Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Patriotism and cosmopolitanism martha c nussbaum analysis
Patriotism and cosmopolitanism martha c nussbaum analysis
The importance of nationalism vs. patriotism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While finding cosmopolitanism and patriotism in the same country is rare, it’s entirely possible. The two aren’t mutually exclusive and can in fact compliment each other. The best example of this is Sweden. Sweden is cosmopolitan in its efforts to support and aid other drastically different groups. While it doesn’t boast America’s version of patriotism, it still lends itself to the definition as Swedes very much enjoy and support their country. Sweden also encourages other communities’ national identities by supporting decolonization efforts and local movements for more rights, thereby combining cosmopolitanism and patriotism in its actions.
Cosmopolitanism comes from Greek literally meaning “citizen of the world.” The ideology is a simple
…show more content…
In efforts to make themselves appear more cosmopolitan and avoid being labeled xenophobic, many Swedes don’t publicly display their national pride, but on certain occasions it comes through, for example on National Day, previously Flag Day, and in international competitions to support athletes, performers, and scholars from Sweden. Despite only displaying it periodically, they always have pride for what their country stands for, especially its humanitarianism (Duxbury, Tidholm and Lilja). None of this conflicts with Swedish cosmopolitan efforts. Citizens are able to celebrate their national identity, promote the national identities of others, and at the same time support human rights in all communities, whatever those locally accepted rights may be. Nussbaum argues that patriotism is “an idealized image of a nation [as] a surrogate parent who will do one’s thinking for one,” (Nussbaum 15). She believes a culture of patriotism allows citizens to reject their moral duties to uphold human rights and instead merely follow whatever their country does. This view is simplistic, patronizing, and pessimistic. Human beings are for the most part too complex to be satisfied with such a one-way relationship. Being proud of one’s country doesn’t blind one to the humanity of those in other
In Nussbaum’s article I have a problem with the unrealistic goal of universal cosmopolitanism, as it is impossible for an individual to think of themself fully a citizen of the world. A sense of home identification will always linger as no one feels welcome or is welcomed in every nation or community on earth. It is impossible to make a patriotic person non patriotic as no one person has had the exact same
All over the world and in history, countries and nations have expressed pride towards their nations through spirit and have unified together as one. Nationalism is the force behind the unification, strength, and cooperation of these nations. First, nationalism is a powerful force that helps to unite all different people into a single nation. It is also important for nations to use nationalism to claim justified independence from one another. Finally, nationalism can be taken too far if it is used unjustly or incorrectly. Nationalism is important and necessary for beneficial political changes, but can become harmful and unproductive when used for a country’s personal agenda and lust for power.
For example, Mark Twain expressed his hatred by stating, “A patriot sets himself apart in his own country under his own flag, sneers at other nations and keeps an army of uniformed assassins on hand at heavy expense to grab slices of other people’s countries and keep them from grabbing slices of his. In the intervals between campaigns he washes the blood off his hands and works for ‘the universal brotherhood of man’ with his mouth.” Twain makes many valid points by bring up how patriotism encourages hatred and distrust for other countries, promoting war by having an army of assassins, and washing away wrongful violations within the country. Numerous Americans have shown similar controversy in regards to whether they should support patriotism. Despite the fact that patriotism can bring social culture and bonding together, it can ultimately become destructive and does more harm than
World War I, also known as “The Great War”, was a global war that revolved mainly around Europe. It took place from 1914 to 1918. This was a very brutal war that caused many casualties. The soldiers who survived experienced severe trauma and mental discomfort. This trauma was a direct result of the violence and agony they experienced during the war. Motivation for this war was the idea of nationalism and the pride in one’s country. This war was the cause of disillusionment among many of the soldiers that were involved in it.
According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, national pride, also known as patriotism, is love for or devotion to one's country. Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan, told others to beware of patriotism. He shows how it is appropriate, yet sometimes deceiving. Gerald R. McDermott, author of “What Jonathan Edwards Can Teach Us about Politics,” uses Edwards to support his own beliefs about national pride. McDermott builds an argument to persuade his audience that Christians should be wary of national pride by quoting Edwards’s words, by using history to create an image for the audience, and using Edwards’s argument that entirely Christian countries have never existed.
At the end of the 19th century and early in the 20th century, many saw warfare as a necessary component of modern statecraft and even saw war as the marker of the coming of a new age. Three main forces that prompted World War I were: militarism, nationalism, and imperialism. Militarism is the idea wherein a country is able maintain strong military capabilities and be prepared to aggressively defend or promote national interests. Imperialism is defined as an empire created by a country that rules and governs the people to create a civilized society. Lastly, nationalism is the notion wherein a countries own need must be prioritized before any other. Heinrich von Tretschke, Henri Massis, and Alfred de Tarde, wrote articles to voice out their pro-war spirit during World War I. They believed nationalism was one of the main arguments that led European nations to go to war at the turn of the century.
In source 1 the main focus is ultra-nationalism, the quote is saying that it is not enough to love and want your country to succeced you must fight others to prove this. This is the definition of ultra-nationalism the belief that it is not enough to care for your country you must kill to prove this. It is also saying that if you do not feel like you can fight for your nation that you have to leave and find a new nation to be a part of because the only way that one can be proud of their nation and prove it is by killing. The parts of that prove this is the point of view of someone who believes strongly in nationalism is that they are saying that if you are not willing to fight for your country it must mean that you are “ashamed” of your country.
By the late 1890s, the U.S. had recovered from the domestic turmoil of the Civil War and
As defined, cosmopolitanism as a whole is the idea that all cultures and ethnic groups within our world belong to a single community based on a shared morality. Considering this, Anthony Appiah claims that “cosmopolitanism is universality plus difference.” He says this because cosmopolitanism is based upon people accepting the variety of people, but understanding that all the different people of the world belong to one group due to a shared moral standard. But how can this be, when there are wars and conflicts going on throughout the world? Appiah discusses this throughout his book Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, as well as the commitments that cosmopolitans make, such as the commitment to the respect of differences in humans
There is nothing wrong with loving the country you identify a citizen of; the problem lays with the extreme nationalists who disregard all other beliefs and opinions that are not their own. Nussbaum uses the example of USA chants at the Olympics as extreme patriotism. These acts seem to, “express a wish for America to defeat, abase, humiliate its enemies…. In other words, anyone who crosses us is evil and should be crushed”5 Fighting for the change to cosmopolitanism, Nussbaum says that, “emphasis on patriotic pride is both morally dangerous and, ultimately, subversive of the worthy goals patriotism sets out to serve.”6 These competing ideologies are at very opposite sides of the spectrum. Nationalism and patriotism believe that you are a citizen of the country and should proclaim that you are proud of that, while cosmopolitanism is trying to refute that. “We say that respect should be accorded to humanity as such, but we really mean that Americans are worthy of special respect.”7 Not all accounts of nationalism are this extreme nor are they necessarily bad, but they do suffocate the different ways of thinking that cosmopolitanism is trying to
Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.
Through the novel of Little Bee, I realized that we should know more about ourselves, and the sence of pride of our own culture; standing on the point of a global perspective. Remove prejudice, narrow-minded and limitations, and learn to observe the different nation, different social, different cultural customs, traditional idea. Make us more rational, and have a more comprehensive, more understanding of the human society. We need standing on a higher level to regard ourselves and others. On the whole, all the people are the member of human and the society after all. If both the oppressed and the oppressor can try the best, the oppressor can help the oppressed as unconditional, and the oppressed can identify with their cultural background and self-awareness. Then, I think that cosmopolitanism is not an especially difficult to accomplish.
Isolationism is “a policy of abstaining from economic and political relations with other countries” (Smith). An isolationist is “a politician who thinks the Republic ought to pursue a policy of political isolation” (McDougall 40). After its founding on July 4, 1776, the United States of America practiced this policy in order to keep itself out of foreign affairs. But it was not called this until the late Save for its trading with other countries, the United States followed the ideas that isolationism promoted. However, it was clear that in the 1900s that the U.S. was starting to turn away from the policy of isolationism. The presidents could no longer be isolationists according to the true definition. They became involved World War I after
After World War I, relations between each country wasn’t bad or good. There wasn’t a lot of bad feelings after World War I, and the issues that caused the war were resolved for the most part. Germany was the only country that was still really sour about the outcome of the First World War. After World War I, there was what historians called the Interwar years. This was the period from 1918 to 1939 and was the period between both world wars.
Globalization affects this world and the people of this world in many ways. It is the idea of making the entire world like a single country.