Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women in ancient Rome
The role of women in ancient Rome
The role of women in Rome and Greece
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Just as religion is an important part of any society, religion and worship of the gods was a fundamental concept to the foundation of Rome. As Rome continued to expand across Europe and Africa, the incorporation of societies conquered by Rome brought about foreign religious identities and cults. Specifically, contact with the Greeks had left an impression on the Romans, with the Romans adopting the majority of the Greek Gods while changing most of their names. While some of the foreign deities were seen as a danger to the Roman elite, such as the Cult of Bacchus, some were accepted and sponsored by the Roman Senate, which is the case for the Cult of Magna Mater. What drove the Roman Senate to suppress the Cult of Bacchus while welcoming the Cult of Magna Mater into the religion practiced by the society?
The little information that we know concerning the Cult of Bacchus is
…show more content…
Evidence supports that the goal of the Senate was to control the religions practiced by their citizens in order to maintain control over Rome. In the case of the Cult of Bacchus, we see a cult that was not formed by the Roman elite, but was brought about through its citizens. While Livy may argue that suppression of the cult may have been morally motivated to preserve the image of Roman values, the Roman Senate was afraid of an uprising due to cult gaining popularity that they could not control. The cult was mostly ran by women, which went against the patriarchal Roman society, and sought to initiate young men before they were of age to serve in the military and come of age through the common channels experienced by men at the time. The Cult of Bacchus was a threat to the Roman Senate’s control over Italy and the way of life, as they had known it. The Senatorial Decree on the Rites of Bacchus and the persecution of 7,000 members supports this
In the early second century BC, the Roman Senate accrued a powerful ruling over the city’s civil government. Rome’s elite members lived at the heart of Rome and gave power to the members of the Senate. These elite citizens gained nobility through prior ancestors whom held consulships. With the prior influential heritage, they pushed the decisions of the Senate in order to gain more wealth and land. This often meant bribes, threats, and posturing to sway leaders to vote for laws that were favorable. This period did not last for long as for in the latter half of the second century growth in the cities occurred and meant change for the patrician nobility. Tribunes, such as Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus used this change to enforce social policies that were in favor of the plebeians, but also their eventual downfall.
Rome went through major changes in its culture because of the start of the growing spread of Christianity. Early on Christianity was not the chief religion and around 64 AD Christians were actually punished and targeted by the ruler Nero. There was an order to kill any Christian, most were killed in very brutal ways. The Christians were killed because the ruler was in fear that the Roman Gods would be upset that they (all of the people) were not worshipping them (the gods) and they would punish the
The senate was a collective of the state’s best people, by tradition chosen from the aristocracy. Their role was to advise the elected magistrates. In practice, they came to be the collective of former magistrates. Their authority lay in their advice became like orders to serving magistrates. Their authority lay in their prestige and their experience. The roman senate was basically the governing body of men in Rome. It consisted of few hundred members, all who had to have property or money.
Philosopher A: In the Republic, the Senate was the primary branch of the Roman government and held the majority of the political power. It controlled funds, administration and foreign policy, and had significant influence of the everyday life of the Roman people. When Augustus came to power, he kept the Senate and they retained their legal position. The Emperor’s rule was legitimized by the senate as he needed the senators experience to serve as administrators, diplomats and generals. Although technically the most authoritative individual in Rome, Augustus strived to embody Republican values. He wanted to relate and connect to all parts of society including Plebeians. Through generosity and less extravagance, Augustus achieved a connection with the common people.
...ion this all showed that style of governing and ruling an empire started a century long pattern of events that eventually lead to the fall and destruction of the old oligarchy led by the Senate. The combination of desire for personal gain and glory of a politician or general was what weakened the Roman customs and the Senate. This was a cycle among the Senate, to find themselves stuck in a problem and to find others to fix with of course military means but in turn make everything more corrupt with their disruptive practices such as Pompey and Julius Caesar. But they were not the only ones there were others who were to blame for causing such decay and corruption such as Marius, Sulla, Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus. They were the ones who kept this corruption cycle going and it was Augustus Caesar who finally broke the cycle and brought stability and order back to Rome.
"When Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus sought to establish the liberty of the common people and expose the crimes of the oligarchs, the guilty nobles took fright and opposed their proceedings by every means at their disposal" - Cicero. The Gracchi brothers were clearly well intentioned men who had the interests of Rome at heart, instead of their own, which was a common attitude amongst the other senators. The reforms of the Gracchi were long over-due and their programs were genuine attempts to deal with Rome's problems. During the Gracchi's existence, Rome was facing a number of social, political and economic problems. They were frustrated with the conservatism and selfishness of the oligarchy and so adopted methods which threatened the balance between the senate, the magistrates and the people which had existed for a very long time - in this way they can be regarded as revolutionary. It is likely that they interpreted the problems far too simply, and they failed to see that Roman society had changed. The Senate also failed to see these changes and reacted to the Gracchi's actions in the only way they could - violence. The senate felt threatened by the Gracchi's methods, and as a result violence was used for the first time in Roman politics.
... to improve humanity, the Romans looked to each other to find meaning and purpose in life. Because of the poor answers to life’s basic questions that resulted from this act and the harshness of the Caesars, Rome eventually fell from power. In summary, the Roman concept of God in relation to the Caesars contributed to the civilization’s decline.
Christianity explicitly sought to connect the natural world and the supernatural world in the embodiment of Jesus. Since Jesus was the "son of G-d" in his incarnation on earth, the matter is not that the supernatural world is a part of mankind, but instead that mankind is a part of the supernatural. But, Jesus, being entirely divine in nature (as well as entirely human in nature) did not give into the same temptations as the Roman gods. Christianity stressed a connection between the world and G-d - since the Christian G-d is meant to be personal (the establishment of this personal bond would therefore be salvation). The Roman cults had no such concept - and so remained separate from humanity.
In The Bacchae, Euripedes portrays the character of Pentheus as an ignorant, stubborn, and arrogant ruler. These character flaws accompanied with his foolish decisions set the stage for his tragic downfall. Pentheus' blatant disregard to all warnings and incidents, which prove that Dionysus is truly a god, lead him to his own death. In the end, his mistakes are unforgiving and his punishment is just.
The struggle over reason and passion is something we deal with in everyday life. Not only is it dealt with through decisions we make, but also through moral debates regarding humanity and its inherent selfishness. While there is no right answer, Plato and Euripides expand on the issues of reason and passion, relating them to how one acquires and maintains a virtuous persona. In Plato’s Republic, Socrates emphasizes reason and passion as harmonious in the virtuous soul, while Euripides, in The Bacchae, suggests that reason and passion are contradictory forces.
Within the Ancient world, political leaders manipulated the balance between religion and politics to further their own power. In particular, Gaius Octavius (63 BC – 14 AD) later known as Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus, exploited the ‘imperial cult’ as a political tool within the Roman Empire. Termed by modern historians, the imperial cult was a combination of local religious cults where people worshipped the emperor as a deity who received divine honours exceeding all other living entities. By directly allowing the imperial cult in the Roman provinces, this achieved much required unity and stability throughout the Empire. Consequently, this enabled Augustus to indirectly incorporate the cult into Rome’s ritualistic polytheism practices.
Throughout the history of Rome, from the monarchy to the late empire, religion had played a great role in it's society and was involved in almost every aspect of the life of the Roman citizen. It was common for each house to have it's own patron god/gods and ,on special occasions, the head of the house would make a sacrifice to the personal gods of the family. Also, great festivals were usually held in honor of certain gods and would include spectacles like chariot races and Gladiatorial fights.
...uing the belief in various gods and goddesses. After the expansion of Rome they started developing other forms of deities based on Greek culture, basically meaning “Greco-Roman” religion. Although many religious cults that were connected to Rome including Greece were often accepted, many were banished.
History meets cognition: The Asclepius cult as a pattern of practice Historical research has traced the origins of the Asclepius cult and has explored its development and geographical expansion from the fifth century BCE, when it was established as an organized religious institution in Epidaurus,. Historians have further studied the development of the Epidaurian sanctuary into the most significant asclepeion and the influences it exerted on the establishment of Asclepius temples in other Greek cities as well as on the competitions between these cities seeking to promote their reputation as Asclepius cult centers. Particular attention has been payed to the institutional organization of the local sanctuaries, the topographies, architectural
Throughout our history, cults have become a prevalent part of our society. More and more cults are forming every day. Although not all of them are dangerous, some can perform practices that are toxic to their members. Cults use fear and control to gain more and more members. Once members join a cult, they are forced to perform the practices that the cult leaders require. It is through these practices that cult leaders convince their members to stay in the cult. Through mind control and scare tactics, cults have become a very powerful and dangerous part of our society.