Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious influences on society
Religious influence in society
Religious influence in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious influences on society
Debate of the Superiority of Religion
¨ Religions are comforts for people. They make them feel secure, and
there is no first hand proof everything you believe is true. It is
very comforting for the individual to be right, and in this example in
their belief, if they are nearer to the truth than other religions, or
believe to be so, then they will feel more secure.
¨ All religions lead to the same place, by different paths. They all
end up at the same God. Many religions believe the same thing e.g.
that there is a God watching down upon the earth, and are all similar.
Therefore it is very difficult to define one "nearer to the truth than
others" when they all believe the same outcome, but by reaching it by
a different "path".
¨ Religions are faiths not facts, and therefore you have no proof that
one is nearer to the truth than the other. If you believe one thing,
but another religion does not agree you cannot state that as a fact
you are right, there is no direct proof.
¨ Nobody has proof of the truth and so nobody can prove that their
religion is nearer to the truth than others. You need to have some
sort of evidence to back it up, otherwise you cannot claim you
religion is nearer to the truth than any other religions is, without
being naïve.
AGAINST
¨ Part of some religions is to believe that yours is the most
important, and so it is not naïve to believe yours is nearer to the
truth, as you are continuing and obeying your religion and faith by
believing yours is nearer to the truth, as instructed.
¨ Over time we have come to find out more of God, and religion. Many
religions are extensions of others, and all religions will lead up to
the same God, but one will discover more than others will quicker, and
therefore at at least one time their religion will be nearer the truth
The influence of religion on humankind can be traced back to the first records of
Religion, which is meant to enhance the faith of it followers, has done the opposite. The practices of religion have become overwhelmingly factual that the faith component of religion has vanished. In order to be a genuine beliver one must comprise an authentic faith. Both religious leaders and followers must realize that their religion is not factual, but sustained through faith. The key to the gates of heaven is faith, not facts.
In an organized religion debate, Alan Dershowitz and Alan Keyes contended many issues on religion and morality. Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor, believed that "morality can be maintained without religion." He also stated that it must be maintained without religion because times have changed. He said that if religion is not separated from state it could have severe damage, such as the Crusades and the Holocaust. Dershowitz believes that there is a difference between morality and religion. When people are moral without religion, they are being virtuous on their own, not because they are afraid of God. He stated that religion should not consist of a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate, stated that religion sets the standard for what's moral. Keyes argued "power only ultimately respects another power," and Martin Luther King Jr. was not a preacher by accident. Dershowitz also stated that not everything in the Bible should be believed word-for-word, even George Washington said "indulge religion with caution." Keyes believed that if state and religion should be separated, then why does the Declaration of Independence contain so much about religion? Alan Dershowitz and Alan Keyes would have argued endlessly about religion's role in society if there were not a moderator to stop them.
The Necessity of Religion in Today's Society No, religion in NOT necessary in today’s society. Maybe not every war but, the main cause of some of the most devastating wars has been religion. Today, discrimination is based on a person’s belief or religion. Though some might say that discrimination could be based on clothes or looks, but those trends may be demanded of them by their religious beliefs.
Religion has existed since the dawn of civilization and over time has evolved into the religions we have today. Today the most prominent religions are monotheistic, having one omnipotent god, and despite having many differences they share basic tenets of respect and kindness. Religions, such as Judaism, give explanations for the unknown, provide hope, and bring about a sense of community.
According to Entwistle (2015) epistemology falls under the science of philosophy which main concerns are theory and explanation of knowledge. (Entwistle, 2015) Main epistemic methods are logical reasoning and empiricism. Some other concerns are doubts if our knowledge claims present just an opinion or justified belief. The basic epistemologic foundation is a search for a causation and proofs. For instance, if the God exists is there any empirical data to support that statement? I certanly believe that epistemology and Christianty stand in front of each other. In other words, they are on oposite sides and fundamentally incompatible with each other.
Many works of literature have been known to have their words wrap around a certain subject such as gender, politics, and experiences. But some works go into a more personal level such as religion. In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” and Salman Rushdie’s “Imagine There’s No Heaven”, they talk about the strength in the relationship between individuality and religion. These two authors have written their stories based on how an individual’s life, choices, and beliefs can or can be altered by the religion that surrounds them. As one reads these stories, they might be able to notice that they have a lot in common but there are many difference on what the stories are actually about. These two authors have expressed the relationship between individuals and religion through the similarities, differences, and resolutions.
The point and purpose was to promote the great nation of the United States, and
The existence of God has been questioned since the beginning of time. Religions thrived on answering the unanswerable questions of the universe and people were able to find solace in the answers. As science has expanded and been able to answer these questions with natural, as opposed to supernatural answers, many people stopped looking to God and religion for the causes of things and started looking towards science. God was dead, according to many scientists and people of all professions. Many philosophers, however, have different conclusions.
Religion is “the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship.” (Cambridge Dictionary) Many people believe in something else out of the evidential or scientific view, thinking that good things happen because God says so, or that the universe was not made by the Big Bang. Even though is something that was more present in history years ago, a lot of people still believe and practise a religion. According to Stephen Juan there are about 4,300 religions in the world. About a 75 per cent of the population of the world practises a religion and the two religions most widely spread are the Christianity and the Islam. (2006) They can be divided in believers, adherents or not adherents, agnostics and atheists. People who are believers are the ones who have faith in something great beyond and
There are many ways that show that we can separate religion from morality in order to show that they are distinct. Morality shows the choices we make deciding right from wrong which ends with one or more parties receiving benefits. Religion is the belief in a being that is supernatural or present in the environment. The followers of that typical religious ideal may choose to follow under that being's guidance or stem off from the primary goal and change what is recommended for that. I can see that the followers of the different types of religions in the world follow their respective beings because they are symbols of authority to them, which means that they should be obedient to that being. Holding power and knowledge over the world and our
In Alfred North Whitehead’s “Religion and Science”, he nullifies the argument between the religious factions and scientists of the world by eliminating all grounds for the argument. Although debated to the “ends of the Earth”, Whitehead points out that these two subjects are actually based upon events that are unrelated. He states “Science is concerned with the general conditions which are observed to regulate phenomenon; whereas religion is wholly wrapped up in the contemplation of moral and aesthetic values”(Whitehead, Religion and Science). Through his definition of both viewpoints, he is able to explain one will never see the other, thus no argument exists.
But the form of religion has too. For example, theocracy was the main form of government societies would run by. They all lived in a monotheistic government in which God is recognized as the supreme civil ruler. Everyone in the community was taught to only believe in one god and if anyone in the community viewed others worshiping other gods, they would be accused of witchcraft and put on trial for execution. Fear of speculating other religion was the big mass hysteria people faced during the 17th century. But this idea of monotheism did not continue as an only option in the modern days. We now have a polytheistic community. We have various members from around the world worshiping different gods. This form is not neglected but preferred in different societies. Not only does it create a diverse world, but it allows for many to voice their opinion without judgment. This generation has allowed many humans to search for other religions and their meaning without any judgments. The mass hysteria of fear of worshiping other gods has decreased drastically since the 17th
Up until the Enlightenment, mankind lived under the notion that religion, moreover intelligent design, was most likely the only explanation for the existence of life. However, people’s faith in the church’s ideals and teachings began to wither with the emergence of scientific ideas that were daringly presented to the world by great minds including Galileo and Darwin. The actuality that there was more to how and why we exist, besides just having an all-powerful creator, began to interest the curious minds in society. Thus, science began to emerge as an alternative and/or supplement to religion for some. Science provided a more analytical view of the world we see while religion was based more upon human tradition/faith and the more metaphysical world we don’t necessarily see. Today science may come across as having more solid evidence and grounding than religion because of scientific data that provides a seemingly more detailed overview of life’s complexity. “Einstein once said that the only incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible” (Polkinghorne, 62). Yet, we can still use theories and ideas from both, similar to Ian Barbour’s Dialouge and Integration models, to help us formulate an even more thorough concept of the universe using a human and religious perspective in addition to scientific data.
Last October 20 to 22, 2017, Apo Whang-Od Oggay was brought to Manila from Kalinga, for Manila FAME, a trade show on culture, designs, crafts, and brands with the help of the Philippine Air Force (Rey and Serafica). The original reason for her being brought to the trade fair was to nominate her for the Gawad sa Manlilikha ng Bayan (GAMABA), or the National Living Treasures Award, according to the executive director of the Department of Trade and Industry’s Center for International Trade Expositions and Missions, or DTI-CITEM (Rey, “Whang-od not 'exploited,' says Manila FAME organizers”).