Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The crucible social pressure
Essay social pressure
Essay social pressure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Northrop, Sarah
English 10H P.4B
Halpert
10 June 2014
The Noble Savage: Bound to Corruption Jean-Jacques Rousseau is credited for developing the idea of the Noble Savage. However, “the concept of the Noble Savage has existed in various forms since the dawn of time.” (“Noble Savage” 1) According to “Noble Savage,” an article from Discover the Networks, “the term ‘Noble Savage’ expresses the concept of the…‘natural man,’ untouched by the supposedly corrupting influences of civilization.” (“Noble Savage” 1) The term was created based on the idea that human beings are fundamentally good, but when exposed to societal stresses, they collapse into acts of impulse and destruction. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates and brings
…show more content…
Frankenstein’s creation comes into the world as a Noble Savage, innocent and oblivious, remaining unaffected by the dangers of societal standards. When the creature first is brought to life, he is a “natural man.” He is good, innocent, and pure. In other words, a Noble Savage, not part of a society that could potentially distort him. When reading the following excerpt from John Milton’s Paradise Lost, the creature indecisively compares himself to Adam and then to Satan, not knowing which he relates most to. “Like Adam, I was created apparently united by no link to any other being in existence… [but] many times I considered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition… I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me.” (Shelley 112) The creature notes that like Adam, he is rejected by the man who created him, though he has goodness inside him. His internal struggle demonstrates that he is troubled about becoming corrupted. The fact that the creature recognizes there is good inside him indicates that he has not yet been ruined by society. At this point in the novel, the creature can still be considered a Noble Savage because he is not fully tainted by the world surrounding him. However, the creature later leaves his isolation in the woods and ventures out into society. He is instantaneously tarnished by those who are shocked at his unsightly appearance. …show more content…
He gives up on trying to belong and whips and then hangs himself. While he is whipping himself, the people of the World State chant, “oh, the flesh!... Kill it, kill it!” (Huxley 175) The fact that the supposedly civilized people of the World State are encouraging John’s self-flagellation demonstrates that they have long been taken by humanity’s corruption. According to Discover the Networks’ article on Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s theory of the Noble Savage, society’s participation in John’s downfall is due to the fact that “civilization invariably corrupted them and alienated them from their higher selves.” (“Noble Savage” 1) When first introduced, John is a pure, good being. However, much like Frankenstein’s creature, he too, loses his status as a Noble Savage as he is crushed under the pressures of
The creature goes on to say that “To be a great and virtuous man appeared the highest honor that can befall a sensitive being; to be base and vicious, as many on record have been, appeared the lowest degradation, a condition more abject than that of the blind mole or harmless worm.”(52) He is speaking of his creator, Victor Frankenstein, as he believes the “virtuous” part of him is the “god-like” way that he had permeated him with life but the “base” part of his creator is the violent way in which he shunned him and left him to fend for himself to the natural world.
Savagery is brought out in a person when they lose everything else. Lord of the Flies by William Golding shows us that when there is a lack of societal boundaries, animalistic behavior is what will follow. Humanity is destroyed with lack of guidelines or rules.
The creature’s moral ambiguity characteristic was a vile ingredient to the construction of this novel Frankenstein because it made the reader 's sympathies with him even after the audience knows he had committed murder because the readers had seen the truth this creature had to face. That he had tried everything within his power to peacefully live with them, to interact, communicate, and befriend them “these thoughts exhilarated me and led me to apply with fresh ardour to the acquiring the art of language”, that even though he was seen as a monster because of the looks he was created with, something he had no control over, he still had hope to be seen as equals, ”My organs were indeed harsh, but supple; and although my voice was very unlike the soft music of their tones, yet I pronounced such words as I understood with tolerable ease. It was as the ass and the lap-dog; yet surely the gentle ass whose intentions were affectionate, although his manners were rude, deserved better treatment than blows and execration;” this hope of his was utterly crushed, and can only set him up for utter disappointment(12.18). Because in the end he only received hates, scorns, violence, and prejudice from his good will. So in the end of the story, Mary Shelley’s forces the readers to see within the creature’s heart and for
The Creature, Victor Frankenstein’s creation, is shaped into a monster through its experiences, instead of the nature of itself, which is more expected. Victor Frankenstein, on the other hand, is shaped into a monster because of his mind’s power-hungry nature. Victor treats his creature poorly and he himself becomes wicked. While the Creature also becomes wicked in the end, its actions are more justified because multiple people treated it poorly, causing the Creature to lash out. Even though Victor Frankenstein and the Creature both turn into wicked monsters, to some extent, only one of
As Frankenstein is enroute to his pursuit of gaining more knowledge, he states, “I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed” (Shelley 41). Frankenstein’s decision in allowing his intellectual ambitions to overpower everything else in his life leads him to be blinded to the dangers of creating life. He isolates himself from his society when creating the monster, letting himself be immersed in his creation while being driven by his passions, allowing nobody to be near him. The fact that he allows this creation of a monster to consume his total being reveals how blinded he is to the immorality of stepping outside the boundaries of science and defying nature. His goal in striving to achieve what wants to in placing man over nature makes him lose his sense of self as all he is focused on is the final product of his creation. He starts to realize his own faults as after he has created the monster, he becomes very ill and states, “The form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I raved incessantly concerning him” (48). His impulsive decision to make the monster leads him to abhorring it as it does not turn out to be what he has expected. Because he chooses to isolate himself in creating the
Victor Frankenstein, a character in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, decided that he wanted to bring life into this world; a life that would eventually go on to killing the creator himself. The Creature can be seen as either innocent or guilty. The popular opinion of the Creature seems to be that he is guilty considering how he has burned down a house, set up Justine for murder and murdered three others. However, after taking a close look at the text, it can be seen that Frankenstein’s creature is not guilty. He was brought into this world with a child-like innocence, never progressed past the emotional state of a child and was rejected throughout his whole life causing him to do the things he did.
The characters in Frankenstein are a collection of those in Paradise Lost. Frankenstein parallels Eve in the Garden of Eden in that they would do whatever it takes to gain the knowledge of all things. While, the Creature corresponds to Satan because they both wanted to break free from their creators and receive a chance at their own decisions. In Chapter 15 of Frankenstein, Shelley alludes to Paradise Lost in order to establish a connection between the Creature and Adam, when the Creature tries to 'sympathize with [his] feelings and cheer [his] gloom.' However, he then realizes that it was all a 'dream, no Eve soothed [his] sorrows, nor shared [his] thoughts, [he] was alone.' The creature meets with the fact that Frankenstein abandoned him, and ?in the bitterness of [his] heart [he] cursed him.' Yet, earlier in Chapter 10, Shelley suggests an affiliation between the Creature and Satan. He feels like a 'fallen angel, whom thou drivest from misjoy.' Both Satan and the Creature make a vow to destroy something good. In Book I, Satan vows to 'seek to bring forth evil' out of good. Similarly, the Creature declares that 'if [he] cannot inspire love, [he] will cause fear. This network of characters aids the reader in identifying the intertextuality of the two pieces.
After his creation, Frankenstein’s monster is left in isolation, cursed to endure people’s hatred towards him. This revulsion met by onlookers is merely based on the creature’s hideous looks. The monster is not actually a monster at all. He displays more humanity than many other characters in Frankenstein. The ultimate irony is that the prejudicial belief is what caused the reanimated human to become a monster. In the nature versus nurture debate, proponents of the nature theory believe that a person is unchanging and that one’s experiences do not affect that person’s behavior. If this were true, the monster would not change as a result of his interactions with humans. It is undeniable that the creature does immoral things, but when Frankenstein’s monster saves a little girl from drowning, Mary Shelley takes a clear stance that the creature was naturally noble but became monstrous as a result of interactions with humans.
Rousseau thinks the behavior of savage man is unaffected by others. These individuals have no "moral relationship or known duties" (128) to others or to the world. Their actions are "neither good nor evil" (128) because they are not bounded by social rules, which dictate how people should act and think towards each other and the world as a whole. That is, a person does not have to worry about what others think of him or his actions. Rousseau further believes that savage man has "neither vices nor virtues" (128) because he has no commitments or relationships. One flaw with modern society, which is not shared by savages, is that people are concerned with their reputation, morality, and how others perceive them. They get caught up in the pressures of trying to conform to the expectations of others. Their personalities consequently change, almost to the point of non-recognition. In their quest to achieve material things, modern man misses or forgets the essence of who he really is.
Imagine being brought into the world to be completely thrown away by whoever created you, for being born. Now, this is the perspective of the Monster that Frankenstein created. The Monster was immediately hated as soon as he came to life. His own creator found him to be repulsive: “ I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.” Pg 59 PP 3. This hatred caused the monster to feel awful and run away in despair. Victor Frankenstein felt that he was justified to give up on his creation because it was ugly. This is completely unfair to the Monster because it has not done anything wrong, yet Victor Frankenstein feels he has the right to immediately turn his back on his creation. This is something that is frowned upon in society, but is sometimes the case. If this betrayal had not have happened, the Monsters nature could have been completely different. The Monster merely acted out because he was so greatly betrayed. In all honesty, the monster had good intentions in his heart, and he had a great soul. This great soul became diminished by the instant rejection as soon as he came to life. Now the Monster tried to keep it's spirits high but then things just seemed to get worse for him. Once the Monster
Our artificial faculties have made us weak, a weakness that is inherently unnatural. Rousseau asserts, that in order for us to understand man in the state of nature, we must evaluate, and critique the savage man, the man as he exists and survives in the state of nature. Rousseau’s theory of the natural state of man is evidence that he does not agree with the concept of the state of nature as it is theorized by Hobbs; as the state of war of each against all, and Locke’s assertion that natural man is rational and that the state of nature is one where man has the ability to reason. Instead, Locke is of the belief that in his natural state once stripped of the artificial facilities of human invention and improvement, man is basically a beast and it is from here that his natural need for improvement propelled mans creation of a civil, political, society. This unnatural evolution is where man sets the foundation for inequality. Rousseau’s discomfort which the idea that the natural state of man may be both organic and Hierarchical is also evident in his theory of human nature. Unlike philosophers before him, Rousseau theory is able to be more complete because he is able to examine the behavior of man in his natural state and provide a rational argument based on the his understanding of human evolution and comparative human anatomy. Rousseau’s radical new theory of human nature reinforces his belief that the savage man was a peaceful man, but this man was unfulfilled. The natural human need for interaction and human nature reaffirms that the savage man was a man who is peaceful, but he was also unfulfilled. The need for interaction, and the need for improvement in order to find actualization have influenced several important chan...
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein, the protagonist, produces a monster and instead of teaching his monster the mannerisms and norms of society, he abandons him. Victor expects his monster to make it in the harsh, critical society without being taught correct demeanors because he believes that having correct mannerisms is intuitive. A common viewpoint of the book is that Frankenstein’s monster should receive the blame, because he should have had proper nature, but in reality, society nurtured him to act out. Victor isolated the monster, and other members of society followed in Victor’s example and also treated him as so; which made the creature’s actions monstrous. Frankenstein played God, causing society to view his creature as a monster and as a risk to the public, but Frankenstein did not intend to create the monster as dangerous in nature; society nurtured him to act as a beast.
Rousseau mentions, what is the true object of discourse in this instance. For example, he talks about the foundations of society and how it all started with man itself. In part one Rousseau starts us off with examining natural man. If you strip a man of artificial faculties such as supernatural gifts, you can see that an animal that is less strong and agile than others. Natural man’s only tool is his body, which is stronger than ours. Rousseau says that on a one-on-one contest, savage man would easily beat civil man. Other Philosophers such as, Hobbes, Putendorf, and Cumberland say that Savage man is naturally intrepid. Which meaning savage man is fearless and adventurous than natural man. There are many differences between savage man and natural man. One of the differences between them that make up the inequality of human nature is self- preservation. Self- Preservation is the protection of oneself from harm or death which is something savage man has over natural man. It is savage man’s major care because he sleeps so much and thinks so little. Being naked and without shelter is not a disadvantage for him. We also have to take into account the metaphysical and moral side of man. Man contributes to his own operation because he is a free agent, but is otherwise similar to the animals. The key distinction of man is the faculty of perfectibility. It is the source of
When His Creation comes to life and after Years of running away, Leaving in the shadow he comes out and wants to obligate with the monster but he doesn't accept it which again hint out how moral and irresponsible is Victor Frankenstein, he does not even teach the elements like love, caring, sharing. Victor Frankenstein’s the real monster because of his strong knowledge which turns out its his passion, considering the time period and he's revolutionary idea for that period of time. The appearance is not what make us Monsters its What in our hearts, The creature is what an unsocialized human would be like after being hurt and treated bad by the society and not being away of how to handle his emotions, feeling, thoughts.
Rousseau’s depiction of the noble savage in Discourse on the Origin of Inequality separates man from society in order to argue that modernity has come with a cost to man’s natural state. Rousseau explores the uncivilized state of nature to form “conjectures…concerning what the human race could have become, if it had been left to itself” (Rousseau 17). Through his conjectures, Rousseau’s posits that the progress of man is detrimental to his well-being. Nevertheless, the formations of civil and, later, political societies were responsible for “perfect[ing] human reason while deteriorating the species” (Rousseau 43). He finds that the acquisition of knowledge is dangerous, and man is better off naïve about the true extent of the world (Rousseau 31). Aside from an instinct for self-preservation, the noble savage comes equipped with pity. In his natural state, this pity exists as amour de soi, or simply, good intentions. Without this pity, “men w...