Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The crusades were motivated by economic gain
Consequences of the crusades
Consequences of the crusades
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1095, a series of medieval battles, also known as the crusades, began between the Christians and Muslims. Pope Urban II delivered an influential speech to the knights and soldiers to fight and win the “Holy Land” back. He used convincing language as he supports the benefits of war. He states that by doing this, they will be doing God’s desire, giving them a sure passage into heaven, he also says that if whoever kill anyone that is not Christian, will be rewarded; therefore he is using religious ideals to motivate the citizens to battle. After his speech, a large amount of people started their journey to the Holy Land. The main motive behind the crusades was financial gain, but was also religious principles and prizes in the background. …show more content…
For many of the partakers in the Crusade, The pogroms that were conquered demonstrate the financial gain of the crusades.
The crusaders also attacked many different cities to gain more money for the Catholic Church. On the crusades there was a number of opportunities for individuals to get money for themselves by conquering small areas. The main purpose why they conquered cities was to take everything that the previous government possessed. A French crusader sent a letter to his wife in 1098 saying, “My dear wife, I now have twice as much silver, gold and riches as I had n I set off for this Crusade.” Most crusaders went for financial gain, and left their family and loved ones behind so that they could obtain more money and riches to bring back. This shows that one of the reasons for the crusades was for grater financial gain and when the continuation of the crusaders also gave the church more funding and in doing this gave them more power, money was the equivalent of power and this power gave Urban a higher stance and more accesses to political
power. To obtain more trust and to thrust for him self he used religion to get a better himself if he knew by using religion the people where more likely to resinate with what he was saying. To start of his enticing speech he calls them sons of God and places them in a religiously difficult place by saying “there remains still an important work for us to do” as if to say that they have not worked to the a stranded worthy enough for the lord at their job is not done. He also says, “preserve the rights of the church” saying that the church has lost its rights and by fighting in this power hungry war they will regain and preserve Christianity. Urban used his highly established religious podium to sway the devotion and loyalty of devout Christians, he vindictively twisted the words of God for his own growth used a façade and it worked. To conclude the crusades, it was just another way to gain financial power and by using religion as a loophole he caressed and charmed the people to fight. He uses false words to create a war, and two of the main10 commandments clearly states, “You shall not lie, and you shall not lust what others have.” Therefore, it cannot be God telling The Pope this since he is obviously breaking the 10 commandments. Pope Urban II motivates the knights and soldiers, and other people to go and win the “Holy Land” back, by using persuasive language and also religious ideals.
Foss explains, “What Urban needed was an enterprise, clearly virtuous in serving the ends of Christiandome… in these moments of reflection, the popes mind turned towards Jerusalem.” Urban II reflects back on the first taking of the Holy City after the defeat of the Byzantine Empire in 1071, and begins to question what his people know about the Turkish race and really the ideology of Islamic thought. Foss goes on to examine the ignorance of westerners and needed to be “reminded [by the pope] of the infamous heathens, their cruelty and hatred of Christians,” hoping this would justify the first Holy Crusade. However, Foss identifies the creativity of the Pope’s language to persuade the knights and army of the people to embark on the Holy Crusade based on the Muslims cruel actions turned onto their fellow Christians. Claiming the Muslims “Killed captives by torture…poor captives were whipped…and others were bound to the post and used as a target for arrows.” Foss examines the Popes words as an effective effort of persuasion in creating an army of crusaders to help clean “…Holy places, which are now treated with ignominy and polluted with Filthiness” and any sacrifice in Jerusalem is a “promise of a spiritual reward… and death for
The First Crusade is often cited as one of the most damnable consequences of religious fanaticism. A careful inspection of the circumstances and outcomes, however, will reveal a resultant political restructuring of Europe under the banner of Christendom. The purpose of this investigation is to investigate Pope Urban II’s motives in initiating the First Crusade, with a particular focus on the consolidation of the Western Church’s influence in Europe. Among the primary sources that will be consulted are the letter sent by Patriach Alexios of Constantinople to Urban, and an account of Urban’s speech at Clermont. Relevant excerpts from both of these primary sources, as well as contextual evidence and a wide array of historiography, will be taken
The Crusades were the first tactical mission by Western Christianity in order to recapture the Muslim conquered Holy Lands. Several people have been accredited with the launch of the crusades including Peter the Hermit however it is now understood that this responsibility rested primarily with Pope Urban II . The main goal of the Crusades was the results of an appeal from Alexius II, who had pleaded for Western Volunteers help with the prevention of any further invasions. The Pope’s actions are viewed as him answering the pleas of help of another in need, fulfilling his Christian right. However, from reading the documents it is apparent that Pope Urban had ulterior motives for encouraging engagement in the war against the Turks. The documents and supporting arguments now highlight that the Pope not only sought to recruit soldiers to help but also to challenge those who had harmed the Christians community and annihilate the Muslims. He put forth the idea that failure to recapture this lands would anger God and that by participating, God would redeem them of their previous sins.in a time of deep devoutness, it is clear this would have been a huge enticement for men to engage in the battle. Whether his motives were clear or not to his people, Pope Urban’s speeches claiming that “Deus vult!” (God wills it) encouraged many Christians to participate and take the cross.
Throughout the duration of the crusades real motivations shone though on behalf of the Crusaders. Not only did they lack a religious purpose for fighting, but they made the Muslim’s lives complicated and valueless. They were power hungry, land coveting people who fought with non Christian ideals and Morales. It should be clear to anyone and everyone that the prime motivation behind the Crusader’s fighting was power and land which would eventually lead to wealth.
The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.
Crusaders were affected economically. Crusader 3 states, “I sold my land in order to raise money for the Crusades and now I have nothing! I have no more power or wealth.” Crusader 3 was affected negatively because he sold land in order
In 1095, Pope Urban II called the first crusade. Happening between 1096 and 1099, the first crusade was both a military expedition and a mass movement of people with the simple goal of reclaiming the Holy Lands taken by the Muslims in their conquests of the Levant. The crusade ended with the capture of Jerusalem in July 1099. However, there has been much debate about whether the First Crusade can be considered an ‘armed pilgrimage’ or whether it has to be considered as a holy war. This view is complicated due to the ways in which the Crusade was presented and how the penitential nature of it changed throughout the course of the Crusade.
A main cause of the Crusades was the treatment of Christian pilgrims. They were robbed, beaten, and then sold. The main group of Turks, the Seljuk Turks, were threatening and growing in power. The Byzantine Emperor, Alexus I, began to become worried and sent out an urgent plea to Pope Urban II, in Rome. He requested for Christian knights to help him fight the Turks. Pope Urban II did agree to his appeal although Byzantine Emperors and Roman Popes were longtime rivals. He also did agree with Alexus I, in fearing that the Turks were expanding. Pope Urban encouraged French and German Bishops and Nobles to also take part in this. “ An accused race has violently invaded the lands of those Christians and had depopulated them by pillage and fire.” This is when Pope Urban II called for a crusade to free the Holy Land. Urban did agree to this having some of his own motives in mind. He was hoping his power would grow in ...
In 1071, the Byzantine Army was destroyed by the Turks who also captured their emperor, which led up to the mercenary conquering Syria and Palestine, Leaving the City of Jerusalem left to be taken by more oppressive leaders. The new leaders of Jerusalem hated the Christians and committed a widespread genocide of over 3000 Christians along with destroying churches or using them as stables. But what they didn’t realize was that it would throw their economy way out of balance which is what the old leaders had realized. This genocide of the Christian people is what sparked the need for crusades and the Rise of Christian Soldiers wanting to avenge their deaths. Emperor Alexius I sent an ambassador to Pope Urban II regarding the atrocities in Jerusalem
The First Crusade (1095-1099) had a successful outcome in which the crusaders gained entry to Jerusalem unlike the Second Crusade (1145-1149), where the crusaders didn’t get anywhere near the Holy Land. To an extent, I do believe the difference in the leadership of the two crusades did contribute to their different outcomes. However, I also believe that there were other factors which were more responsible for the outcome, such as the difference in motivation of both the leaders and the main crusading army. Both the crusades, had strong leaders and weak leaders, but it was their motivations that varied, and it was possibly this reason why their outcomes varied.
At the end of the 11th century, Western Europe had emerged as a great power, not yet as strong as the Byzantine Empire or the Islamic Empire of the Middle East and North Africa, however, it had substantial growth in political and religious influence during the Middle Ages. At this time the Byzantine Empire was under constant attack from the Seljuk Turks and many losses had lead to a significant decrease in the Byzantine territories. After the wars with the Turks, years of civil war and chaos followed until Alexius Comnenus, a general in the Byzantine army seized the throne in 1081 and took control of what was left of the Byzantine Empire.
The Fourth Crusade is considered one of the most successful yet one of the most confusing. There has never been a clear cut answer as to why this happened other than Pope Innocent III had called to return to the Holy Land and take Jerusalem the “Holy City” back from the Middle East. But was this really the end goal of the Fourth Crusade. I propose no, that this wasn’t the main goal but instead it was merely a guideline for the Fourth Crusade. The real meaning behind the call for the Fourth Crusade was to reunite the Roman and Byzantine Churches, to obtain wealth from Byzantium and to pay off the Venetians.
The First Crusade was seen from many different points of view, and every account and reference in the source must explain where, when, and by whose interests was it written. Each participant made their own crusade, and the leaders had their own beliefs. Different views often put them at odds with one another. There were four different accounts on the First Crusade from Christians, Jews, Muslims, and Byzantines. These accounts of the First Crusade all had different interpretations because of differences in religious and cultural beliefs.
During the Middle Ages, Pope Urban II called the First Crusade to take back Jerusalem from the Arabs. It was called during the Council of Clermont. He promised that those who fought in the war would be forgiven of all sins, and would go to heaven if they died during the war, allowing anyone to join the crusade, even people who kill people all the time in war. Thus sparking the beginning of the First Crusade, inspiring Christians all throughout Europe. It had people of all sorts fighting, no matter their class. It was ultimately a successful crusade, but the results of the war shows that it was not a legitimate war, due to its unjust qualities, and innocent deaths that resulted. The First Crusade was not a just because of the lack of rightful
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...