Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Role of Forensic Science in the Criminal Investigation
Role of forensic science
The effectiveness and limitations of DNA in criminal investigations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As the month went by, all the murderers were caught. According to Mooney, they were all working together. “They were like some sort of gang,” said Mooney, “Just less organized.” The killers were caught, due to evidence being found in their houses, many of which, were murder weapons.
One of the households was that of Clancy Byrne’s. While the rookie police officer wasn't found guilty, his older brother Nicholas, was. Nick had been staying with Clancy for a couple days to visit him and his mom, who lived nearby. Clancy’s brother lived in another state, and claimed multiple times, that he was innocent. But the case was solved, and that was that. Almost.
Clancy came to work at the department the day after, and greeted Mooney, and Chris, with a
…show more content…
deadly glare. The look in Clancy’s eyes wasn't anger. It was beyond that. After the month’s recent events, Clancy hated Mooney. Clancy knew Nick was innocent. He tried to tell everyone else, but they believed Mooney. It wasn't unusual for an annoying little rookie to try and draw attention to himself. But Clancy didn't care. He was determined to prove his brother innocent. Clancy didn't even think twice about it, because he knew his brother. Nick was a good guy, who was always kind and selfless person. He missed out on a big party that he was dying to go to, just so he could visit his mother for her birthday, who also believed Nick was innocent. The next day, Clancy snuck into Mooney’s office, now looking more clean than it ever had been before.
He took a look around the office in search of something, anything, that could prove his brother innocent. Clancy knew the risks he was taking, and what would happen if he got caught, but he didn't care. While he wasn't nearly as good a person as Nick, he was still willing to take risks for the people he loved. As Clancy moved toward the desk, Clancy pushed aside something hard and shiny that was hurting his eyes and looked around. Clancy was looking, particularly, for faulty evidence. He was sure that Mooney had screwed up somehow, and that his brother(and possibly the other accused murderers) were innocent. “Stupid Mooney,” thought Clancy. “Someone probably planted that weapon on my brother, and Mooney just jumped at the chance to get paid.” He searched Mooney’s drawers and bookshelf, and found nothing. “I know I’m missing something…” thought Clancy. And when Clancy took a closer look at his surroundings, he found more than he bargained for. It was then that he heard someone walking toward the room, and swiftly made his way …show more content…
out. Clancy and his mother weren't the only people who believed that Nick was innocent.
Meanwhile, in Gramburgh, Detective Jesse Page was one of the many people that were aware of the continuous murders going on in SmallVille. Everyone in Gramburgh considered Jesse nosy and annoying, but she got the job done. Gramburgh, unlike SmallVille, was not very quiet. There was a time, where in Gramburgh, crime lurked in every corner. Ever since the police took more force, the number of scum on the streets lowered dramatically. Detective Page was one of the biggest reasons why. For some time, Page has been busting dirty cops, who work with criminals for their own benefit, which was once one of the town’s biggest problems.
Page´s suspicion began when she learned that every accused criminal that participated in the SmallVille murders pleaded not guilty. Page tried to get everyone aware of this, but they all agreed that those people were the murderers, and they just pleaded not guilty because they were liars too. Page decided she should take matters into her own hands, and after a considerably long drive to SmallVille, where she rented a hotel room, she got right on the case. First, she had a talk with Nicholas
Byrne
Second, the search of Hicks home did not include a search warrant, and in Meyers case the police did have a search warrant. In Myers case, police had a lawful search warrant to search for drugs and drug paraphernalia. During that search police located a bloody rag, which was sent for testing. The results of this test revealed the blood belonged to a murder victim, implicating Myers for suspicion of murder. Although the police did have a search warrant, the warrant only listed drugs, and paraphernalia.
The Army CID sent a new, inexperienced investigator named William Ivory to investigate the scene. Ivory decided after looking around the house that MacDonald made up the story of the killers. He also persuaded everyone that he was the culprit. This meant that everyone in Ivory’s chain...
The Supreme Court used this evidence, and the fact that the pants and the blood had been transported to the crime lab in the same box, and that a vial and a quarter of autopsy blood were missing, to rule that, if known by the jury, could have created reasonable doubt (House V. Bell, 2006). This, along with the evidence, presented by House, that Mr. Muncey had a history of spousal abuse against Mrs. Muncey, and the fact that he had fabricated an alibi to cover his whereabouts for the time of the murder, could have created a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury, had it been presented at trial (House v. Bell, 2006). It was with these facts in mind that the Supreme Court reached a final ruling in this case. The Court’s final ruling was that while House had not presented sufficient evidence to exonerate himself completely, he did present enough evidence to create the question of his actual guilt, and warranted a new trial (House v. Bell, 2006).
Charges were brought against the nine adult members found in the house, for the murder of Officer James J. Ramp (McCoy).... ... middle of paper ... ... 17 Nov. 2013. https://blackboard.temple.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-3541666-dt-content-rid-41882923_2/xid-41882923_2>.
The psychological abuse that the four suspects were exposed to made them make a wrong confession. In addition, being in an environment where the interrogation room is tight and dark increased the suspect’s anxiety. Moreover, the Frontline documentary stated that the suspects were held in custody for long hours with Robert Ford who used threatening language in order to make them confess. Not only that the suspects made a false confession, but they also told Ford different stories on how they murdered the victim. The coercive interrogatories, led Joe Dick to accept the label Ford put on him and the others. Although Ford was supposed to act just, he acted upon his self interest. Thus, he denied all facts because of fear of embarrassment of being wrong. However, after serving many years in prison, the four suspects were released to face stigmatization and labeling from the society. Indeed, this case proved that there is a malfunction in the justice system and that there’s a need for an immediate
Because police investigators are usually under pressure to arrest criminals and safeguard the community, they often make mistakes. Sometimes, detectives become convinced of a suspect 's guilt because of their criminal history or weak speculations. Once they are convinced, they are less likely to consider alternative possibilities. They overlook some important exculpatory evidence, make weak speculations and look only for links that connect a suspect to a crime, especially if the suspect has a previous criminal record. Picking Cotton provides an understanding of some common errors of the police investigation process. During Ronald Cottons interrogation, the detectives did not bother to record the conversation “But I noticed he wasn 't recording the conversation, so I felt that he could be writing anything down”(79) unlike they did for Jennifer. They had already labelled Ronald Cotton as the perpetrator and they told him during the interrogation “Cotton, Jennifer Thompson already identified you. We know it was you”(82). Jenifer Thompson 's testimony along with Ronald Cotton 's past criminal records gave the detectives more reason to believe Ronald committed the crime. Ronald Cotton stated “ This cop Sully, though, he had already decided I was guilty.”(84). Many investigative process have shortcomings and are breached because the officials in charge make
The novel Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer has a very in-depth conflict that is showcased all throughout the novel. In Theo's community, there is a high-profile murder trial about to begin. Mr. Pete Duffy, a wealthy business man, is accused of murdering his wife Myra Duffy. The prosecutors have the idea that Mr. Duffy did it for the one million dollar insurance policy he took out on his wife earlier, however they have no proof to support this accusation (Grisham 53). The defendants do however have the proof that no one saw the murder, for all everyone knew, Mr. Duffy was playing his daily round of golf at the golf course right by his house. As the trial moved on, the jury was starting to lean towards letting Mr. Duffy walk a free man. To this point, there has been no proof to support the prosecutors statements that Mr. Duffy killed h...
In this documentary, we never go into the minds of any of the people, but only get to interpret what we see and hear. This documentary was filmed in Jacksonville, Florida where Brenton Butler, a 15 year old African American boy was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. The main people in this documentary are Ann Fennell, Patrick McGuiness, Brenton Butler, and detectives Williams, Glover, and Darnell. Ann Fennell and Patrick McGuisness are the two defense attorney’s on Brenton’s behalf. Brenton Butler is the boy being accused of murder. Detectives Williams, Glover, and Darnell are the detectives in department 3 the violated many laws and policies while holing Brenton in
When horrific crimes occur in large cities, many of them can be chalked up to gang violence or to the larger population of that specific city. But when horrific crimes happen in small cities like Lincoln, Nebraska, people begin to ask questions like who did this and why. In 1958, a nineteen year old man named Charles Starkweather put the entire state of Nebraska and possibly the entire nation in a state of terror. With his murder spree taking only three days, Starkweather had collected a body count of ten bodies, including two teenagers and a young child. Understanding Starkweather’s past and state of mind begins to answer the second question of why.
These murders were indeed brutal. Herb lay sprawled on a mattress in the basement, stabbed, his throat slashed and a shotgun charge fired to his head. His hands were bound and his mouth was taped shut. Found on a couch in the adjacent room was his son, Kenyon, bound, gagged and shot in the head. Upstairs was Bonnie and Nancy. Bonnie was bound and gagged, Nancy was only bound. They had both been shot in the head.
In 2003 Ronell Wilson and his friend Jessie Jacobus arranged to sale guns to a buyer. The buyers happen to be two undercover detectives. They arranged to meet in Staten Island to exchange guns for cash. Wilson and his friend did not have guns to sale and the plan was to rob the two gun buyers. When they met the gun buyers Wilson and Jacobus sat in the back of the car right behind the two detectives. At some point Wilson realized that the gun buyers were cops and begin shooting them one by one to avoid going to jail. Wilson used a small handgun to kill both detectives. Wilson killed Detective Rodney J. Andrews and detective James V. Nemorin.
The murder had occurred three months ago and the case had been turned over to a different detective, Milo Sturgis, due to the lack of progress in solving the case. Milo Sturgis is a personal friend of Dr. Alex Delaware and requested his assistance. Very little was known about Professor Hope Devane and Detective Sturgis asked Dr. Delaware to compile a psychological profile of her.
What drives a person past insanity? What drives an individual to feel no remorse, but rather a psychological relief in murderous acts? Consider all the different types of people on Earth as well as the lifestyles and situations these people are raised up in. As much as it’s desired to think the world is filled with people who carry no such thing as a bad bone in their bodies, that thought process is simple deception. The fact is that psychopaths and sociopaths hide among others in everyday environments - neighbors, teachers, family members, doctors, friends, or even the local mailman. Psychopaths are declared as people who suffer from a mental disorder causing aggression and abnormal behaviors such as their “lack of
According to the Oxford Dictionary; a serial killer is a person who commits a series of murders, often with no apparent motive and typically following a characteristic, predictable behavior pattern. They usually go through a cooling down period where there are no murders. Then start the killing spree back up again after the cooling down period. The killing spree usually doesn’t last more than a couple of years without the murderer being caught. And there is usually a victim type and killing style which leads to the killer being identified. This is the definition of a serial killer so why is it so commonly believed that this is a male dominated area. “However, if, as seems to be the case in many countries, the only
Jack the Ripper, the Zodiac Killer, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Son of Sam, the BTK Killer. The names and assumed names of these cold-blooded serial killers are forever branded into the cognizance of people everywhere. This is mainly due to the mass media coverage, including newspapers, movies, television specials and books. This media coverage brought to light that these killers were, on the surface, normal, successful, attractive, productive members of society – that is, until the time that their heinous crimes came to be discovered.