Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on modern society
Effects of technology on modern society
Effects of technology on modern society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on modern society
Abortion, school prayer, gay rights, gun politics and many more are all a part of the list of controversies that divide our country. A culture war is a conflict between groups with different ideals, beliefs, and issues. James Davison Hunter’s book, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, shows that these issues “are not isolated from one another but are part of a fabric of conflict which constitutes nothing short of a struggle over the meaning of America. Unlike the religious and cultural conflict that historically divided the nation, the contemporary culture war is fought along new and, in many ways, unfamiliar lines” (Hunter). Hunter argued that two definable polarities existed in the major issues of the war. The new shift in cultural acceptance of the times has changed the culture war. Many Americans argue that “there is a religious war going on in this country, a cultural war as critical to the kind of nation we shall be as the Cold War itself, for this war is for the soul of America” (Fiorina). However, some argue that the culture war is only based on small differences between the Democrats and Republicans. The issue at hand is how divided the American public is today and how much time is focused on this polarization. This division is not just a small difference in parties, but more a difference in moral and religious issues.
One of the major issues in the cultural war is the idea of abortion. The Republican Party supports the human life amendment while opposing abortion funding. They “assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed [upon]” (Republican Party Platform ). The Republican Party also strongly promotes adoption and abst...
... middle of paper ...
...w the issue regarding their beliefs from religion. The culture war of America is always in view for the population. So much time is focused on the issue at hand instead of the actual progress being made. The moral differences between parties take preference over solving the issue. The culture war is not an issue of cultural differences, but more of religious and moral differences.
References
Bowman, Carl Desportes. "The Myth of a Non-Polarized America." 2011. The Hedgehog: Critical Reflection on Contemporary Culture. 1 March 2014.
"Democratic Party Platform." 2013. On The Issues. 27 February 2014.
Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. Culture war?. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005.
Hunter, James Davison. Culture Wars: The Stuggle to Define America. NewYork: BasicBooks, 1991.
"Republican Party Platform ." 2013. On The Issues. 28 February 2014.
Fiorina, Morris P., and Samuel J. Abrams. Culture war?: The Myth of a Polarized America. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Education, 2006. Print.
Increasingly over the past two decades and in part thanks to the publication of James Davison Hunter’s book, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, the idea of a culture war in American politics has been gaining attention. While the tension between conservatives and liberals is palpable, it’s intensity has proven hard to measure. However, it doesn’t seem that many Americans are polarized on the topic of polarization as most would agree that the culture war is real (Fiorina, 2005). This thinking is what prompted Morris Fiorina to write the book Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. In it, Fiorina outlines an argument against the idea of a culture war by looking at party affiliation by states, how public opinion on hot button issues changed over time and various explanations for why Americans are so hung up on the topic of polarization. While Fiorina makes a good argument, the evidence supporting the culture war is too powerful to explain away.
The ability for people to look at a situation from a different perspective is vital in today’s globalized society. Diversity is the most important core attribute we share that gives us a new perspective to assess situations differently through our diverse backgrounds and upbringings. Unlike Patrick J. Buchanan’s argument in his essay titled “Deconstructing America,” diversity is not a burden, but rather a necessity in America’s culture. Conversely, Fredrickson 's essay titled, “Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective,” illustrated a more precise version of American history that disproves Buchanan’s ethnocentric ideologies. Buchanan speaks of diversity as a narrow, one-way street. The imprecise interpretations of history
Both works provide valuable insight into the political atmosphere of American society, but vary greatly in their intended message, usage of persuasive method, projected audience, and choice of tone. One can see resemblance, however, in the fact that the authors of both articles strive to spark a reaction in their readers and encourage change. In that regard, while Hedges’
American Cultural Studies: An Introduction to American Culture. New York, NY: Routledge, 1997. Print. The. Marger, Martin N. Race and Ethnic Relations: American and Global Perspectives.
“Republican Party Platforms, Then and Now.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 28 Aug. 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
James Wilson’s article, “How Divided are We?”, attempts to convince the reader that there is polarization (a culture war) in the United States. Wilson does not define polarization by partisan disagreements solely, rather as “an intense commitment to a candidate, a culture, or an ideology that sets people in one group definitively apart from people in another, rival group” (Canon 205). This polarization stretches to the extent that one group’s set of beliefs is totally correct and the rival is wholly wrong (Canon 206). Wilson provides three chief factors for the growth of polarization...
In today’s culture, dominated by being right and shunning anyone who dares to oppose that right option, society is in a constant game of who can convert the most people to their beliefs. Since there were people to debate about it, even before there were Twitter memes of Kim Davis to retweet or website articles like The Plan For Muslim World Dominance, religion has been a staple topic to be right about. As society appears to be falling apart at its seams, it is time to set pride aside and find common ground. As a nation of immigrates, Americans live side-by-side with Muslims, Hindus, Jews, and Jehovah’s Witnesses. No longer do public schools have Christian-based daily pray, and almost 10% of the 114th Congress consists of religions other than Christianity. It is time the world’s people found their
Thomas, Oliver "Buzz". "How To Keep The 'United' In United States: Coping With Religious Diversity In The World's First 'New' Nation." Church & State Feb. 2007: 19+. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 1 Mar. 2013.
In the past few years, America has been becoming more and more liberal with its stance on various issues. We are changing laws and practices that have long been in place, and while some view it as progressive, others view it as morally wrong. By encouraging changes in practices that were established with a Biblical mindset, America has begun to subtly alienate the Christian. Although America is still a land where individuals are free to practice their faith freely, it is becoming harder to display...
Worldwide abortion has taken the lives of billions of babies for years the Democratic Party is choice for a number of reasons. “Abortion dates back to Ancient Greece where doctors were forbidden to help procure an abortion. One Greek gynecologist suggested that women should engage in energetic exercise, jumping, carrying heavy objects, and riding animals” (Mollienr1 1). Consistent with Roe v. Wade, the Democratic Party position on abortion is choice standing behind the right of every woman to choose regardless of ability to pay. The Republican Party opposes abortion, their pro-life agenda supporting the human life 14th amendment to the constitution protections apply to unborn children. Family planning supports a woman choice in whether to keep or abort a child. It’s the women’s right to determine whether or not to have a child, her body, her choice the government holds no control over any individuals body and what they choose to do. Women’s health clinic attempt to prevent abortion complications by following the many regulations in varies states that have legalized abortion. Even with these restrictions many women who seek an ab...
Griswold, W. (2013). Cultures and societies in a changing world. (4th ed.). United States of America: SAGE publications Inc.
Andrew Hartman’s A History of the Culture Wars: A War For the Soul of America was shockingly hard to digest due to harsh reality of the right and left controversy that we see in America politics today. Hartman focused this so called “culture war” throughout the sixties on issues like feminism, racial segregation which contradicted equality and separation of church/state in the educational system.
Kroeber, A. and C. Klockhohn, Culture: A Critical Review of Concept and Definition New York: Vintage Books, 1989.
Family-planning policy in the United States has recently taken a dramatic change in direction. Over the last decade, the pace of legislation designed to restrict access to abortion services has accelerated [1]. At the same time, public funding for contraception has been singled out as the specific target of ideological opposition [2] and has become newly entangled in the abortion debate. Although abortion has long been controversial, this shift in attitudes toward contraception is both surprising and recent. It marks a striking change from the 1950s and 1960s, during which the family-planning movement generated strong bipartisan support for widespread voluntary access to contraception [3]. This era culminated in 1970 with a Republican president,