Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the historical significance of proclamation of 1763
Stamp act and its effects
What is the historical significance of proclamation of 1763
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ragini Inguva
Period 2
9/16/15
Due to the damaging French and Indian War, the British rapidly lost money and went into debt post-war. This had a tremendous effect on both the colonists and many British citizens as well. The British began to tax both its’ citizens and the particularly the colonists at high prices to compensate for the great loss they had suffered due to the war they had to fight in the Americas. Right after the war, the British had to send over extra military forces in order to enforce the Proclamation of 1763 and make sure that the new taxes would be enforced as well but this also took a great deal of finances from the government’s pockets. The government appointed George Grenville to solve England’s financial crisis
…show more content…
as it had gotten out of hand. This period after the war also marked the end of Britain’s method of control on the colonies called salutary neglect- they started to impose more rules and become stricter with the amount of control they held over the colonists. To address the taxation of the colonists first, George Grenville came up with strict acts to regain the money lost. The British imposed many different acts on the colonists, namely the Currency Act of 1764, The Sugar Act of 1764, and the Stamp Act of 1765. The Currency Act was designed to reduce the loss of money due to the high and inflation and the low value of the colonists local currency. The colonists were banned from using any form of paper money. The next enforcement, the Sugar Act was designed to replace the previously ineffective Molasses’ Act. Colonists were then being charged a higher rate on their sugar. The last act was the Stamp Act and this was one of the most controversial of them all, it was an act that taxed many common goods and rather than following this Act, most people smuggled even at the risk of being tried in a vice-admiralty court. There were many other Acts that the British enforced but the listed three really triggered American resistance after the French and Indian War. Americans were upset at this taxation and resisted the British efforts to enforce the taxes because they were not getting a say in the taxation and they felt like they were being treated as inferior to the English residents. Many patriots believed that the Parliament did not have any right to tax the colonies because each individual colony had their own government to internally tax them. One of the things that had a great influence on the American resistance to these taxes was the Enlightenment movement. Many colonists applied John Locke’s principle of every human’s natural right to the ‘forceful’ British taxation. As a result of the injustice the American’s felt, they were very resistant to the British efforts. The colonists started to move away from abiding to the British parliamentary laws and rather focusing on their own colonial laws when they began to protest the British laws formally in a legal setting.
The House of Burgesses kicked off these formal complaints to in 1765 and later that same year the Stamp Act Congress took place. Rather than just occupying the Americas as English citizens, the colonists at this point began to use their local governments as the basis for all of their laws. Many colonial Leaders began to argue the Enlightenment philosophies like natural rights and these arguments would ultimately lay the foundation for the Declaration of Independence and the fundamental reasons for the separation between England and the United States. A group of colonial leaders that really led this movement toward independence were the Sons of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty was a group of colonists including many patriots who were intent on securing their rights as citizens of England and later wanted to completely separate from the nation. Although there were many patriots who consciously made the decision to shift toward colonial leadership as opposed to staying loyal there were also the people who wanted to stay true to Britain and those were the Loyalists who did not participate in the resistance against the British. Soon, with all the combined taxation that was being imposed on the colonies, the propaganda spread about the British by the Sons of Liberty, and …show more content…
Enlightenment philosophies - the colonies were moving toward revolution and war against the British at a quick pace. The different approaches to the acts resulted in the final unification of the colonies. Patriot leaders began to attempt to unify all the colonists under one cause by spreading propaganda like the Boston Massacre engraving and talking of the ideals about liberties and natural rights. Due to all of the Acts being enacted by the British that were loading an unfair amount of tax on the colonies, there was already a moderate base of people that had issues with the English but more people would continue to start unifying into a single unit because continuing bad decisions that King George makes in response to colonist resistance. The big organization that united the colonies and gave them something in common to feel like one entity were the Committees of Correspondence. These committees allowed the colonies to communicate grievances about the British to one another, share news about anything occurring, and start slowly developing what was later the American identity. Although there were a few measures taken to unite the colonies, the development of one, strong unified identity was a long ways away even during the Revolution. Although many people were uniting under one cause, there would still be a strong divide between a Virginian and a New Englander, for example. a.
One of the first elements of the engraving that portrays the artist’s perspective about the incident of the Boston Massacre was that the “Red Coats” or the British are more clearly identified and they stand taller than the blurred-out, faded colonists. This element makes it seem like the British were brutally attacking an innocent group of colonists. Another piece that we can see is that the Captain in the painting is holding an arm outward which usually indicates that he is giving an order. Not much is known about how the fighting during the Boston Massacre actually started but one thing that is definitely known is that the British Captain did not give the order to shoot so the artist clearly tried to omit this fact and show the British in a worse light for the propaganda piece. A third part of this painting is that the only group of armed people in the engraving are the British, with large rifles. However, during the actual Boston Massacre, the colonists were not completely innocent- they were throwing stones and other large objects right at the officers in a mob formation. The artist is clearly trying to show the British in the worst possible light by engraving it in this
fashion. b. There were many reasons why the Boston Massacre did not directly lead to war with the British. During this time period, not everyone was really convinced that they should think about separating with the British and instigate war with them. A lot of colonists did not even care about the incidents occurring all the way in Boston because their focus was solely on their own separate colony. In fact, even the patriots were not all interested in separating, they just wanted a say in the Parliament and more rights as British citizens. On top of that, many colonists were either Loyalists or undecided between the two groups. Those who were undecided were the prey of people like Sam Adams who spread propaganda like the Boston Massacre engraving and although some swayed, it took a while to gain a majority of the people to be patriots and wage war against the British. Close after the incident, there was a battle at Lexington and Concord but even after that, the colonists sent out a letter apologizing to King called the Olive Branch petition. So clearly, the colonists were not ready because of the amount of people they had and because they were not in the right mentality yet to go to war with Britain right after the Boston Massacre. c. Another event that could be used by the colonial propagandists to rile up the colonists against the British would be the events during the battle at Lexington and Concord. A picture of the Red Coats, similar to the Boston Massacre engraving, marching to Concord in order to capture any colonials carrying weapons would be effective in angering the colonists just as the method worked with the engraving of the Boston Massacre. It would work because it can show how the British wanted to suppress the colonists and take away their rights without hesitation.
After the French and Indian War, the British were unimpressed with the colonial war efforts and generally assumed they were unable to defend the western frontier, whereas the colonists thought they had done well in all of the wars and were confident that they could defend themselves. This led to conflict between the two nations, brought on by the costs of the wars. Landowners in Britain wanted to reduce the taxes placed upon them. King George III and the Whigs supported a colonial policy that would abandon salutary neglect and force the colonies to support the cost of the British empire. In addition to this the British began to be more present in the colonies, beginning with Pontiac’s rebellion where the British sent troops instead of letting the colonial forces respond to the attack, because of their thoughts on the colonists military efforts. The Proclamation o...
The British colonies in America from the time they were established up until around 1763 had a policy of Salutary Neglect. Salutary Neglect meant that the British would not interfere with the colonies national or even international affairs. This benefitted the colonies, they got to experience some forms of democracy, and they also were able to experience independence in a way though they took it for granted. The British after the Seven Years War, which was fought on American soil, for the Americans protection, decided that the colonies should be required to pay for it in taxes. Britain was in debt, and their economy was in a recession, so the well off colonies tax money would have helped them considerably. The tax would only be the beginning to a long line of British policies further upsetting the colonial people.
The patriots are making drawings and paintings were drawn for the Boston massacre that doesn't show accurate events or make us look bad. In document 1(The Boston Massacre (1770)) a patriots, Paul Revere made an engraving that shows that the red coats (the British army) are just firing at the patriots. In the caption it states “… help to increase the Americans’ outrage over the Boston massacre.” The engraving was made to anger the colonist because the British is just firing their guns at the patriots. The Boston massacre happened because the patriots started to throw at thing like snowballs at the red coats. In class (America the Story of Us), the video we saw it showed that the patriots threw something at the loyalist first. The gun fire wasn’t on purpose. It was a mistake and when one gun goes off all the guns goes off. The red coats didn’t want to fight. So the patriots are trying to make us look bad when the British were innocent.
After the French and Indian War ended in 1763, Great Britain had nearly gone bankrupt paying for the war. The British thought it was only logical to start new taxes against the colonists. After all, to the British, they had fought the war in the name of the colonies and in what they believed was in their best interest. Many different types of taxes came and went to help pay for the debt. Over time, the
After the French and Indian War, the British government decided to make the American colonies pay a large share of the war debt with new taxes that they issued. The English ...
It was the 4th of July in 1776 when delegates from all thirteen colonies assembled at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Not knowing the full significance of what was about to take place that day,the delegates would do something that would forever change the course of the American people.
The population of Boston in 1765 was over twenty thousand people, and it was the second largest city in the country. The city was split up into two political factions, the loyalists, also known as the “Tories” were loyal to the British nation and respected and followed their policies. The other group was the Patriots, they too pledged alliance with the British, but they also believed strongly in their colonial rights, and more often then not went against parliamentary decisions. America still had not declared independence from England in 1765, and was expected to follow the rules of the parliament and the King. The government like all other states was structured differently, but the people elected their representatives. Unlike the British who let the people vote, but they are “indirectly represented” by Parliament. The stamp act was one of the first things Britain did to upset the colonies. John Adams who was a prospering young lawyer at the time, called the Stamp Act “That enormous engine, fabricated by the British Parliament, for battering down all the rights and liberties of America.” The stamp act put a tax on legal documents, and other paper items. The Americans called this “Taxation without representation”, because they didn’t have any elected officials in Parliament, who were representing them. The Americans petitioned the administration, but the King and Parliament simply ignored our pleas. This act caused the formation of the loyal nine.
In the 1760s, Boston was full of disorder. With each new British law came protest from American colonists. The people of Boston believed that Britain did not have the right to tax them because they did not elect their representatives in Parliament. Only the Massachusetts Assembly, whose members were elected every year, had the right to tax its citizens. The Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767 led to boycotts and unrest, steered by a group known as the Sons of Liberty. As a result, the British government sent troops to Boston to keep order. Instead of staying in a fort on an island in the Boston harbor, the British troops stayed on the commons and were living in buildings in the middle of town. The British troops’ presence in Boston was not welcome and Bostonians viewed them as a threat. Because they did not like the English army in their city, fights between the American colonists and the British troops were common.
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence for the American colonists to proclaim freedom from Great Britain's oppressor, King George III. American colonists had been suffering for many years when this important document was drafted. King George III had pushed the colonists into a state of tyranny and most decided it was time to start an independent nation under a different type of government. Jefferson focused his piece toward many audiences. He wanted not only King George III and the British Parliament to know the American's feelings, but also the entire world. The time had come for an immense change amongst the American colonists and Jefferson made sure everyone was aware of it by using his superior strategies of persuasion.
By 1776, England had fully colonized the America’s eastern coast. The colonists felt they were not adequately represented in Parliament and resented being told they had to shelter British soldiers, pay exorbitant taxes they never agreed to, and that those who had settled beyond the Appalachian Mountains needed to move back east. Trade was restricted in a way that forced the colonists to pay taxes. Jefferson was called upon to draft the Declaration of Independence, which stated that the Creator endowed all men the rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. By 1783, England recognized the United States of America as a sovereign nation.
When in the course of the household we, the teens, have always had the responsibility of doing the chores around the house.When oneself has to do chores one has to miss out on hanging out with friends, going to the mall, et cetera. Of course we do not wish to be disrespectful toward our parents but it is now time that we write our own Declaration of Independence. It is important that our parents or guardians know how everyone feels about the chores that have been placed on us and why we should be independent.
The Declaration of Independence includes four parts. The first part is the Preamble, which explains why the Continental Congress drew up the Declaration. They felt their reason should be explained to England.
There are many important factors in the Declaration of Independence, which enable the foundation of a new government. These range from describing grievances with England, to how government should be run differently, to the first statement of separation. The first step to the foundation of a new government is the uniting of a people in a common goal. Since all people were feeling violated by English soldiers, it was necessary to state these grievances in order to make people aware that they are not alone. When people learned that others felt the same as them emotion was stirred. The Declaration of Independence listed the grievances such as, “He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” The next important step to the foundation of a new government was to gain peoples ambition by showing how the government would be run if a new party took over. This goal was achieved by stating the rights of man. “We hold these truths to be self evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This statement made people hopeful and feel kindly toward this new government. The final step in the preparation for a new government was separation from the old government. This was declared twice in the Declaration of Independence. In the beginning, “That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, driving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and in the end, “that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved. In conclusion, the Declaration of Independence was able to motivate people, give them ambition, and made it simple for Americans to take action.
What is the Declaration of Independence? The declaration of independence states that all individuals have inalienable rights, requiring life, liberty, and property, a document by which the thirteen colonies proclaimed their independence from Great Britain. If these rights are not protected, people have the right to abolish the government and institute a new one that is willing to secure those rights and their happiness. The declaration was written by Jefferson when he had the vision that America should be liberal. While liberals wanted to over through the government, conservatives believed that not every person should receive the same privilege, not every person is the same and therefore, not every person should be created equal. America is viewed as a liberal state. Thomas Jefferson once said, “When the people fear the government, there is tyranny, when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” This was the strongest reason for the people to bear arms, so that they can be protected from tyranny in the government. People wanted their independence.
The British citizens were being heavily taxed and the French and Indian War had taxed the British heavily. They thought that it was only right that the colonists whom they had spent so much money protecting, and who were taxed lightly in comparison with the other British citizens, to help pay. Note please that prior to this the British had allowed the colonists to tax themselves and did not impose revenue raising...