Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Changes in elementary education
An essay about standardized testing
An essay about standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Changes in elementary education
Our actual educational system After reading Sir Ken Robinson 's book "Creative Schools The Grassroots Revolution That 's transforming Education" the reader can visualize several examples about how to change the actual educational system. He analyzes the process of education in which we are involved and how this one could be replaced with a creative one, which encourages students to be creative in all spheres and subjects; instead, prepare them for standardized tests. Education should be a process where students learn gradually at their own level. The author defines it as " organized programs of learning … that young people need to know, understand and able to do things that they wouldn 't if left to their own devices" (Robinson, p 17) Also, he suggest and analyze, in base of his experience, how education needs to be transformed in order to benefit students and prepare them for life, instead guide them through the straight line of standardized tests. He pointed the importance of teaching and education itself, and how creativity can be a key factor that makes students engage with the learning process. What are standardized tests? According to study.com …show more content…
Doing that involves an increasing mastery of skills, knowledge, and ideas." (Robinson, p. 119) The mentioned idea can be used to motivate students to participate in the learning process. The same way young children learn playing with others, the older child can do it experimenting and prove their theories. As a teacher is easy to noticed the difference between a lesson that is pure theory, and the lesson that incorporates creative factors. Students present a better behavior during the lesson, participate, interact, formulate questions and get the answers working together without
All students, and children especially, have tremendous talents, which are forgotten when their minds walk through the school door. Their forever developing talents and favorite interests are left for an uncreative school environment. I, for one, have always been taught and believed in an education, or following the guidelines of another, was essential in achieving wealth and success later in life. However, after listening to Robinson’s argumentative speech, I realize creativity and a valued education coincide with each other. To justify myself, creativity and thinking outside the box has led to many of the world’s advancements. Therefore, when teaching future leaders, and future generations of employees and employers, teaching creativity in a forever rapidly changing and unpredictable world would have benefits. At last, I believe that the educational system puts too much emphasis on a substantial, everyday American future over one’s happiness in a later life. Every human being is already born a unique artist, never made into one; constantly growing into a more talented
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
What they neglect to realize is that most problems are unpredictable. So when a student faces a challenge not taught in the classroom, they will be incapable of solving or getting out of the situation. Once the formula does not work, creativity becomes a necessity. Some even fear the mere thought of imagination, since new possibilities open up the risk of failure or not being accepted. Students hold back their curiosity once they realize that teachers are unwilling to answer their question if it differs even slightly from the curriculum. These are the exact reasons our youth’s power to create fades. The value of creativity is beyond words; our society thrives on innovation. Take the stereotypical example of Bill Gates—he became a billionaire with the help of his creative thinking. So why would creativity not be the heart of our education system? Simply because there is not enough time or enough people willing to put in the
Teachers are worried about being at blame for students not doing well on a test, leading them to base their curriculum on the content of the standardized tests and how to succeed on it. Many teachers feel they are having to leave creative teaching behind to have well-performing students ( Davis, M.E. 2015). It is extremely difficult for teachers to balance traditional teaching with the growing expectations based on test scores. In the article, Brining Imagination Back to the Classroom: a Model for Creative Arts and Economics, Mary Davis (2015), the author research’s ways to generate discussion and a more in-depth way of teaching instead of what one economist referred to as “Chalk and Talk Teaching. Teachers fear all of the high stakes testing that is controlled by the federal government because high stakes testing provides an indirect control over student learning (Hursh, D. 2013). Test data from these exams is used to determine which schools are making adequate yearly progress. Those that don’t improve can receive funds for improvement and educational services, but if they do not improve there can be consequences making the school district look bad. These test scores can be used to measure teacher’s performance and determine if their salary increases or stays the same and it can also determine an individual school continued existence. Another debate, comes
The American system of education is considered to be one of the most progressive in the world. One of the surveys on attitudes toward teaching around the world found that the United States is unique in its strong emphasis on "good teaching." My experience at State College has helped me to understand better how this system works, and what methods and techniques American teachers use to motivate their students for creative and active learning. However, I can also see that this system doesn’t work perfectly in every classroom. Reading Ernest Boyer’s article “Creativity in the Classroom” helped me with my understanding of the main problem that nowadays exists with the American college education system. According to the author, the problem is that teachers and students don’t see each other as one team doing the same business; therefore, in most classrooms the process of learning becomes a boring procedure instead of being mind-blowing. Moreover, reading this article, I could analyze the reasons of this problem that the author identifies through my own experiences at State College.
"I believe you don't grow into creativity, we grow out of it, or rather get educated out of it." Once a year one thousand remarkable people gather in Monterey, California to exchange something of incalculable value, their ideas: Sir Ken Robinson is one of those remarkable people. During his talk Robinson takes the opportunity to “pin his audience to the wall” while talking about his views and ideas on education. Robinson is a talented author as well, in his latest book he talks about natural talent. There is a point in the book when he says, “The element is the point at which natural talent meets personal passion. When people arrive at the element, they feel most themselves and most inspired and achieve at their highest levels.” And during his speech he makes it clear that our education system is stunting our children’s creativity, therefore preventing them from achieving their very best. Ken Robinson speaks out of a true passion for education and his thoughts on the ideas that, though born with a true sense of creativity, as we age our education makes no room for our creative side to truly blossom and grow into something special.
I am writing an essay over the film of Ken Robinson: Do schools kill creativity? The audience for the essay I am writing will be my classmates and teacher, Heather J. Mathers, from my Ivy tech English 111-14h class. The video I am writing about took place in 2006, which is very worrisome, it is now 8years later and we are seeing the exact effects of what was discussed. My purpose or hope for this essay is too help spread the word and knowledge that we understand what is now happening from the school systems killing creativity. I hope to answer questions and open eyes of others to see that creativity is a vital skill that we should not be punished or thought of as a negative thing. I hope to be a part of a movement that embraces all things
Knowledge is great, vital even but schools don’t teach you how to use by adapting it to what you want to achieve and be prepared to experiment with adaption of concepts. This ability is where schools fall down. Creativity you could argue is the ability to use information in whatever form it comes, in a way the is unforeseen and different so that the view goes "oooh now that is cool" or "wow I would have never thought of that". Schools fail totally when they insist of the all-encompassing dogma surrounding standardized testing as the only source of educational excellence. Educational excellence is about being able to use creatively the knowledge you experienced. And Ken Robinson expresses this with certainty and uses rhetorical strategies to convince his audience.
What can the new generations of America do to increase creativity in schools? Expanding the minds of today’s youth will support them to invest in their own thoughts and ideas. If schools teach and support creativity, then kids will have the mentality to change the world. I think schools should require certain classes and have specific courses that can be implemented in children’s early years.
In today’s workplace, creativity is a valued skill. Sadly, as Sternberg states, creativity is “harder to find in older children and adults because their creative potential has been suppressed by a society that encourages intellectual conformity” (qtd. in Ye 28). By implementing educational technology, intelligence no longer needs to conform to one standard. Instead, technology can cultivate coursework to connect to the student 's individuality and encourage higher-level thinking skills to become the focus of the classroom. A study by Hye-Jeong Kim, Ji Hyeon Park, Sungae Yoo, and Hyeoncheol Kim, dealing with the practice of innovative technologies in the classroom to inspire discussion that improves students’ understanding, stimulates their creativity, and allows them to better express and communicate their ideas through drawing, discovered that “the treatment group revealed a higher creativity score than the control group...These students also demonstrated generally deeper information processing... [and] significantly higher on Originality, Abstractness of Title, and Elaboration” (216). Technology supplies the opportunities for the school to harness higher-level thinking processes and forge a generation with the abilities needed to innovate and create a better world for humanity. Nevertheless, one must not forget that technology’s innumerous attributes and applications go beyond educational
Kyung Hee Kim, a creativity researcher at the College of William and Mary, stated that since 1990 children have become “less able to produce unique and unusual ideas.” He explains how he believes that the program instilled in our educational system, No Child Left Behind, has really hurt creativity: “If we just focus on … testing, testing, testing, then how can creative students survive?" Standardized tests have become the number one source of measuring one’s wisdom, and sometime, it can be an inaccurate representati...
First we will explore the contextual background to the focus on creativity in schools today. Where did the idea of creativity in education stem from? We will travel rapidly through the twentieth century research before coming to more recent developments and initiatives.
To Conclude, Children all around the nation are bursting with excitement with their creative imagination and should be allowed to put these tasks to work. Education systems should practice on making focusing more on creativity than just logic. Also, the amount of electives and clubs should be expanded to fit almost every student’s needs. Lastly, teachers should be supportive of their students and encourage creativity instead of shaming it. Therefore, Schools should focus on creating unique individuals instead of
Nowadays in many schools, there is more concentration on exact sciences, such as math, history or chemistry, rather than other fields which require creativity. Schools require students to memorize historical facts, solve mathematical equations or apply chemical formulas, sometimes neglecting their talents, their abilities to sing, draw or dance. For years this teaching method has taken many individuals far from their dreams, from discovering their potential capabilities and from successful future. One purpose of liberal arts education is to give equal opportunities to students to discover their talents, to use creativity and become who they want, instead of following the standard path which is arranged for all students, while overlooking their unique individualities. In his Ted Talk, Sir Ken Robinson states that all children are born artists, the problem is to remain an artist as they grow up (Robinson, 2007). According to Robinson when children attend school, they start to frighten of being wrong, as in schools it is the worst thing possible. Finally, this fear leads to the loss of creativity, thus less chance for pupils to discover and develop their extraordinary abilities, different from basic academic education. So, schools tend to increase academic intelligence, which sometimes kills children’s creativity, providing unequal conditions for pupils with different abilities and
The second step in developing an engaging lesson is to focus on the instructional strategies used to help the students understand the material. It is at this point, the teacher decides what activities they will use to help address the “big ideas” or the “essential questions”.