Cultural Values, And The UN Declaration Of Human Rights

The American Anthropological Association in its 1947 “statement on human rights” situated its advice on the principle of the social context of the individual and the significance of including the sociocultural values of his/her society into consideration when drafting an inclusive non Western-Euro/American-centric “UN declaration of human rights”. It holds that each group of people would perceive its culture as the most benevolent and thus the inherent goodness of their values should be sufficient in regulating their affairs and protecting their rights. It disregards the historical fact that the “white man burden” was not limited to the Europeans and North Americans, but many nations have engaged in imperial expansionism around the world before

1948. On Science and Human Rights. American Anthropologist 50: 352-5.

Engle, Karen. 2001. From Skepticism to Embrace: Human Rights and the American Anthropological

Association. Human Rights Quarterly 23: 536-560.

Farmer, Paul, and Nicole Gastineau. 2002. Rethinking Health and Human Rights: Time for a Paradigm Shift.

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 30(4): 655-66

Harris, Sam. 2011. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. Simon and Schuster.

Merry, Sally Engle. 2003. Human Rights Law and the Demonization of Culture (And Anthropology Along the

Way). Polar: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 26(1): 55-77.

Riles, Annelise. 2006. Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage.

American Anthropologist 108(1):52:65.

Shelton, Dinah. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. OUP Oxford.

Steward, Julian. 1948. Comments on the Statement on Human Rights. American Anthropologist 50: 351-2.

Turner, Terence. 1997. Human Rights, Human Difference: Anthropology’s Contribution to an Emancipatory

Cultural Politics. Journal of Anthropological Research 53(3):