This is a field trip report shows what I learned on the field trip to the Provincial Courts on Wyndham Street in Guelph. Though there was only one case I was able to observe it will give legal terms that will be underlined with a brief definition along with it.
I arrived at the courthouse and met the rest of the class in the waiting area by the courtrooms. As the last few stragglers arrived Mr. Fast informed us that the Docket was by the front doors, he also gave us friendly advice that it would be smart to get the names written down so we could use them later in our report. A Docket is a list that has the names of the accused and their offences are written. As I stood there getting all the names down I heard a few of my classmates saying
…show more content…
We took our seats and chatted amongst ourselves, I watched as the special constable walked in and I wondered just what role she played in the courtroom. Not long after the Court Reporter who is the person that records everything said in court during the trial and the Court Clerk who is the court official who assists the judge in administering oaths and performing other duties entered the courtroom and took their place.
Then a man named Roderick W. Harriot was called to the defence stand by one of the police officers standing by the prisoner's box. As that happened another officer entered the courtroom from the back of the gallery and tripped which made a loud noise and everyone turned to look. Just shortly after the Court Clerk told us to all rise as the Judge entered the room the judge is the court official appointed to try cases in a court of law and to sentence convicted people.
Harriot I learned had had two previous court dates and when the judge asked he told the judge that he would be representing himself from the looks the judge and Mr. fast gave, I knew that was a bad idea. The judge then set a new court date for August 17th and the man left the courtroom.
Then I heard them talking about a different woman who was not on the docket, Amanda Brandcandi. I heard there was a $1000 fine she was supposed to pay and that once again she was a no
In the case of Drew Peterson, the court docket is important for the accused because it explains the why the different filings and rulings were made pertaining to the admissibility of evidence in this case and if the accused should in fact be accused of the murder of his wife Kathleen at all.
I wanted to look at the investigative and criminal procedures following the arrest of an alleged criminal and the powerful effects via testimonies and evidence (or lack thereof) it can have on a case.There is an importance of the courts in regards to crime that can’t be over looked. The primary function of the criminal justice system is to uphold the established laws, which define what we understand as deviant in this society.
Fear and confusion plays a huge part in the criminal justice system because of the huge number of cases and facilities unable to handle them. The building is condemned and they have new judge had begun his position as the new supervising judge. His name is Roosevelt Dorn. Beckstrand is excited to be working on Duncan's. His case is a well known infamous one and Beckstrand almost hated the kid. Offenders in this case are used to a substantial number of setbacks in the system and and finding her main witness is becoming trouble for Beckstrand. Ronald, along with the other young delinquents, doesn't seem to care about anything.
“The trial was brought to a speedy conclusion. Not only did Judge Evans find the twelve guilty, fine them $100 each, and committed them to jail, but five people in the courtroom who had served as witnesses for the defense arrested. […] The police were then instructed to transfer the seventeen prisoners that night to the county jail”(30).
The courthouse was crowded, all seats were taken and many were standing in the back. It was silent, no one spoke, not even a baby cried out. There was the Judge sitting in the front of the room, the defendant, the solicitor, and the jury. I was a member of the jury that day. Everyone knew the truth, the defendant was innocent, and the evidence that was established was supportive and clear.
I attended the Bail court on Monday, February 22 at the Ontario Court of Justice in Scarborough. After some searching, I found the court assignment sheet posted outside a clerk's office. It had listed each courtroom number and what they were assigned to hold. Courtroom 412 was bail, courtroom 406 was guilty pleas, and 407 was first appearance. When I approached courtroom 412, I saw the crown counsel have a brief conversation with a colleague. They were critical of the Judge being late – the court was scheduled to reconvene at 2pm. She sarcastically stated that 'he must need a longer lunch b...
... witness. Therefore it was found through my observations of the civil courts that the courtroom is very much a ritualised environment in which there are considerable power disparities.
The criminal justice system is made up of many components that are constructed to ensure justice for victims of crimes, along with criminals. It is designed to guarantee that punishing those who are guilty will protect the innocent. Within the criminal justice system, there is a document that consists of all the jurisdictions of criminal law. This document is called the criminal code and entitles the offences that are acknowledged in the jurisdiction along with consequences that are enforced for these crimes. Throughout the years, there are offences constantly being added to the Criminal Code of Canada and many proposals being made by the Law Reform Commission of Canada.
This event overall was very quality. They loaded the auditorium with people as a judge sat on the top of the stage. They escorted in a :criminal” in. Later we would learn he was a drunk driver. He had killed an innocent teen, and injured two others. The girls parents are testifying against him for the murder of their daughter.
The story as a whole was inspired by Reginald Rose’s experience of jury duty in New York City. At first he was reluctant to serve on the jury, but he ended up telling in a press meet “ The Moment I Walked into the courtroom and found myself facing a strange man, whose fate is suddenly more or less in my hands, my entire attitude changed.” The words from Rose showed the pressure he faced inside the courtroom and his personal conscience he had not to make a mistake with the decision. The overview of the story is an engrossing drama in which eleven jurors believe the accused is guilty,
With in this courtroom observation paper I will form two articles and classroom knowledge to show the relevance they play within courts today. First, local legal culture, in "court culture" concept is based on dimensions of solidarity and sociability, the intersections of which create four cultures with associated case management types: hierarchical culture (rule-oriented case management); networked culture (judicial consensus); autonomous culture (self-managing); and communal (flexible case management). The second being, court guidelines and the sentencing structure, how’s it work, and why out comes different areas that defer from Kalamazoo and Southwest Michigan as a hole.
The courtroom is a place where cases are heard and deliberated as evidence is produced to prove whether the accused person is innocent or guilty. Different courtroom varies depending on the hierarchy and the type of cases, they deliberate upon in the courtroom. In the United States, the courts are closely interlinked through a hierarchical system at either the state or the federal level. Therefore, the court must have jurisdiction before it takes upon a case, deliberate, and come up with a judgment on it. The criminal case is different from the civil cases, especially when it comes to the court layout. In this essay, I will explain how I experienced a courtroom visit and the important issues are learnt from the visit.
The case was almost closed until the police could not get ahold of David Davis who had initially helped identify Ron Platt. The police then sent an officer to David’s house. The officer had gone to the wrong house by mistake and found out that David was posing as his friend Ron. David then
The old man that had testified explained that he heard the young boy say, “I’m going to kill you” and then heard the body hit the floor. They also explained that the L train was passing by at this exact time. Juror 9 then related to the old man by saying that this old man wanted attention and recognition. The old man wanted someone to listen to him and he made himself believe that he heard those things. They then started arguing on the fact that the old man said that this young boy yelled that he was going to kill his father out to the whole neighborhood and how that was highly unlikely. Juror 5 then changes his vote to not guilty. Juror 11 then questions why the boy would come back to the scene after he killed his father. Juror 11 felt like it wouldn’t have been possible that he would go back to the scene because he heard somebody scream and he was calm enough to not leave fingerprints and clean up evidence. Juror 11 then changes his vote to not
Let me begin by saying that I am very honored to be addressing the County High School Class of 2012 as students of this institution for the last time. We've spent these last four years creating some serious memories: four years of chieftain power, leaking roofs, questionable Homecoming skits, and musical principals. Four years of good teachers, bad teachers, new teachers, old teachers. Four years of youth, music, growing up and breaking free. Four rubber chickens, four yearbooks, four ASB presidents and four chubby bunnies.