Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of imperialism in africa
Effect of imperialism in africa
Impact of imperialism on africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Between 1880 and 1914 European powers wanted acquire land in the African colonies. Political leaders encouraged settlement in the African colonies to promote their global dominance. Some think that this was just another example of greed for trade and the seeking of markets. However, others believe it was simply to fulfill capitalist needs: the desire of more raw materials and labor forces. A main factor that has commenced each leader to gain land is imperialism and some of the reasons include religion, economy, power, and social incentives. Many who gained a profit from colonization justify their motives, which can be seen through their personal reactions and feeling about imperialism. The political leaders Prince Leopold and Joseph Chamberlain have positive feelings about imperialism and believe in extending a country's power through military force or diplomacy. Document 1, written by Prince Leopold, claims that Belgium can grow outside of Europe in order to gain more colonies, eventually leader to power. In a social aspect, he wants his country to be seen as imperial and stressed the economic importance of capitalism. However, Prince Leopold is a heir to the throne of Belgium, so his main objective may only be to increase his future countries …show more content…
power and standing. Moreover, Joseph Chamberlain, a politician, conveys that the British isles has suffered continuously economically, so if they cut off the colonies there will not be much difference (Doc 2). Nonetheless, he is a British politician, so he would want Britain to gain money and resources to maintain and build the British Empire. On the other hand, many Anti-Imperialists believe that Capitalism should not be pursued.
For instance, in “The Genesis of Jingoism,” William Clark states that capitalists value colonization and use nationalist support for their actions, which is “...one of the leading factors in breaking down nationalism…” (Doc 4). He believed the military funded money to help maximize profit in Africa. Similarly, the German Social Democratic Party Congress assume that colonialism is for greedy capitalists to make money and show off military (Doc 5). Nevertheless, since the writer is a socialist, he would say this, because he is expressing his disapproval of capitalist desires and that the greedy bourgeoisie wanted to invest in
capital. In contrast, others have views of Imperialism and motives that are on other sides of the spectrum. Martial Henri Merlin, a Pro-Imperialist and governer general, wanted to gain all the new terirries in Africa instead of Europe (Doc 7). In his opinion, the more advanced people should have the right to take such valuable resources because the industraialized countries have an actual use for them. Conversely, as a colonial governer, he would support this because he directly benefits from the acquisitions in Africa, which intersts him. George Washington Williams, exposes that in Congo, the white leaders intimidated the natives, and were given alcohols so the Europeans could make treaties (Doc 3). He is a Baptist minister, not intentionally racist, was contempt of the exploition of the natives, which reveals his lack of consideration for others. Another piece of evidence that could further explain such controversial responses is the poem “White Man’s Burden”, by Rudyard Kipling, a Pro-Imperialist writer. In his poem, he thinks that the United States should help the Philippines. The U.S. acted similar to Britain of the Soviet Union, trying to imperialize over the globe. The Age of Imperialism has made Europe consider both the advantages and detriments of colonization. A majority of those who benefitted from the exploitation believed that imperialism was important for the economy. Others, however, thought it was important to help the undeveloped civilizations. In comparison, British Imperialism in China took place during the nineteenth century and was economic, due to the high demand for silk, tea, and porcelain. British did not take over the Chinese land, like in India and Africa, but the impact is evident in today’s culture and politics.
Nationalistic ideas made European countries want to take action in the colonization of Africa. In Document B, the English John Ruskin says, “…seizing every piece of fruitful waste ground she can set her foot on, and there teaching these her colonists … that their first aim is to be to advance the power of England by land and by sea.” This quote shows how the Europeans were proud of their countries and wanted to spread their territories in order to be the best. It can be seen in Document A how the Europeans had already colonized a lot of Africa by the 20th century, with seven countries holding territories by 1914. The idea of nationalism helped push European countries into colonizing Africa, which led to more land for resources and ultimately helped Europe economically.
Imperialism has become a driving force among European nations in the growth of power and wealth. European countries placed large values on controlling colonies, similar to how members of the aristocratic society today would put emphasis on owning an immaculate mansion or an expensive car. Colonies formed in Latin America, Africa, and Asia were seen as status symbols for the overarching European countries; colonies represented economic strength and political power, which was fueled by intense nationalistic spirits. Competition for colonies became the biggest aspect of imperialism, leading several European powers to bicker over controlling colonial trade. The voices of the Colonists were oppressed and ignored as their land and resources were encroached upon by the Europeans.
One of the main reasons Europeans colonized Africa was for their useful resources. There are countless assets in the African landscape that were wanted by other nations. The European countries had access to some of the worlds most needed resources such as cotton, oils, coal, gold, and diamonds because they controlled Africa. This is shown on a chart of African colonies and their exports. ("Selected African Colonies and Their Exports" 269). This shows how the European countries carefully selected the land they did, to get certain resources they needed or wanted to use to benefit from. Another chart from a book by Trevor Lloyd, (Lloyd, The British Empire), displays the large jump of exports to Africa from 1854 to 1900. What that means is once Great Britain established complete control of South Saharan Africa, they began to export the resources they found that they could use. These charts are proof of how the European's wanted resources, and that is one of the main reasons for the imperialization of Africa. Not only did the European nations want the continent's resources, but they had an equal hunger for power.
The motivations behind U.S. imperialism were far different from the motivations of major European countries. Many European powers felt pressured to keep the balance of power among nations. The need to continue expanding was to make sure one country did not gain to much power over the others. The pressure to keep up with neighboring countries consumed European powers. The scramble for Africa changed Britain’s views on expanding when France started to colonize the country. Soon all major powers in Europe joined in the scramble to gain territory in Africa. The United
In conclusion, the motives concerning imperialism in Africa are a matter of expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources. Europeans countries constantly tried to compete with their neighbors in fair ways to become the most dominating country. Just as much as they took possession of Africa, their will was also to assist Africa on their right path and put an end to any dilemmas they may be
Imperialism is when a mother nation takes over another nation and become its colony for political, social, and economical reasons. Imperialism is a progressive force for both the oppressors (mother country) and the oppressed (colony), majorly occurring during the late 19th and early 20th century. It had more negative effects than positive effects due to its domination to other nations.
As the 20th century approached, more and more countries grew desperate for land, resulting in an imperialistic activity known as the Scramble for Africa. The European imperialists were motivated by three main factors; economic, political, and social. These factors made countries compete for power and eventually led to the scramble for African territory. Although economic expansion at times was a positive outcome of European imperialism in Africa, these positive effects are outweighed by negative outcomes such as loss of culture and independence.
Practice what you preach! The Unites States preaches democracy, freedom, liberty and justice by all. Our ancestors fled England to gain these basic rights and establish a land of liberty and justice for all. As I study history, I have come to question whether we, as a country, really live by these principles. By the late 1800s the United States had become a world power with the ability to influence other countries and expand to new lands by using it military and economic powers; America was divided on how to use this power and influence. Expansion or isolation seemed to be the most argued political themes of the early 1900s. Europeans had drawn satisfaction from fulfilling a self-imposed “civilizing” mission to spread Western culture and
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting a land grab on the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economic, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation. Europe in this period was a world of competing countries. Britain had a global empire to lead, France had competition with Britain for wealth and so did other nations like Germany and Russia.
In the 19th Century King Leopold II was the king of Belgium and he was looking for a way to expand his power and influence of the Belgium state. During this time imperialism was becoming very prominent, especially in European countries. Imperialism was a way for a country to easily gain wealth by implementing military force on another country or group of people. They would extract resources and goods from these places and, in its wake, imperialism destroyed these societies and their cultures. King Leopold II is a perfect example of European Imperialism and in his book King Leopold’s Ghost; Adam Hochschild details the effects that King Leopold II had on the Congo in Africa. Hochschild also argues that Leopold’s rule had an impact in the Congo
It has been debated by varying scholars as to whether Caesar Augustus’ foreign policy to expand Rome’s empire had more to do with defensive imperialism as a response to encroaching threats, or rather, an aggressively, unprovoked move to claim hegemony over the known world. However, I would like to postulate in support of the former theory that in an attempt to restore and ensure long-lasting security to their empire, Augustus was forced to take proactive measures in order to preserve it. With territorial boundaries normally running along the rivers so as to provide a better defensive posture, he felt it necessary to expand the northern border to the river so as to secure their autonomy and position. Perhaps if he could establish a wide buffer
"We cannot sit huddled within our own borders and avow ourselves merely an assemblage of well-to-do hucksters who care nothing for what happens beyond. Such a policy would defeat even its own end; for as the nations grow to have ever wider and wider interests, and are brought into closer and closer contact, if we are to hold our own in the struggle for naval and commercial supremacy, we must build up our Dower without our own borders." 1899, Theodore roosevelt his book, The Strenuous Life.
The end of the American Civil War saw the country enter a period of isolationism , during which the nation sought to heal itself and regain internal stability. The conflict had left many states ravaged by war and resentment still lingered on both sides. In an effort to reunify the country, Americans chose to concentrate on domestic issues rather than international matters. During this time of reconstruction in America, there arose a small following of persons dedicated to bringing about an American Monarchy. These men became dubbed imperialists, because they sought to turn America into an empire, in the traditions of Caesar’s Roman Empire. While the movement never garnered enough serious support to become viable, it did spur much debate over
The colonization of Africa officially began in 1884 with the Berlin Conference. Western European powers began to split up the land and resources in Africa among themselves. This period of history became known as the Scramble for Africa. The Scramble for Africa occurred because as the slave trade ended, capitalists saw Africa as a continent that they could now exploit through legitimate trade. European capitalists found new ways to make money off of the continent. With greater exploration of the continent even more valuable resources were found. The encouragement of legitimate trade in Africa brought Europeans flocking to colonize Africa. Africa lost their independence, and along with it, their control over their natural resources. Europeans used the term the "White Man's Burden," a concept used by white colonizers in order to impose their way of life on Africans within their colonies, to ...
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything.