Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime and punishment character analysis essay
The psychological significance of Dostoevsky
Crime and punishment character analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime and punishment character analysis essay
Fyodor Dostoevsky's 19th century novel Crime and Punishment explores the psychological torture and moral dilemmas that the main character Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov faces after he murders a pawnbroker and her sister. All of the characters in the novel face troubles and suffer as a result of them; however all characters do not respond to their difficulties in the same manner. Through the use of foils, a literary device in which one character is contrasted with another in order to emphasize particular qualities in the other, Dostoevsky explores characters' various responses to difficult situations. Both Katerina Ivanovna Marmeladov and Pulcheria Alexandrovna Raskolnikov are mothers living in poverty and are struggling to support their …show more content…
Svidrigaïlov acts as a warning for Raskolnikov and foreshadows Raskolnikov's eventual end if he remains so cyclical and misanthrope. While Raskolnikov has many character flaws and has committed a gruesome act, his faults are much less grave than Svidrigaïlov's. Svidrigailov’s lacks morals and lives for his own pleasure; as a result, he assaults his wife and servant, he has his wife murdered, and he takes advantage of young women (221, 400). Furthermore, Svidrigaïlov is an embodiment of Raskolnikov's idea of extraordinary people, people who have a "right to commit breaches of morality and crimes" in order to "overstep certain obstacles [...] for the practical fulfillment of his idea" (205, 206). Svidrigaïlov believes that his actions are not bound human ethics. For a long period, Svidrigaïlov is able to contain and ignore his guilt, and he actually flaunts his lack of morals, but eventually his guilt overtakes him and drives him into insanity and results in him committing suicide: “Svidrigaïlov pulled the trigger” (402). Raskolnikov is in a similar situation in that he has also murdered two women due to his extraordinary people principle, but unlike Svidrigaïlov he is aware of his guilt and …show more content…
Raskolnikov and Razumihin have fundamental character differences which directly influence their actions. Raskolnikov and Razumihin were students together while studying at university and both were “obliged to give up the university” (43). However, the two men respond differently; Razumihin attempts to improve his situation by working small jobs, such as translating books, in order "to save enough to return to his studies" (43), while Raskolnikov is too proud to teach lessons “without boots” because he does not want to look poor (24). Raskolnikov's pride and idealistic beliefs result in him secluding himself from society and also causes him to spend his time "thinking" rather than working (23). Raskolnikov is condescending and very selective about the work that he will do, while Razumihin is very practical and very accepting of all job opportunities. Raskolnikov's pride results in him rejecting help, which is graciously offered to him by many, including Razumihin, in that Razumihin offers him a job and cares for him when he is sick (105). Furthermore, as a result of his pride, Raskolnikov is egotistical and rude to other people, especially those who try to help him, but Razumihin is extremely loyal and continues to care for Raskolnikov
In his book Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky explores the paths of two men, Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov. These two men encompass many similar problems and obstacles throughout their lives. Both commit murders and are faced with the long and mentally excruciating journey of seeking redemption. They also share many characteristics of their personalities. The reason that the outcomes of their lives are so drastically different is due to the fact that they have completely different perspectives on life.
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s novel, Crime and Punishment, he introduces Raskolnikov, the main character, when Raskolnikov is deliberating over whether or not he his capable of committing a murder. Raskolnikov has been contemplating his ability over several weeks. As his obsession with his ability to commit murder grows, Raskolnikov isolates himself. He disconnects from the few friends he had made when he was a student in St. Petersburg, drops out of university, will not work and therefore is in debt to his landlady, and even stops writing home to his mother.
Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment begins with Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov living in poverty and isolation in St. Petersburg. The reader soon learns that he was, until somewhat recently, a successful student at the local university. His character at that point was not uncommon. However, the environment of the grim and individualistic city eventually encourages Raskolnikov’s undeveloped detachment and sense of superiority to its current state of desperation. This state is worsening when Raskolnikov visits an old pawnbroker to sell a watch. During the visit, the reader slowly realizes that Raskolnikov plans to murder the woman with his superiority as a justification. After the Raskolnikov commits the murder, the novel deeply explores his psychology, yet it also touches on countless other topics including nihilism, the idea of a “superman,” and the value of human life. In this way, the greatness of Crime and Punishment comes not just from its examination of the main topic of the psychology of isolation and murder, but the variety topics which naturally arise in the discussion.
In Crime and Punishment, we see Raskolnikov caught between reason and will, the human needs for personal freedom and the need to submit to authority. He spends most of the first two parts stuck between wanting to act and wanting to observe. After he acts and murders the old woman, he spends much time contemplating confession. Raskolnikov seems trapped in his world although there is really nothing holding him back; he chooses not to flee and not to confess, but still acts as though he's suffocation (perhaps guilt?)In both novels defeat seems inevitable. Both characters believe that normal man is stupid, unsatisfied and confused. Perhaps they are right, but both characters fail to see the positive aspects of humans; the closest was the scene between the narrator of Notes from the Underground and Liza. In this scene he almost lets the human side show, rather than the insecure, closed off person he normally is.
In his novel Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoevsky uses Raskolnikov as a vessel for several different philosophies that were particularly prominent at the time in order to obliquely express his opinions concerning those schools of thought. Raskolnikov begins his journey in Crime and Punishment with a nihilistic worldview and eventually transitions to a more optimistic one strongly resembling Christian existentialism, the philosophy Dostoevsky preferred, although it could be argued that it is not a complete conversion. Nonetheless, by the end of his journey Raskolnikov has undergone a fundamental shift in character. This transformation is due in large part to the influence other characters have on him, particularly Sonia. Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia plays a significant role in furthering his character development and shaping the philosophical themes of the novel.
In a way, Raskolnikov submits to both theories of the extraordinary man. What is important to understand is why Raskolnikov believes himself to be extraordinary. Firstly, Raskolnikov's perilous financial state and near destitution cause him to be pushed to the edge of sanity. Secondly, the natural arrogance that stems from possessing a great intellect (which Raskolnikov does) causes Raskolnikov to believe that he is above everyone else. In respect to his crime, one can look at it from both the Hegelian and Neitzschean point of view.
The contrast within Raskolnikov creates and inner duality where he is torn between good and evil. On one hand, Raskolnikov believes that he is equal to that of Napoleon. He believes intelligence puts him on a higher level than those around him, while the fact he is impoverished lowers his status. For example, he believes he is able to justify his murders due to the fact “it was not a human being” he killed but merely “a principle” (274). Raskolnikov’s thought process dehumanizes Alyona due to the fact he does not consider her a person, simply an idea. He believes that he killed the principle" that he is an average person to prove that he is above the law and therefore above average. On the other hand, Raskolnikov is frequently seen committing unselfish acts, such as handing out money to those in need, despite not having money of his own. He is later noted to have saved two children from a burning building, demonstrating a conflicting aspect within Raskolnikov; he is aware of the divide between good and evil and and chooses evil when he decides to kill the pawnbroker, Alyona, in order to prove his superiority over the rest of society. After the murder, Raskolnikov lives in a conflicting mental state where he is seen contradicting himself, specifically when he considers kill him himself to end his sufferings. As he walks along the Neva River, he recollects how he, “wanted to end it
Razumikins true nature always shines through when in the company of Raskolnikov. This demonstrates that by having contrasting characters one is able to extrapolate the most out of both personality types. Without Razumikin, Raskolnikov’s character wouldn’t have been able to achieve its level of self-pity
Fyodor Dostoyevsky utilizes duality and split persona as the central vehicle to contrast the notion of the psychology of crime and punishment. Throughout the novel Raskolnikov is mentally tormented by his cruel acts and continuously transitions between his urge to act on his guilt or act out menacingly. Thus, Dostoyevsky is able to capture the true essence of dual conflicts and the fluctuation between intellectual principles. Raskolnikov exhibits a split personality in his words and actions.
Dostoevsky felt the same guilt and anxiety that his character Raskolnikov did for committing his crime. Dostoevsky’s portrayal of Raskolnikov’s
His sister's marriage, the police interrogating him, being able to get a shorter sentence in jail to admit his crimes. The only mistake that Raskolnikov truly accepts is the killing of the two women. This materialistic drive is what caused him so much suffering and hardship. Again, there is this recurring theme of how Raskolnikov’s pride got in the way of his judgement and eventually caused his mental demise. It is very relatable to see this because it is human nature, the natural condition for humans, to reject the accepting of defeat and keep imagining oneself as perfect and above everyone else.
Consequently, with no one to concur with his ideals, Raskolnikov As the fumes of guilt continue to suffocate Raskolnikov within the confines of his psyche, he realizes the oscillatory nature of his psyche; moreover, Raskolnikov holds a certain duality within his psyche that creates disharmony and, therefore, a lack of equilibrium within his psyche. This paradoxically serves as grounds for his descent into a heightened state of psychological disunity as his diametrically opposed psyche contrives an identity crisis, exacerbating his pre-existing mental
To test his theory Raskolnikov committed a crime. The work of the mind, in this case, can be considered as the cause of the error. Raskolnikov considers himself to be "strong" personality. In his opinion, such persons have the right to cross any lines separating the crime from the norm. However, having committed a crime, "crossing" this very line, Raskolnikov begins to realize that he does not belong to the circle of "elected".
Dostoevsky’s classic psycho thriller tells Raskolnikov’s tale of woe as he sets out to discover whether he has the right to transcend moral law. The characters that Raskolnikov encounters