey the idea of descriptive representation, members of Congress would need to look more comparable to a downsized America, with numbers reflecting similar demographics rather than focusing on one …show more content…
This is when a districts lines have clearly been drawn by state legislators for partisan and incumbent benefit (Conover, 10/13). Therefore, gerrymandering lessens how representative Congress is of the American people because its purpose is increase the number of votes for whom the one drawing the district lines, usually the state legislator, wants to win, while making the votes of the opponents less significant. Typically, those in charge of redistricting focus on devaluing the votes of minorities in order to maintain majority. There are three types of gerrymandering; cracking, packing, and tacking. Packing is when there is a concentration of a certain type of voters into one district to reduce their influence (Conover, 10/13). For instance, an example of this would be if all the mass amount of Democrats within a district were packed into a single district. Cracking is when specific types of voters are spread out among several districts so they do not get enough votes in a district to win (Conover, 10/13). An example being breaking up groups of Hispanics over several districts so that their votes do not hold as much value as they would have had there been a significant number of Hispanics over the span of a few districts. Finally, tacking is when unusual shaped districts are created to focus majority party power, usually by tacking one district to another faraway district (Conover, 10/13). An example of this may
The excerpt “Congress: The Electoral Connection” written by David Mayhew centers around the fundamental arguments that discusses how members of congress are self-interested for reelection. Mayhew further elaborates on his idea by discussing the electoral activities that congress members devote their time into and resource from, which are advertising, credit-claiming, and position taking. Mayhew’s excerpt further examines the framework in how congress operates which contributes to the explanation of how and why congress partakes in the certain electoral activities.
What motivates members of Congress to act the way they do? Mayhew would argue in Congress: The Electoral Connection that members of Congress are ‘’single-minded re-election seekers’’ and that re-election is their one and only goal. Whilst the assumption that all members of Congress are ‘‘single-minded re-election seekers’’ does go some distance in analysing the motives behind members of Congress, the reading fails to take into account the other key goals of members of Congress. Other goals include good policy and future career positions. It is important to remember that the achievement of both re-election and other goals are not exclusive, members of Congress often are motivated by more than one goal.
In his article, “Homestyle,” Richard Fenno seeks to answer one question: How does an elected representative's view of his/her district affect his or her political behavior? To answer this question, Fenno identifies what a Member of Congress’s
In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In “If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?” author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation.
The politico model of representation is the most appropriate representation for congressional members to follow. Because the public
Representation: the effort of elected officials to look out for the interests of those who elect them
Redistricting is the legislative political process of redrawing the geographic boundaries of congressional district based on population following the decennial census. Each state is obligated to adhere to certain Supreme Court requirements regarding redistricting. Respective districts within a state should ensure population equality, contiguity, compactness and no discrimination against minority. Districts can be drawn to protect incumbents. The process of deliberately modifying districts in order to increase the partisan advantage of a particular political party is called gerrymandering.
When gerrymandering occurs, a political party draws the boundaries of an electoral district in a way that helps their party win elections over the other parties. For example, if a Republican controls a state, and it appears like the party will lose a seat in the future, the Republicans will draw the district in a way to exclude as many Democratic voters as possible. Perhaps they will do this by removing a democratic stronghold from one district and adding it to another district that will either easily go Republican or will have a Democratic representative no matter what happens. Before 1964, the majority party could draw districts in any way they wanted to, and chaos ensued. Consequently, in 1964, the U.S Supreme Court legislated that the districts “had to contain equal population, and be as compact as possible” (“Gerrymandering”). Every ten years the U.S. issues a census to determine the population of each state. After this, each state receives their share of the 435 seats, and then the state gets to break the population into the corresponding number of districts. This whole process, known as reapportionment, takes weeks to determine, and in many cases, courts must determine the shape and area of each district. Even though the districts must contain equal population, gerry...
At first, I thought that just splitting up the population into districts with relatively square shaped would be the correct way to make the candidates happy. I attempted to make their houses the center of the district and expanded from there until I got the population equal. Voters in states like Idaho wouldn’t benefit from this. There are other problems when it comes to gerrymandering. While a candidate from the majority party has the advantage, it doesn’t allow for a third party candidate to have as much of a chance.
The single-member district election system is the most common and best-known electoral system currently in use in America. It is used to elect the U.S. House Representatives, as well as many state and local legislatures. Under single member district systems, an area is divided into a number of geographically defined voting districts, each represented by a single elected official. Voters can only vote for their district’s representative, with the individual receiving the most votes winning election. This method of electing representatives is better than any alternative solution in various ways. Four compelling reasons to support the single-member district election system include the fact that single-member districts give each voter a single, easily identifiable district member; the way single-member district voting helps protect against overreaching party influence; that single-member districts ensure geographic representation; and finally, that single-member districts are the best way to maximize representatives’ accountability.
Stephen Medvic, In Defense of Politicians, discusses why Americans feel that politicians are dishonest. In 2007, a Gallup poll about honesty and ethical standards for occupations, showed that only 12 and 9 percent of people felt that Congressmen and State office holders held high standards, (Medvic p. 2). In addition, Americans tend to like their representatives more than the members of Congress because they view them as actual people. Americans view Congress as a group of politicians who are greedy and not representing their interests, (Medvic p. 4).
From unresponsive and unrepresentative government to increasing polarization and political gridlock, gerrymandering, specifically partisan gerrymandering, is to blame. Furthermore, the “first past the post” system of American democracy only strengthens the effects of Gerrymandering as the winner of the election, and the winner alone, gains power. There is incredible initiative for parties to create as many favorable districts as possible so they may either retain or gain power. Given that many states grant the power of redistricting to the state legislature, concerns of unfair districting as a result of partisan interests are valid.
South University Online. (2013). POL2076: American Government: Week 4: People and Politics—Interest Groups. Retrieved from http://myeclassonline.com
Since gerrymandering is the process of dividing legislative districts with a clear motive of attaining the most seats in legislature as possible, we can say that this is done for partisan gain and not for the good of the country and general people. In a sound democratic system, voters should be able to choose their representatives through elections. However, when representatives get the chance to draw their own legislative district lines, lawmakers have the power to choose their voters instead. When one political party has control over the state government, voters in the opposition party are unable to come up with an effective strategy within a reasonable time-frame. Everyone: Voters, representatives and our democracy all lose. Gerrymandering is not just the geographical division, but those lines can often lead to cut traditional legislative districts off from one another. For instance, if someone from a particular region is bounded to some cultural and traditional practices and if the area was gerrymandered in irregular manner, it would completely cut off cultural, traditional and historical communities from one another. This practice cripples the power of voters, has continued for a really long time and must come to an
This picture, probably the only one in existence of all my friends together, has more meaning than it seems. At first, it appears to be nothing more than a happy congregation of teenagers, all from the ages of fifteen to sixteen. In the background you can see a fence enclosing a sand volleyball court. My friends that are kneeling on the bottom row are Shawn (who is affectionately known as Goose because of his long neck and his last name being Gosselin) and Paul. The ones on the top row are, from left to right, Brad, Matt, Kayla, Charlie, Jenny, Greg, Brent, and Daniel. I am at the far right side. You can tell by the expressions on some of their faces, especially Paul's, that they weren't quite ready for the picture to be taken, for more reasons than one. First, there was someone else taking a picture at the same time. Also, most of them never could have guessed that the picture would have to be taken in the first place. After all, I was supposed to be with them forever, right? Wrong. This was my going-away party.