Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis on cyrus the great
Thesis on cyrus the great
Thesis on cyrus the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thesis on cyrus the great
Good Afternoon Miss Silk and classmates. For my project, I will be exploring a significant figure - Cyrus the Great. His impact on the ancient world is extremely well known, and I will be assessing the legacy of Cyrus the Great’s rule in ancient history.
During his establishment and rule of the Archaemenid Empire, Cyrus was exceptionally impactful in the way he ruled, including his structure of government and treatment of people in the lands he conquered. The importance of this figure cannot be understated and this led to the decision to study his legacy.
The sources which will be used are a mix of primary sources, mainly from Greek and Babylonian texts, as well as secondary sources such as books and websites. Sources such as Herodotus, Xenophon
He first ascended to the throne of the Median Empire, and then subsequently conquered neighbouring areas such as the Indus area and the Babylonian Empire. Both Herodotus and Xenophon agree that he established a robust form of government, and the people of the land which he conquered respected him due to his tolerance of languages and religion.
The source that will be analysed in this speech is the Cyropedia by Xenophon, produced around 370 BCE. It is a biography of Cyrus the Great, merged with some fictional elements. Through close study of the source, many interesting points about perspective, reliability and usefulness can be made.
Firstly, Xenophon presents a surprising perspective on his rule, portraying him in an extremely positive light. This is intriguing, considering the tense relations between the Persian and the Greek Empire. Xenophon writes that “…here is a man …who won for himself obedience from thousands of his fellows, from cities and tribes innumerable: we must ask ourselves whether the government of men is after all an impossible or even a difficult task, provided one set about it in the right way.” Xenophon praises Cyrus’ rule, exemplifying him as one of the most admirable and righteous kings in ancient history. Given his background, it is highly unlikely that Cyrus the Great differed considerably from Xenophon’s
He then united them into the Archaemenid Empire. However, Xenophon completely ignores this, and claims that Cyrus gained the throne from Cyaxares, the son of the king of Medes who does not exist. He even makes reference to these wars in his other texts, clearly demonstrating bias. It can be concluded that the Cyropedia is unreliable when investigating the life of Cyrus the Great.
Usefulness is also another a factor in assessing the Cyropedia. Due to the partly fictional nature of the book, some historians believe that it does not hold any reliable historical evidence. However, it is still useful for assessing his legacy. Regardless of whether Xenophon’s work was truly an accurate depiction of Cyrus the Great, his book has been read by millions of people.
The Cyropedia may not be useful for gaining accurate facts about his life, but how his rule was portrayed and his importance still makes it a valuable source. For example, the Roman historian Aristobulus who accompanied Alexander the Great to the tomb of Cyrus had seen the devastation of robbery on Cyrus’ tomb, and had been ordered to repair the tomb. This is evidence that Alexander greatly respected
* Xenophon in Seven Volumes, 3. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; William Heinemann, Ltd., London, 1980.)
The three aspects of this worldview often when illustrated in historical works, such as in Spartan Society, need to be understood and examined together because of the large amount of overlapping in worldview concepts. For example, the humanistic view of Lycurgus and his many great accomplishments does not only prove the emphasis of human accomplishments as seen in ancient Greek humanism, but as they are often put in contrast to the other countries and described as these ideals that the “other” cannot attain proves to illustrate the idealism present in the worldview of the ancient Spartan people. Lycurgus, as recorded in Spartan Society, also is seen in a rationalistic way of thought. Xenophon will even say, “I certainly admire him and consider him in the highest degree a wise man” (Spartan Society, 166). Lycurgus, the highest of wise men, is the leader, and the man who does not follow the ways of the “others,” but takes the high road and creates the ideal society through his many great accomplishments. The “others” or sometimes referred to as “elsewhere” is mentioned frequently in this account of this great
Herodotus. “Greece Saved from Persian Conquest.” Readings in Ancient History. Eds. Nels M. Bailkey and Richard Lim. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.
Throughout the tale, Telemachus continually grows into the role of a confident, clever and wise young man, striving to live up to his reputation as Odysseus’ son and Prince of Ithaca. His mother, and Odysseus’ wife, Penelope, is a symbol of marital fidelity, having waited for her husband’s return for twenty long years and refusing to succumb to the Suitors demands that she marry one of them, and instead employing trickery and subterfuge to evade their pressing stipulations. In stark contrast, the Suitors are very static characters, neither growing nor changing in character development throughout the tale. Both Telemachus and Penelope are dynamic characters because their characters grow, develop and change. Through the reading of this epic poem of Odysseus’ ten-year journey, we also gain a keen insight into ancient Greek society, and the social expectations one might encounter. The Greeks were very hospitable and very welcoming, even to foreign outsiders. There is also a great presence of both aristocracy and patriarchy in action appearing in this tale, both key aspects of ancient Greek
Augustus and Cyrus overlap in positively promoting their efforts to reform and restore the cultural institutions of their Kingdoms and Empires, to improve the livelihoods of their peoples. Both Cyrus in Babylon and Augustus in Rome, ascend to power following upon times of destruction and deterioration. In both first person accounts, the men employ the positive strategy of restoring the culture and in turn the faith of their societies in order to reestablish support for their kingships. Cyrus is poignant in choosing to emphasize, “Daily, I supplied (the temple) [with offerings of x gee]se, two ducks, and ten turtledoves above the former (offerings) of geese, ducks, and turtledoves.” His phrasing shows his desire to place himself above all previous
...rule of Amenemhet. He was responsible for rebuilding democracy, staff of scribes and administrations. He used propaganda literature to reinforce his position as king. The Egyptians pictured him as a good shepherd opposed to inaccessible god. Ammon was given prominise over other gods. His kingdom became extremely powerful. He established trades with foreign land and formed a standing Army and built forts on the southern frontier.
Dionysius I of Syracuse garnered a reputation as a warmongering tyrant who harmed his people with his oppressive regime. However many surviving sources that explore his rule were written by people who were ideologically opposed to perceived tyrants. It is therefore quite possible that aspects of Dionysius rule where left out or exaggerated to suit the author`s anti-tyrannical agenda. It is the intention of this paper to argue that Dionysius rule did in fact benefit Syracuse more than he harmed it during his lifetime. His domestic and foreign affairs will be explored in order to show how he in fact benefitted the Syracusan state as well as the majority of its people. It will however also be argued that his legacy did harm the Syracusan state but that overall Dionysius rule was beneficial in his lifetime.
Intro: There are a wide variety of themes present throughout the Odyssey, written by Homer. Be it hospitality, perseverance, vengeance or power of the Gods, loyalty is truly the theme that brings the whole book together. Being 10 years after the Trojan War, many have forgotten about Odysseus and his men as they constantly brave what the gods throw their way. This essay will be talking about Odysseus and Penelope’s mutual loyalty to one another, the loyal relationships between Gods and men and finally, the loyalty Odysseus’ men show for him until death. This essay with prove to us that without loyalty, Odysseus’ legendary journey would have been put to an end near where they started. The general theme of loyalty is what kept Odysseus motivated and determined.
The book written by Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, contains two controversial debates between distinguished speakers of Athens. The two corresponding sides produce convincing arguments which can be taken as if produced as an honest opinion or out of self-interest. The two debates must be analyzed separately in order to conclude which one and which side was speaking out of honest opinion or self-interest, as well as which speakers are similar to each other in their approach to the situation.
An important theme in Herodotus’ histories is that of Religion. The perception we get of Persian religion from Herodotus may be perceived as biased and not entirely truthful and so it is important to dig deeper and study the subject from both the Greek perspective and the non-Greek perspective. According to Herodotus, a possible religious motif might lie behind the reason for the Persian wars with the Greeks’ destruction of the sanctuary of Cybebe (Herodotus 5.101-102). Greek authors have since then created a perception of Persian luxury and decadence and although literature from Herodotus, Ctesias and Xenophon can be quite useful, one must be cautious of their interpretation as the bias in their sources are very evident. I will therefore take a deeper look into the question at hand by examining Persian religion, its origins and ideals, then moving onto the tolerance shown by the Persian kings, their destruction or construction of temples and integration into religions of other cultures. All this will be done whilst examining what Greek sources and non-Greek sources say about the matter.
In Thucydides’, “The Peloponnesian War”, there is a specific passage that was rejected in antiquity and is still reject now by most modern scholars, book 3 paragraph 84. It does seem, however, that this paragraph was added in by almost a want to-be Thucydides imitator because it seems to break his character. Nevertheless, I believe that this paragraph should be included with the rest of the book. Although, the text is somewhat difficult to understand how it could fit in with Thucydides, it does follow his train of thought throughout the books. My argument is that I fully agree, that the passage in book 3 paragraph 84, is indeed Thucydides’, although it seems a little out of place, it fits in with the other themes of his work and this paper will explain how.
...'s future, creating a blurred line between the real and fantastical. Fact and fiction continues to cohabitate in the daily debate and rituals of Modern Greece and it is quite possible that the Delphic Oracle is to praise and/or to blame.
In this essay, I am going to anaylise the Peloponnesian War. I will look at what appears to have caused the war, how it developed, and what the outcome of it was. As Thucydides is virtually the only surviving primary source of this event, I will also discuss the man and his method.
"The Flow of History." FC25: Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Era (336 BCE-31 BCE). n.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014.
Xenophon, (430-c.354 BC) Athenian peer of Plato and fellow student of Socrates, is known for his philosophical writings including Anabasis, Cyropoedia, and Memorobilia. Xenophon wrote extensively on the domestic economy in his Economist and defined the duties of a wife therein (the overseer of the home and children) and marriage as a “partnership ordained by the gods.” Not much is known about the life of Xenophon after his education. It is, however, recorded that Xenophon served as a mercenary in Cyrus’ army. After he returned to Greece, Xenophon joined Spartan General Thibron and fought his own city-state of Athens, for the Spartan king, at the Battle of Coronea. For this crime against his home state, he was banished from Athens and lived on property provided by the Spartans near Olympia.