Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drawbacks of corporate social responsibility to a business organisation
The nature of csr in a business
Drawbacks of corporate social responsibility to a business organisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction There has been a seismic shift in how companies market themselves and their respective goods and services. The primary reason for the shift seems to be a changing consumer base; one that incorporates social, environmental and ethical issues into their buying decisions. Pressure from these more socially conscious consumers has driven companies to adopt more robust corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies in order not only maintain customers but garner new ones as well. It now seems that in all most every advertisement there is some mention of the company’s CSR endeavors. Over the last few decades major corporations have shifted their focus from one of a mostly profit driven focus to one in which CSR has become integrated into their business culture. While an increased emphasis on CSR will most definitely enhance a company’s image in a positive way, whether it will equate to actual success in terms of either market share and or profits is speculative. The CSR efforts of each company will determine how the public perceives those efforts and if the efforts are merely attempts to generate more revenue or sincere efforts to make a difference. CSR has been defined in many different ways. CSR is generally understood to be the way a company achieves a balance or integration of economic, environmental and social imperatives while at the same time addressing shareholder and stakeholder expectations. It is about meeting the current needs and ensuring the future generation’s needs are not compromised upon (Gupta & Sharma, 2009, p. 397). Consider also the following definitions of CSR (Schwartz & Saiia, 2012, p. 4): - The idea of social responsibilities supposes that the corporation has not only economic and l... ... middle of paper ... ...e and a positive reputation. But all of these programs are useless unless they serve the true purpose of a business and that as previously stated is to provide a return on investment (profit) to the owners/shareholders. Responsible companies will take a balanced approach; non-responsible ones will go too far in one direction at their own peril. References Gupta, S., & Sharma, N. (2009). CSR - A Business Opportunity. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 396-401. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=10&sid=635dc40f-c062-4efb-a6c9-0a58e82991e5%40sessionmgr114&hid=118&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bth&AN=36875566 Schwartz, M. S., & SAIIA, D. (2012). Should Firms Go “Beyond Profits”? Milton Friedman versus Broad CSR. Business and Society Review, 117(1)(1-31), 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2011.00397.x
“There is only one and only one social responsibility of business- to use its resources and engage in activities designated to increase its profits so long as it decides to stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud.”
In today’s society is it becoming increasingly more difficult for companies to stay competitive in their industry. Even established brands eventually die out due to growing competition from other companies. Corporations are having a difficult time figuring out a strategy that keeps them at the top of their game. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the strategic value of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility). Corporate advertising is changing dramatically, appealing to consumer’s ethos using the causes that matter most in their lives. It is important for consumers to understand the manipulation that comes along with the CSR strategy. Skepticism about companies’ goals is crucial when making the right consumer decisions. Understanding CSR will help the consumer evaluate the affects of their consumption choices.
The famous scandals facing the corporate world that is Enron and WorldCom brought a lot of disruptions to their operations. This brought about strict government regulations, as a result. This also marked as the reminder for NGOs to begin criticizing MNCs. This brought about ranking that necessitated firms to submit their non-financial performance records alongside their financial performance ones. The media has also become a close checker on companies. This has brought the need for firms to embrace social responsibility in their operations to curb battling with restrictors. Firms have also established good relations with their suppliers both as a prerequisite for effective business and as a social responsibility. (Cetinkaya, 2010)
Corporate social responsibilities (CSR) have a different meaning in different company but in my view CSR is the concept which is the ability one of the companies can do for society. As the company responsibilities toward the society and environment in the way operate their business. CSR is about how companies manage the business processes to produce an overall positive impact on society. CSR also known as a “corporate citizenship” and with do that CSR is not provide an immediate financial benefit to the company but promote positive social and environmental change. (www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corp-social-responsibility). CSR is a high profile nation which the business world perceives as a strategic (Economist, 2008; Porter & Kramer, 2006)
To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? So before we go into greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit society.... ...
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Milton Friedman presents a compelling argument in “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits” by arguing that businesses need to focus only on increasing their profits and integrating social responsibility will only hurt them as a company. Since “only people can have responsibilities” (Friedman 52), Friedman argues that businesses as a whole do not have any type of real responsibilities because there is not a singular person for these responsibilities to fall on. Corporate executives are people as well and may feel they have social responsibilities to society but these “are the social responsibilities of individuals, not of business” (51). In terms of corporations, the businessmen are the ones that hold the responsibility of the company. Friedman argues that the only responsibility these managers hold is to those who own the corporation, the shareholders. If the individuals themselves want to contribute to social responsibility they must do it with their own money in their personal lives, but they should not use social responsibility in
According to Mike Peng, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the consideration and response to issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm to accomplish social benefits along with traditional economic gains the firm seeks. CSR is a way in which a company seeks to achieve a balance between profit, environmental concerns and social imperatives. This is known as the ‘Triple-Botto...
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
Article 1 The Brain and Soul of Capitalism Nancy Koehn, author of “The Brain and Soul of Capitalism”, advocates that companies cannot hope to sustain themselves while ignoring external responsibilities. According to the Harvard Business Review article, it is imperative that capitalism has a brain and soul in order to tackle the dynamic and complex issues plaguing the business environment and society as a whole today. The International Organization for Standardization endorses these ideals by claiming social responsibility is ‘a critical factor in [a company's] ability to… operate effectively [in addition to a gauge of] overall performance’ (Investopedia, 2015). The company’s aim should target more than simply maximizing profits.
CSR is a concept where company involves in social and environmental in their business operations. This is done to achieve a balance of economic, environmental and social obligations.in simple terms giving a hand for those who are not capable of achieving with their objectives and attending to them so that they could make those objectives a reality. This could improve organizations cooperate image which would also leads to attain a high market share.
Friedman, M., (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In W.
When the problem became serious two main views formed: the “narrow” view and the “broader” view, based on different ideas. The “narrow” view is based on the proposition that corporations have no social responsibility and they have only one main purpose, to make a profit (Friedman, 1970). So corporations should remain socially independent and all conflicts must be solved through the individual responsibility concept. On the contrary the “broader” view states that corporations have social obligations as all existing participants of market, persons and entities are tied together and are mutually dependent. So corporations cannot ignore some serious events or problems, which take place, and must help society, as profit is not their single purpose.
There are now several concepts of CSR and its definition, along with the meaning across corporations. In my opinion, and according with our textbook in page 11. CSR is about a particular set of business and strategies that deal with social issues. In addition, we can clearly perceive that CSRs application along corporations has increase in the past decade due to the several local, and international regulations in order to enforce business to act responsible.
A company has an economic obligation. It must earn a favorable return for its stockholders in the restrictions of the law. But, corporate social responsibility means that organizations have also ethical and societal responsibilities that go past their economic responsibilities. CSR needs organizations to develop their documentations of their responsibilities to include other stakeholders such as workers, customers, suppliers, local societies, state governments, international organizations, etc. Ethics could be seen as a fundamental component of individual and group activities at the heart of organizations’ errands.