DSM-5: A Case Study

Use of the DSM
The Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and other assessment tools assist in the identification and development of treatment options. Application of the DSM-5 requires knowledge of possible advantages and limitations. Is it also helpful to understand when it is appropriate to apply the information provided in the DSM-5. The DSM was essentially developed to provide a ‘common language for mental health professionals (Butcher, Hooley, & Mineka, 2014). This fifth edition continues an evolutionary process aimed at maintaining guidelines for diagnoses that advise and analyze clinical practice (APA, 2013).

Two Strengths
One strength of the DSM-5 is that it is widely used throughout mental health profession in the United States (Butcher, et al, 2014). Knowledge and skill in the use of the DSM-5, increases the ability of counselors to communicate with colleagues and clients. The criticism and controversy surrounding the revisions in the DSM could be considered

The stigma attached to certain disorders or mental illness in general, could negatively affect both inner and outer perceptions. It can affect the sense of self by creating hopelessness –“ I’m crazy, I can’t cope.” Labeling can alter outer perception by limiting or minimizing the effort the therapist believes is necessary—“She was previously diagnosed as bi-polar, I’ll recommend medication” (Butcher, et al, 2014). The DSM diagnosis has minimal benefit, without the information derived from a diagnostic interview (Butcher, et al, 2014). Similar to an assessment interview, the diagnostic interview relies on a series of questions, or prompts that gradually establish a “diagnostic hypothesis.” This allows the clinician to seek verification with questions more closely aligned with the main characteristics of specific DSM diagnoses (Butcher, et al,