Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Free will and consciousness essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Free will and consciousness essay
CHAPTER #4: ANSWERS ON DEEP HUMAN INTEREST RIDDLES! • What is Origin of The Principle of ‘Good’ & ‘Evil’ and Why Will Always Be? • What is ‘COSMIC IGNORANCE’? • Do we have a ‘FREE WILL’… and IF WE DO, What is The Origin of ‘FREE WILL’? • What are and what causes The ‘PANGS OF CONSCIENCE’? • What is the origin of ‘Sympathy’ and ‘Antipathy’ & How and Why to Overcome It? • What are The ‘COSMIC GLIMPSES’? • Why Martinus (Re) Gained ‘Cosmic Consciousness’ Exactly at the Age of Thirty & Deeper Cosmic Explanation of Who WE ARE, and of Young Age Behavior? • The ‘Cosmic Analysis’ of Our RELATIONSHIP TOWARDS WORK? • What is the Deeper Cosmological Meaning of REST? • HOW COMMUNICATION
In the article The Cosmic Perspective by Neil deGrasse Tyson he examines a range of topics from human life coming from Mars to how our perspective of the universe relates to religion. In the year 2000, a new space show opened at the Hayden Planetarium called Passport to the Universe, which compared the size of people Milky Way and beyond. While a show like this might make someone feel minuscule and insignificant, Tyson says that seeing the size of the universe actually makes him feel more alive not less and gives him a sense of grandeur. I agree with his idea that looking at us as a people in comparison can actually give you a sense of grandeur. However, when I compare myself to the vastness of space, it puts events on Earth in perspective while showing how influential we can be as a people even if we are small.
In Roderick Chisholm’s essay Human Freedom and the Self he makes the reader aware of an interesting paradox which is not normally associated with the theory of free will. Chisholm outlines the metaphysical problem of human freedom as the fact that we claim human beings to be the responsible agents in their lives yet this directly opposes both the deterministic (that every action was caused by a previous action) and the indeterministic (that every act is not caused by anything in particular) view of human action. To hold the theory that humans are the responsible agents in regards to their actions is to discredit hundreds of years of philosophical intuition and insight.
The view of free will has been heavily debated in the field of philosophy. Whether humans possess free will or rather life is determined. With the aid of James Rachels ' article, The Debate over Free Will, it is clearly revealed that human lives are "both determined and free at the same time" (p.482, Rachels), thus, in line with the ideas of compatibilist responses. Human 's actions are based on certain situations that are causally determined by unexpected events, forced occurrence, and certain cases that causes one to outweigh the laws of cause and effect. The article also showcases instances where free will does exist. When human actions are being based on one 's emotions of the situation, desire, and simply that humans are creatures that are created to have intellectual reasoning. I argue, that Rachels’ article, provides helpful evidence on compatibilists responses that demonstrate free will and determinism actions come into play with each other.
Human beings always believe that what they want to do is ‘up to them,' and on this account, they take the assumption that they have free will. Perhaps that is the case, but people should investigate the situation and find a real case. Most of the intuitions may be correct, but still many of them can be incorrect. There are those who are sceptical and believe that free will is a false illusion and that it only exists in the back of people’s minds, but society should be able to distinguish feelings from beliefs in order to arrive at reality and truth.
The lines that define good and evil are not written in black and white; these lines tend to blur into many shades of grey allowing good and evil to intermingle with each another in a single human being. Man is not inherently good or evil but they are born innocent without any values or sense of morality until people impart their philosophies of life to them. In the words of John Locke:
About 2 weeks ago my thoughts towards the reality of free will ceased to exist. Everything that I had previously thought did not mean a thing; I was given a new perspective that grasped me almost instantaneously. Robert Blatchford, author of "The delusion of Free Will" provided me with a new perspective that has taken over my thinking on free will. Blatchford states, "the will is not free, and that it is ruled by heredity and environment." All it took, were those words, ...
Theology of free will and predestination is neither basic nor complex. Asking whether we have a will, seems as though it would be simple to answer. However, it is in the answer that the intricacies begin to stem. Before answers are allowed to be given, definitions must first be offered. First, what is freewill and what is predestination? Freewill, defined by David Bennett, is the ability to accept or reject Gods plan for salvation. In contrast, predestination is that God chose to save certain people.
Imagine starting your day and not having a clue of what to do, but you begin to list the different options and routes you can take to eventually get from point A to point B. In choosing from that list, there coins the term “free will”. Free will is our ability to make decisions not caused by external factors or any other impediments that can stop us to do so. Being part of the human species, we would like to believe that we have “freedom from causation” because it is part of our human nature to believe that we are independent entities and our thoughts are produced from inside of us, on our own. At the other end of the spectrum, there is determinism. Determinism explains that all of our actions are already determined by certain external causes
Schick, T & Vaughn, L. Do We Have Free Will? A Review of the Leading Theories
Since the foundation of philosophy, every philosopher has had some opinion on free will in some sense, from Aristotle to Kant. Free will is defined as the agent's action to do something unimpeded, with many other factors going into it Many philosophers ask the question: Do humans really have free will? Or is consciousness a myth and we have no real choice at all? Free will has many components and is fundamental in our day to day lives and it’s time to see if it is really there or not.
Free will represents an individual making choices or taking action without any constraints. While it can be argued that different aspects of determinism restrict or negate the possibility of free will, one should not assume that the presence of metaphysical, physical or scientific constraints nullify the possibility of free will. Furthermore, it should be noted that fear of reprisal may not be construed as inhibition to free will, because essentially, free will constitutes the ability of an individual to make a decision to do or not do something (Sartre, 1948).
Nature is complicated. It includes many different sorts of things and one of these is human beings. Such beings exhibit one unique yet natural attribute that others things apparently do not—that is free will.
Free will means; The theory that human beings have freedom of choice or self-determination; that is, given a ...
As philosophy has progressed throughout the years, several issues have been resolved, but a major one remains the center of debate. Do humans have free will or are all of one’s actions predetermined to occur? Some believe that free will does exist, some believe that it does not, and others believe that free will and determinism are actually compatible. Determinism is a metaphysical thesis that claims that at any state of the universe as a whole, there is one and only one possible future state. Thus, any idea of alternative options for agents to choose among is impossible, whereas “Free Will” is a philosophical term for a particular sort of capacity that allows rational agents (also known as humans) to choose a course of action from among various alternatives. In Galen Strawson’s “Free Will” he sets out to clarify that free will is an illusion, and therefore humans cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.
Galaxies are large groups of stars, dust, and gas. Galaxies contain planets, star system and clusters, and interstellar clouds. In between these objects, there’s a sparse interstellar medium of gas, dust, and cosmic rays. There are supermassive black holes located at the center of most galaxies. Supermassive black holes are the largest type of black hole. Galaxies that have less than a billion stars are considered “small galaxies”. Galaxies are categorized according to their shape. There are three types of galaxies, which are elliptical, spiral, and irregular galaxies.