Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aspects of existentialist theory
Essays on existentionalism
Essays on existentionalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the most important existentialist to ever live was a man named Søren Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard believed that “truth is subjective and subjectivity is truth,” meaning that a variety of people can look at the same exact situation, and still comprehend it differently. Another well known existentialist is a man named Martin Heidegger. Heidegger believed that there are two types of people in this world, those who are a “Beings In The World” and those who are “Beings Towards Death” Their ideas are seen throughout the movie "Blade Runner" numerous times. Blade Runner is set in the year 2019, during a time where Los Angeles has become engulfed in urban decay, depression and darkness. In the beginning of the film we are introduced to Rick Deckard, …show more content…
During his visit he also meets Tyrell’s personal assistant, Rachael. Deckard asks Rachael numerous specified questions that ultimately alerts him that she is a replicant. Deckard expresses his surprised to Tyrell and asks him why she doesn't know that she's a Nexus-6. Tyrell then explains that she has had memories from his various family members planted inside of her mind and that he believes that she has been suspecting such. It is not until she confronts Deckard about her suspicions that she is faced with the heartbreaking truth. After learning the truth of herself, she accepts her condition and continues to live life the way she sees fit. Another instance when Kierkegaard’s ideas are demonstrated is when Deckard begins to fall in love with Rachael, which ultimately complicates his feelings about slaughtering other replicants. Being that Deckard is a blade runner it is his duty to "retire" any replicate that he comes into contact with. After he initially comes into contact with Rachael his outlook on replicants start to shift. One prominent moment is when she saved him from Leon, this caused him to be much more sympathetic towards her. As a result, when she asks him if he would retire her, he tells her he wouldn't, but someone else surely …show more content…
Throughout the movie, Roy and the other replicants try to find a way to avoid their terrible fate. As Roy and Deckard fight at the end of the movie, Roy he feels his body beginning to degrade. Roy also realizes that no matter what he does to Deckard, he will not be able to change the fact that he is going to die. As he decides to accept his fate it is clear that he doesn't want to be alone in his final moments. All he wants is someone to be there to remember him, so that his memory can live on even though his own memories "will be lost in time like tears in rain". This story reflects the ideas of both the Danish Søren Kierkegaard and the German philosopher Martin Heidegger. Kierkegaard believed “truth is subjective and subjectivity is truth” which can be seen when both Deckard and Rachael have to come to terms with their new found “truths and subjectivity”. Throughout the story the character Roy shows significant signs of a transition from being a “Being In The World” to “Being Toward Death”. He does so when he finally coming to terms with his own mortality and, in his final moments, accepts it instead of continuing to fight against
People one can never really tell how person is feeling or what their situation is behind closed doors or behind the façade of the life they lead. Two masterly crafted literary works present readers with characters that have two similar but very different stories that end in the same result. In Herman Melville’s story “Bartleby the Scrivener” readers are presented with Bartleby, an interesting and minimally deep character. In comparison to Gail Godwin’s work, “A Sorrowful Woman” we are presented with a nameless woman with a similar physiological state as Bartleby whom expresses her feelings of dissatisfaction of her life. Here, a deeper examination of these characters their situations and their ultimate fate will be pursued and delved into for a deeper understanding of the choice death for these characters.
Blade Runner and New Brave World's Perspective's on Humanity Ridley Scott’s film “Blade Runner: Director’s Cut” and Aldous Huxley’s
The plot of the movie “Blade Runner” becomes unrevealed till the end of the movie. Many assumptions about the plot and the final of the movie appear in the spectator’s mind, but not one of these assumptions lasts long. Numerous deceptions in the plot grip the interest of the audience and contribute for the continuing interest to the movie eighteen years after its creation. The main character in the movie is Deckard- the Blade Runner. He is called for a special mission after his retirement, to “air up” four replicants who have shown flaws and have killed people. There are many arguments and deceptions in the plot that reveal the possibility Deckard to be a replicant. Roy is the other leading character of the movie. He appears to be the leader of the replicants- the strongest and the smartest. Roy kills his creator Tyrell. The effect of his actions fulfils the expectation of the spectator for a ruthless machine.
How to live one’s life is a question faced by any human being with relatively normal cognitive functioning. Some find beauty in every day life, reveling in something as simple as the gentle shaking of leaves dancing to the whispered song of the wind, or waking up to someone they have decided to spend the rest of their lives with. Others only see the mundane and the tedious, growing bitter and resentful as a relentless existential crisis latches on to the deepest parts of their psyche, casting a grim and ominous shadow over every thought and action. This probing question of how to live is at the forefront of Soren Kierkegaard’s “Either/Or: A Fragment of Life.” The aforementioned views are, indeed, reflected in the fragmented perspectives provided by Kierkegaard’s fictional characters, “A” and “Judge Wilhelm,” who perhaps reflect Kierkegaard’s own divided views. Love and companionship are at the crux of how to live for both A and Wilhelm, despite the glaring contrast between A’s calls for a hedonistic,
E. Cummings creates a critical and intolerant tone. He uses his work to criticize “most people” and how they blindly follow others. Cummings intolerance arises from others critical opinion of not normal people, whom the townspeople of the writing do not acknowledge. The uniqueness of both the main characters in the writing and Cummings is shown by the distinctiveness, inconsistency, and incorrectness of the writing. This tone directly relates to the theme and how anyone and noone are compassionate, caring people who actually recognize the value of life ,but are surrounded by townspeople who just stumble through life without a care or emotion. Cummings uses the seasons, bells, his unique composition and the repetition of “Women and men” and “anyone” to create and emphasize the unfortunate cycle of life. The use of the seasons in lines three,eleven, and thirty-four emphasise the passing of time and the unchanging ways of the townspeople. “Women and men”, in lines five and thirty-three,are used to remind us of Cummings definition of “most people” and how people tend to blend in and follow. The bells in lines two and twenty-four are used to indicate a change in the character 's, the first bell is before love and the second bell is rang before death.These significant life transitions show how love and death are final. life The character “anyone” introduces a person, unlike any others in the town, between him and his
Although Christopher Nolan does not acknowledge any philosophical basis for Memento, the film provides a character, Leonard Shelby, who serves as an example of several aspects of existentialism. Through Leonard, Memento illustrates Soren Kierkegaard's idea of truth as subjectivity, Freidrich Nietzsche's notion that God is dead, and Jean-Paul Sartre's writings on the nature of consciousness.
We are born into this world with the realization that life is hard and that life is like a box of chocolates and it is hard to take it at face value. The majority of our time is spent trying to answer an endless stream of questions only to find the answers to be a complex path of even more questions. This film tells the story of Harold, a twenty year old lost in life and haunted by answerless questions. Harold is infatuated with death until he meets a good role model in Maude, an eighty year old woman that is obsessed with life and its avails. However, Maude does not answer all of Harold’s questions but she leads him to realize that there is a light at the end of everyone’s tunnel if you pursue it to utmost extremes by being whatever you want to be. Nevertheless, they are a highly unlikely match but they obviously help each other in many ways in the film.
In his famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy, Hamlet contemplates death and existence. To him, death is full of unknowns and existence is full of suffering and pain. Eventually, he decides to endure “the heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks/that flesh is heir to…” (Shakespeare 62-3) rather than face the possible horrors that might be revealed in death. Kumin’s “In the Park” agrees with Hamlet in the aspect that death and the afterlife is mysterious. Through the exploration of Buddhist and Jewish beliefs on death and the near death experience of Roscoe Black with a grizzly bear in Glacier Park, Kumin comes to a conclusion that death is inevitable and non-discriminatory. Her nonchalant acceptance of death contrasts with Hamlet’s fear of death. The attitude of both poems towards life further sets them apart. Hamlet is tormented and intimidated by the suffering and pains of existence while Kumin subtly appreciates the complexity of life and the possibilities it offers.
Viktor E. Frankl, a Holocaust survivor, once said that “Challenging the meaning of life is the truest expression of the state of being a human.” But what does it mean to be human? What distinguishes a human from an animal or another living being? Throughout history, there have been several times when the existence or the humanity of a group of people have been questioned. Individuals have often been dehumanized on the base of religion, race, nationality, and political views. In the neo-noir science fiction film, Blade Runner, director Ridley Scott emphasizes the theme of what it means to be human through the narrative of the main character Rick Deckard, an ex-Blade Runner who reluctantly agrees to hunt down the androids who invaded Earth. These
In Sickness unto Death, Kierkegaard stresses the importance of becoming a “self”. He explains the dangers of despair and of society. According to Kierkegaard, the “self ” is a synthesis of the finite and the infinite and of possibility and necessity. In order to become a “self”, a person must find and keep a balance between these states of being. The self is who a person is meant to be, no more and no less. A person should not attempt to become more than he or she is able to be, because he or she will always be chasing something that is unattainable. When a person does this, Kierkegaard says they are in infinitude’s despair. Whether people want to believe it or not, people are not equal in the eyes of the world. A person with one arm will never be as great of a guitar player as Clapton or Satriani. A blind person will not be able to play tennis as well people with vision. We should take Franklins advice that, “you can do anything you set your mind to” with a grain of salt, and realize that while we may be able t...
In Sunset Limited, Black conveys Kierkegaard’s philosophy through his own life and words. In the beginning of the play, Black and White argue over the meaning of life—the former loving it, the latter trying to end it. Early on, Black tries to identify with White’s suicidal argument by noting that “Suffering and human destiny are the same thing” (55). Of course, Black’s admittance does not mean he believes in White’s argument, but instead that he understands White’s pain. Likewise, Kierkegaard’s description of life is similar to Black’s reasoning. In his writing, Kierkegaard recounts both the painful way a person is brought into the world and then taken out of it, saying, “[…] and then tell me whether something that begins and ends thus could be intended for enjoyment.” But the undertone of both Black and Kierkegaard’s statements cannot go unquestioned, and White replies, “You’re not making any sense” (55). White fails to understand that everything is common sense for Black, who has not only suffered more than White could ever imagine, but also believes in a force outside White’s wildest dreams. Originally a convict, Black turns his life around after a near-death experience, believing God chose him of all people to talk to. He lives in hopes of delivering God’s message and love to those bereft of it, for what pain can someone experience if God is on the other side? Comparatively, Kierkegaard’s detailed analysis of despair calls the obvious solution faith alone. Somehow, Black evinces Kierkegaard’s belief through becoming a productive member of society. After believing to have heard the Savior in his sleep, Black leaves his former friends and refrains from various forms of pleasure so he can help those less fortunate than himself. I...
In this futuristic film, Harrison Ford is a Bladerunner, a man who by using an eye scanning machine and asking questions can determine if a person is really human or is rather genetically created. In the meantime, three of these non-humans find out they only have a four year lifespan and try to find a way, through foul means more than fair, to extend their lives. This culminates in a rather disturbing fight between the leader of these non-humans and Harrison Ford’s character.
Do people have freedom to choose? The answer is absolutely yes in the existentialist’s point of view. However, it seems that the majority of people are not acknowledged with this innate right. They often encounter situations they believe that they don’t have freedom to make their own decision because of people set limitation on their choices for many reasons. Therefore no one is fully free. However, people can ignore the limitations. The core of Existentialism is everyone has freedom to choose. The novel 1984 by George Orwell demonstrates the psychological manipulation of people’s minds cannot take away everyone’s right being free to choose. In the novel The Stranger by Albert Camus and the play Waiting For Godot by Samuel Becket both somehow
The sci-fi movie ‘Blade Runner’- based on the novel ‘The Bladerunner’ was written in 1974- the age of fast advancement in genetics.(This is incorrect. The novel was published in 1968 titled Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick, how could you put this in your paper without checking.) It deals with themes abs(?) ideas of genetic engineering/ programming, cloning/ replication, moral philosophy, questions on immortality and high tech. But what made the story unique was the fact that the replicants had emotions and values. They are not something like robots(rephrases sentence).
Existentialism is defined as "a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will”. In other words, existentialism it emphasizes individual freedom. Throughout The Stranger, the amount of existentialism views is abundant. The use of Mersault’s experiences covey the idea that human life has no meaning except for simple existence. The idea of existentialism in Albert Camus' The Stranger reflects through Mersault's life experiences with his relationship with Marie, the death of his mother Maman, the murdering of the Arab, and Mersault's trial and execution, all these events show that Mersault’s life of no meaning.