Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social impact of the death penalty on society
The death sentence: an inefficient method of punishment
Introduction to the death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social impact of the death penalty on society
Life, no matter whose life it is, is invaluable. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the licit authorization to execute someone for committing a heinous crime. It is unfortunately approved by the government. Despite the fact that the death penalty has been so controversial, the death penalty should be annihilated because life is priceless. The death penalty is incredibly costly. Under the cruelty of the circumstance, the cost of the penalty is obscene. Why should people spend “million more on this fatally flawed system, wouldn’t it make more sense to spend (America’s) dollars on programs that will reduce violent crimes?” (Source B par. 8) Capital punishment costs thousands for each trial. Consider the following factors: …show more content…
Milada Horakova was a politician who was framed for planning to overthrow the government. Although officials had a “ lack of evidence, she was found guilty of treason. Horakova was hanged on June 27, 1950” (Source A line 7). Convicts, just like Horakova, are sometimes innocent. If a virtuous convict is executed, they can not be brought back for a new trial if new evidence found. However, if they are sentenced to life without parole, they can be freed. The action that needs to be taken is lifelong imprisonment because a “sentence of life imprisonment incapacitates a prisoner just as well as the death penalty” (Source A line 102). As previously stated, the innocent can be freed from life imprisonment. For those who are guilty, life without parole removes the dangers from society without committing the equally heinous act that put them in their situation. The _________ of capital punishment is decided by humans, and humans make …show more content…
They argue that with the penalty, the people on death row can quickly and peacefully end their lives while keeping the community safe. These critics have a valid argument, especially since the people serving life without parole often wonder if “ 15 or 20 minutes of terror found to be cruel and unusual wouldn’t be a better option” (Source E par. 11). However, these skeptics fail to comprehend that new evidence can be discovered at any time. If an irreproachable person is sentenced to death, and new evidence can be discovered proving their innocence, they can not be brought back from the dead. This is not uncommon. In fact,”innocent people have been found on death row, like Carlos DeLuna and Johnny Garrett, both wrongfully convicted and executed for murder before new evidence surfaced proving them innocent”(Source C par.6). If capital punishment is annihilated altogether, the critics can’t argue that a quick death is suitable for all of the
Are there really innocent people on death row? At least twenty-three people have been executed who did not commit the crime they were accused of (JAICLC). And that 's only those that we know. And here lies a natural danger of capital punishment...when we execute an innocent person; the real killer is still on the streets, ready to victimize someone else. But when an innocent person is arrested, he is often the motivating reason behind further investigation, and if he is executed, than the case remains closed forever or until someone else gets killed by the real perpetrator. Often the only people who know what really happened are the accused and the dead. It then comes down to the skill of the examination and the defense lawyers as to whether there will be a conviction for accidental murder or for manslaughter. At times, a detective could naturally make an error and possibly lead to the conclusion that the innocent committed the crime. Whether it be multiple years in prison or even capital punishment there is no possible way of revenging or forgiving the judge and jury for this miscarriage of justice. There must always be the concern that the state can order the death penalty justly. In America, a prisoner can be on death row for many years awaiting the outcome of numerous appeals (Short). In simpler terms killing another being with or without evidence is not fair, decent, or ethically
Upon examination, one finds capital punishment to be economically weak and deficient. A common misconception of the death penalty is that the cost to execute a convicted criminal is cheaper than to place a convict in prison for life without parole. Due to the United States judicial system, the process of appeals, which is inevitable with cases involving death as the sentence, incurs an extreme cost and is very time consuming. The cost of a capital trial and execution can be two to six times greater than the amount of money needed to house and feed a prisoner for life. "Studies show incarceration costs roughly $20,000 per inmate per year ($800,000 if a person lives 40 years in prison). Research also shows a death-penalty ease costs roughly $2 million per execution," (Kaplan 2). Capital punishment is extremely expensive and depletes state governments of money that could be used for a wide range of programs that are beneficial. As Belolyn Wiliams-Harold, an author for the journal Black Enterprise, writes that county governments are typically responsible for the costs of prosecution and the costs of the criminal trial, including attorney's fees, and salaries for the members of the courtroom. All this money is spent at the expense of the corrections department and crime prevention programs, which are already is strapped for cash (Williams-Harlod 1). These "financial constraints," such as capital punishment, do not promote a healthy, commercial society, but actually cost and harm the public.
Thus, many groups of people are involved in a death penalty case. However, other also equally important factors are also involved, such as money and time. Each state varies in amount expended towards death penalty and life imprisonment. However, in Texas, the state with the highest capital punishment rates in the United States alone, it is stated that each individual in a death penalty case “costs taxpayers about $2.3 million. That is about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years.” This is one detail that those opposing death penalty implement in their argument to abolish said act. Another factor is time invested in these cases. Most death penalty cases range from 6 to 10 years, factoring death row and other complications. Thus, the more time invested in determining guilt or innocence, the more money of taxpayers are being consumed. However, as depleting as it is, there is a good reason for. They take so long because they are trying to avoid as many mistakes as possible, meaning they don’t wanted to convict or even worse execute an innocent person wrongly accused or framed for a
However, Jeff Jacoby from The Boston Globe argues in his article that “there is also protection for the living (When Murderers…, 1). For instance, when the judicial system condemns someone to life in prison there is always the possibility that the criminal may escape. If that criminal escapes he could potentially use his anger to murder the remaining people that had him sent to prison to begin with. Also he could injure or even murder other people that are not even connected with the crime. For the individual that committed the crime there is no sense of self consciousness. However, if the individual responsible for putting the criminal in jail was to find out that he escaped and continued his spree of crimes it could cause that individual to feel guilty about not doing something more to the person who does not care about what they have done or how it has affected anyone
When a defendant is convicted and sentenced to death, theoretically what follows is an execution. An execution doesn’t follow death sentences very swiftly, and in some cases at all for a variety of reasons. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that only 15% of people sentenced to death from 1973-2009 had been executed by the end of 2009. Of these cases, 46% ended in alternate ways (reversed convictions, commuted sentences, or the death of the inmate). Of the inmates sentenced to death during that period, 39% were still
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is defined as the pre-meditated or planned taking of a human life by a government in response to a crime committed by that legally convicted person. It has been discussed extensively over the years by many people. There are many reasons to agree or disagree with capital punishment, but the reasons against it completely outweigh the ones that support it. Many of the justifications for affirming the death penalty either do not apply wholly to our justice system, are misunderstood, or just do not make sense. There is no justification for killing other human beings and all of the arguments cannot change this. Since 1976, over one thousand people have been executed by the government.
Those who are for the death penalty argue that without it the murderers would be released back into society, only to kill again. They believe in the saying “an eye for an eye”; and that life in prison is not a cruel enough punishment, but that the only way to stop further murders is death. In fact, there have been cases that show legitimacy to this belief. In one occurrence, author Mike Royko exemplifies that “at the time of his [the murderer] trial it was mentioned that this was his second murder.” This murderer had been tried twice, for two different murders, while this is true some murderers have come back to society to kill again, that does not mean all criminals will follow that path. There are many cases in which men are sent to life in prison without the chance of parole; in which case the criminal cannot kill again and does not have to be killed. Legalizing the death penalty is allowing “one person to judge another incapable of rehabilitation” (King).
The most expensive part of the capital punishment process is the initial trials and pre-trials [2]. During this phase, the person accused of murder is determined either guilty or innocent. It is also during this phase that they choose whether or not to sentence said person to death. According to statistics from the Death Penalty Information Center, capital trials (cases with the possibility of the death penalty) cost approximately one million dollars more than a non-capital case. To put it another way, the amount of money needed to sentence someone to death could pay for 8 years of school at Harvard University. The attribute c...
If an error occurs in the procedure, the criminal will face a painful and cruel death. Even more horrifying, an innocent person can be placed on death row. “The reality is that there are few innocent people on death row; the vast majority of these inmates did, in fact, commit the crimes for which they were found guilty. These killers brutally took the lives of innocent victims. By not recognizing the lives of their victims as sacred, they cannot claim their own lives are sacred. In the end, the death penalty is an individual punishment for an individual crime” (Bowman and DiLascio). Although this quote tries to offer a counterpoint to the argument that the death penalty should be abolished, it still admits that there are innocent people on death row. An innocent man placed on death row results in two casualties of innocent men while the brutal murderer sleeps peacefully each night. Errors in the death penalty can destroy families, terminate friendships, and disintegrate love and companionship. Since there is no guarantee that every person on death row is guilty, it is too dangerous to risk more innocent
Many people, including some higher educated people, tend to believe that executing someone is a lot cheaper than the alternative, which is life in prison without the possibility of parole. Indeed, this thought seems like common sense. However, extensive research has been conducted that contradicts that belief. For instance, a study conducted in Maryland, in 2008, found that the state spends roughly 1.9 million dollars more per capital case, compared to non-capital cases (Warden, 2009). But how can this be some may ask. Well, the reason capital punishment costs more than life without the possibility of parole, is because death penalty cases are longer and more expensive. Because the capital punishment is an irreversible sentence, the state, or government, is required to heighten the defendant’s due process in order to decrease the chance of the defendant being innocent (DPIC). Furthermore, not only is it more expensive for the trial phase, it is also a higher price for a state to imprison death row inmates compared to other
“Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from the death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this risk we cannot
Source G represents a graph that clearly displays the extraordinary high price of cases in which the death penalty was successfully sought in Maryland, $3,017,000, compared to the price of cases in which the death penalty was not sought, $1,103,000 (The Cost of Capital Cases). Between the local and state governments and taxpayer dollars, an excessive amount of money each year is paid toward capital punishment cases when it could be used for much more productive and needed causes. Some people, like Dr. David B. Muhlhausen, argue that the death penalty saves innocent lives, so the high cost for taxpayers is worth the added expense, but “counties have been threatened with bankruptcy by the cost of death-penalty cases” (Blethen). If the costs of capital punishment cases are so extreme that certain counties are on the brink of bankruptcy, authorities should take a step back to deliberate the priorities of the community, and hopefully the innocent, law abiding taxpayers would be more important than the death of criminals who would be just as threatening in prison as they would be if they were dead. Even though prison security has the slightest chance for error, “the cost of lifetime imprisonment pales in comparison, and ensures the same level of public safety
Life imprisonment is a sentence of imprisonment for a serious crime; the person is to remain in jail for the rest of their life or until death. You can receive life imprison for crimes such as murder, high treason, drug dealing or human trafficking, or aggravated cases of burglary or robbery resulting in death or bodily harm. If you are sentenced to life in prison that does not always mean that you will never get out of prison. After servicing a portion of the jail sentence you ...
The first reason why death penalty should be allowed and get more active is life sentence is costly. According to “What is the Average Cost to House Inmates in Prison”, the average cost of housing an inmate in the U.S. was $31,286 in 2012 for per year. According to the “Who, what, where and why”, the United States has roughly 2.4 million people in prisons. Therefore, the money which America pays to keep prisoners who are in prisons is about $75120000000 for per year.
A study by a New York State Defenders Association in 1982 showed, “The death penalty is not now, nor has it ever been, a more economical alternative to life imprisonment. A murder trial normally takes much longer when the death penalty is at issue than when it is not. Litigation costs – including the time of judges, prosecutors, public defenders, and court reporters, and the high costs of briefs – are mostly borne by the taxpayer. The extra costs of separate death row housing and additional security in court and elsewhere also add to the cost…. were the death penalty to be reintroduced in New York, the cost of the capital trial alone would be more than double the cost of a life term in prison. (“Capital