Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Underlying drivers behind criminal behavior
Underlying drivers behind criminal behavior
Underlying drivers behind criminal behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Underlying drivers behind criminal behavior
Elements such as social-environmental, psychological, parental and family are risk factors in the American society that have an effect on determining if actions can be defined as criminal. Edwin Sutherland was a criminologist who believed crime plays a key role in forming an impact in an individual's society. He rationalized that “criminal behavior is learned behavior” (C.R. Jeffrey, 1965). Criminal behavior is not genetic which means that if an individual is born into a family of criminal's, the chances of he or she becoming a criminal is at a higher risk but does not necessarily mean he or she will be involved in criminal acts throughout their lifetime. The environment individuals surround themselves in and live in, influences their way of …show more content…
The criminal activities these individuals can be involved in can range from theft, robbery, burglary, stealing/dealing drugs,etc. The environment in which they grow up in causes them to enact in these irrational behaviors. Individuals are not aware of any other way of life which results in them getting into trouble and having a criminal record. It is stated that “poverty can lead to high levels of stress that in turn may lead individuals to commit theft, robbery, or other violent acts. Moreover, poverty may lead to an actual or perceived inferior education, which would cause youth to count on less access to quality schools, jobs, and role models(Ludwig,1). This will lower the opportunity costs of crime and cause there to be a greater affiliation of the youth association themselves with gangs and spending time on the streets. Societies where there is high levels of unemployment will cause crime rates to be at a greater risk. This is due to individuals having no job which means they do not have a source of income coming in causing them to be more likely to have to enact in criminal behavior to get the needs that are essential to …show more content…
An individual's personality drives behavior within themselves. This is because it is a principal motivational element. It is said that “Crimes can result from abnormal, dysfunctional or inappropriate mental processes within the individual’s personality” (“Criminal Behavior”, n.d.). An individual may act in a criminal way or enact in irrational, criminal behavior because he or she feels it is needed. The mind is what is telling the individual to commit the crime. Social consensus can illustrate what is considered “normal” or “adequate” in society by the greater number of individuals in a certain social group. Mental processes that are different from the standard or norm can be provoked from factors such as “diseased mind, inappropriate learning or improper conditioning, the emulation of inappropriate role models, and adjustment to inner conflicts”. (“Criminal Behavior”, n.d.). Psychological the mind of this individual is not in the righteous state causing them to believe the criminal way he or she is acting is how everyone else is acting. Observing past behaviors of this individual helps to determine how his or her future way of acting will be. Individuals get too carried away by his or her emotions which causes him or her to act in a certain criminal
One of the most important social factors that contribute to violent death in the United States is poverty/ unemployment. “Poverty can lead to high levels of stress that in turn may lead individuals to commit theft, robbery, or other violent acts” (Taylor, 2006, p.1). Poverty can lead to people with an inferior education meaning that they have less access to quality schools, role models, and jobs. So many people including children and teens are more likely to engage in bad behaviors and associate themselves with gangs due to poverty. Crimes and violent deaths are committed when so impoverished people have a way to obtain material goods. When they want to acquire more goods they will commit more violent acts. Unemployment increases poverty rates and will lead to people committing crimes due to being depressed from having no
Trait theory views criminality as a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits. It is based on a mix between biological factors and environmental factors. Certain traits alone cannot determine criminality. We are born with certain traits and these traits along with certain environmental factors can cause criminality (Siegel, 2013). According to (Siegel, 2013), the study of sociobiology sparked interest in biological or genetic makeup as an explanation for crime and delinquency. The thought is that biological or genetic makeup controls human behavior, and if this is true, then it should also be responsible for determining whether a person chooses crime or conventional behavior. This theory is referred to as trait theory (Siegel, 2013). According to Siegel (2013), due to the fact that offenders are different, one cannot pinpoint causality to crime to just a single biological or psychological attribute. Trait theorist looks at personal traits like intelligence, personality, and chemical and genetic makeup; and environmental factors, such as family life, educational attainment, economic factors, and neighborhood conditions (Siegel, 2013). There are the Biosocial Trait theories an...
High crime rates are an ongoing issue through the United States, however the motivation and the cause of crime has yet to be entirely identified. Ronald Akers would say that criminality is a behavior that is learned based on what an individual sees and observes others doing. When an individual commits a crime, he or she is acting on impulse based on actions that they have seen others engage in. Initially during childhood, individuals learn actions and behavior by watching and listening to others, and out of impulse they mimic the behavior that is observed. Theorist Ronald Akers extended Sutherland’s differential association theory with a modern viewpoint known as the social learning theory. The social learning theory states that individuals commit crime through their association with or exposure to others. According to Akers, people learn how to be offenders based on their observations around them and their association with peers. Theorist Akers states that for one, “people can become involved in crime through imitation—that is by modeling criminal conduct. Second, and most significant, Akers contended that definition and imitation are most instrumental in determining initial forays into crime” (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 2011:57). Although Akers’ theory has been linked to juvenile delinquency in the past, it has also been tested as a possible cause of crime overall. Individuals learn from observation that criminal behavior is justifiable in certain circumstances. In connection with juvenile delinquency and crime, peers and intimate groups have the most effect on individuals when associated with criminal behavior. One is more likely to mimic the behavior of someone who they have close ties with, whether the behavior is justifiable or...
Biological crime theory describes that an individual is born with the desire to commit a certain crime. Evolutionary factors influence an individual’s involvement in criminal behavior. “Biological theories focus on aspects of the physical body, such as inherited genes, evolutionary factors, brain structures, or the role of hormones in influencing behavior” (Marsh, I, 2006, 3). Murderers that are innate to kill are born with factors such as mental illnesses that are the driving force as to why one may kill. Because of the biological crime theory, some individuals, though rare, are able to plead insanity. This is because the actions of the individual are said to be beyond their control (Ministry of Justice, 2006, 3).
A persons’ personality is made up of different characteristics such as, being humorous, compassionate, self-obsessive, outgoing, shy, aggressive etc… These are things that influence our behaviour in predicable ways. An increase of certain personality traits like, being aggressive, impulsive, easily influenced, no fear/understanding of consequences, make people more disposed to crime. People with personality disorders are even more disposed to crime. Personality disorders are mental health illnesses that affect how people cope with their feelings and how they communicate with other people. They usually develop in late adolescence and early childhood.
Finding strong evidence surrounding this topic could be significant to reducing crime rates and addressing the public health issue. What I have learn from research-based evidence and analyzing social and cultural theories, is that criminal behavior is multifaceted and is influenced by a range of determinants in which surrounds the nature versus nurture debate. I believe that nature and nurture both play significant roles to the making of a criminal.
In today’s society, one will find that there are many different factors that go into the development of a criminal mind, and it is impossible to single out one particular cause of criminal behavior. Criminal behavior often stems from both biological and environmental factors. In many cases criminals share similar physical traits which the general population do not usually have. For example criminals have smaller brains than properly adjusted individuals. However biological reasons cannot solely be the cause of criminal behavior. Therefore, one must look to other sources as to how a criminal mind is developed. Social and environmental factors also are at fault for developing a person to the point at which they are lead to committing a criminal act. Often, someone who has committed a violent crime shows evidence of a poorly developed childhood, or the unsuitable current conditions in which the subject lives. In addition if one studies victimology which is the role that the victim plays in the crime, it is apparent that there are many different causes for criminal behavior. Through the examination of biological factors, in addition to the social and environmental factors which make up a criminal mind, one can conclude that a criminal often is born with traits common to those of criminals, it is the environment that exist around them that brings out the criminal within them to commit indecent acts of crime.
They also explore the myths about the connection between genetic factors and criminal behavior. The first myth they looked at was “Identifying the Role of Genetics in Criminal Behavior Implies That There Is a “Crime Gene.”” This myth is dismissed because of the unlikelihood that that a single gene is responsible for criminal behavior. The second myth they look at is “Attributing Crime to Genetic Factors is Deterministic.” This myth is also easily dismissed because of the fact that just because someone has a predisposition to a certain behavior doesn’t mean that the person will take on that behavior.
Third, learning criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups. Youths tend to spend significant portions of their time with their friends and family members, as such they tend to influenced by the attitudes and actions of those with whom they spend the bulk of their time. Fourth, learning criminal behavior involves assimilating the techniques of committing a crime, including motives, drives, rationalization and attitudes. During the learning process, not only does the young criminal learn effective techniques for criminal behavior, such as hotwiring a vehicle, or selling stolen items, they also learn how to react in different situations, essentially, when to run, when
In addition, when an individual has the potential to lose something that is important to them, they may question if engaging in criminal activity is worth it (Agnew, 2001). However, if an individual has nothing to lose, is poorly educated, and has no moral support, then they have a higher chance of participating in crime (Agnew, 2001). There are two main motivations as to why crimes occur; individuals are pressured into crime or they’re tempted with a reward of some sort (Reckless, 1961). In some circumstances, parents unintentionally teach their children to engage in crime as well as being taught beliefs that support
An individual usually experiences high levels of dopamine before and after an altercation and it can cause an individual not to recognize the lasting angry expression they have on their face. Also, “Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is key in information processing and most consistently linked to criminal behavior in its deficiency; low levels are linked to depression and other mental illnesses” (Schram, P. J., & Tibbetts). People with low levels of serotonin have trouble communicating in everyday life and this has a strong connection with criminality because people that
Criminals are born not made is the discussion of this essay, it will explore the theories that attempt to explain criminal behaviour. Psychologists have come up with various theories and reasons as to why individuals commit crimes. These theories represent part of the classic psychological debate, nature versus nurture. Are individuals predisposed to becoming a criminal or are they made through their environment.
Many people have the belief that an individuals’ socialization can be the determining factor whether he or she may commit a crime. In criminology, there are many different theories that suggest the idea that socialization is a factor behind one committing crimes. There are three socialization theories that can support the fact that one’s socialization is the main factor in criminality. The social control theory expresses that a person who has a weakened bond with society in general, there is more room for that person to participate in delinquent behavior. Most social learning theories state that a person learns behavior from observing the people that they interact on a daily basis within society.
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.
I now know that criminology prefer to highlight the correlations between crimes’ social climates and criminals’ psychological states of mind. While some argues that criminal behavior is a result of individuals’ association with criminal peers, other claims that crime is a reflection of an individual’s genetic disadvantages. I have come to learn that there are no universally agreed formulas on decoding crimes and criminal behaviors. What we have, however, is a manual full of academic opinions and subjective views that have emerged alongside of the development of criminology. At the same time, the volume of conflicting perspectives that I have stumble upon in studying criminology reminded me again that the success of our current assessment models has yet to be determined. Thus, the study of criminology is an appropriate practice that will further prepare me to conduct meaningful research on legal studies and to provide accurate and in-depth findings in the near