Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Court visit introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Court visit introduction
At 1:30 p.m. on a Monday afternoon, I entered the San Bernardino Justice Center in Downtown San Bernardino for my first court visit. After passing through the metal screen detectors and making my way up to courtroom number 19, I opened the courtroom doors plated “Judge Harold Wilson” and nervously checked in with the bailiff and the court clerk. The judge, judicial clerk and two attorneys were already in the room chatting. I was surprised to hear the friendliness in their tone and conversation they all were having regarding their personal lives. The attorneys from opposing sides were chatting like they were best friends. I asked the bailiff, “If this is normal?”, he said, “Yes it is! and whatever they show on TV is not reality.” Soon after our conversation, the bailiff brought in the defendant. He was well dressed, black male, probably around the age of 35. He sat down next to the defense lawyer and the chit-chatting resumed. After 20 minutes of laughter and constant bantering, the judge asked the bailiff to bring the jury inside. As the bailiff walked outside to call the jury in, the judge went to his chambers. …show more content…
The judge went row by row and asked what the hardships were. It was evident that people were coming up with excuses that were not even logical to get out of this trial. I asked the bailiff if this happens all the time. He nodded and said, “ People usually do not want to sit in a serious felony cases and that is why they try to get out of it.” After hearing everybody’s excuses the judge and the attorney went back to the chambers and discussed about who should stay and who should go. It turns out people who cannot take off from work because they are the sole provider of the family, planned vacation that cannot be rescheduled or students who cannot miss classes, were taken off the case. The judge accommodated the people who were planning on missing just 1-2 days of the trial and the rest had no option, but to
When trying to describe Dan Locallo as a compassionate judge one could use the Tony Cameron, the Larry Bates and the Frank Caruso Jr. criminal cases. Tony Cameron has been in jail for only five months. He was arrested for armed robbery in August of 1997. Cameron has an inner conflict that he keeps fighting-whether or not he wants to plead guilty or not guilty (Courtroom 302, 26). Tony Cameron realizes that if he wants to present his case to the judge he better make it a good one. Most offenders that visit the courthouse feel like...
“Corruption is like a ball of snow, once it’s set a rolling it must increase (Charles Caleb Colton).” Colton describes that once corruption has begun, it is difficult to stop. Corruption has existed in this country, let alone this very planet, since the beginning of time. With corruption involves: money, power, and favoritism. Many people argue today that racism is still a major problem to overcome in today’s legal system. American author (and local Chicago resident) Steve Bogira jumps into the center of the United States justice system and tells the story of what happens in a typical year for the Cook Country Criminal Courthouse, which has been noted as one of the most hectic and busiest felony courthouses in the entire country. After getting permission from one of the courthouse judges’ (Judge Locallo) he was allowed to venture in and get eyewitness accounts of what the American Legal System is and how it operates. Not only did he get access to the courtroom but: Locallo’s chambers, staff, even his own home. In this book we get to read first hand account of how America handles issues like: how money and power play in the court, the favoritism towards certain ethnic groups, and the façade that has to be put on by both the defendants and Cook County Workers,
As one of the seven jury deliberations documented and recorded in the ABC News television series In the Jury Room the discussions of the jurors were able to be seen throughout the United States. A transcript was also created by ABC News for the public as well. The emotions and interactions of the jurors were now capable of being portrayed to anyone interested in the interworkings of jury deliberations. The first task,...
The New York Times bestseller book titled Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the O.J. Simpson Case examines the O.J. Simpson criminal trial of the mid-1990s. The author, Alan M. Dershowitz, relates the Simpson case to the broad functions and perspectives of the American criminal justice system as a whole. A Harvard law school teacher at the time and one of the most renowned legal minds in the country, Dershowitz served as one of O.J. Simpson’s twelve defense lawyers during the trial. Dershowitz utilizes the Simpson case to illustrate how today’s criminal justice system operates and relates it to the misperceptions of the public. Many outside spectators of the case firmly believed that Simpson committed the crimes for which he was charged for. Therefore, much of the public was simply dumbfounded when Simpson was acquitted. Dershowitz attempts to explain why the jury acquitted Simpson by examining the entire American criminal justice system as a whole.
I attended the Bail court on Monday, February 22 at the Ontario Court of Justice in Scarborough. After some searching, I found the court assignment sheet posted outside a clerk's office. It had listed each courtroom number and what they were assigned to hold. Courtroom 412 was bail, courtroom 406 was guilty pleas, and 407 was first appearance. When I approached courtroom 412, I saw the crown counsel have a brief conversation with a colleague. They were critical of the Judge being late – the court was scheduled to reconvene at 2pm. She sarcastically stated that 'he must need a longer lunch b...
Facts: In Georgia, Eric Presley was convicted of cocaine-trafficking in Dekalb County. Before potential jurors entered the courtroom, the judge noticed an observer, who was a relative to Presley, and asked the observer to leave the courtroom, on the basis of there not being enough room in the court for observers and jurors. Later, Presley asked for a retrial on the basis of the public being barred from the courtroom. He mentioned that there was, in fact, room in the courts for observers, but the trial courts denied him, as well as The Court of Appeals of Georgia and the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
Many were wearing casual clothing such as jeans and a long-sleeve shirt. Many were alone or with a co-defendant while some were sitting with their family members. Two of the defendants stood out to me because they were dressed completely different from the others. One of the defendants could be described as a homeless person because they wore older, worn-out jeans and a sweatshirt. The defendant’s facial appearance also gave away to his financial background (he had a long unkempt beard and his face looked dirty). The man also appeared to be suffering from a mental illness. The other defendant could be described as a typical college student because he came to court dressed in a nice dress shirt, dress pants, and black dress shoes. His mother attended with him when he was arraigned for drunk driving. When I first saw him, I did not think that he was a defendant, in fact, I thought he was a college student from a neighboring college who was interested in the criminal justice system and was observing cases to get a better understanding of everyday processes in courtrooms. While most defendants were seated in the courtroom waiting for their name to be called, a small portion of them was also brought in by police officers in
For my court ethnography I observed plea, bail, and family court in the city of Milton. However, it was called the Ontario superior court of justice. When I first entered a court it looked exactly like what I had seen in movies. The court setup, the vernacular used, and the customs of the court employees were exactly like what mainstream media has displayed to the public over the years. Entering the court, symbols of justice were exhibited everywhere in the courtroom. In the courtroom all kinds of cases were occurring, and people from all types of backgrounds were involved. Observing the inner workings of our justice system gave me invaluable insight on how law and order is preserved in our society. Furthermore, I also got to witness the specific
Fairchild, H. & Cowan, G (1997). Journal of Social Issues. The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and Society.
In the month of February, i visited the Superior Court of Bakersfield California. I sat down on the trial of Timberlake vs People. This trail was murder and gang related. The man being charged was a 33 years old and his name was Paul Timberlake, who was suspicious of committing a murder. The judge that over saw the trail was John R. Brownlee. The District Attorney was Mr. Russel. Lastly, The Public Defender was Mr. Lucard. As i opened the door to the trail room, I noticed the room was full of seriousness. Everyone had a blank facial expression and showed no signs of joy. I made my way to the audience seating and sat down quietly. The Judge called forth the prosecutor. The prosecutor order two police officers to come inside the trail to serve as witnesses. Once they came inside, he played a video of a
The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many.
When we are young, most of us are somewhat naive. We are inherently taught that
The courtroom actors are crucial to a discussion of ritualised power and power relations in the court as they are specific individuals who hold great amounts of power. As Carlen (1976:54) points out, it is the people who work at the place in question that hold the most power and control over its rules and procedures in comparison to those who are merely visiting. In this case it is the judicial personnel, lawyers and judges that exercise more power over people such as the defendants and witnesses. This is specifically an example of ritualised power since it has been this way for an extended period of time. When one observes a courtroom a hierarchy is evident that not only differentiates between those with and w...
The judge was a middle-aged male who looked intimidating and seemed to be well respected. To my surprise, we did not have to stand up when he entered the room. After the judge came out I assumed the jury would follow quickly after. However I quickly learned that there would be no jury for this particular trial. After a few minutes, the handcuffed defendant entered the room wearing an orange prison jumpsuit. He was a middle-aged, African-American male who was involved in a narcotic conspiracy case. In addition to the defendant a probation officer, the prosecutor and the defendant’s lawyer were also present. Aside from me, my classmate and a student from Georgetown the defendant’s wife and sister were in the