Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal trial process 3 p 4
The effects of corrupt police on the department and the public
Role and function of judges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criminal trial process 3 p 4
In our justice system there is a process that involves a series of steps beginning with an arrest and can end with a trial. Each state criminal processing are a lot alike but they also have their differences. The first step in criminal processing is an arrest. An arrest is defined as “taking a person into custody for violating criminal law” (Wright, 2013) or “to deprive a person of his liberty by legal authority” ("Glossary", 2009). Once a defendant is arrested they are then read their rights and put into an officer car. The officer will then tell the defendant that anything you do or say can be held against you so most people will not speak just so nothing can be used against them. It is always best not to talk because at the end of the day …show more content…
An appeal is defined as “taking a case which has been decided in a court of inferior jurisdiction to one of superior jurisdiction, for the purpose of obtaining a review” ("Glossary", 2009). In Virginia the appeal process is done by filing a petition which is a formal application to a court requesting judicial action on a firm matter. In Virginia the Court of Appeals “provides appellate review of final decisions of the circuit courts in domestic relations matters, appeals from decisions of an administrative agency, traffic infractions and criminal cases, except where a sentence of death has been imposed” ("About ", 2009). “Only the petitioner is allowed to address the appellate court during the writ panel. In the event the petitioner files a reply brief, the appellate court does not allow oral argument; it determines whether the petition will be granted based solely on the briefs” (Litigation Section, 2011, p. 4).
When a criminal case petition is done it is referred to one or more judges in the Court of Appeals. If a petition is granted briefs are filed by both parties and the clerk refers it to a panel of the Court but if the appeal is not granted the petitioner then has the right to appear in front of a panel to state why their petition should be granted. In the end if all of the judges agree that the petition should not be granted then the case ends and the defendant can try for another
…show more content…
I do not feel the system always fails us. It is not always the system that is the problem it is the people. Each case is always different but every person has their own opinions towards certain cases and certain people. For example if you had a criminal case that had to deal with a dead beat dad who is being accused of murder but there is not a lot of evidence. If you have jurors who are half males and half females who is to say those females won’t convict him just based off him being a dead beat dad and not off the fact there was a lack of evidence. A lot of the time people are also power hunger and want to make examples out of others and for that there is no fix. I do think one thing that would help is if there are cameras with audio on cops and around their cars where they could not tamper with them or turn off the sound. I also think there should be cameras around traffic lights so things around them could be caught. I just think more camera need to be in place so there can be more video footage. With technology now a days people should always be recording and never be afraid to turn it in. It is not only up to officers to keep people safe people should be willing to stand up and help each other
(7) Right to appellate review: The Supreme Court did not rule regarding appeal since their ruling was this case was to be remanded back to the lower courts.
After an arrest is made, before they may begin questioning, they must first advise the suspect of their rights, and make sure that the suspect understands them. These rights are known as the Miranda Warnings and include: 1. What is the difference between a. and a. You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. 2.
It seems pretty straight forward. We get arrested and we are told we can get a lawyer. Although you may not have been through the process, you have probably seen what happens next on the latest episode of law and order or NYPD Blue. You get taken into a tiny room to be questioned by an investigator or two, and your lawyer sits next to you and continually tells the investigators that you have nothing to say (Friedman, 2014). "You have the right to ... not much: Why are there no 'Miranda rights' in our country ?", is an article by Solomon Friedman that explains this is not the case in Canada, and asks the question, Why not?
The speech is broken down to many rights. You have the right to remain silent, so you can stop answering questions at anytime. Anything you say or do can be used against you in the court of law means that anything that you admit or alibi that you use will if wanted to be used in the court. You have the right to a attorney if you can not afford one, one will be appointed.
The first thing that should be thought about prior to any form of interrogation is the suspect’s rights; particularly his or her Miranda Rights. Also known as the Miranda warnings, “the purpose of [which] depends on whether you are the law enforcement officer or the suspect. From a suspect's point of view, it is to remind you that you have a Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself. From an officer's point of view, it is to help preserve the admissibility of your statements in a criminal proceeding” (Second Call Defense, 2014). There are four main principles to the Miranda statement that an officer will read; although the exact wording may change from police department to police department. Miranda warnings or rights basically state that: you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you, you have the right to an attorney, and you may be appointed an attorney if you cannot afford one. In addition, an individual may wave his rights outlined within the Miranda statements. Suspects can waive their rights to a lawyer and to remain silent by knowingly and voluntari...
The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.
There are a few elements that need to be introduced before an arrest is taken place. These few elements are Seizures and detention, Intention to arrest, Arrest Authority and lastly understanding for the individual that they are being arrested. To discuss these elements it first starts with seizure and detention. Seizure and detention have a two-lane road which is actual, meaning that a person is taken into custody without using the use of force but very few touching is sometimes involved or by firearm, the other way is constructive which means when an individual's corporates with the officer peacefully. It is known that if neither of these exists the arrest isn't valid (Del Carmen). Another element of arrest is the intention to arrest. The intention to arrest clear means that the law enforcement officer has the intention to arrest individuals by words of mouth or with action taking place. Without the intentions to arrest on the scene it would also be considered invalid (Wadia Whalen). Also with the intention to arrest once words and action are taken place, the officer has to take the person down to the police station or before a judicial officer. The intention to arrest is quite hard to prove because it's whatsit in the officer mind. The other element listed above that is
When someone is taken into custody they are read certain rights. These rights are called the Miranda rights. These insure that everyone knows what rights they have upon being arrested. Once arrested the police officer must read the rights. Included in the right are the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. For people that cannot afford a lawyer the lawyer will be appointed. Before the rights were implemented people would think they had to tell the police everything they saw or did, also by police stating the rights the people know that they have the right to a lawyer.
The use of evidence and witnesses is a mechanism in which the law attempts to balance the rights of victims and offenders in the criminal trial process. Evidence used in court are bound by the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and have to be lawfully obtained by the police. The use of evidence and witnesses balance the victims’ rights to a great extent. However, it is ineffective in balancing the rights of offenders. The law has been progressive in protecting the rights of victims in the use and collection of evidence and witness statements. The Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Bill 2014, which amends the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, passed the NSW Legislative Council on 18 November 2014. The amendment enables victims of
I believe officers in law enforcement are here to serve and protect the citizens of this country. Although as I stated before I also believe that there are still a few that are bad. The majority of them are good. For any kind of change to begin a number of factors need to be involved. The citizens need to use fairness.
What happens when officers forget their role and responsibilities? They abuse their power and go beyond their duties crossing lines that should not be crossed for instance in Saratoga New York a police officer tries to conduct and illegal vehicle search, when the civilian refuses, the officer slaps him and takes the keys. This type of conduct should not be tolerated and officers should constantly be reminded of the consequences of such actions. One thing in particular that can be observed is that in most videos the officers are not alone yet the other officers knowing their partner are wrong do not intervene, this pattern shows that the officers are not being trained properly. Proper training can easily avoid such conflicts for example in the case of Saratoga New York another officer could have deescalated the situation by letting his partner know that what he is doing is illegal, this simple action could had avoided a lot of problems. The majority of police officers do an excellent job but is the few that do not do a good job the ones ruining the image and reputation of the force, reminding officers of their duties and paying attention to their actions can make a difference in job performance while helping keep good community
Receives written arguments (called briefs) from all sides and schedules oral arguments. . .” (“Supreme Court”). After hearing all available evidence, the final decision and/or opinion is often published in order to inform the
Another way would be to hold the police officer accountable for their mistakes and punish them for it. It is important to know from the start how well an officer will do in the long run. Sometimes bad decisions are caused from being mad or just from simply having a bad day. Ethical decisions are essential in any situation. It is a responsibility as an officer to know of ethical behavior.
as officers to serve and protect. Three possible solutions to this problem would be firing the
The process begins with an incident reported to the police officer and that police officer may arrest an individual based upon probable cause. The offender is taken to a jail facility where he or she is booked. Now, based on the crime committed the suspect may post bail and if bail is not granted he or she must await trial. In trial, the jury decides if there is enough evidence to indict the accused of the crime. The judge will convict the offender and punish him for the crime committed. It is essential for one to be familiar with the criminal justice process to ensure your rights and decisions are constitutionally