Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of csr
What is CSR and its Description? According to the publication ‘Making Good Business Sense’ by Lord Holme and Richard Watts, they defined CSR as: “Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large”. It is a duty of every corporate body to protect the interest of the society at large. The main motive of the business shouldn’t only aim to earn profits but also take interests for the welfare of society and perform its activities within the framework of environmental norms. Companies should voluntarily agree to contribute both socially …show more content…
The term Corporate Social Responsibility a.k.a CSR was coined in the year 1953. The earliest mention of CSR was in HR Bowen’s Social Responsibilities of the Businessman who is undoubtedly the “Father of Corporate Social Responsibility” because in his publication he said that several hundred businesses were vital centres of power and decision making processes and they have had major influences and touched lives of many citizens. There is no acknowledgement of Business Woman probably meaning women weren’t involved. Bowen’s initial definition of the social responsibilities of businessmen was “It refers to the obligations of businessmen to pursue those policies, to make those decisions, or to follow those lines of action which are desirable in terms of the objectives and values of our society” Another interesting mention in his publication was CSR or the “social consciousness,” of managers meant that Businessmen were responsible for the consequences of their actions in a sphere somewhat wider than that covered by their profit-and-loss statements. And not to my surprise, 93.5% of Businessmen responding agreed to this …show more content…
Nike has understood that very clearly and in turn it gives back A LOT. They have had huge impacts on the people they’re working with or providing services to. They want to create long term positive changes so that everyone can get access to sport, the employees and partners support communities in which all of us live in! They have spent more than 52.7 million dollars investing in community all over the world alone. The introduction of their ‘WE portal’ has brought all their employees together to do activities involving community, volunteering and service. Due to this, employees are so satisfied that they have voluntarily contributed about 1.4 million dollars in the year 2013 from 1.1 million dollars in 2012. They take involve themselves in disaster reliefs, donating money in millions, rebuilding houses, distributing essential supplies and donating meals to the needy after the after-effects of a disastrous natural calamity. For example they used their own 2-million dollars to help in rebuilding after the destructing damage caused to the US east coast by the Superstorm Sandy. Access to
Social responsibility can be defined as “the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Mallen Baker, 2004). In addition, social responsibility has been defined differently by various corporate leaders that provide guidelines which impacts how one manages the core business. Social responsibility is an essential part of a business. If managed correctly should strengthen the competitive spirit of the company and provide prosperity to society.
Most brands have a set ‘corporate responsibility’ belief, but Nike seem to be acting on the belief with the best outcome. Nike’s ‘my time is now’ campaign gave back to a sport that accounts for a large sum of their profit by hunting for footballing talent. Nike celebrated a new generation of footballers with ‘The Chance’, an extension to the campaign. This is accompanied by an environmental scheme using recycled polyester, diverting 2 billion plastic bottles since 2010, bettering products and improving lives. They class it as “innovating for a better world” (Nike;2014). They divert back to sport constantly with schemes and foundations. Believing that sport is for everybody, they do what they can to allow everybody the access to sport as they believe it as the “greatest investment a society can make” (Nike;2014). The best example of their worldwide responsibility being achieved was with ‘The Nike Foundation’. The Nike foundation allowed adolescent girls to end their own poverty and make changes for the world. The idea was to unlock potential in the most deprived places.
To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? So before we go into greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit society.... ...
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept whereby organizations consider the wellbeing of the public by taking responsibility for the effect of their actions on all stakeholders; customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment in every aspect of their operations. This responsibility is seen to extend beyond the statutory obligation to comply with legislation and sees organizations willingly undertaking additional steps to improve the quality of life for employees and their families as well as for the local community and society at large.
Milton Friedman presents a compelling argument in “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits” by arguing that businesses need to focus only on increasing their profits and integrating social responsibility will only hurt them as a company. Since “only people can have responsibilities” (Friedman 52), Friedman argues that businesses as a whole do not have any type of real responsibilities because there is not a singular person for these responsibilities to fall on. Corporate executives are people as well and may feel they have social responsibilities to society but these “are the social responsibilities of individuals, not of business” (51). In terms of corporations, the businessmen are the ones that hold the responsibility of the company. Friedman argues that the only responsibility these managers hold is to those who own the corporation, the shareholders. If the individuals themselves want to contribute to social responsibility they must do it with their own money in their personal lives, but they should not use social responsibility in
According to Mike Peng, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the consideration and response to issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm to accomplish social benefits along with traditional economic gains the firm seeks. CSR is a way in which a company seeks to achieve a balance between profit, environmental concerns and social imperatives. This is known as the ‘Triple-Botto...
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
Nike impacts communities, cities, states, countries, and the world. Cheyenne says, “We sit down with students and help them with their education. We provide children with after-school programs, so we can help them stay fit. We also do lots of charity work…we donate a lot to hospitals” (Nike, Cheyenne. Personal Interview.
Covey & Brown (2001) “the role of business in society has progressed over the years, from being primarily concerned with profit for sharehold¬ers to a stakeholder and community approach with a focus on corporate social responsibility”
The first discussion question posed was, “How does Dr. Friedman characterize discussions on the “social responsibilities of business”? Why (Jennings, 2009, p. 79)? Friedman (1970) characterized the discussions on social responsibilities as one hundred percent unadulterated socialism. Friedman (1970) characterized these discussions in that manner because he felt that a corporate executive should focus solely on making profits and not on social aspects. He mentioned how people who conduct and express themselves in this fashion are positively reinforcing and supporting the actions of individuals that have been weakening the foundational blocks of free society. Friedman (1970) posed a question which was the crux of his 1970 article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” where he investigated the true contextual meaning of what responsibilities mean to businesses. Friedman describes how businesses cann...
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
The classical view of CSR is a prominent ideology which business organizations are seen merely as profit-driven organizations. Simply put, businesses work for the sole purpose of making a profit. Thus, this profit motive is the sufficient and unique social identifier that separates a business organization from other institutions in society. These business organizations have a limited, yet essential role in society. Social concerns are considered important, but businesses, in the classical view, are focused solely on the economic activities and are judged accordingly. By having a limited role in society (i.e.,...
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an ability to evaluate and initiate things independently to be responsible for the organization’s effects on both social well-being and environment issues. It may involve short-term costs that mostly apply to the company’s effort to develop positive environmental and social changes.
Corporate Social Responsibility is an organisation’s obligation to serve the company’s own interest and the one’s of the society. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility has a definition of a concept where the companies integrate social and the environmental concerns into their own business operation and also on a basis of voluntary with their interactions they have with the stakeholders. Corporate Social Resp...
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its