Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Key terms of discrimination
What is discrimination? An action intended to exclude another group An indication of low self-esteem A preconceived attitude about another group
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Key terms of discrimination
This analysis will serve to measure the accusation of discrimination by Mr. Ron Whyme against We Deny Everything Insurance Company (WDE). As explained by Nelson (2009), in order for prima face discrimination to have taken please, one must demonstrate they are part of a protected class; that they applied for the job; were rejected for the job or promotion, and the job was filled by someone else. The analysis will be measured by the most widely and legally accepted method of conducting the analysis is measuring the factors by the 4/5ths (or Griggs) rule. By using the 4/5ths rule as a determination for the outcome of the analysis, the protected class is compared to the majority group by dividing the number of individuals applied by the number
hired. “Under the 4/5ths rule, if the selection ratio for protected class A (the minority group) is less than 80 percent of the selection ratio for protected class B (the majority group), then the plaintiff has statistical evidence of adverse impact discrimination, or there is a prima facie case of discrimination” (Nelson, 2009, slide 5). In this case, the four regional center managers (RCM) were all over the age of 40, and considered part of the protected class. “The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) forbids age discrimination against people who are age 40 or older” (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, n.d.). All RCM’s were considered for the role of corporate claims specialist (CCS), but none were hired, resulting in age discrimination based on the 4/5ths rule. Finally, WDE lacks validation of their hiring procedure. Validation s described by Nelson (2009) as the process of collecting evidence which supports tests and measures. Validation is a vital part of the procedure outlined by the EEOC when analyzing the protected class. In conclusion, the analysis supports the claim of Mr. Whyme against WDE based on three determining factors; the 4/5ths rule outcome, Mr. Whyme being part of a protected class, and because WDE lacks validation.
After applying the four-fifth’s rule, and examining the selection ratios for all job categories, it is determined that the evidence points to disparate impact discrimination.
One of the issues in the case EEOC v. Target Corp. is that the EEOC alleged that Target violated the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by engaging in race discrimination against African-American applicants who were interested in management positions. It is argued that Target did not give the opportunity to schedule an interview to plaintiffs, Kalisha White, Ralpheal Edgeston and Cherise Brown-Easley, because of racial discrimination. On the other hand, it argues that Target is in violation of the Act because the company failed to retain and present records that would determine if there was reason to believe that an unlawful practice had been committed.
Hamblett, M. (2004, August 26). 2nd Circuit: Impact of Employer Acts Grounds for Suit: Court rules on disparate impact theory of recovery. New York Law Journal. Retrieved April 4, 2005 from http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1090180422885
1. Were Mr. Goebel and other African-American applicants victims of racial discrimination because of the hiring policies of the defendant? Explain your position and cite all relevant case law. If you cannot take a definitive position, explain what specific information you require to be able to take a
Discrimination in the workplace continues to be topics and issues of discussion, despite efforts to minimize or eliminate its ugly head. Discrimination is defined as the unfair or prejudicial treatment of people based on race, gender, disability or age (Fieser, 2015). Furthermore, some companies has used other forms in conjunction with discrimination like sexual harassment to mask unjust treatment in the workplace. Lilly Ledbetter was an employee at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. for over 19 years. During this period, she consistently received low rankings in her annual performance-and-salary reviews. As a result, Lilly received significantly lower raises than her male counterparts, which led to her filing a civil lawsuit
...evidence, the committee should have adhered to the Cumberland plant HR Director’s correspondence that clearly stated that interviewers should not award points to candidates for being a “diversity candidate” and “it is really important up front before your interviews start to have a definition of what ‘Outstanding,’ ‘Well-Qualified,’ and ‘Qualified’ is. This needs to be documented and dated before the interview process starts” (Walsh, 2010). The district court found the interviewers placed candidates in these categories after the interviews and ranking had been completed. In turn, this ensured the number of “Outstanding” applicants equaled the ‘exact’ number of job openings and their candidates of choice were in the top 10 group. As a result, TVA should ensure a legitimate matrix is developed for scoring purposes and not be manipulated for preferred results.
There were a few issues of fairness presented in Michael Simpson’s case that happens in in real world work places that prevents employees from working to their full potential or causing them to leave the work place all together. In this case study Michael Simpson is faced with the dilemma of whether or not he should leave Avery McNeil, the accounting at which he is currently working at. Simpson had interviewed with many consulting firms before graduating college, and had chosen Avery McNeil because it had the potential to allow him the most rapid advancement in his career. Within two years of working their he was promoted to manager and he received a great pay raise. However, a few days later Simpson came upon a sheet with pay grades of other
Rebecca M Blank; Marilyn Dabady; Constance F Citro. Measuring racial discrimination. WorldCat. Washington, DC : National Academies Press, 2004.
depending on the level of discrimination and the particular population affected by the actions of
Disparate treatment is a form of discrimination that is prohibited by laws in which all employers must comply, including fire and emergency services. Disparate treatment in the workplace is applicable to many functions of the workplace, including, discipline, promotions, hiring, firing, benefits, layoffs, and testing (Varone, 2012). The claim of disparate treatment arises when a person or group “is treated differently because of a prohibited classification” (Varone, 2012, p. 439). In the 2010 case, Lewis v. City of Chicago, six plaintiffs accused the city of disparate treatment following testing for open positions within the Chicago Fire Department (Lewis v. City of Chicago, 2010). The case is based on the argument that the Chicago Fire Department firefighter candidate testing, which was conducted in 1995, followed an unfair process of grouping eligible candidates, therefore discriminating against candidates of African-American descent.
So when describing discrimination suits, the plaintiff typically alleges that the performance measurement system unjustly discriminated against them because of age, race, or gender. All things considered, many performance measures are subjective, and we have seen that individual biases can affect them,
Discrimination is known to exist in all workplaces, sometimes it is too subtle to notice, and other times it is exceedingly obvious. It is known that everyone subconsciously discriminates, dependant on their own beliefs and environments that surround them. However, discrimination can be either positive or negative in their results, and sometimes discrimination is a necessary part of life.
This chapter has presented some common issues that plague employers around the country. Companies have continued to evolve, they look for ways improve and define job criterions and assessments. These methods establish identifying traits that the best applicant should possess for different types of employment opportunities. It is imperative that the applicant’s rights balance the scales of prescreening. The case overview in this assignment looks at how measuring prescreening test as a condition of employment can create conflicts with the Title VII protected classes and rights of the applicants in this case.
Harassment and discrimination can affect a business in many ways. Having a history of harassment and discrimination claims can damage a business’ reputation and affect its bottom line. It can cost the business current and future clients as well as investors and employees. Depending on the gravity of the claim(s), the process of settling the claim(s) can take anywhere from months to years. Meanwhile, the cost of the settlement and other fees continue to add up. A business might have to compensate the affected parties besides paying court fees and lawyers. The EEOC has seen a rise in monetary rewards from 7.5 million to 24.3 million (Glazer, 1996) However, all of these can be avoided by properly educating employers and employees about their rights and what harassment and discrimination entails.
Many job seekers will face employment discrimination or perhaps to be treated differently because of their skin color, age, or religion. Although it is illegal to discriminate in hiring and firing, however, one of the mo...