Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of standardized tests
Standardized testing in education
The truth about standardized tests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of standardized tests
Since elementary school, students have been sharpening their No. 2 pencils, preparing to fill in the bubbles on their standardized tests. To younger children, these tests aren’t a very big deal. But little do they know that the tests they take in elementary school are practice for the biggest test they will take in their lives. This test is the ACT, or the SAT. These tests are a huge deal. Students’ results on these tests could change their plans for the future, and that’s a lot of pressure. So are these tests really all that they are made out to be? Are they really that important enough to stress about so much? Many people have started to say that standardized tests are hurting American schools, and that they put too much pressure on students. …show more content…
Standardized tests hurt students. Standardized tests provide parents and teachers with a false sense of security, they create stress, and they are dehumanizing. 36 and 2400. These two numbers are the most important numbers to students who are taking standardized tests. Standardized tests have been a part of an American student’s life for more than 50 years. The earliest record of standardized testing comes from China. The most famous standardized tests are the SATs, the Scholastic Aptitude Test, and the ACTs, American College Testing. The ACT test measures what a student should have already learned. On the other hand, the SAT test is more like a test to see what a student is able to learn, it may have material that the student has not learned yet. Although both of these tests are meant to test the students’ learning, many people say that they are not accurate. They provide parents and teachers with false information, a false sense of security. In an ABC article, John Allen Paulos wanted to see how predictive SAT test scores really were. He wanted to see the correlation between high school SAT scores and first-year college grade point averages. Most of the studies found that the correlation between SAT scores and first-year college grades is not overwhelming, and that only 10 percent to 20 percent of the variation in first-year GPA is explained by SAT scores. Generally, if a student scores well on a test, it assumes that they know the material. However, this assumption may not be true at all. The student may have just memorized the fact, formula, equation, etc., that was necessary to do well on the test. This also brings up the fact that some students are just naturally gifted in taking standardized tests, while others are not. Standardized tests do not even provide any feedback to students on how they can perform better on their next tests. The results are not given back to the teachers and students until months later. When these results come back, there are not any instructions provided by the test companies on how the student can improve these test scores. “All the SAT measures is how well you take the SAT. It does not reveal how smart a person you are. The SAT does not measure the skills needed for college, and it certainly does not predict how well I am going to do in college classes. In fact, studies have shown that high school grades are a better predictor of grades in college than an SAT score.” (Amanda Chan, 1) For most students, stressful is the one word to describe standardized tests. Brain research has suggested that too much stress is psychologically and physically harmful. This also goes back to the fact that some students are just better test takers than others, and this fact could greatly affect students’ scores. When stress becomes too overwhelming, the brain shifts into a “fight or flight” response. If the brain is under too much stress it chooses to either fight with what it is facing or flight, give up on it. Shifting to this place can make it is impossible to engage in the higher-order thinking processes that are necessary to respond correctly to the standardized test questions. The responses to these questions affect the students’ future. They put so much pressure on themselves to do well because their mind set is on the fact that their score will affect what college they get into, what career they will be able to pursue, what their parents’ reactions will be like, and what their future will turn out to be. Since students know that test scores may affect their future lives, some of them do whatever they can to pass the tests. Ways to pass these tests include cheating and taking performance drugs. Because teachers know that test scores may affect their salaries and job security, they also cheat. Teachers are spending more and more time “teaching to the test.” Instead, of teaching students interesting, compelling, useful, or favorable subjects that are going to help build up the development of a student’s understanding of the world, teachers take time preparing students for the tests which shuts out the possibility of learning anything new or important. There is also stress involved after taking the test. Students who do well on the test get caught up on a cycle of great achievement. They have to continue keeping up with the cycle. They stress over keeping up the cycle at all costs through at least sixteen years of schooling. Students who don’t do too well stress about how well they’ll do on the next test they will take. They stress about what they are going to do with their life next. Standardized tests are dehumanizing.
The world is no longer concerned with educating whole human beings, but instead, it is focused on collecting “data.” “Standardized testing robs students and teachers of using their creativity and critical thinking. It holds everyone accountable for meeting this one standard when that is nearly impossible to do. It turns us into robots, dehumanizing both teachers and students.” (Gettysburg College, 1) Standardized test are given to schools by the government. The problem with that is that the government is not in the classroom with students every day. They do not know what the students need. Standardized testing takes away time from student learning experiences where they are not able to think critically or be creative. Standardized tests take place in an artificial learning environment. They are timed, students are not allowed to ask questions, use references, talk to another student, and they cannot even get up and move around. All of these things do not mirror the reality of the real world at all. These tests are reducing the richness of human experience and human learning to a number/ set of numbers. A student may have a deep knowledge of a particular subject, but receive no acknowledgement for it because their test score may have been low. Maybe if students could draw a picture, lead a group discussion, or make a hands-on project, they could show all the knowledge that they really have. They cannot do any of these things in a standardized test. As stated before, testing also creates “winners” and losers.” The “winners” get to move on with their life, but the “losers” often suffer from loss of self-esteem and the damage of “low expectations.” Standardized tests do not value diversity either. There are a wide range of differences in the people who take standardized tests. People have different cultural backgrounds, different levels of proficiency in the English language, different learning and thinking styles, different
family backgrounds, and different past experiences. These tests treat everyone as though everyone is identical, which is far from the truth. There is so much emphasis and pressure put on standardized tests. They come with costs, stress, and pressure, but they are a norm in America. There needs to be a better source of education for students. Standardized tests provide parents and teachers with a false sense of security, they create stress, and they are dehumanizing. 36 and 2400. Are these numbers really worth aiming for?
This is precisely the problem. Standardized tests are old and outdated, and the harm they cause to America’s education system by far outweighs the benefits. These tests were intended to monitor and offer ways to improve how public schools function, but instead they have impaired the natural learning ability of students and imposed upon the judgment of experienced educators. Although a means to evaluate the progress of public schools is necessary, it is also necessary to develop more modern and effective ways of doing so. Standardized testing mandated by the federal and state governments has a negative effect on the education of America’s youth.
One time I heard a teacher at my old high school tell a new teacher that their job is to teach to the test and nothing else. I did not really know what she meant, but I knew something about what she said sounded very wrong. I thought why are they just teaching us how to pass the test instead of just teaching us what we need to know? Later I found out that whether or not I graduate depends on passing the test. The idea of standardized testing to say whether or not students graduate is a bad one. Not just bad for schools, principals, and teachers, but it can mean the end of a student’s future before it begins. That means not only does schools suffer, but everyone in our communities, states, and country suffers. It used to be that students had to take standardized tests every year. The results of these tests said what school districts would get more money or less money for the next school year. And it would also tell schools and teachers if some students needed to be put into higher level programs such as gifted and talented or advanced placement courses or if they were having problems and should be put in special education.
Standardized tests have been used to see how much a child has learned over a certain period of time. These tests have been a highly debated issue with many parents and just people in general. In the article “Opting out of standardized tests? Wrong answer,” the author Michelle Rhee argues that people should not be trying to opt out of standardized tests because it allows the country to see how much a child has learned and the things they need to improve. On the other hand, in the article “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong,” the author Kristina Rizga argues that standardized tests are not an efficient way to measure a student’s intelligence.
Standardized testing assesses students, teachers, and the school itself, which puts a great deal of pressure on the students. High scores show that the school is effective in teaching students, while low test scores make teachers and schools look as though they are not teaching the students properly. This is not always the case. There are teachers who do teach students what they need to know to pass the test, but their students are still unprepared. Although teachers try to improve instruction, student performance is still variable to other factors that the school cannot control.
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine ranking of people.
tests were primarily employed as measures of student achievement that could be reported to parents, and as a means of noting state and district trends (Moon 2) . Teachers paid little attention to these tests, which in turn had little impact on curriculum. However, in the continuing quest for better schools and high achieving students, testing has become a central focus of policy and practice. Standardized tests are tests that attempt to present unbiased material under the same, predetermined conditions and with consistent scoring and interpretation so that students have equal opportunities to give correct answers and receive an accurate assessment. The idea is that these similarities allow the highest degree of certainty in comparing result...
In order to pass this testing done in elementary and secondary school, every single student needs to have the same knowledge. It does not take into account any disabilities, anybody that thinks outside the box. Everybody taking the test has to meet a certain criteria. Does standardized testing really prepare students to expand themselves? Teachers are concentrated yearlong is providing information for students to pass these tests. All they are doing are causing students to memorize information that will them pass these standardized tests. Children are not learning. Children are not getting education. They are memorizing information. They are all memorizing the same information as if they were robots preprogrammed to do whatever the owner asks of them. These standardized tests are eliminating the ability for students themselves to critically
The National Education Association (NEA) conducted a survey, wherein teachers were asked various questions about the impact standardized testing has had in their classrooms. According to Tim Walker, “Forty-two percent of the surveyed teachers reported that the emphasis on improving standardized test scores had a ‘negative impact’ on their classroom, while only 15 percent said the impact was ‘positive,’” (para.5). According to this survey, fifty-two percent of teachers said that too much time on test prep, with it being estimated that the average teacher spends about thirty percent of class time focused on preparing for the test (Walker para.7). Despite the majority of teachers, the people who see the effects the most, reporting that standardized testing does significant harm to education, the results of the exams are still stressed far too much. It would appear that the stress on standardized testing has taken its toll on the educators, too, as forty-five percent of surveyed teachers reported that they had considered quitting due to the rising importance of standardized testing and their results (Walker para.
It’s an age-old question. Do standardized tests really show what students know? Some may think they are a great way to measure education and others may think that one test does not justify a child’s knowledge. What is this test exactly? A standardized test is any test that requires all test takers to answer the same questions, or a selection of questions from a common bank of questions, in the same way. They are used to “judge” or “measure” the knowledge or skills that students learn in school. The problem with these standardized tests is that they measure all students on the same material, leaving out special skills the student may have. It also puts a great deal of stress on a student to know that they will be timed on these questions that
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
These tests are pressed upon not only the children, to see their rank in understanding the curriculum that is being thrust on them, but it is also pressed on the teachers. To be more specific, these tests change not only the way a teacher approaches the subject matter, they actually dictate what will be taught. This, in turn, leads to less time- if any time at all- that educators may pursue arts, extracurricular activities, or anything more in depth that could be seen as fostering a well-rounded curriculum. While others may argue that standardized testing is the best education style for children, that is not entirely so. Alicia Anthony of Oureverydaylife.com in her article “The Effects of Standardized Tests on Teachers and Students” further advocates my argument by expressing “Significant time is devoted to test preparation, including review worksheets and practice tests. These activities take away from higher-order thinking instruction, which has been proven to have more long-term benefits for students.” In essence, these tests are creating less time to dedicate to critical and creative
Almost every student takes them, dreads them, and stresses over them. They measure the growth and knowledge of a student, determining their aptitude for college. But are they truly accurate? Standardized tests “are defined as any test that is administered, scored, and interpreted in a standard, predetermined way” (Mooney 10). Both the SAT and ACTS are controlled, unvariable systems that supposedly assess students in the most fair method. Primarily, “in the West standardized tests in schools appeared during the Industrial Revolution” (Mooney 11). Gradually growing and becoming more common, these tests became “standard” for their time. However, “in 1983 a report cited statistical evidence- 23 million American adults were functionally illiterate
In August of 2004, a New Mexico high school teacher reported that many students didn’t take their standardized testing seriously because it didn’t affect their grades. Instead, this junior class at New Mexico Valley High School had “fun” with their testing, filling in answers in shapes such as Christmas trees, battleships, and hearts (Contreras). Though many teens understand that standardized testing isn’t completely helpful, school corporations still administer them. Why? Many would say that they assess the teachers and measure the intelligence and performance of students, but it is arguable that they are unnecessary and measure the amount that students care and/or pay attention instead.
It's nearing the end of the school year, and students and teachers alike are in a panic. Have the teachers taught enough? Have the students learned enough? All this worry and stress stems from one very specific issue: standardized testing. All of this commotion is just another indicator the standardized testing does more harm than good. Standardized testing is an inefficient and harmful practice that puts too much pressure on students, incorrectly categorizes test-takers, and results in ineffective teaching. (maybe rephrase, order-wise)
On the surface, the objective measures of today’s standardized tests sound sensible. In theory, they give every student a solid picture of achievement, and an equal opportunity for advancement. But after years of memorization and drills, what were once intellectually excited and motivated five-year-olds have become bored or grade-obsessed teenagers. Their thrill over accomplishing real tasks and exhibiting real skills is replaced with anxiety over upcoming tests and a concern for high grades. By giving the exams such importance, they are stripping the classrooms of all of the freedom of learning and encouraging the students to focus, not on what they want to learn, but what they have to learn to pass the exams. But isn’t accepting the pitfalls of societal norms a necessary part of growing up?