Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health service delivery
Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health service delivery
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In health care being cost effective is important because of the strict budget guidelines and the importance of providing good health care services. Cost effectiveness is utilizing resources to the best of their ability and creating a good health care outcome. There are many different ways to use cost effective techniques to bring change into a facility. The practice of using cost effective methods is important to know because it has a direct relationship to the evaluation of health services and outcomes.
Robinson defines cost-effectiveness analysis as, “a form of economic evaluation in which the costs of alternative procedures or programmes are compared with outcomes measured in natural units-for example, cost per life year saved, cost per case cured, cost per symptom free day” (1993, p. 307). Simply put, “cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis provide information about the differences in outcomes in relation to differences in costs” (Hicks, 2014, p.342).
This comparison is important in many health care organizations because as new technology and medical procedures come out, it is important to know if a change from the current tools and practices should be made to the new ones. To be effective in providing good medical care an organization has to know if a new procedure will improve health outcomes or not. If an organization does not pay attention to the costs of adding new technology, then it can create a deficit in the budget and push back regular activities the organization could have normally provided; had it not used up the money set aside for those tasks.
Detsky, & Laupacis state that a cost effective analysis, “requires allocating a fixed budget across all competing programs and is specifically aimed at ...
... middle of paper ...
...5-D Health-Related Quality of Life Index can help measure the person’s quality of life by using various factors called dimensions. These dimensions can include: breathing, speech, mental functioning, hearing, eating, eliminating, sleeping, mobility, vision etc. This index helps in cost effectiveness because it allow for the evaluation of health services. The organization can see the value of adding new technology or procedures and decide the effectiveness of utilizing the procedure or not.
In conclusion, cost effectiveness is important to understand because of the effect it has on the evaluation of health services. Two tools that are used in evaluating cost-effectiveness include QALY and the 15-D Health-Related Quality of Life Index. The organization benefits by being cost-effective because then they can provide services that a produce a good outcome.
The government controls and regulates healthcare somewhat because healthcare organizations are in a position to take advantage of the elderly and sick so there are regulations that protects them. It seems as though healthcare facilities are being paid less for their services today. Some critical measures for the survival of a healthcare organization are to optimize performance and quality. Finding system-wide efficiencies and cost reduction healthcare will help. In order to get better and keep high quality and performance while still raising reimbursements, it is necessary and important to involve doctors with the ideas and plans for any management strategies.
A website like Hospital Compare presents patients and their providers with important information on hospitals. They can view patient satisfaction surveys and see how hospitals are handling important diseases like stroke and heart condition. Patients are able to choose a hospital that will provide them with the care they need and they can avoid hospitals that lag behind in key areas. Another benefit is that hospitals are held more accountable. It is bad business for any hospital to have low rankings. Externally reported measures allows the public to see how well a hospital is performing, which can equate to more business or a loss in revenue. These reports put a spotlight on hospitals and forces them to fix areas that need improvement. A major challenge to externally reported measures is the data. If the data is not collected correctly or lacks accuracy it can cause more harm than good. Information that is not accurate can cause a hospital its reputation. The hospital would have to spend time fixing the error and the public perception that the false report has caused. Benchmarking can be benefit in these reports as it allows health care facilities to see where they stand when compare to either national standards
Review, T. R. (2017, September 01). A Debate Over the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Retrieved October 25, 2017, from
Thus, reducing administrative work gives an opportunity to clinicians to spend more time with their patients. Through health informatics, some medical procedures can be automated, saving money for the health care budget. Research by Blumenthal and Tavenner (2010) states that, “The widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States is inevitable. EHRs will improve caregivers' decisions and patients' outcomes. Once patients experience the benefits of this technology, they will demand nothing less from their providers.
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the compensation representation that compensates healthcare contributors for accomplishing pre-authorized objectives for the delivery of quality health care assistance by economic incentives. P4P is increasingly put into practice in the healthcare structure to support quality enhancements in healthcare systems. Thus, pay-for-performance can be seen as a means of attaching financial incentives to the main objectives of clinical care. However, reimbursement is a managed care payment by a third party to a beneficiary, hospital or other health care providers for services rendered to an insured or beneficiary. This paper discusses how reimbursement can be affected by the pay-for-performance approach and how system cost reductions impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare. In addition, it also addresses how pay-for-performance affects different healthcare providers and their customers. Finally, there will also be a discussion on the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of healthcare.
The world of healthcare changes every day. Technology, as we know it evolves and changes the actual care that patients receive and even post care as well. It has been determined that most faults are caused by system failures. When a break in the system has occurred it must then be decided where the,” inefficiencies, ineffective care and preventable errors” to then influence changes within the broken system (Hughes, 2008). Improvements sometimes can begin with measurements and benchmarks which in turn will allow organizations to assess the trouble spots and broken areas within the system. Many times those broken areas within the system will be owned by the humans who operate within these systems. According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM)
The patients should receive safe and appropriate care in return for payment equal to the level of care received (“What is Value-Based Care”, 2016). For providers, this means using affordable and proven treatments while also catering to the patient’s needs (“What is Value-Based Care”, 2016). Additionally, this model is built upon measurement which when relayed to the patient will inform them of the scope and cost of their care. Examples of measures that are tracked, provided by the article “What is Value-Based Care,” include: procedural complications, hospital-acquired infections, and readmissions; providers face penalties if these metrics are unacceptable (“What is Value-Based Care”,
The person pursues healthcare service with great expectations such as quality health care, latest technological interventions and low cost for their service. Nowadays, one of the challenges facing by the health care providers is providing appropriate care and identifying their needs in a cost effective and comprehensive way without compromising the quality of care. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reported “an rise in healthcare spending from $2.34 trillion in 2008 to $ 2.47 trillion in 2009, the largest one year increase since 1960” (Pickert, K, 2010). “The action to improve the American health care delivery system as a whole, in all of its quality dimensions such as efficiency, effectiveness, equitability, timeliness, patient-centeredness, and safety for all Americans” (IOM, 2011).
2. The twin problems of the health care industry as viewed by society are cost and access. First of all, the cost of getting health care is very high and it is getting higher each day. This has been mostly caused by the combination of high cost and an increase in quantity of services provided to the communities. The other problem involves access to health care. American enjoy limited or no access to health care. Many efforts have been done to reform this, but still but still many people are left without access to the care. These two problems are related due to the fact that if the health care industry gets to high off course people no longer will be able to have any access to it. The higher prices are, the lower access people have to it.
The purpose of quality initiatives is to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable patient centered care( DeNisco & Barker, 2013). The quality improvement evaluation is important in the health care industry to find out the best practice care and to provide high quality cost effective care to patients. The public and private agencies are the regulatory entities in the health care Industry which promote quality and safety in the delivery of health care. The major regulatory agencies are CMS, the Joint commission, and AHRQ (deNisco & Barker, 2013).
The World Health Organization outlines 6 areas of quality that help shape our definition of what makes quality care. Those areas are; (1) Effective: using evidence bases practice to improve health outcomes based on needs of individuals and communities. (2) Efficient: healthcare that maximizes resources and minimizes waste. (3) Accessible: timely care that is provided in a setting where the skills and resources are appropriate for the medical need and is geographically reasonable. (4) Acceptable/Patient-Centered: healthcare that considers individual needs, preferences, and culture. (5) Equitable: healthcare quality that does not vary because of race, gender, ethnicity, geographical location, or socioeconomically status. (6) Safe: healthcare that minimizes harm and risks to patients. (Bengoa, 2006)
care outcomes help to control costs? It is not possible to determine the accuracy amongst
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
...d procedures are now being monitored to improve clinical processes. Ensuring that these processes are implemented in a timely, effective manner can also improve the quality of care given to patients. Management of the processes ensures accountability of the effectiveness of care, which, as mentioned earlier, improves outcomes. Lastly, providing reimbursements based on the quality of care and not the quantity also decreases the “wasting” and overuse of supplies. Providers previously felt the need to do more than necessary to meet a certain quota based on a quantity of supplies or other interventions used. Changing this goal can significantly decrease the cost of care due to using on the supplies necessary to provide effective, high-quality care. I look forward to this implementation of change and hope to see others encouraging an increase in high-quality healthcare.
...d about the economic nature of new technologies, Dr. Slez emphasized that “costs almost always increase with new equipment”. When deciding whether or not to adopt a new technology, Dr. Slez cited cost of implementation, industry standard, and efficacy relevant to the current market as his primary considerations. “If a treatment costs more but is no more effective, we won’t adopt it” he continued. Technology, as with all other aspects of the firm, must be consistent with that firm’s goals; excellent care at an affordable cost.