DREAM Act: A Social Analysis

954 Words2 Pages

The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, also introduced as H.R. 1842 and DREAM Act will provide undocumented students with a pathway to citizenship. “DREAM Act,” is bipartisan legislation which addresses the situation of young persons who grew up in the United States and graduated from American high schools, yet are unable to continue their education and reach their highest potential because of their legal status (Mahony, 2012). I will be analyzing the benefits of to this fairly new act, defining the social issue, addressing the effective and ineffective approaches to the problem, providing a social analysis, economic analysis, political analysis, and presenting the outcomes of this policy.
Each year, approximately 65,000 …show more content…

The “Immigrant Children’s Educational Advancement and Dropout Prevention Act of 2001” (H.R. 1582) during the 107th Congress, was enacted to allow undocumented immigrant students to first apply to be protected from deportation and then apply to become a permanent resident if they met a number of similar criteria as the DREAM Act now (Barnett, Pamela, 2016). "GUTIERREZ TIES IMMIGRATION PROPOSAL TO EDUCATION STATUS” (Congress Daily, 2001). Then the “Student Adjustment Act of 2001” (H.R. 1918) was created as a limited version which lowered the age eligibility and was also the first bill to be given the short title of “Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act” or “DREAM Act.” Since first introduced in 2001 by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Richard Durbin (D-IL), the DREAM Act has come up for a vote several times. The act failed to pass in the U.S. Congress twice in 2003-2004 by a 16-3 vote and again failed in 2006 by a voice vote without dissent as an amendment to the Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) bill (S.2611). The DREAM Act has provisions to extend citizenship to illegal immigrant children but was denied multiple times until considered as a stand-alone bill (S.2205). It soon garnered a bipartisan majority vote of 52-44 in the Senate but failed to reach the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture. Many Republicans like Ted Cruz, Texas Governor Rick Perry, Mitt …show more content…

However, this problem has been becoming more well-known to people recently since the uproar of the GOP Presidential debate in 2011. “114,000 potential beneficiaries with at least an associate’s degree would be immediately eligible for conditional Lost Policy Release (LPR) status. 934,000 children under 18 could be eligible for conditional LPR status in the future, which would provide them with incentives to finish high school and pursue a postsecondary education or join the military. 489,000 potential beneficiaries could be eligible for conditional LPR status in the future if they obtain a GED” (Batalova, Jeanne, & McHugh, M., 2010). A myth about the DREAM Act is that it is an amnesty. Opponents claim that it puts students in the front line for green cards. The fact is that the DREAM Act requires responsibility and accountability of students who also meet initial requirements. These young adults who qualify and apply would receive conditional permanent residency status that is valid for six years (NAFSA, n.d.). In fact, according to a recent analysis by the Migration Policy Institute, just 38 percent of all potential beneficiaries will successfully complete the DREAM Act’s rigorous process and earn permanent immigration

More about DREAM Act: A Social Analysis

Open Document