Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should employers use social media in the hiring process
Risks and consequences of social networking
Risks of too much social media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In today’s world, many people find means of communication and staying in touch through social networks. Immediately, everyone’s lives are at your hand, whether through Snapchat, Twitter, or Facebook. The popularity of social networking Web has even encouraged people to share some of their most private print and visual information. The information that is being put out is out there publicly and leaves a trail that anyone can trace even college admission officers and potential employers. Colleges may use the network as a way to look deeper into the person in search of any potential red flags.. And while potential employers use it for the same purpose, they also could use it to get to know the prospective employee on a personal level that would not be found in an interview. College admissions officers and potential employers choice of checking social networking profiles is an acceptable practice. …show more content…
When applying to colleges, colleges take into consideration SAT scores, AP scores, school grades, sports, and online appearance.
What is placed online by a prospective student says a lot to a college admission officer. It opens a door to find more about a student than a transcript would include, “While still no substitute for face-to-face interaction, social media have opened lines of communication and inquiry for both students and institutions that were inconceivable only a decade ago”(Source B). Not only does it add depth to the student it also saves colleges from admitting students that may embarrass the school. College admission officers look for, “content that people would find objectionable like racist comments… Students who post self-incrimination information online show a lack of common sense”(Source A). Access to social media is a way to protect the school’s name and get to know a student on a personal
level. Social networks can be used legitimately in the hiring process. What a potential employee puts on in the public world is public. If an employer choose to see what is out there, “it’s unreasonable to make personal information available to the whole world and not expect employers to look at it”(Source G). White collar occupations use social networks in order to present their extent of knowledge regarding the area of expertise. An employer would hope to find information that would boost an employee's qualification, for example, when hiring a writer, the one with a blog would have a higher chance compared to someone that did not have any proof of work(Source G). Social networks should be used in order to build on a person resume and introduce depth to a person. Although the use of social networking in college admission and for potential employers can be seen as an acceptable form of approval, there are aspects than be seen as unethical. At an interview whether be for a job or college, the interviewer can gather basic information such as gender, age, race, and other identity markers simply from being in the same room(Source F). From this, it would lead to an already made up decision of who or how the person might be especially of the person does not “fit in” with the work force, a biased judgement. If the interviewer decided to go online to find out more it would be easiest for discrimination to brew but, “it’s a whole lot harder to assess someone’s professional sensibilities by their social activities if they come from a world different than our own”(Source F). What is put online is to build character but through context; a context that has nothing to deal with employment. The internet is a social place where, “... there’s no clear delineation of social and professional spheres.”(Source F). Mistaking something social for professional is an easy way to misjudge a person’s qualification. The choice of college admission officers and potential employers to check social network profiles is an acceptable choice. The checking of a profile for colleges is another way to add extensive information to a prospective student that would not be found in their transcript. It also saves the school from being a victim of a tarnished reputation. While jobs use social network for the same reason, they also use it in hopes of finding works or examples that could aid in the selecting process. Although checking social networks is completely acceptable, on the downside it does allow room for misinterpretation and prejudice judgments.
As the Reconstruction Era ended, the United States became the up and coming world power. The Spanish-American war was in full swing, and the First World War was well on its way. As a result of the open-door policy, England, Germany, France, Russia, and eventually Japan experienced rapid industrial growth; the United States decided to pursue a foreign policy because of both self- interest and idealism. According to the documents, Economic self- interest, rather than idealism was more significant in driving American foreign policy from 1895 to 1920 because the United States wanted to protect their foreign trade, property and their access to recourses. While the documents also show that Nationalistic thought (idealism) was also crucial in driving American foreign policy, economic Self- interest prevailed.
In “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Dana Fleming presents an essay concerning the safety of social networking sites and how Universities can deal and prevent problems. This article is targeted towards school administrators, faculty, and a social networking user audience who will either agree or disagree with her statement. I believe Fleming presents an excellent, substantial case for why she reasons the way she does. Fleming gives a sound, logical argument according to Toulmin’s Schema. This essay has an evident enthymeme, which has a claim and reasons why she believes in that way. Toulmin refers to this as “grounds."
This specific article addresses the implications of “online social networking and how they transcend disciplinary actions and reputational harm” (442). Fleming begins her argument by paralleling the transformative properties of the invention of the telephone years ago to social networks today (440). Students’ online identities come at a price, allowing job recruiters, school administrators, ...
Ever since Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook in 2004, millions of people have flocked to the website, resulting in “1.49 billion active users” (Facebook). Facebook allows users to not only reconnect with old friends, but also share whatever the user deems necessary. Facebook has many privacy settings that enable users to prevent anyone from seeing what they post. Even so, skeptics out in the world strongly attest that Facebook, and similar social media websites, aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. In the essay Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password Is Fair Game, Alfred Edmond Jr. addresses the false security Facebook provides to its users, and uses that notion to support his claim that bosses should
Fleming, Dana L. “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” New England Journal of Higher Education.22.4 (2008): 27-29. Print.
Most individuals use these social networks and applications as an outlet to connect with old friends and family, share media, and keep up with everyday topics. Sometimes, employees exchange social media accounts if they become friends at work, which is acceptable. But, if an employer decides to review an employee or potential employee’s personal account without their permission, that is an invasion of privacy. Also, a person’s social media account should not have to be monitored or reviewed by an employer, especially if it does not relate to the job itself. Everyone deserves privacy, and if an employee’s social media account(s) have to be monitored, the same should apply to the employers as
Allowing college admission officers to use social media presence, in special situations, as an instrument to assist them in the evaluation of prospect students is an excellent way to move and progress at the same rate the times we are living. Nowadays, Social Media Presence and Social Networking play a fundamental role in the way individuals connect and relate with others, with their social environment, and their community. It is then, necessary for a college to be able to considerate these factors when the screening and assessment of some prospect students takes place.
As older siblings, friends, and cousins were denied position at school and in the work force, we realized that adults and employers had found Facebook. Our uncensored character was on display for future bosses, colleges, etc. and they were there to stay. Instead of references being the test of character for a job, it was the online identity that determined whether or not the application got even a second glance. In light of this revelation, we changed. Our Facebooks no longer reflected our true selves, but rather the person that we thought colleges and employers should see. Much like hiding our dirty laundry from prying eyes in the halls of high school, we could no longer wear our proverbial hearts on our internet sleeves, for the future was at stake. Much like what had once been the Old West, the internet was now connected with railroads—each leading back to the offline person. Tame and orderly.
Social networks are increasing dramatically every year. Employers are turning to social networks because it is a tool to screen job applicant’s profiles. According to a survey conducted by jobvite.com (2013), 94 % of employers use social media profiles to recruit job applicants. This trend assists the applicants and recruiters. Job applicants should be judged by their social network profiles because social media give positive image about the candidate, prove the information in the resume, and help to identify if the person fits the culture of the company or not.
The situation revolving around these sites is not likely to clear up any time soon; in fact, as freshmen enter higher education institutions, more activity regarding social networking will take place. Christine Rosen, “a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington” (2), said that the amount of freedom and control that technology gives us also provides a direct route for marketers to advertise products to these users. In addition, she says that college administrators use Facebook as a means of snooping around to find evidence of illegal activity of students. Many of these administrators and employers also create fake profiles in order to conduct these investigations, although, as spokesman for Facebook Chris Hughes says, creating...
A person’s right to privacy is being challenged with the high use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter. What used to be considered part of your personal life is not so personal anymore. When one chooses to share details about ones-self to their friends via a social media, they are not always thinking about the “other” people. The other people could be ones current boss or future employer. Other people could be a school official, your baseball coach, your friends’ mother; you name it the list goes on and on. Recently, a few employers or perspective employers have requested Facebook and other social network log-in information. It is probably a violation of equal employment laws, and there are two senators investigating the practice of requiring job applicants and employees to provide their social network log-in information as a condition of employment.
This is yet another way of invading privacy. In the past, employers would only know what you told them in your interview. They would assess your skills and determine if you were right for the job, aside from knowing your beliefs or views. However, now with Facebook an employer can see all the personal information, this can negatively influence a candidate’s job. The same goes for those who are currently employed and potential students. “Dr. Nora Barnes, Director for the Center of Marketing Research at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, published a study that showed more than 20% of colleges and universities search social networks for their admissions candidates” (Fodeman). This is becoming a part of the admissions process, but it is unfair. Searching someone’s Facebook to determine his or her admissions eligibility is wrong and a privacy invasion. As long as a student has fulfilled the school’s requirements and done well in school, why should it matter what their personal lives are like? In the time before Facebook, this would be like a school sending someone to secretly follow a potential student and see what he or she does in their
The first aspect being addressed is the problem with social network sites exposing information. Social networking has created an environment where it is nearly a duty to expose oneself. Profiles on these social websites are updated everyday with personal information such as locations, status, and future plans. Anyone can search another’s name and find information about their history, pictures, and activity. With the help of social networking sites...
First of all, schools should keep students focused during classes. By giving students access to social media for anything in the class, that starts leading to these issues. “All universities have been struggling to balance freedom of speech and the right to express an opinion, with reasonable
Students who want to find jobs may regret posting private pictures and comments on Facebook. Employers not only screen resumes and conduct interviews, but also view job candidates’ Facebook profiles. The boss wants to know if the applicant is actually a “professional.” Pictures may show the person drinking, smoking, or doing other unprofessional activities. Offensive comments can also hurt an applicant’s chances of getting the job.