Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comment on the theme of deception
Essays on deception in relationships
Essays on deception in relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Deception is portrayed in many forms in life. Through family, friends, strangers, and even government, it is hard to trust anyone. The novel Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier, tells the story of how a lower-middle class woman navigates her new, fancier life filled with deception and mystery. Deception is a huge theme in Rebecca because there are many instances of it throughout. Rebecca deceives everyone into thinking she is innocent and pure, while Max and she deceive everyone into thinking that they have a happy marriage are the ideal couple. Another theme is justice and how to decide what is morally right. The plot and character development of Rebecca and Maxim show this because Max needs justification in his murder of Rebecca. The character …show more content…
development of Max is important because he goes from a quiet, mysterious stranger to revealing his darkest secret to his new bride, and expecting her to stick with him through the ordeal. Rebecca’s development also goes along with her deception and how she was seen as perfect at the beginning, but her dark side is eventually revealed.
The Narrator’s character also develops from a shy and quiet girl to a strong-willed young woman. The Narrator’s point of view can also be examined as she is retelling the story from a number of years later, so it may not all be accurate. The setting, and possibly characterization, of the home, Manderley, is very significant because it was the scene of many of the most important events hat transpired throughout the story.
Notably, the title character of Rebecca is the character that is the most fascinating. She is already deceased when the story starts, so her development cannot be changed or stopped, because it has already happened it just needs to be revealed. After Max admits to killing Rebecca, he tells the story of how she tricked everyone she met, “’No one would guess meeting her that she was not the kindest, most generous, most gifted person in the world”(du Maurier 271). Anyone who had ever met Rebecca would immediately fall in love with her and think that she was just the most wonderful person. She was very smart in how she acted to make people think that she was truly this kind and welcoming, and knew exactly how to talk to everyone so
…show more content…
that they would only see her as wonderful. Later on, it is revealed that Rebecca had a separate living space in London where she kept her improper acts separate from Manderley, “What she did in London did not touch me-because of Manderley […] I told her she could see her friends in London” (275). Rebecca saw her “friends” in London and would casually keep up her appearances at Manderley, so that she and Maxim could still be seen as the happy couple they were. However, she started seducing men at Manderley, and bringing them to her boat house on the property, “She used to have this fellow Favell [her cousin] down to the cottage […] Then she would spend the night down there with him”(277). Rebecca was so dissatisfied and unsettled that she had affairs with her cousin, and Max did not like that because it was not in London and it was too close to Manderley, which was his place. Rebecca turned out to be a deceiving, manipulative, and highly disturbed individual, but few knew this side of her. Max was first introduced at the hotel Cote d’Azur as a kind man who actually talked and interacted with the Narrator, “’I’m afraid I must contradict you […] you are both having coffee with me’” (14). Max is seen as very kind because usually Mrs. Van Hopper’s guests forget about the Narrator, and she sits at a different table and quietly eats her meal or drinks her tea. Maxim is the first guest who has treated her like a human being, not only at tea time but also when he starts a romantic relationship with the Narrator. When he “proposes”, it is very abrupt and not like the Max who drove around with the Narrator, “No, I’m asking you to marry me, you little fool” (51). Max is starting to develop into his condescending self now because he knows that he can have someone to be superior to. Although he does eventually admit to loving the Narrator, he also has a superiority complex. Then, when he admits to killing Rebecca, a whole new side of him is exposed, “’She turned round and faced me, smiling […] When I killed her she was smiling still. I fired at her heart” (280). Max reveals that he actually felt inferior, for once, to Rebecca. She had been playing him ever since the start of their marriage, and he could not take being manipulated to, or not having power. Max felt like the only way to regain his power, and life, would be to kill Rebecca, and that is exactly what he did. The characters of Rebecca and Max both develop into colder, and more selfish beings as they both realize that the other needs to be in power. The theme of justice is very significant because Max kills Rebecca, but faces no consequences for his actions.
It could be argued that since Rebecca was so horrible to him that she deserved it, and that is what the Narrator makes it seem like. After it is found out that Rebecca could have been suicidal, because she only had a couple months to live, Jack Favell is visibly devastated and remarks “The law can get you yet, and so can I, in a different way…”(370). Since Rebecca’s death was ruled a suicide, Max will face no legal consequences for his actions, only a semi-guilty conscious. Max seems above the law because he is upper class, and he covered up his mistakes very well. However, it is inferred that Julyan, the Colonel who was investigating this case, most likely knew that Max killed Rebecca, ”’He knew,’ said Maxim slowly, ‘of course he knew’”(374). If Julyan did know that Max killed Rebecca, he chose to ignore the law wither for lack of evidence against Max, Max’s social class, or he felt like Rebecca deserved it. Due to the fact that only Max, Frank, and the Narrator were some of the only people who knew about Rebecca’s manipulation, it would be left that he did not accuse Max because of lack of evidence and Max’s social class. The judge had also already decided that Rebecca committed suicide, and there was a great deal of evidence that supported this theory, so there would be no point in trying to dispute that at this point in time. Another huge theme is
deception. Like stated before, Rebecca deceived everyone she met by seeming like she was a wonderful person, but in reality she was terrible and manipulative. Rebecca even tried to seduce Frank, a loyal friend of Max, “’He broke down and told me. She never left him alone, he said, she was always going down to his house, trying to get him to the cottage. […] [Frank] who had always thought we were the normal happy married couple we pretended to be’” (275). Max and Rebecca bot were deceitful to their friends and family with their marriage, but Rebecca took it too far. Max and Rebecca had an agreement that she would leave her improper events for London, and Max would have Manderley, but she eventually brought them to Manderley, and even tried to seduce one of her husband’s dear friends. Therefore, the themes of justice and deception are both prevalent and evident through the characters of Rebecca and Max. The Narrator has many interesting aspects about herself. To begin with, the Narrator is for the most part a reliable narrator, but there are many instances where she goes off into her imagination and imagines different outcomes of events. This can be confusing at times because it is not certain if she is recounting what actually happened or if she went off into her imagination. After the inquest into Rebecca’s death, the Narrator is back at Manderley and thinking about what would happen if Max is found guilty, “I did not know what happened. I did not know what people did. […] Suppose Maxim was taken away?”(315). Although it is obvious that she is using her imagination, the language and how much detail she brings in from her own life can make it confusing at times. Another unreliability is that this is being retold after many years, so it is natural that some things might be forgotten or misremembered. Also, the only the only side that is mentioned is Max’s side of the story, and he could be making Rebecca seem untrustworthy in order to gain sympathy and have a reason to have killed Rebecca. Although, Rebecca may have been a manipulative person, it cannot be completely trusted because there is only one side, and it is impossible for the other side to be heard because Rebecca is dead. Finally, barely any personal details about the Narrator are revealed in her retelling. When the Narrator and Max first start talking, he asks her age, “and when I [the Narrator] told him he laughed” (27). The age is revealed to Max, but not to whomever she is retelling the story to. Something else that is never revealed is the name of the Narrator, she is simply referred to as Mrs. de Winter. A possible reason for keeping the Narrator’s age and name a secret is to keep her anonymous, to not have her replace Rebecca, and that the story is more about Rebecca than the narrator. The Narrator also is a new Mrs. de Winter, so by not giving her another name than that makes her anonymous and easier to relate to. The story is mostly about Rebecca, and how she changed everything around her while she was alive, but it does not focus on the Narrator that much, so there is no need to give her a name because even though she is the narrator, she is not that important. Obviously she tells the story and adds more emotion to the plot, but overall she is not helpful in plot advancement. The narrator adds emotion because she is very emotional to the murder confession, and the events that follow, and that adds more suspense and emotion because it is viewed through her eyes, as someone who love Max and did nothing wrong. Therefore, the Narrator is unreliable due to the fact that she is retelling the story from many years later, and the story is not about her so that is why she is not given a name or age. Therefore, through many aspects of the novel, the themes of justice and deception and thoroughly evident. The characters of Rebecca and Max go though many changes and they both become more manipulative and power hungry over the course of their marriage. The themes of justice and deceptions are again both evident in the characters of Max and Rebecca. Justice is not served for Rebecca because she does not deserve it, and Max is above the law because he is of an upper class. Rebecca is the most deceptive and manipulative character, because she manipulates men to have affairs with her so she can feel fulfilled, and so that she can have power. Her marriage to Max is also deceptive because everyone thinks that they are a very happily and in love couple, but that is not the case at all. Finally, the Narrator’s point of view is unreliable because only one side of the mystery is seen, Max’s, and it is not certain if Rebecca was actually that manipulative. Also, the Narrator does not receive a name or age to keep the focus on Rebecca, because the story is mostly about her and what she has done. To conclude, deception and justice work very well together, because in order to have justice served, everything must be clear and precise, and there can be no deception.
Throughout the novel, crucial family members and friends of the girl that died are meticulously reshaped by her absence. Lindsey, the sister, outgrows her timidity and develops a brave, fearless demeanor, while at the same time she glows with independence. Abigail, the mother, frees herself from the barbed wire that protected her loved ones yet caused her great pain, as well as learns that withdrawing oneself from their role in society may be the most favorable choice. Ruth, the remote friend from school, determines her career that will last a lifetime. and escapes from the dark place that she was drowning in before. Thus, next time one is overcome with grief, they must remember that constructive change is guaranteed to
The creative writing techniques that Wharton uses within her writing enhance the story and make it worth reading. Wharton is very descriptive in almost every aspect of her story. This gives the reader another element to the story rather than just reading dialogue or general descriptions. A point where Wharton gets descriptive, is when she starts to explain Frome’s house and how “ the image (of itself) presents of a life linked with the soil, and enclosing in itself the chief sources of warmth and nourishment, or whether merely because of the consolatory thought that it enables the dwellers in that harsh climate to get to their mornings’ work without facing the weather, it is certain that the ‘L’ rather the house itself seems to be the center, the actual hearth-stone of the New England farm” (Wharton 11). This shows how detailed Wharton can get. It not only gives the reader a g...
The conventions that Rebecca reflects of the romantic genre are those of the characteristics of the hero and heroine (as mentioned above). The heroine is usually innocent and vulnerable with low confidence and low self-esteem. The narrator of the novel also holds these characteristics. The first impression of the hero seems rude, arrogant and insufferable but the heroine soon realises she was wrong and sees the hero differently. This is also a convention of the Romantic genre. Rebecca also subverts certain aspects of the genre, such as the ?happily ever after? ending to most romantic novels. The gothic genre is also found in the novel, with the spirit of Rebecca haunting Maxim and the narrator?s marriage.
Deception is an effective parenting tool. Maternal deception is present throughout the book as the mothers and grandmothers guide their daughters to happiness through misleading stories, and warnings to brighten their daughters’ future. This is particularly evident in the relationship between Waverly and her mother Lindo Jong. Earlier, Lindo learns that Waverly already secretly engaged with her fiancé Rich, but pretends not to know. She did not act on it so she could have an untainted view on whether Rich is a good husband for Waverly. This works well for Waverly, as Waverly put, “I came up with a brilliant plan. I concocted a way for Rich to meet my mother and win her over” (Amy Tan 194). Many family friends come over to have dinner at Lindo’s house. During the dinner, Waverly introduces Rich to Lindo, and Lindo wastes no time as “she scrutinized him from head to toe, checking her appraisal of him…” (Tan 195-196) When Waverly asks Lindo of her opinion about Rich, her only comment is on his freckles. In the end, it turns out that the random comment means that she is fine with him, but it does deceive Waverly that Lindo might not like Rich. Lindo appears ...
For example, Ruth May is usually very objective in her descriptions of things and enjoys people viewing her that way. For example, she says that her parents “won’t talk about the bad things in front of my sisters, but me I can listen all the livelong day while I’m getting me a banana in the kitchen house and peeling it” (Kingsolver 51). Not only does Ruth May remain objective, but the majority of her views come from her parents and sisters rather than directly from herself since she is immersed in their life and everyone else around believes that she is too young to have a view or opinion on anything. On the contrary, Rachel is very subjective in the novel and tries to involve herself in a variety of situations. For example, she is very self-centered and focused on what will happen to her. This is still the case when she says “the instant we get back to Georgia I am filing for an adoption” (Kingsolver 268). So not only does Rachel put herself directly in the middle of a situation, she declares it and wants everyone to know. Rachel has a difficult time remaining objective throughout the novel and therefore often loses her unreliability as a narrator. Each of the other characters have differing narrative perspectives than Rachel and Ruth May. However, it is this that shapes the novel and its structure as a circular
An example is her torture during the majority of the book. In 6th grade she went to her friends party, and to her astonishment, a couple began making out in the closet. She called her mom to tell her what was going on and her mom told the mother ...
An Ivy League girl who has no daddy issues and a rich family is no better than any other woman because she has never taken her clothes off for money. A girl is no better than a woman who allows people to caress her, or escorts on the side based on her boundaries. Different things work for different people. Free a woman to live the life in which she is more than the way she looks, what she buys or what she has to sell, and she will amount beyond what society could have even imagined for her. Compromise for the sake of being accepted is insolent. Once the boundaries set by society are broken, society does everything within its power to contain the beasts again. Daphne Du Maurier felt the restraints 1920s society placed on her with idealizing domestic women. By using Rebecca as the backbone within her novel and counteracting such a strong character with the weak narrator, Du Maurier displays that oppression can only be destroyed with rebellion. In Rebecca, Daphne Du Maurier uses the contrast of female personas to emphasize the 1920s society’s malevolence towards women and justify their right to break out of patriarchal submission in order to be distinguished as an equal.
In Daphne Du Maurier’s Rebecca, Rebecca de Winter, the first wife of Maxim de Winter, imposes her presence posthumously into Manderley. Rebecca’s power over the de Winters is compared to an ivy “held place in [the] lost garden…and would soon encroach upon the house itself”, who had “thrown her tendrils about the pair and made them prisoners” (Du Maurier 3). Although the reader never sees Rebecca as a living character, her lust for power over Maxim is ever present. Rebecca’s power over the narrator and Manderley is well represented by Mrs. Danvers, a ghastly housemaid who remains loyal to the original Mrs. de Winter. Mrs. Danvers, who is like a puppet for Rebecca, states, “sometimes, when I walk along the corridor here, I fancy I hear her just
Location, location, location--physical setting functions symbolically in Jane Eyre. The author and filmmakers work with place to add depth to thematic concerns. Each location in Jane Eyre represents a different stage in Jane Eyre’s life, her childhood happens at Gateshead. She then moves on to her education at Lowood Institute until she wants to get out into the world and seek her fortune. Next at Thornfield comes young love, where she finds mystery and temptation. Afterward Jane endures a temporary banishment at Moor House and in the little town of Morton, where she discovers friends and relatives.at the novels end Jane experiences mature love at Ferndean when she returns to Rochester.
The setting used throughout the novel Wuthering Heights, helps to set the mood to describe the characters. We find two households separated by the cold, muddy, and barren moors, one by the name of Wuthering Heights, and the other Thrushcross Grange. Each house stands alone, in the mist of the dreary land, and the atmosphere creates a mood of isolation. These two places, Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross Grange differ greatly in appearance and mood. These differences reflect the universal conflict between storm and calm that Emily Bronte develops as the theme.
Jane Austen completes her story with a “Cinderella ending” of Catherine and Henry marrying. However, her novel is more than a fairytale ending. Although often wrong and misguided in their judgments, she shows the supremacy of males that permeated throughout her society. Jane Austen takes us from a portrayal of men as rude, self-centered, and opinionate to uncaring, demanding, and lying to downright ruthless, hurtful, and evil. John Thorpe’s and General Tilney’s total disregard for others feelings and their villainous ways prove Austen’s point. Whether reading Northanger Abbey for the happy ending or the moral lesson, this novel has much to offer.
Imagination is the actions of forming new ideas, or images not present to the senses. It creates a form of what is real and what is not real, and sometimes can separate a person from reality. In the novel Rebecca by Daphne duMarier, Daphne portrays the narrator as having a very imaginative mind. One of the biggest key roles played upon the character is imagination, and the narrator shows imagination can conjure up unnecessary events in a person’s mins The narrator In the novel lets her imagination take over her mind, causing her to change the way she behaves, causing her to become self conscious, and altering her relationship with the people around her, and as well as her husband.
... represents his ultimate downfall. By the end of the novel, Nelly, the narrator, is well read, even commenting that she ‘could not open a book in the library that [she had] not looked into.’ (ch. 7). She even manages the finances of the house, which, when this book was written would have been strictly a male-only affair. Having previously only taken over the narration from chapter four onwards from Lockwood, who is condescending about local people, again showing a great challenge to male dominance by narrating almost the whole story.
She first begins with the introduction of Jane Austen’s life circumstances, how small amount of money she had with her mother and her sister and the better life circumstances of her five brother whilst they had got access to work that was paid, inheritance and preference and also the right for independence, personal power that is prosperous and masculinity.
She hides her actions and attempt to justify them until she is expose by the letter from the paper regarding her novel entry. She is ignorant to her unrealistic judgements about Cecilia and Robert and attempts to fix the problem when she made it worse. She realizes her mistake when the letter questions the conflict of her novel and she witnesses her attempt to hide the true horror behind her decision. While she attempts at hiding her problem in the draft, she made it more noticeable to the paper and drain the luster of the plot. Her realization of her ignorance honor the lovers’ romance and made her strive to atone her former