Critique of Davis Guggenheim’s documentary _Waiting for Superman_

920 Words2 Pages

In Davis Guggenheim’s documentary Waiting for Superman, he exposes mainly a one-sided argument against teachers unions, by stating the unions are a “menace and an impediment to reform.” His documentary explores the tragic ways in which the American public education system is failing the nation's children, and explores the roles that charter schools and education reformers could play in offering hope for the future. Statistics show our nation’s student dropout rates, diminishing science scores, math scores, and schools closing due to lack of funding, but numbers fail to represent the names and faces of the children whose entire futures are at stake due to the inability to enact change. Bianca, Emily, Anthony, Daisy, and Francisco are five students who deserve a better opportunity in education. By investigating how the current system is actually obstructing their education instead of bolstering it, Guggenheim opens the door to considering possible options for transformation and improvement. Guggenheim uses certain cinematic elements like interviews and cartoons, to influence an emotional response from the viewers and manipulate their opinion for the argument against its portrayal of unions. A short clip of a Milwaukee high school classroom displays students playing games, sleeping, and teachers lounging at their desks reading newspapers. The response in Howard Fuller interview displays the aggravation, disappointment, and ferocity against the actions of these teachers. Fuller fired those teachers but then forced “to rehire them with a year’s back-pay because of a provision in the teachers' contract called “tenure””, a specification by teacher unions. (Tenure is a status granted to an employee indicating that the position o... ... middle of paper ... ...eems like a strange game to me” and Kamras responds without a comment but just a smudge look on his face. Guggenheim’s cunning technique of using certain cinematic elements like interviews and cartoons, to influence an emotional response, from the viewers, manipulates their opinion in the argument against unions. The overall reaction leaves the viewers appalled by the education system and yearning to make changes by raising the standards for teachers, education, and the entire system. The beaming light of hope at the end of the tunnel may be small but is in existence and will grow when more people stand up for higher requirements for education, lower dropout rates, “removing the barriers to change” and schools generating more students prepared for college. Works Cited Waiting for Superman. Dir. Davis Guggenheim. Geoffrey Canada. Paramount Picture, 2010. Film.

Open Document