Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About gunpowder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About gunpowder
2:Another reason why gunpowder revolutionized Europe was the transition from medieval artillery to modern artillery that contained gunpowder. After the powder was spread along the Silk Road in the 13th century, it landed in the hands of Europeans seeking a more prominent way of using the powder. Before gunpowder, medieval artillery was based of heavy swords, iron armor, axes, knives, and arrows. These items were the basis of medieval artillery and only men who have trained for many years could obtain these weapons. The weapons were used for another 500 years before gunpowder was introduced, and some of the items started to involve the technology of the powder. For example, regular arrows soon transitioned to arrows with tubes of gunpowder on …show more content…
them causing them to set fire when reaching the enemy. In the 14th century, medieval artillery had been obliterated due to completely dominance of gunpowder on the battlefields with cannons, guns, rifles, firearms, and more. The invention of the cannon specifically sped up the transition to modern artillery. Europeans first invented the cannon during the mid 13th century when they noticed that the shape and workings of a church bell could lead to a ultimate weapon of destruction.
The cannons were assembled with barrels and long wooden cores that were hammered together and then filled with molten hot iron to secure any cracks. When Europeans tested a cannons use at war, they often exploded because the gunpowders explosions was too strong compared to canon itself. A primary source that indicates gunpowder was a transition to modern artillery from medieval is this image. The primary source shows two men battling, one with medieval artillery and one with more modern artillery. The image was created during the 14th century which indicates that Europeans were familiar with gunpowder and were tampering with it. It also shows a man fiddling with a cannon and a trebuchet at the same time. The action of the image was against two men that appeared to be fighting with different weapons that represented different time periods. The man on the far left was on top of a castle with a crossbow dressed in iron armor, which represented the medieval age. The man fighting on the far right was located on the ground loading cannons while the trebuchet is untouched in the …show more content…
background. A trebuchet is a weapon that is loaded with stones and is flung at large walls or areas, commonly used in the middle ages.
The image indicates that the man on the bottom has forgotten about the trebuchet and is more focused on the cannons abilities because of the gunpowders tactics. Since the cannon is increasingly more compelling than the trebuchet, men in the Middle Age started to transition to gunpowder- based technology knowing that gunpowder was more effective and powerful. The image could also be seen as soldiers thinking that cannons are more of a effective weapon since it’s chosen over the trebuchet. Gunpowder was the primary propellant in cannons by making the cannon fire the iron/steel ball to its enemies. It drove the ball upward causing a smokey effect resulting in a large sound from the kinetic energy towards the heavy ball. By 1350, cannons and other gunpowder based weapons were regularly used in the English and French armies. Therefore, the transition from medieval artillery to modern artillery truly impacted the fighting style in Europe. Gunpowder gave warfare a fresh start to create powerful weapons that ultimately made Europe and many more places stronger in the long run. In the end, there was now a quicker way to defeat an entire army more sufficiently and
faster. 3:Another reason why gunpowder impacted Europe was because it contributed to the fall of feudalism which helped form a new modern era. Gunpowder was created during the bridge of the old world and the forming of the new world. It helped contribute to the new world because old world warfare was being left behind and replaced by gunpowder. Before gunpowder, the code of chivalry was the behavioral guide for all social and class relationships in the medieval age. It was the base of warfare itself because in order to fight, one would have to train for years before being able to be on the battlefield. Either that, or one with wealth and power could bargain there way on the battlefield. So when gunpowder was introduced, it ended the code of chivalry which resulted in the fall of feudalism. It ended the code of chivalry since men didn’t have to work as hard to be on the battlefield anymore since guns could be used by anyone. Chivalry was a major part of feudalism because it made up the relationships between lords, serfs, and kings. When chivalry ended, gunpowder took over its position and acted as a new way for men to fight easier and more substantial. Gunpowder was also a big threat to the church as well which collided with the fall of feudalism. If lords and kings could obtain gunpowder they could use it against the churches. Along with the power, the extremely large gunpowder quantity made Europe the head of colonization. Without gunpowder than the history would of played out very differently since there would still have stone weapons, chivalry like relationships, and similar things from the medieval ages. Therefore, with the new world approaching, gunpowder impacted Europe in this sense because without it, the world would be using steel weaponry still. It enhanced our power and was even a threat to the church because it was so powerful. Like said, it made Europe the head of colonization which meant that it controlled everything and everyone. Even the church was competing against gunpowder for power.
As the Reconstruction Era ended, the United States became the up and coming world power. The Spanish-American war was in full swing, and the First World War was well on its way. As a result of the open-door policy, England, Germany, France, Russia, and eventually Japan experienced rapid industrial growth; the United States decided to pursue a foreign policy because of both self- interest and idealism. According to the documents, Economic self- interest, rather than idealism was more significant in driving American foreign policy from 1895 to 1920 because the United States wanted to protect their foreign trade, property and their access to recourses. While the documents also show that Nationalistic thought (idealism) was also crucial in driving American foreign policy, economic Self- interest prevailed.
Silver has always been around but it wasn't until the 1500's to the mid 1700's that the
As I walked through the snow with aching, raw feet, the blood, making a trail behind me, I soon began to realize how Valley Forge and this whole war in it’s entirety was driving me to the point where I wanted to quit. It was the winter of 1777 and the American Army was forced to set up camp 18 miles outside of Philadelphia, we called it Valley Forge. The question that keeps popping up in my mind while I sit miserably in my hut is, am I going to re-enlist? I am not going to re-enlist for 3 reasons; death and illness, harsh conditions, and the lack of support and supplies.
In the colonization period, the urge to conquer foreign territories was strong, and many lands in the Western Hemisphere were conquered. With the colonization of these areas, a mercantilist relationship was formed between the conquered civilization and the maternal country. A major part of this was the restriction of exportation of native resources only to the mother country as well as the banning of trading with colonies of other countries. In turn, there was an increasing in the number of smuggling activities during the time. According to a British sailor named William Taggart in 1760, the illegal smuggling of goods into these areas had a positive impact because it brought prosperity to the people in Monte Christi, as there were only one hundred poor families. Likewise, Dominica governor John Orde praised the trading because it created prices much lower than with its maternal country. However, British admiral David Tyrell, Roger Elletson, Dominica governor John Orde, and a 1790 Bahaman newspaper report all had similar views on the harmful effects and corruptness present in smuggling. Despite this, physician George Lipscomb and British Lieutenant Governor Thomas Bruce had neutral opinions on the matter, and only stated what they witnessed in the process.
After the Second World War, the world was more interesting in oil than ever before. The conflict itself made the countries of the world realize that oil was a serious factor in the quest for power. From this point in history, oil was considered the driving force behind a successful economy and therefore attaining power. Therefore the quest for oil heightened during and after World War II. In the effort to acquire more oil, many countries began to seek out additional locations to drill and this drove the United States to the Middle East. In late 1943 a man named DeGolyer who was a geologist went on a mission to Saudi Arabia to survey the possibility for oil. His mission there concluded that “the oil in this region is the greatest single prize in all history”. With such a conclusion it is not surprising that the United States began extremely concerned with the oil concessions there.
The canister shot was a wooden cartridge carrying iron balls and when fired would explode like a shotgun for shorter range personnel. The cannons were mostly low trajectory as opposed to the mortars which were high trajectory and fire bomb shells. The mortar was based on a wooden platform and a wedge of wood was used to incline the front of the barrel. There were land service mortars and sea service mortars. The land service being more mobile and the sea service much heavier and were permanently positioned on ships.
Although many think of trebuchets and catapults as two different things, trebuchets are actually a type of catapult. While a standard catapult is any device that will throw an object by means of tension, a trebuchet throws and object by means of gravity from a counterweight that will fling an object by means of stored up energy, which is known as potential energy. Modern trebuchets usually use metal weights or sandbags as the counterweight, but, medieval armies would use anything from bags of stone to crates of animals. When the trebuchet was first used in ancient China during the fourth century, it was highly preferred over the standard catapult. When trebuchets were first becoming popular, armies and army leaders were gravitated towards them, because of their design. It was easier to get a more accurate measurement of the landing point of the ammunition. A trebuchet can throw an object by using a counterweight on the
What is a trebuchet? The question isn’t a common one, especially in today’s day-and-age due to the fact a trebuchet in the simplest of terms was a weapon used in medieval times. Many could compare it to a catapult , but the trebuchet can shoot a projectile a further distance and is far more accurate. Although the trebuchet is most commonly associated and used during the medieval times, the trebuchet’s original and most archetypical uses can be traced back to the fourth century B.C in China. China created the original trebuchet “to help with military strength and strategy” (Marsden, 2013, para. 2). Although China originated the trebuchet, it soon was adopted in other countries and made its way to Europe around five-hundred A.D. where it was mainly used by the French. This weapon was changing to become bigger, better ,and stronger constantly. For example, the archetype of the trebuchet had a group of pulling men that pulled a rope which fired the projectile. This later changed to a counterweight . Although the design of the trebuchet was changing on a constant basis, even the original itself was well-advanced for the time, pushing technology a step further. This new technology held great potential and was
The trebuchet is used with a long wooden arm refreshed on a hinge point, which acted as a big level. A bullet was placed on one end and soldiers in this earlier form of the trebuchet pushed on slings devoted to the other end to fundamentals swing the arm around and throw the
hundred pounds each of four cannons - a British and American cannon from the battle of
In medieval times, there were many forms of artillery and siege weapons such as the Ballista, Catapult, and Trebuchet. Each one of these siege weapons proved excellent in battle but one reigned supreme. The trebuchet was the favorite and most effective. It was improved upon over the years and made into the deadliest siege weapon of the medieval era. It was widely favored due to its ability to launch anything that would fit in the sling over castle walls (Alchin,2015).
The name of the Trebuchet is ironic, being a French originated word, when this mechanical weapon was first invented in 300 BC, China (Alchin, “Trebuchet”). However, the machine that the Chinese used in the beginning, did not resemble the modern-day Trebuchet, and worked more like a sling. Sadly, this Trebuchet did not have the wished for results by the Chinese. Consequently, this weapon went through changes before it came to be the Medieval Weapon we think of today, the weapon that “overthrew” it’s two predecessors the catapult and ballista (“The Trebuchet”).
The word trebuchet comes from the Middle French verb trebuch, meaning ‘to tumble’ or ‘to fall over,’ which is exactly what the throwing arm of a trebuchet does when it is released. The medieval etymology of the word (first appearing in English in the fourteenth century as ‘trepegete’) has led many historians to believe that this war engine was a medieval invention, but this ‘bad neighbor’ took up residence in the annals of military history long before that.
Gunpowder’s effect on the world can be exemplified through the grand changes in weapons. This can be shown through the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 by the English navy. In this sea battle, the Spanish Armada outnumbered the English navy immensely turning the odds against the English. However, the Spanish Armada still used old boarding tactics while the English used advanced weaponry. In the end, “the English used their superior firepower to whittle away the Spanish forces” (Schlager). The English navy's victory over the Spanish Armada illustrates the effects of the invention of gunpowder. With the successful usage of advanced gunpowder based weapons, the English navy crushed the opposition even when the Spanish Armada clearly had the upper hand. The defeat of the Spanish Armada shows that weapons based on gunpowder allowed countries with smaller armies to have a higher chance in winning their fights. The gunpowder weapons proved to be a tactical advant...
“Volley Guns” (Chivers, 2010, p.26) or also known as “Organ Guns” (Ellis, 1975, p.10) were first attempts at increasing firepower by adding several barrels at the firing itself, rather than simply attempting to increase the rate of fire. “Gunsmiths had long ago learned to place barrels side by side on frames to create firearms capable of discharging projectiles in rapid succession. These unwieldy devices, or volley guns, were capable in theory of blasting a hole in a line of advancing soldiers” (Chivers, 2010, p.26). An example of such weapons can be seen on July 28, 1835 when Giuseppe Fieshi unleashed terror on King Louis-Phillipe in Paris, France. He fired his 25 barrel “volley gun”, killing 18 of the king's entourage and grazing the King's skull. The weapon was ineffective however. Four of the barrels failed and another four ruptured. Two other barrels had exploded inside, grievously wounding Giuseppe. (Chivers, 2010, p. 27)