Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on fear of crime
The study of crime and fear of crime in the countryside has much to offer rural as well as criminological studies. For one thing, greater attention on these issues will complement an otherwise urban geography of crime and will fill important gaps in existing knowledge. In light of recent ‘moral panics’ over increases in rural crime, such work would be timely and could provide important information on the nature and extent of rural crime. Further, such knowledge could have an applied benefit and assist in the development of policing strategies in rural places. However, it is essential that rural crime be studied from a rural perspective. There is a danger otherwise that comparisons with urban areas will lead to a philosophy of ‘less of a problem means that there is no problem.’
It is important to listen to the voices of rural people and how they live out their experience of rural crime. A wide range of voices should be listened to, not just those of dominant or hegemonic groups. In doing so, attention must be focused on the way in which rurality is socially constructed and how ideas of criminality and cultural threat form part of, or threaten, these ideals. In short, there is a need to assess the extent to which ‘fear of crime’ is bound up with cultural difference and is both informed by and impacts upon changing social relations in the countryside. It is important to understand these issues and the way in which they can lead to the exclusion of particular people and lifestyles in rural areas.
The recently published White Paper Our Countryside: the Future: a fair deal for rural England (detr 2000) continues the principles of partnership policing established under the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act. This White Paper recognizes that cr...
... middle of paper ...
... being victim to these crimes may be very different. It is also clear that the study of Neighbourhood Watch and rural crime encompasses many social and political issues. Their closer consideration will reveal more about the nature of contemporary rural society and who is considered to be part of it, as well as evaluating how voluntary action continues to sustain the interests of certain rural residents.
This paper has attempted to offer an insight into crime concern felt by residents of a rural English village. Although it has provided an initial examination of voluntary response to crime in rural areas, it has focused on an isolated area where crime is below national levels; therefore conclusions should be taken with caution. It would be valuable to conduct research in other areas and, in particular, those deprived rural areas which suffer from higher crime rates.
This paper will be focusing on the courts as the specific sub-system in the criminal justice system. As said in the book the court system is responsible for charging criminal suspects, carrying out trials, and sentencing a person convicted of a crime. The fear of crime influences criminal justice policies in the court system. One way it does this is with the courts sentencing. Courts are able to give out severe punishments as a method of deterrence. This specific type of deterrence would be general deterrence. The book says that general deterrence theory should work if the punishment is clear, severe, and done swiftly. According to this theory, crime rate should drop because people will fear the punishment. The other way fear of crime influences
Young, J. (1981). Thinking seriously about crime: Some models of criminology. In M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan, & J. Pawson (Eds.), Crime and society: Readings in history and society (pp. 248-309). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
However, his work has been very influential in both the policy making process and criminological theories both in Britain and around the western world. Merton’s theory does not explain all crime but it has great merit in the ones he attempts to explain. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Merton. R-(1968) Social Theory and Social Structure.
Most people use second hand information as their core source of information about crime, this source of information usually being the media. When carrying out sample research in Birmingham, Susan Smith (1984) discovered that 52% of people obtained most of their information about crime from the media, 36% obtained it from hearsay or alleged experiences of friends and neighbours, 3% from their own experiences, and 1% from the police service themselves (cited in Jones, 2001; 8). However the media tend to exaggerate upon areas of criminal activity causing a moral panic. ‘A moral panic is a semi- spontaneous or media generated mass movement based on the perception that some individual or group, frequently a minority group or subculture, is dangerously deviant and poses menace to society. These panics are generally fuelled by the media, although not always caused by, media coverage of social issues… These panics can sometimes lead to mob violence… (newsfilter.co.uk).
In general, official statistics of crime recorded by the police and surveys of the public such as victim surveys and self-report studies are the three main measures of the extent of crime in Britain. The oldest method is to rely on official data collected by criminal justice agencies, such as data on arrests or convictions. The other two rely on social surveys. In one case, individuals are asked if they have been victims of crime; in the other, they are asked to self-report their own criminal activity. (Terence P. Thornberry and Marvin D. Krohn) Although these are a main secondary source of quantitative data, each of them may contain some drawbacks. Thus, this essay will introduce these three methods and demonstrates their disadvantages, such as the police crime statistics exclude the unreported and unrecorded crime;
Crime exists everywhere. It is exists in our country, in the big cities, the small towns, schools, and even in homes. Crime is defined as “any action that is a violation of law”. These violations may be pending, but in order to at least lower the crime rate, an understanding of why the crimes are committed must first be sought. There are many theories that are able to explain crimes, but three very important ones are rational choice theory, social disorganization theory and strain theory.
In conclusion, there is much evidence to suggest that today’s society is both fearful and fascinated by crime, however, it could be argued that this has always been the case, that society has always been both fearful of, and fascinated by, crime.
The French make the mistake of keeping a standing army in time of peace, and these men prove a menace to society, since they are either idle or trying to overthrow the government. A third class of people who are forced into thievery in England, says Hythloday, are rural people who are victims of the growing practice of enclosure of arable land for the grazing of sheep. Wool has become profitable in England and landowners are keen to cash in. To this end, they turn out of their homes the farm tenants who previously worked the land to grow food, and fence it in for sheep pasture, often demolishing the houses to make room for more sheep. While arable farming requires many laborers, the keeping of sheep needs few. Thus large populations of unemployed and starving agricultural laborers roam the land. Another class of people who turn to thievery is gamblers, who must find a way of replenishing their lost money. Hythloday would ban gambling and bring in government legislation to regulate the production of wool. One of the root causes of thievery, Hythloday says, is poor education. If society fails to educate its people, it should not be surprised if they turn to crime. Finally, he adds that if the punishment for theft and murder is the same, then robbers will be more disposed to kill their victims and thereby get rid of the witness, as if he is caught, he will be no worse off for having killed.Hythloday describes a better method of dealing
The dominant theme within the article Appeals to community and crime prevention (Crawford, 1995) is the theme of community – which sees several definitions and applications throughout the article. The paper engages in the numerous ways in which ‘community’ can be defined, all of which are reasonable but also hold widely differing ideals to each other. For example, the definition of ‘community as a defence against outsiders’ (Crawford, 1995, p.106) – in an ‘us vs. them’ manner – is a legitimate definition of what community could be, but at the same time it is widely different to the concept of ‘community as shared space’ (Crawford, 1995, p.108), though it also is a legitimate manner of defining what a community could be. Calhoun (1998, cited in Blackshaw, 2010) however notes that “community” cannot be defined as a group of people or a certain place, which throws both previous definitions out of the water. The concept of community is a fluid idea, that is open to interpretation and change, and the applications of it in modern
After the hungry 40’s, in the 19th century when the benefits of the industrial revolution began to appear, crime rates went down because food prices were more stable and sometimes decreasing and there was a higher amount of exports of industrial goods leading to more money. (Clive Emsley, Crime Reasoning Notecard, 41.) The police played a very small role in the decrease in crime but the years of carefully thought out policing systems ..
In today’s society there is a high fear of crime by society. Society actions show that there is anxiety and fear about crime. Therefore, anxiety and fear about crime has placid our cities and communities. Society express fear of being victimized by crimes, criminal activities, and behaviors. Therefore, according to, (Crime, 1999) states that “ the level of fear that a person holds depends on many factors, including but, not limited to: “ gender, age, any past experiences with crime that a person may have, where one lives, and one’s ethnicity.” All of those factors have a huge impact on one’s fear level.
Modern crime has often been thought to arise from these ashes in areas where there is social disorganisation ultimately leading to individual disorganisation. [10] In this context, crime is a structured choice to...
Chris Kershaw, Tracey Budd, Graham Kinshott, Joanna Mattinson, Pat Mayhew, Andy Myhill.The 2000 British Crime Survey (England & Wales). Home Office Statistical Bulletin 18/00. Oct. 2000. http://www.crimereduction.gov.uk/statistics12.htm
Henry, S. and Lanier, M. M. (2001). What is Crime? Controversies Over the Nature of Crime and What to do About it. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
First is the environmental crime prevention that finds to replace the particular attitudes of the communities that may result in criminal actions (Crawford, 1998). They study on what specific reasons why people commit crime. However, they consider the environment as the most influential factors of committing a crime, so they are focusing on how to reduce crime by targeting the possible causes of crimes or possible opportunities that criminals can get into. Second, situational crime prevention, perhaps it is based upon the evidence that crime is often resourceful and aims to modify on related factor to limit the opportunities for offender to engage criminal behavior (Tonry and Farrington, 1995; Cornish & Clarke, 2003). This study specified the actions or measures that prioritize the importance of focusing the very specific opportunities of crime in a certain circumstances. Furthermore, they tend to lessen the said opportunities for committing a crime through this crime prevention. Third is social crime prevention, which focuses on physical environment (Rosenbaum, D. P., Lurigio, A.J. & Davis, R. C., 1998). They may include action to improve housing, health and educational achievement, as well as improve community cohesion through community developmental measure. And also, they give more attention on how crime is