Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of teamwork and leadership
Importance of teamwork and leadership
Communication is the key to a successful team
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of teamwork and leadership
This was the third week of the team debate, and I was impressed with our progress. I was exhilarated by the thought of engaging in constructive argument amongst my team. We had been in constant interaction and communication throughout since the beginning of the task, which was pleasing. I had the utmost faith in my team, to fulfil their individually assigned roles. This week was extremely chaotic for most of our team members, especially with a few members writing exams, and our team leader being away on a field trip. It was, however pleasing that they were still able to communicate, and ensure that the team remained informed. Our leader expressed eagerness and managed to engage with us throughout the week, although she was experiencing network …show more content…
problems. We were confident in the roles assigned to us, and each member focused on the task handed to them. The Whatsapp group was more of a guidance portal, which assisted anyone who needed help. I was fascinated by everyone's ability to interact with one another, which was inspirational. I personally benefited from posting questions to the group, which was refreshing and jovial.
I decided to assemble a draft copy of the task is was assigned, since I was going to be busy during the next week. I used the many journals sourced by my group members, which was extremely helpful. My task focused on "why DDT should be banned", therefore I based my work on the negative impacts of DDT on the environment and the health of humans. I also focused on past occurrences, which influenced communities. I was thoroughly enjoying this topic, as it included many different types of problems. I also found information on alternatives to DDT, which was less harmful and extremely effective. I was baffled by the production of DDT in the United States, since they banned the use of DDT in their country. I gathered as much information as I could and processed it. I had two other teammates working with me on this task, and it was reassuring, as they could fill in the gaps I had missed out. This topic was not straightforward, as it focused on a variety of aspects, which was informative. I was extremely grateful for our group choosing this topic, since I had already grasped large volumes of new information with respect to this topic, which was
pleasing. Our leader played the role of our lecturer since the beginning of this task. She had been posting questions in the discussion forum, however unlike our lecturer she engaged us with respect to our responses, and that was no different this week. I was thoroughly impressed by my teams willingness to participate in the discussions, notwithstanding previous experiences with peers on the discussion forums, which was refreshing. I enjoyed this week and managed to get ahead on my personally assigned task, which was helpful. I am looking forward to the next week with vehemence and enthusiasm.
...d for the general public in order to raise social awareness in preventing polluting the world. It is important to raise social awareness on topics of this nature because it is affecting our world. It is important to consider it as every individual problem and concern rather than see it as an external issue. Saukko chose a whole new approach and technique to get into people’s mind. Usually, authors that want to point out and raise social awareness on issues of this nature, tend to be direct and straightforward about it. However, Saukko has taken it to the next level by approaching the readers in a unique way that will catch more of their attention and hopefully move their emotions on the topic.
The documentary about DDT and Silent Spring is really sad. DDT is an innovation that was seen positive by the public yet they did not studied about it hard enough to find out what will the effects of it will do. At first I saw a positive light about it because it is said to help farmers and neighborhoods kill pests. It really does kill the pests but it has effects to all life forms too.
The first day we got there we had started off so wrong by arguing. We weren’t doing well and we argued most of the time. Us as a team, we honestly made ourselves look bad in front of the coordinators and other teams that were watching us. The coaches had given us a real big pep talking about sticking together as a team to make us better. Although we didn’t think we needed it, it actually
In his short story, “Top of the Food Chain”, T.C. Boyle effectively argues that humans are destroying their planet with chemicals and that the general consensus of the public is that it is okay. He argues this efficaciously through the use of rhetorical and satirical devices, which are used throughout his story. Overall, I agree with Boyle’s argument that DDT is an especially harmful chemical to our planet, and while it may have had a place at one time, there is no need for it any longer.
As soon as the four members of my team entered the breakout room, we had begun the stages of team development. As Bruce Tuckman (1965) observed in his research, teams often undergo a five-stage process of team development: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. During my team’s forming stage, we defined what our objective was and planned a general outline of how this was to be accomplished. Because we didn’t know each other very well, a quick introduction was given so we could get to know each other a little better. Next, we had a brief stage of storming which caused a bit of inefficiency. This was our initial five minutes of confusion due to not knowing each other’s strengths and who was better suited to answer which question. Our norming and performing stages melted together as we quickly gained our footing on the task at hand and settled for an execution strategy which would allow us to perform at a fairly efficient speed. Our performing stage was very encouraging and helped the team push through the questions...
As with most group projects, I started out with a basic understanding of the issue; essentially pollution and environmental changes humans make impact the environment in very bad ways. I grew up with a family who believes in intelligent design, young earth theory, and they all vehemently deny that anything humans do cause damage to the planet- everything reported in the news or by scientists are part of a larger “Liberal Democrat conspiracy.” Thus, my views had become largely hazy and even though I pride myself on being a Liberal, educated, intelligent young person, sometimes I was unsure what was actually true or what had been dramatized or exaggerated by scientists or the media to actually get people to pay attention. In addition, I also
Our team did really well with making sure everyone’s ideas were heard, but conversations with another team, who did not successfully complete the simulation, was because one or two people took the lead, and other group members were hesitant to speak up. Compared to other teams, our team managed group thinks effectively. One other team saved more money than us when they completed the challenge, which confirms the assumption we should not have made in trying to implement as many tasks as we did. Every team had challenges with time constraint which was due to a number of factors such as: brand new teams, unclear instructions, and a drop in team morale when the system gave negative feedback at a wrong task. While the successes and challenges were magnified because we were living the experience, and outside observer would have a difference of
This experience for me is challenging yet very fulfilling. Though it is not in a business set up, I’ve learned a lot of valuable lessons that I may be able to use as well someday in my career. I believe that a group with a lot of members means diversity even though we have the same culture. There will be members who have different styles in working with other people as well as personalities that may clash with each other. In this experienced, I’ve seen some of my members fight with each other due to unwillingness to compromise with each other’s ideas, members who are not committed in doing their task well and not submitting their part on time as well as uncooperative members. During this time, I perceive that this situation is my responsibility, if my members are not motivated enough, it means I’m not inspiring them to meet our goals, if they don’t know how to compromise with each other, it means I don’t have enough authority and my influence is not sufficient for them to be willing to listen and follow me as well as compromise with the other members. During the time when the conflict arises towards my members, I have decided to take some actions because besides from it’s my responsibility to meet our team’s deadlines and goals, I believe that as a leader, I have an opportunity to form a group that is harmonious, motivated in
People work in groups or teams everyday whether in their career, education, political organization, church, or any other social setting. Conflict while working in teams or groups is inevitable. When taking people of different backgrounds, personalities, moral, and ethical beliefs and putting them together in a group, conflict will arise. The key to achieving your team goals is to construct and conquer your goals with keeping the greater good of the team in mind. Conflict as it arises should be combated and abated through swift and thorough resolution techniques. When dealt with properly conflict resolution can give rise to a cohesive and productive team.
All three group members were present in the library to work on the presentation together and rehearse before the presentation. At the time of the conflict. I was confused as to why the group member who didn't agree with the final product and the direction in which the presentation went did not voice her opinions or disagreements. I was worried that we were so disorganized at a time when we should be ready for the presentation. Fortunately for all group members we did read our notes and do our research on dementia care in relation to wandering, elopement, rummaging and hoarding and we did understand that wandering and elopement was a big concern for dementia patients and was a big safety concern, because we had this knowledge damage control was possible and we stayed focused on our presentation and collaborated as a group in the little time we had left. Other team members seemed to be emotional and tearful and I believe this was because they were worried at this point we wouldn't be able to present the material as a
In week 7 our seminar leader allocated us into smaller groups of six to work together, get together and to start preparing for the mock debate in week 9 and the debate in week 10. When we started to get alone with each other, it was seen that it is not going to be easy to achieve our goals, not just because in our group had a strong activist, reflector, theorist and pragmatist, but we also needed to face some solvable difficulties as our first meeting of the week was cancelled by problem like the lack of communication, miscommunication and the ability to listen to another.
As the old saying goes, "An ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of cure." The dynamics of a team can be very diverse. Sometimes that's good and sometimes it's bad. It is so important to extinguish all issues from the very beginning because otherwise they lie buried and slowly build into something that is blown out of proportion. It is important to safeguard the team from this by setting up a system of routine meetings, and team rules to where people have a chance to discuss and solve potential problems in an open unbiased forum.
Effective communication encompasses many concepts. For a leader to be effective, one must be able to build relationships between different parties. In order to build a good rapport, one must be able to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of those involved, and within oneself. Acknowledging these differences will allow for a better collaboration between team members. A leader must also have the ability to put conflict resolution theories into practice. Allowing differing points of view may challenge the original idea and will make for a more thorough decision making process. Although this may seem counterproductive, it actually ensures the best possible outcome. One must be consistent in the message presented yet be flexible, approachable and maintain a positive attitude. Allowing for different perspectives to be heard will allow team members to feel valued. This flexibility helps to solidify the concept that everyone is in this together; thus establishing an environment where all team members can have a buy-in. Encouraging team members to voice opinions and give feedback produces an atmosphere of constructive give-and-take; a real t...
PURPOSE (state specific purpose, relate topic to audience and establish credibility): The cars we drive every day release toxic exhaust gases into the atmosphere that damage it. We should try to do better to reverse these effects now; otherwise, our world will continue to get filthier and eventually become uninhabitable.
The stages of team development are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Norming is the first stage that involves team members getting to know each other and trying to figure out where they fit in. As a leader, it is important to provide clear directions and set proper goals and expectations during this stage. Storming is the next stage and as the name suggest it is characterized with struggles, challenges, conflicts, and competition among team members. During this stage, I will provide a mediating role and facilitate conversations that steers the team towards the right