Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of cursive writing
Importance of cursive handwriting
Importance of cursive handwriting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of cursive writing
USA today has posted a statistic saying that there are 41 states that do not require cursive to be taught(Tarshis). As of recently the Common Core standards do not require penmanship, specifically cursive, as they use to in favor of typing and print. Cursive Writing is an unnecessary skill that should not be taught. With the digital age growing and devices being more and more common the ability to write in flowing letters is not needed. Anne Trubek Brings to attention the bonuses of typing at a young age stating “Many students now achieve typing automaticity ...This allows them to focus on higher-order concerns, such as rhetorical structure and word choice”. Kids are able to type rapidly to allow for other subjects to be taught. This allows Students to focus on what they are learning instead of making the letter “P” look perfect. When comparing the pros and cons of cursive writing the use of digital texts available to read is brought up with the simple statement .“Digital texts make it obsolete”(”Debate Over Cursive Writing: Necessary Skill Or a Waste of Time?”). Any document that was in cursive can now be read by anyone as many important cursive documents have been transcribed digitally. The ability to read these documents in …show more content…
Australian experts and finland's board of education agree saying “learning to type was "more relevant to everyday life"”(Kerin).Typing will be used much more frequently than cursive. With only so much time in the day it is more important to teach the skill that will be used. Trubek comments on the decline of handwriting, let alone cursive explaining “If printing letters remains a useful if rarely used skill, cursive has been superannuated”.In today’s world printing by hand is becoming less and less present. Teaching children something they will never use, such as cursive, does not make sense.Cursive even loses the priority of child
Cursive should not be taught in schools! Schools don’t need cursive. There are other things that kids could be doing in class. Read my next paragraph to find out what and why.
In conclusion, Cursive writing is very well out dated. We use technology now more than ever. Maybe a new common core standard should be computer skills. As cursive writing holds no benefits to students. The truth comes out, cursive writing has essentially disapeared. So why ever bring it
...rner. Teachers simply don’t have enough time to teach handwriting. We want students to be able to express themselves, and be assessed on this skill, yet these same students have to rely on electronic devices not only for writing, but for grammar and vocabulary. Most schools don’t have funding to place a computer in every student’s hands, so they should not be asked to replace writing with typing. Learning to write by hand should be taught in elementary school because of its impact on learning to read, self-expression and higher education.
Many were once against typography when it first emerged. One prime example was Plato, who Ong and Postman both mention at some point in their work. In fact, Ong states that “Writing, Plato has Socrates say in the Phaedrus, is inhuman, pretending to establish outside the mind what in reality can only be in the mind. Writing is simply a thing, something to be manipulated, something inhuman, artificial, a manufactured product” (Ong 27). He then goes on to say that many have made the same argument about computers today. However, the essential message from this quote is that many believed that these technologies would have a negative effect on the way we think. Ong goes on to disprove Plato’s rationale by explaining that “…his philosophically analytic thought, including his analysis of the effects of writing, was only possible because of the effects that writing was having on mental processes” (Ong 29). Due to the fact that he was even able to analyze typography meant that he was subsuming to typography’s nature. Postman would agree that Plato would not have been able to formulate his analytic views if it were not for writing. Postman wrote that literacy is highly rational. He iterated that discourse in a culture dominated by print tend to have a coherent arrangement of an idea, a fact, or a claim. Postman would explain to Ong that the cause of this is similar to some of the reasons Plato
Technology is not killing our ability to write, but it is reviving it and pushing our literacy to new directions. Andrea Lunsford, from Stanford University, conducted an experiment to scrutinize college students way of writing. Her results were alarming, "I think we are in the midst of a literacy revolution the likes of which we haven't seen since Greek civilization." Lunsford discovered that only 38% of students writing occurred within the classroom, the rest was written in their own free time. Most of our socializing now takes place online and always involves text or writing. Before the Internet, most of our communication was verbal. The only time Americans wrote was for a school assignment and if their job required writing. Otherwise most people didn't write another paragraph once they left
Technology,” by discussing the ways the invention of the computer changed literacy practices. The computer was seen as a “gateway to literacy,” causing Baron to reflect on the technologies before the computer that led to literacy. Throughout his article, he questions “where literacy began” and “how we got to where we are” present day in our literacy practices. With his article, Baron’s goal is to get his audience to recognize that writing itself is technology. Baron discusses the stages, evolution, and impact of literacy technologies over time.
Thesis: Cursive writing should be taught in school because children today only know how to hashtag and text. Very few actually know how to write in cursive. Learning cursive will enhance students’ spelling ability and reading skills. It will also help students with learning disabilities.
The article claims that students are “remarkably adept” at “addressing their audience and adapting their tone and technique to best get their point across.” In the social media atmosphere, children post a paragraph or two in which they get their point across. This teaches them to write in a way to display their tone in a deliberate and distinct manner. The usage of technology by students is appropriate. Thompson’s excerpt evidently proves this prominent truth as it shows a “literacy revolution” in which technology improves the capability of writing.
What happened to the pen and paper quality of literacy? Traditional elements such as the pen and paper method has been changed due to the advancement of technology the quality of learning has been digitized to fit this day and age. “Just as the nature of and expectation for literacy has changed in the past century and a half, so has the nature of writing. Much of that change has been due to technological developments from pen and paper, to typewriter, to word processor to network computer, to design software capable of com...
Handwriting is essential in today’s society. Learning to handwrite helps improve motor skills, memory, and comprehension. These skills are necessary for students’ success in school and in their future. Due to technological advancements, schools deem such handwriting unnecessary. This is not practical, but it is.
The same ideology reigns true for cursive writing; it needs to be treated like a foreign language, not something glazed over with a single-use worksheet. As students age, the use of the paper versus technology is shocking, with the increase of paper assessments becoming at least twice that done on
...he Constitution or Declaration of Independence- the very documents that contain the values and morals of our country. Cursive handwriting is no longer taught in many schools, thus impairing student’s ability to create neural passageways, improve fluency, and gain dexterity. Sure, there is no particular daily need for the delicate script, but letting the writing go extinct is unethical. Many countries describe the USA as lazy and culture poor- we need to prove these other nations wrong. Not only for the benefit of getting a better reputation, but also because we respect our language and want to preserve it for future generations. The death of cursive can cease. There is a vaccine, a cure, an antidote. This cure? Teaching the language in schools once again, typing less and scribing more, and most importantly informing individuals about the value of this set of ABC’s.
In the book “The Shallows” Nicholas Carr really stress how technology is ruining many brains. He believes in the natural ways of learning, the way of learning that drives a person away from technology. What Nicholas Carr fail to realize is that technology is toughening children’s ability to gather information quickly and thoroughly. Nicholas Carr said, “The net’s interactivity gives us powerful new tools for finding information, expressing ourselves, and conversing with others. It also turns us into lab rats. Contently pressing levers to get tiny pellets of social or intellectual nourishment.” This usage of technology by children has claim to be handy in writing skills because children are able to access sites and games that can help their writing performance. Children can also access information and sites about writing that teachers can’t show them. Sites such as “Read&Write,” “iWriteWords,” and “Write About This” (Saxenal 1). “Read&Write” is an app that helps children write letters (Saxena 1). “IWriteWords” helps and teaches children ways to improve handwriting. This app has up to 70 levels that require a child to trace letters both lowercase and uppercase (Saxena 1). “Write About This” is another app that helps with teaching and practicing different writing skills. This writing app is suitable for children of all ages and this app is also geared for children to be creative with their writing style (Saxena 1). Some people
Will digital tools help students’ writing? Melinda Kolk is related to Shelly Terrell argues digital tools are effective for students’ writing. This article “Creative Technology Tools and Writing across the Curriculum” give details about the speaker, audience and larger context about digital tools is effective for students’ writing. Melinda Kolk makes the same argument that digital tools are effective for students’ writing and have similarities to Shelly Terrell. Melinda Kolk argues, “Students want to know that their ideas, work, and effort matter.
Plus, there is the added need to educate kids on new technology. However, I only needed one school year to learn how to write in cursive and I now write in a hybrid of cursive and manuscript. Furthermore, although it has been disproven by Steve Graham in The Journal of Educational Research that cursive is faster than manuscript, it was found “papers written with mixed-mostly cursive letters generally receive[] higher ratings for legibility than papers written with [manuscript, cursive, or mixed-mostly manuscript] did” (290). The College Board also found SAT essays written in cursive received a slightly better score than those in